Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So, looking ahead here to the future of Republican Senators who have expressed their opinion today that the latest accusation is another Democrat scam.

Do you think they will face political backlash?

No. I think Democrats will, though, esp. among men. This is mob justice identity politics laid bare. People have had enough.

Do you realize that men are also victims of sexual assault?

Funny how no one doubted the men who claimed the catholic priests raped them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is almost too outrageous to even be believable. It’s like someone said “let’s come up with a shady sexual allegation to make him go away.” And that didn’t work so then they said “let’s try again just to bolster the first one.” Then when that didn’t work they said “screw it, let’s go for broke. Let’s say he’s actually a serial gang rapist.” I mean, this is like every liberal dystopian fantasy come to life

She graduated in a public high school in Gaithersburg in 1980, three years before the judge did. No way she was even in the social circle of the prep boys.

Wow, you have personal knowledge of these people?

I can tell you I met her years ago and she said she knew a ton of people I knew in Chevy Chase. This is long before this incident.

So she was 22 and hanging out in lower Bethesda and NW high school house parties? Why would she want to do that???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So, looking ahead here to the future of Republican Senators who have expressed their opinion today that the latest accusation is another Democrat scam.

Do you think they will face political backlash?

No. I think Democrats will, though, esp. among men. This is mob justice identity politics laid bare. People have had enough.

Do you realize that men are also victims of sexual assault?

Wait, what? Men = bad. Stop complicating things.

[Anonymous]

Seems like Russia my have divided us on gender lines too!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Should we do an over/under on whether the nomination is withdrawn today? I bet it is. Though I don't feel super confident about it.

Only Trump can withdraw him and he just doubled down on twitter. Kavanaugh can withdraw himself which I think would be wise but he doesn't seem to want to do that.

No one's withdrawing. I predict they will ram this through.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So, looking ahead here to the future of Republican Senators who have expressed their opinion today that the latest accusation is another Democrat scam.

Do you think they will face political backlash?

No. I think Democrats will, though, esp. among men. This is mob justice identity politics laid bare. People have had enough.

Do you realize that men are also victims of sexual assault?

Were the altar boys at house parties drinking and partying with drunk priests? Different scenario, friend!


Funny how no one doubted the men who claimed the catholic priests raped them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So, looking ahead here to the future of Republican Senators who have expressed their opinion today that the latest accusation is another Democrat scam.

Do you think they will face political backlash?

They fear their own base more than anything else. He may still be confirmed.

I think the base has shrunk considerably in the past 24 hours!

Remember that Roy Moore was not elected...

Their base may have shrunk a little bit. But many, many more people who sat home in Nov 16 will be voting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is almost too outrageous to even be believable. It’s like someone said “let’s come up with a shady sexual allegation to make him go away.” And that didn’t work so then they said “let’s try again just to bolster the first one.” Then when that didn’t work they said “screw it, let’s go for broke. Let’s say he’s actually a serial gang rapist.” I mean, this is like every liberal dystopian fantasy come to life

She graduated in a public high school in Gaithersburg in 1980, three years before the judge did. No way she was even in the social circle of the prep boys.

Wow, you have personal knowledge of these people?

It's in her statement. Explain to us how did she join those younger boys' social circle already graduated from a remote public school?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“It is our job to make his pattern of revolting behavior clear, piece by painful piece.”

This article states similar:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/09/26/do-you-notice-anything-wrong-with-kavanaugh-accusers-socalled-signed-witness-affidavits-n2522779

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So, looking ahead here to the future of Republican Senators who have expressed their opinion today that the latest accusation is another Democrat scam.

Do you think they will face political backlash?

No. I think Democrats will, though, esp. among men. This is mob justice identity politics laid bare. People have had enough.

Do you realize that men are also victims of sexual assault?

Were the altar boys at house parties drinking and partying with drunk priests? Different scenario, friend!


Funny how no one doubted the men who claimed the catholic priests raped them.

So it’s ok to rape people who go to a party and get drunk?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Should we do an over/under on whether the nomination is withdrawn today? I bet it is. Though I don't feel super confident about it.

Only Trump can withdraw him and he just doubled down on twitter. Kavanaugh can withdraw himself which I think would be wise but he doesn't seem to want to do that.

No one's withdrawing. I predict they will ram this through.

This just gave every red state D and Collins/Murkowski cover to vote no. McConnell might ram through a vote but it will be to get the no vote over with so they can move on to the replacement.

