Murder at Lululemon in Bethesda

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also you must have NEVER shopped in Lululemon! No one goes into a dressing room that an employee doesn't let them in! They are diligent in there about monitoring what you are trying on in the dressing room as well as letting you in the dressing room!

And besides that, it seems almost impossible that two guys could be hiding in the dressing room without anyone knowing. The doors are pretty high off the ground so how could they not see someone (or two) in there? Even if you're stooping on the bench, it just doesn't seem possible. It's a small store, there's no way you would close it up and not know people were there.

[Anonymous]

Exactly....so I don't know where that person got that information but it is completely incorrect information!

[Anonymous]

Did no one notice these two women were missing all night?

[Anonymous]

Apparently not! What about the fiancee of the murder victim? So many missing puzzle pieces!

[Anonymous]

All you folks who think it's an "inside job" probably thought Gary Condit had Chandra Levy murdered, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Apparently not! What about the fiancee of the murder victim? So many missing puzzle pieces!

I thought that police wouldn't investigate missing adults for 24 hours?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also you must have NEVER shopped in Lululemon! No one goes into a dressing room that an employee doesn't let them in! They are diligent in there about monitoring what you are trying on in the dressing room as well as letting you in the dressing room!

And besides that, it seems almost impossible that two guys could be hiding in the dressing room without anyone knowing. The doors are pretty high off the ground so how could they not see someone (or two) in there? Even if you're stooping on the bench, it just doesn't seem possible. It's a small store, there's no way you would close it up and not know people were there.

Not to mention that they would have set off the alarm sensors once they left the dressing room. Of all the theories being thrown out there, this is the one that makes the least sense. I think these two women just happened to be at the wrong place in the wrong time. I pray the monsters who did this are caught and punished.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All you folks who think it's an "inside job" probably thought Gary Condit had Chandra Levy murdered, too.

That's what the police thought.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you folks who think it's an "inside job" probably thought Gary Condit had Chandra Levy murdered, too.

That's what the police thought.

And how did that work out for them?

[Anonymous]

I suspect that Jayna fought back against the attackers and that it is why she was brutally beaten and killed. All of the articles about her mention what a fighter she was. Maybe the other girl did not fight back, or maybe they also beat her and left her unconscious, thinking they had killed her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting perspectives/opinions, most of which I don't agree with although some I do agree with.

I've spoken to a couple people who have the inside scoop on some of the facts.
First: to say this was an "inside job"and that one of the victims was involved is just flat out insane and insulting. These women were unfortunately in the wrong place at the wrong time. It's rather evident that the perpetrators are, without a doubt, sociopaths.
Second: these animals who committed this atrocious crime were, in fact, robbing the store after closing and the victims had returned while the robbery was in progress. The perpetrators didn't just waltz right in - they had been hiding in a dressing room and waited until the store closed to rob it.
Third: I know for sure that there are more facts and details as to what happened in this case but it would not be a smart or tactful move on the part of investigators to release that information to the public. [/quote


Of course! Of course you have inside details! And you're posting them on a message board!

These people in retail check dressing rooms prior to locking up at night.

[Anonymous]

Police search surveillance tapes in Lululemon murder

Tuesday - 3/15/2011, 10:47am ET
Jayna Murray, 30, was found in the back of the LuluLemon store in Bethesda, Md. (Photo Courtesy of LuluLemon.com)
Neal Augenstein, wtop.com

BETHESDA, Md. -- The brutal murder of Jayna Murray was not captured on surveillance video inside the Lululemon Athletica store in Bethesda, but detectives are combing through tapes from nearby businesses in efforts to identify the two masked suspects.

"There was no tape in the store," says Montgomery County Police Captain Paul Starks, "but we have lots of other tape to review."

[ Edited to comply with copyright law. ]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How do PP's know that The surviving victim was the one who left something in the store and that Jayna was the key holder?

NP here- I think its probably b/c her linked in profile has title of keyholder. These women have been through a lot. The youtube video brought tears to my eyes. Thoughts to both of them and their families tonight.

The title is Keyleader not keyholder. It's what the call the staff position about sales person which they call an Educator. The title Keyleader has nothing to do with who has keys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:13:13, have you never heard the term "crime of opportunity"?

Hate to break it to you, but there are coincidences. Happens all the time.

As for the speculators who'd like to think one of the victims was in on it: you're grasping for something to make the victim NOT THE SAME AS YOU. If the victims were not complicit, but just nice law abiding women engaged in mundane daily activities, well then - that means that you too could be brutally beaten, raped, tortured, murdered - all because you forgot your cell phone or ran out to help a friend with something that seemed perfectly safe.

Guess what? It could have been you.

My thoughts exactly. No one wants to believe the two men were just on the prowl looking for any woman they could find and assault her -- I guess that scenario hits too close to home.

Thanks for the free psychoanalysis but you're just wrong here. You're being silly and possibly trying to distract yourselves by getting into another stupid, finger pointing DCUM argument. The reason I brought this up early on in the conversation is because I had been telling my dad about the case and he brought up all of these questions. He lives far from here and has been in law enforcement all of his life. I was mad at him at first for questioning the brutalized women but when I thought about it more, I realized he could be right. There are holes in the story. That is all. I don't know any more answers than you do and I don't feel any better about this than you do but I am still asking questions until we get better answers.

There may be holes in her stories to the general public because the police have decided not to release all of the information they have. Common Sense here please.
Also it could have been you, thinking and all this crazy speculation that it is an inside job is 110% crazy and is just a way for you to feel that it couldn't happen to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting perspectives/opinions, most of which I don't agree with although some I do agree with.

I've spoken to a couple people who have the inside scoop on some of the facts.
First: to say this was an "inside job"and that one of the victims was involved is just flat out insane and insulting. These women were unfortunately in the wrong place at the wrong time. It's rather evident that the perpetrators are, without a doubt, sociopaths.
Second: these animals who committed this atrocious crime were, in fact, robbing the store after closing and the victims had returned while the robbery was in progress. The perpetrators didn't just waltz right in - they had been hiding in a dressing room and waited until the store closed to rob it.
Third: I know for sure that there are more facts and details as to what happened in this case but it would not be a smart or tactful move on the part of investigators to release that information to the public.

Really? Doubtful that it was in progress there is no where to hide in lululemon dressing room or not. Your couple of people may need to check their "facts"