|
People leave their spouses every single day. She could have moved out with an emergency custody order. I know people who got their spouse booted from the house and supervised visitation based on much, much less. I’m not saying this to criticize her but to correct the impression that people are stuck in the marital house with their abuser. The thing is, she DID get him booted from their house. The time period between the decision to leave/divorce/make him leave and the actual leaving is easily the most dangerous for women..whether is an hour or a week. Look up the stats- sadly this fits an all to common pattern. |
+1 it’s gross. |
The thing is, she DID get him booted from their house. The time period between the decision to leave/divorce/make him leave and the actual leaving is easily the most dangerous for women..whether is an hour or a week. Look up the stats- sadly this fits an all to common pattern. She should have left. Much sooner. That’s the point. |
| Do all of you people saying “she should have done this or that” really think she or anyone else really saw this coming? |
A lot of them were on this site at the. The women came forward in such a public way years later when they had nothing to gain from it and were extremely credible, but saying that around here got you shouted down. |
Are you really trying to center YOURSELF in this tragedy? Really?! |
She should have left. Much sooner. That’s the point. OMG-this is why we can’t have nice things. The point is that it is the LEAVING itself that triggers the violence. Had the court order come 30 days ago, we would just be reading about this a month earlier. I guess she should have left on their wedding day? My gosh the density. Dumb af. |
+1. I cannot believe the victim blaming here. Yes he sounds messed up. I doubt she had any idea he would do this. It might not even have been premeditated by him. |
| The patriarchy is alive and well! He was not mentally ill, he didn’t “snap,” he was abusive. The f**cker put his need for control above all else, including his own children. I hope he rots in hell. |
Yes, of course she saw it. Drinking husband, who was an upraising politician, and who purchased the gun and who had a history of violence against the women it was written on the wall. If he is a narcissist, there is no way she did not see him displaying those characteristics over the years of their marriage. |
You must be delusional. |
She should have left. Much sooner. That’s the point. She got a court order telling him to move out by April 30th, but she did not got him booted out of the house. He still was physically there and there were no protective order in place. |
There is a reason why she installed cameras all over the house. |
| That he falsely accused her of abuse, disproved by cameras, shows the DV was an entrenched pattern. Family Court tends to protect abusers not women or children. |
She got a court order telling him to move out by April 30th, but she did not got him booted out of the house. He still was physically there and there were no protective order in place. A protective order tends to provoke more than protect. Are you seriously suggesting it would have kept her safe with him entitled to live in the house until 4/30 and have access to his kids? Genuine protection from abusive narcissistic men is a unicorn in most cases. |