"If the tests mirror what was taught" -- assumes that it does mirror what was taught, and that it was taught well. Sometimes true, more often isn't. "If the tests mirror the formatives that do come home (they are just bigger)" -- in some ways they do, and in some ways they don't. Also, it's a different circumstance. Time pressure is much different, and that makes a huge difference for some kids -- either due to anxiety or differences in speed. So, no, the way they do it now is not good enough. There's no good reason not to let kids have the advantage of getting their own tests and being able to spend time with them. |
PP, has your child tried to retake a test? Is it available as an option? Maybe that's a way for him/her (and for you) to get comfortable with the test process and the material. From what's been posted, it seems like a good way to do that. Someday (college?) those kinds of dry runs, do-overs and opportunities to get copies of past tests won't exist. Test taking is a skill in and of itself. |
Actually in college you get your test back. |
|
Well, having gone through MCPS middle school with two kids and now in high school, this is exactly my experience. So I'm not sure what assumptions you think are incorrect. |
|
|
| I am a MCPS teacher. The failure rate for first try on our school based quizzes and tests is equal to our failure rate on County assessments. The parents are unaware because students retake the school based formatives generally pretty successfully. The County assessments reflect what the student is capable of on the first try. |
| Why would that be? Is the retake easier? Do the students forget what they learn? For my own children, I do not find this to be true at all. In fact, they have been told by their teachers that the school/teacher designed tests are generally harder since they are geared to a smaller group of kids. Not a W school either. |
Yes, I agree with you. Retaking a test can be an excellent learning experience. What I don't understand is why you think it hurts a student to have all graded exams returned home. You quoted a teacher as saying that the retest process is "meant to be burdensome." Certainly the school does not have the resources to have more than a small fraction of students retake a test. You are fortunate that your child has mastered the art of test taking (at least through the first 4 weeks of school) after one retest experience. What about students who are struggling in the class -- getting Cs or lower on their tests but not able to see their marked-up tests without making an appointment with the teacher? Even for those doing well in class, the graded tests can be a valuable resource at home. I always found that, following summer vacation, going through my old tests was an excellent review for a new year. (Most classes are cumulative, relying on a solid understanding of the previous year's work.) Both the retest process and studying grading exams at home are valuable learning tools. There is no need for them to be mutually exclusive. |
No retakes in real life. |
| Sure there are. People issue updates and corrections all the time. You can take the SATs multiple times |
Not easier, but there is more time to study. I think the finals pass rate would be higher with retakes. |
Tell that to Bob Dole. He took/retook the run-for-president test in 1980, 1988, and 1996. He never did pass it, though. |
agreed! If my child works their butt off on time and gets A's why are other kids being allowed to retake tests to up their grade to the same as others got initially. Final grades look the same. |