King Charles strips Andrew’s prince title

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy’s only got like 5 mil. I got 5 mil. Dude is broke

Andrew is obviously the worst but there is also something grotesque about one of your children inheriting a billion dollars and the others a few million.

Happens all the time with privileged families. In this case, being the monarch provides a lot of assets that are not necessarily liquid.

Lol lol lol like Windsor Castle and Buckingham Palace. Can't sell your houses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy’s only got like 5 mil. I got 5 mil. Dude is broke

Andrew is obviously the worst but there is also something grotesque about one of your children inheriting a billion dollars and the others a few million.

Happens all the time with privileged families. In this case, being the monarch provides a lot of assets that are not necessarily liquid.

Primogeniture has existed for centuries in Great Britain. Otherwise all those estates would have been divided into nothingness over time. The worst is when someone has only daughters and they have to pass their assets to some random male relative instead of their own kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy’s only got like 5 mil. I got 5 mil. Dude is broke

Andrew is obviously the worst but there is also something grotesque about one of your children inheriting a billion dollars and the others a few million.

Happens all the time with privileged families. In this case, being the monarch provides a lot of assets that are not necessarily liquid.

Primogeniture has existed for centuries in Great Britain. Otherwise all those estates would have been divided into nothingness over time. The worst is when someone has only daughters and they have to pass their assets to some random male relative instead of their own kids.

The Downton Abbey era is over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy’s only got like 5 mil. I got 5 mil. Dude is broke

Andrew is obviously the worst but there is also something grotesque about one of your children inheriting a billion dollars and the others a few million.

Happens all the time with privileged families. In this case, being the monarch provides a lot of assets that are not necessarily liquid.

Primogeniture has existed for centuries in Great Britain. Otherwise all those estates would have been divided into nothingness over time. The worst is when someone has only daughters and they have to pass their assets to some random male relative instead of their own kids.

I would hope England is more progressive and daughters can inherit it. They changed first born royal, if female, can be Queen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:donnie's in trouble.

Andrew will spill his guts.

So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?

I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.

They don't even need to go to such lengths. They can simply subpoena the many Americans with information. Or make a deal with Ghislaine.

Trump and his pet attorneys and judges aren’t going to allow that. Why the Brits needs to get Andrew to spill.

How do you propose they do that? They aren't exactly stopping him from doing that now.

The palace is trying to stop Parliament from making Andrew testify. Below is just one of many reports about why--Charles and William don't want a broader investigation into royal finances, leases on Crown Estate properties, and the rest. Which is really too bad, because this is one of the few opportunities where some investigative body would let Andrew go full blast on Epstein and Trump.

https://robshuter.substack.com/p/exclusive-the-real-reason-the-king?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=4354752&post_id=177808109&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=3g207y&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

You mean full blast on Bill Clinton.

Sorry, MAGA pedo defender. There’s many more pictures and a long history of Trump and Epstein, sometimes with Andrew in the same pic. If Clinton raped children then go after him. But Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files says it all about Trump.

You are all over the place. You're laser focused on Andrew ignoring all the available Americans who can testify. Andrew is not the glue holding all the together. Just says you're not really looking out for victims as you keep claiming.

You do realize you’re fighting/trolling with multiple posters who are appalled you’re defending Andrew and Trump, right?

You do realize nobody has defended them in any way? And that more than one person keeps pointing this out?

Actually, one poster said that listing after young teens was just fine. And the MAGAs here seem really opposed to real consequences for Andrew.

*lusting

More lies. Nobody here has said anything of the sort. Demanding he testify when he hasn't even been asked is not opposing consequences. There is a process to be followed that nobody has even initiated.

Calm down, you’re misunderstanding. Yes, people here want Andrew to testify (to spill on Epstein’s operation and probably on Trump) or not to testify (because they don’t think lusting after teens is bad—someone here absolutely said “ephobophilia is ok” close to the beginning of this thread—or because they don’t want Trump and/or the BRF’s finances exposed.)

The point, which you keep missing, is that some in Parliament actually want to initiate the process. But lots of press have reported that the palace is leaning on Parliament not to initiate the process to investigate, in fact BP issued s real-life statement saying an investigation would “distract” Parliament from other issues. So Parliament is in limbo, and may investigate, or may not investigate. Whining about “nobody has initiated the process” looks like you’re either ignorant or trying to shut down discussion by insulting other posters, although surely you’d never want to do that. Hope that clears it up.

