That person was obviously being sarcastic and it wasn't me - OP |
Uh, you're totally off. I really feel lucky in every listed aspect of my life. I miss my parents, who died young. That's the one area I feel is lacking though I have great in-laws. |
I meant things like my kids wake up early, my house need a deck refinish, etc. hardly definitive of an unhappy life, in my estimation. |
You must be the only people on earth that have zero minor annoyances in life. |
Do you feel that you let out anger that you have inside you that has been festering inside you for a certain amount of time?? Anger that should be expressed in a healthy manner to those that have caused you anguish, but that you feel for some reason that you cannot express it so you then turn it around and fuel that anger onto strangers and punish them instead?
It makes you feel better because you are getting it off your chest and at the same time, you don't feel totally guilty because you know that strangers on a computer most likely are not affected by your cruelness since everyone on here pretty much is used to the snarkiness anyway. |
You people really cannot read. This is the exact opposite of what OP said. Her sentence was:
The mention of everyday annoyances is a dependent clause. Without it the sentence reads:
She could also have said:
or
Here's what she did NOT SAY, but what you all seem to think she said:
May this be a lesson to OP to not use such complicated grammar when dealing with anonymous internet idiots. |
OK then when you were young, you were a bit awkward, timid, excluded, scapegoated, bullied. You were not the popular cheerleader type in school but a bit geeky. However you were smart and persistent and have managed to do well in life. Still, you harbor some pain from your childhood, because you have never had a chance to tell those bullies to get a life. So now you hang out on DCUM and bully other people so that you get your anger out. But the target of your anger should be directed towards those people who mistreated you in your past childhood, young adulthood life. If this rings true at all, then go find those people on Facebook and get your anger out there. I used to find DCUM helpful but it's people like you who have reduced it to a mindless source of entertainment that brings in trolls from all over and a good income to Jeff. |
Did you read the previous comment where I said I'd never been bullied ![]() |
np, I disagree that it's not useful. I've been on it for about 2 years and have gotten a LOT of value out of it. Sure there are flame wars and hot topics, but to me that is just proof that it's a diverse group of people on here who don't all agree or come from the same demographic, which is usually what you want when seeking advice or information. Your attempts at psychoanalysis are the "mindless entertainment" part of this thread. You have no particular knowledge of OP or psychoanalysis, and are just making stuff up in an attempt to be hurtful. Your blind stabs at OP's life are not adding value or affecting her. So maybe you should look in the mirror and think about whether you are contributing positively to DCUM when you go down that posting road. |
I <3 this OP |
|
No of course I have no particular knowledge of OP because the OP is anonymous - but I do have particular knowledge of psychoanalysis. The OP posted because she is aware her behavior is negative, and appeared to be wondering why this was the case. So I am putting out suggestions. I'm guessing if the OP's behavior on this forum was exposed to people who know her in real life, she would be absolutely mortified. She says she's a "people pleaser" - which implies what people think of her is important. She wouldn't want to be judged negatively by her family, friends, colleagues. So she might hold back on saying negative things in real life because she doesn't want anyone to harbor negative feelings towards her. On this forum, she can be as mean as she likes without worrying that someone will think less of her. It takes a lot of energy to be always politically correct, making sure she doesn't offend anyone in real life. She's glad she has an outlet on DCUM where she can just it all hang out. Someone important in her life when she was younger - parents for example - were demanding and critical, maybe expressing disappointment frequently regarding her character or behavior. She learned that she better say and do the right thing otherwise people important to her will become angry and disappointed in her. The tone of DCUM has changed over the last 10 years - it was useful and a supportive helpful community in the beginning. There was nowhere near the snark and bullying that goes on now. Now I only go on when it's time for a coffee break or lunch break and I need to kill some time. It is sometimes useful but mostly entertainment - when people post, it's usually some superficial question like "Do you like your toilet paper to hang over or below the toilet paper roll?" When people actually post to request advice on a problem they're experiencing in real life, they have to preface "I know I'll get flamed" "no snark please" - yet invariably the bullies join in. So now probably less than 10% of posts are about seeking advice and the rest is just the "Do you wear underwear?" type of question. Back to the OP - maybe you need to do less people pleasing in real life and say what you want - at times. If these people are worth anything to you, they might get annoyed or angry at you - but they won't reject you. On this forum, there is no risk of people rejecting you because no one know who you are. But ask yourself if you're doing anyone any good by making your snarky comments on this forum. |
Got it. If that is what OP meant, yes, I completely misread that sentence and interpreted it to mean the OPPOSITE of what she intended! Sorry about that. I didn't catch that it was a dependent clause in the middle. |
GOOD LORD. This is OP. Let me rephrase for those whose minds are mush. I'm very happy with my marriage, my career, my kids, my financials, my educational/intellectual background and my appearance. Of course, like everyone on earth, I have little annoyances like the fact that my house needs a new deck, my kids get up early (at 7, which is really no big deal), right now we are out of my favorite cheese, etc. It seemed to me that that was clear. As far as the psycho-analytic pp - wrong again. Sure, I'm a people-pleaser in that I don't intentionally ruffle feathers IRL. I just don't see the point, unless something is egregious. I don't respond randomly or cruelly on DCUM, either - I'm not the kind of person that says suicidal posters should kill themselves, calls people fat who post about needing to lose weight, etc. THAT is bullying. I just tell it like I feel "it" is much more openly than IRL, and I think some of the people who know me as funny and thoughtful IRL would be surprised at how tell-it-like-it-is I am online. Not sure why you continue to insist that there must have been some awful bully who left me cowering in a locker in junior high. That wasn't the case at all. I've generally always been like I am now - fun, interesting, intelligent, happy and surrounded by lots of love. I don't think I'm going to find my answer in this thread - maybe there isn't one? - but I appreciate those who seem to think like I do. To the pp who said the stupidity on this thread reaffirms why I post the way I do - YOU, my friend, are onto something. |
Op, you have issues. Someone without issues does spend their time being mean to people online. |