And IMO no way Jeff Flake votes him out of committee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seems like Russia my have divided us on gender lines too!

Not quite. I am a woman. And, I have no doubt in Kavanaugh’s innocence.

[Anonymous]

by numbers, more men than women are victims of sexual assault in the armed forces. Not by percentages, but by raw numbers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Lol. You have no idea how much he did or didn’t drink. This whole thing is bullshit. He’s qualified and will be confirmed.

can't believe you're a real person

I am and a woman and a Democrat who voted for Hillary. Also a lawyer. This campaign is transparently political and the allegations are drafted to be vague guilt-by-association nonsense with timing that is ridiculously and transparently politically-motivated. It’s a campaign to discredit him based on him being at parties where bad things may have happened. You are a sheep and a part of the brainless mob for believing this stuff.

Thank you. It is ludicrous.
So, what is her evidence? Dates? Witnesses? Proof?

It hasn't even hit the major news sites yet and you're discounting it because additional information hasn't been presented? I think it's pretty clear that you've already decided what you will and will not believe regardless of what is said.

The affidavit is online. What should I be waiting for? You don’t think waiting for literally the day before he testifies shows how politically motivated this campaign is? Sorry, the man was nominated long ago and has been sitting on the bench of an important court for years. This is total bullshit.

Where you just as upset about the GOP withholding 90% of his written documents? Or that they released 56,000 pages one day before the senate judiciary hearings?

Lol, really moving the goal posts aren’t we? Do you know how to argue? Do you understand logic? They released an unprecedented amount of documents. Kavanaugh has a long record so, yes, a lot of the documents were reasonably subject to the objection that they were protected by executive privilege. Once again, I’m a lawyer. The GOP objection was reasonable.

Sure, they released an unprecedented amount of documemts. But they also withheld an unprecedented amount of documents. And you may think it's reasonable, but the members on the SJC, who were also lawyers, do not.

And the one moving the goalposts is you.

Your logic:

Avenatti and Dr. Ford coming forward at the last minute?

Bullshit.
GOP releasing 56,000 pages at the last minute? T

Totally reasonable!

I said the withholding was reasonable, not the timing. In any event, docs were released over time and the fact that a portion came out the day before is not remarkable in the context of congressional hearings that you probably have zero experience (though I do). There’s been plenty of time that’s passed and I haven’t heard about anything earth shattering in those docs. You’re probably one of the idiots who was whipped into a frenzy over Hillary’s dumb emails, too. OMG they’re on Huma’s computer! Stop the presses.

There's more of your stellar logic at work. Yes, I was whipped into a frenzy over Hillary's emails, and at the same time, I am opposed to the Trump/GOP agenda. Brilliant! /s

And more goalpost moving, too.

So you basically admit that you don’t understand how congressional investigations work. Great.

I'm seeing how hypocrisy and evasion works for you.

Let me speak slowly. Reporting a vague gang rape conspiracy the day before testimony is not the same as releasing one portion of a huge body of background documents the day before a hearing.

But I thought it was the timing you had an issue with? The timing is the same. Regardless, refuting a rape accusation made 24 hours earlier is much more surmountable than reviewing 56,000 documents in the same time frame.

But go ahead and reply with some snarky baseless insult. That's your "logic."

No, you’re the one who tried to draw a parallel with the timing. Just re-read your nonsense post. Actually you can’t refute this dumb allegation because it’s designed to be vague and unverifiable. There was nothing preventing that allegation from being voiced earlier. By contrast someone does have to go through and collect the documents and prepare them for release which does frequently happen late in the context of hearings. Btw Literally no one who prepares for congressional hearings reads all the damn documents disclosed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is almost too outrageous to even be believable. It’s like someone said “let’s come up with a shady sexual allegation to make him go away.” And that didn’t work so then they said “let’s try again just to bolster the first one.” Then when that didn’t work they said “screw it, let’s go for broke. Let’s say he’s actually a serial gang rapist.” I mean, this is like every liberal dystopian fantasy come to life

She graduated in a public high school in Gaithersburg in 1980, three years before the judge did. No way she was even in the social circle of the prep boys.

Wow, you have personal knowledge of these people?

It's in her statement. Explain to us how did she join those younger boys' social circle already graduated from a remote public school?

Gaithersburg is totally within the prep world. Moco schools, moco culture.

I knew college kids that showed up to HS parties. ESPECIALLY during the summer/beach week