[Anonymous]

If you want to get a summary of Andrew Lownie’s book as well as information on Andrew and Fergie’s connection to Epstein as well as Trump’s and Melania’s connections watch this. It’s worth it. Lownie is actually a historian. He is not a tabloid biographer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62j0L8KiRS8

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you want to get a summary of Andrew Lownie’s book as well as information on Andrew and Fergie’s connection to Epstein as well as Trump’s and Melania’s connections watch this. It’s worth it. Lownie is actually a historian. He is not a tabloid biographer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62j0L8KiRS8

That was a shocking watch, thanks

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:donnie's in trouble.

Andrew will spill his guts.

So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?

I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.

They don't even need to go to such lengths. They can simply subpoena the many Americans with information. Or make a deal with Ghislaine.

Trump and his pet attorneys and judges aren’t going to allow that. Why the Brits needs to get Andrew to spill.

How do you propose they do that? They aren't exactly stopping him from doing that now.

The palace is trying to stop Parliament from making Andrew testify. Below is just one of many reports about why--Charles and William don't want a broader investigation into royal finances, leases on Crown Estate properties, and the rest. Which is really too bad, because this is one of the few opportunities where some investigative body would let Andrew go full blast on Epstein and Trump.

https://robshuter.substack.com/p/exclusive-the-real-reason-the-king?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=4354752&post_id=177808109&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=3g207y&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

You mean full blast on Bill Clinton.

Sorry, MAGA pedo defender. There’s many more pictures and a long history of Trump and Epstein, sometimes with Andrew in the same pic. If Clinton raped children then go after him. But Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files says it all about Trump.

You are all over the place. You're laser focused on Andrew ignoring all the available Americans who can testify. Andrew is not the glue holding all the together. Just says you're not really looking out for victims as you keep claiming.

You do realize you’re fighting/trolling with multiple posters who are appalled you’re defending Andrew and Trump, right?

You do realize nobody has defended them in any way? And that more than one person keeps pointing this out?

Actually, one poster said that listing after young teens was just fine. And the MAGAs here seem really opposed to real consequences for Andrew.

*lusting

More lies. Nobody here has said anything of the sort. Demanding he testify when he hasn't even been asked is not opposing consequences. There is a process to be followed that nobody has even initiated.

Calm down, you’re misunderstanding. Yes, people here want Andrew to testify (to spill on Epstein’s operation and probably on Trump) or not to testify (because they don’t think lusting after teens is bad—someone here absolutely said “ephobophilia is ok” close to the beginning of this thread—or because they don’t want Trump and/or the BRF’s finances exposed.)

The point, which you keep missing, is that some in Parliament actually want to initiate the process. But lots of press have reported that the palace is leaning on Parliament not to initiate the process to investigate, in fact BP issued s real-life statement saying an investigation would “distract” Parliament from other issues. So Parliament is in limbo, and may investigate, or may not investigate. Whining about “nobody has initiated the process” looks like you’re either ignorant or trying to shut down discussion by insulting other posters, although surely you’d never want to do that. Hope that clears it up.

So you want Andrew to just show up without being asked to “testify” ? Seems like you’re angry at the wrong people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:donnie's in trouble.

Andrew will spill his guts.

So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?

I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.

They don't even need to go to such lengths. They can simply subpoena the many Americans with information. Or make a deal with Ghislaine.

Trump and his pet attorneys and judges aren’t going to allow that. Why the Brits needs to get Andrew to spill.

How do you propose they do that? They aren't exactly stopping him from doing that now.

The palace is trying to stop Parliament from making Andrew testify. Below is just one of many reports about why--Charles and William don't want a broader investigation into royal finances, leases on Crown Estate properties, and the rest. Which is really too bad, because this is one of the few opportunities where some investigative body would let Andrew go full blast on Epstein and Trump.

https://robshuter.substack.com/p/exclusive-the-real-reason-the-king?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=4354752&post_id=177808109&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=3g207y&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

You mean full blast on Bill Clinton.

Sorry, MAGA pedo defender. There’s many more pictures and a long history of Trump and Epstein, sometimes with Andrew in the same pic. If Clinton raped children then go after him. But Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files says it all about Trump.

