Why is Blake Lively so overrated?

[Anonymous]

And again, if Blake had just apologized to the reporter instead of doubling down about how she was victimized, people would view her much more favorably. But, as we have learned, Blake is never wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember back in March when Blake made a joke about Kate Middleton's Mother's Day Photoshop and had to apologize? Maybe it already started then.

Yeah so did everyone else. Blake's crimes are hardly serious compared to others. The hate towards her is ridiculous. She snubbed a reporter for a lame comment? People don't like where she had her wedding? That's it?

She comes off as contemptuous of any one she sees as below her, which apparently includes most journalists. And not just in one interview, but dozens.

So everyone just wants to burn the witch? A handsome man can shoot people in the back and the internet swoons. But God forbid a woman be annoying and the social media mobs will troll her relentlessly. People are sick.

What's sick is continuing to berate people because they don't like your golden idol. Why don't you just watch your Gossip Girl reruns and drink your Betty liquor.

Hmm. Seems like mean girls are right up your alley.

okay? I am not the one praising Blake for being mean. Just accept that she is responsible for her own behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting reddit post from four months ago, but at that time it is hard to know if it is a PR plant (the same person posted the same comment a couple of times).The most interesting part to me is that Blake was talking about going to the NY Times months ago (prior to obtaining the text messages and evidence of smear campaign?)

https://www.reddit.com/r/popculturechat/s/5gDvrprhq8

Sounds like trying to rewrite history. There was a meeting Jan 4 highlighting her concerns, well before any of that.

Yes, just saying that the post was made in August so could not have been done retroactively.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And again, if Blake had just apologized to the reporter instead of doubling down about how she was victimized, people would view her much more favorably. But, as we have learned, Blake is never wrong.

Show us on the doll where Blake hurt you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody has any reason to believe this, but a friend of a friend (I know, I know) who worked on the movie said there wasn’t a moment where JB wasn’t completely lovely. That’s the second time I’ve heard that. I obviously don’t have direct involvement and I’m just some random internet poster, but for me, I do feel bad for the guy.

This is what $175k will produce ^^

Yeah yeah yeah. Well nobody will believe anything now. I’m certainly not a PR plant. I can talk about any DCUM lore. Fried tuna? Larla? Stroller wars. Been here since 2010. Now back to the perimenopause forum where I belong…

That was my first post in this thread. Know all of those references too, and joined when it was literally a email list. That doesn’t lend credibility in this topic to either of us.

None of us know who’s posting, in any thread. People are paid trolls, and whether they’re on DCUM or not we don’t know. I do think your post is fascinating, especially since “you feel bad for the guy.” That you believe a friend of a friend so strongly to comment here is interesting wrt human nature. Your post is exactly what a PR campaign looks like, so you made yourself an easy target.

But, I’ll def be seeing you in the perimenopause aisle.

It’s too embarrassing to admit in real life, but I went to see sisterhood of the traveling pants in a theater (by myself) and am a huge Jane the Virgin fan. So my loyalties have been tested in the whole saga, and I am a bit hooked on the drama. The teenage girl inside of me just wants to like both of them, honestly. But maybe I’ll end up disliking both.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And again, if Blake had just apologized to the reporter instead of doubling down about how she was victimized, people would view her much more favorably. But, as we have learned, Blake is never wrong.

Show us on the doll where Blake hurt you.

She asked me to show mah vagina and made me watch a film of her giving birth. Waaah.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And again, if Blake had just apologized to the reporter instead of doubling down about how she was victimized, people would view her much more favorably. But, as we have learned, Blake is never wrong.

Show us on the doll where Blake hurt you.

She asked me to show mah vagina and made me watch a film of her giving birth. Waaah.

You have some sort of Blake mental derangement. Bizarre.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's believable to me that a person trying to be a director in Hollywood gives off extremely different vibes to different people depending on who has power, whom he wants to impress, etc.

His strongest supporters have been members of the crew, hers have been actors. I think that is an interesting commentary on who is likely to be nicer to the man on the street.

What supporters does he have again? Who exactly?

Maybe get off twitter and check out other social media. Plenty of folks on TikTok willing to put both their names and face behind their experiences with Blake or Justin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's believable to me that a person trying to be a director in Hollywood gives off extremely different vibes to different people depending on who has power, whom he wants to impress, etc.

His strongest supporters have been members of the crew, hers have been actors. I think that is an interesting commentary on who is likely to be nicer to the man on the street.

What supporters does he have again? Who exactly?

Maybe get off twitter and check out other social media. Plenty of folks on TikTok willing to put both their names and face behind their experiences with Blake or Justin.

So, nobody.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And again, if Blake had just apologized to the reporter instead of doubling down about how she was victimized, people would view her much more favorably. But, as we have learned, Blake is never wrong.

Show us on the doll where Blake hurt you.

Dp, but there are many interviews where she is completely obnoxious to the person conducting the interview. I suppose that is also all Justin’s fault.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And again, if Blake had just apologized to the reporter instead of doubling down about how she was victimized, people would view her much more favorably. But, as we have learned, Blake is never wrong.

Show us on the doll where Blake hurt you.

Dp, but there are many interviews where she is completely obnoxious to the person conducting the interview. I suppose that is also all Justin’s fault.

Meanwhile moguls are out there raping and drugging women and get few comments. But oh no, a woman was obnoxious!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And again, if Blake had just apologized to the reporter instead of doubling down about how she was victimized, people would view her much more favorably. But, as we have learned, Blake is never wrong.

Show us on the doll where Blake hurt you.

Dp, but there are many interviews where she is completely obnoxious to the person conducting the interview. I suppose that is also all Justin’s fault.

Meanwhile moguls are out there raping and drugging women and get few comments. But oh no, a woman was obnoxious!

Look, she was the one who went to The NY Times and started all of this, she wanted a public reaction. And if it turns out her claims are fabricated as it currently appears, she deserves the negative attention

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And again, if Blake had just apologized to the reporter instead of doubling down about how she was victimized, people would view her much more favorably. But, as we have learned, Blake is never wrong.

Show us on the doll where Blake hurt you.

She asked me to show mah vagina and made me watch a film of her giving birth. Waaah.

You have some sort of Blake mental derangement. Bizarre.

You mock but if was traumatic. Just ask Blake how it feels. And I did nor get paid millions for my effort like she did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And again, if Blake had just apologized to the reporter instead of doubling down about how she was victimized, people would view her much more favorably. But, as we have learned, Blake is never wrong.

Show us on the doll where Blake hurt you.

Dp, but there are many interviews where she is completely obnoxious to the person conducting the interview. I suppose that is also all Justin’s fault.

Meanwhile moguls are out there raping and drugging women and get few comments. But oh no, a woman was obnoxious!

Look, she was the one who went to The NY Times and started all of this, she wanted a public reaction. And if it turns out her claims are fabricated as it currently appears, she deserves the negative attention

Her claims are fabricated? Is that a fact? You just make things up as you go along. None of this has been decided, as a matter of fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's believable to me that a person trying to be a director in Hollywood gives off extremely different vibes to different people depending on who has power, whom he wants to impress, etc.

His strongest supporters have been members of the crew, hers have been actors. I think that is an interesting commentary on who is likely to be nicer to the man on the street.

What supporters does he have again? Who exactly?

Maybe get off twitter and check out other social media. Plenty of folks on TikTok willing to put both their names and face behind their experiences with Blake or Justin.

So, nobody.

No, lots of people. Go look.