You are all over the place. You're laser focused on Andrew ignoring all the available Americans who can testify. Andrew is not the glue holding all the together. Just says you're not really looking out for victims as you keep claiming.

You do realize you’re fighting/trolling with multiple posters who are appalled you’re defending Andrew and Trump, right?

You do realize nobody has defended them in any way? And that more than one person keeps pointing this out?

Actually, one poster said that listing after young teens was just fine. And the MAGAs here seem really opposed to real consequences for Andrew.

*lusting

More lies. Nobody here has said anything of the sort. Demanding he testify when he hasn't even been asked is not opposing consequences. There is a process to be followed that nobody has even initiated.

Calm down, you’re misunderstanding. Yes, people here want Andrew to testify (to spill on Epstein’s operation and probably on Trump) or not to testify (because they don’t think lusting after teens is bad—someone here absolutely said “ephobophilia is ok” close to the beginning of this thread—or because they don’t want Trump and/or the BRF’s finances exposed.)

The point, which you keep missing, is that some in Parliament actually want to initiate the process. But lots of press have reported that the palace is leaning on Parliament not to initiate the process to investigate, in fact BP issued s real-life statement saying an investigation would “distract” Parliament from other issues. So Parliament is in limbo, and may investigate, or may not investigate. Whining about “nobody has initiated the process” looks like you’re either ignorant or trying to shut down discussion by insulting other posters, although surely you’d never want to do that. Hope that clears it up.

So you want Andrew to just show up without being asked to “testify” ? Seems like you’re angry at the wrong people.

For those of you in the back seats (not for this troll): Andrew probably has dirt on Trump's relationship with Epstein (see: pictures of Andrew, Trump, and Epstein together at Mar al Lago) that could potentially bring the orange dirtbag down, and maybe also on Clinton and lots of other rich men. To get this information, either (1) the US Congress needs to do a thorough investigation into Epstein, including issuing subpoenas to lots of people involved with Epstein. Or (2) Parliament needs to defy Charles and William and force Andrew to testify. At this point, a Parliamentary inquiry seems more likely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:donnie's in trouble.

Andrew will spill his guts.

So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?

I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.

They don't even need to go to such lengths. They can simply subpoena the many Americans with information. Or make a deal with Ghislaine.

Trump and his pet attorneys and judges aren’t going to allow that. Why the Brits needs to get Andrew to spill.

How do you propose they do that? They aren't exactly stopping him from doing that now.

The palace is trying to stop Parliament from making Andrew testify. Below is just one of many reports about why--Charles and William don't want a broader investigation into royal finances, leases on Crown Estate properties, and the rest. Which is really too bad, because this is one of the few opportunities where some investigative body would let Andrew go full blast on Epstein and Trump.

https://robshuter.substack.com/p/exclusive-the-real-reason-the-king?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=4354752&post_id=177808109&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=3g207y&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

You mean full blast on Bill Clinton.

Sorry, MAGA pedo defender. There’s many more pictures and a long history of Trump and Epstein, sometimes with Andrew in the same pic. If Clinton raped children then go after him. But Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files says it all about Trump.

You are all over the place. You're laser focused on Andrew ignoring all the available Americans who can testify. Andrew is not the glue holding all the together. Just says you're not really looking out for victims as you keep claiming.

You do realize you’re fighting/trolling with multiple posters who are appalled you’re defending Andrew and Trump, right?

You do realize nobody has defended them in any way? And that more than one person keeps pointing this out?

Actually, one poster said that listing after young teens was just fine. And the MAGAs here seem really opposed to real consequences for Andrew.

*lusting

More lies. Nobody here has said anything of the sort. Demanding he testify when he hasn't even been asked is not opposing consequences. There is a process to be followed that nobody has even initiated.

Calm down, you’re misunderstanding. Yes, people here want Andrew to testify (to spill on Epstein’s operation and probably on Trump) or not to testify (because they don’t think lusting after teens is bad—someone here absolutely said “ephobophilia is ok” close to the beginning of this thread—or because they don’t want Trump and/or the BRF’s finances exposed.)

The point, which you keep missing, is that some in Parliament actually want to initiate the process. But lots of press have reported that the palace is leaning on Parliament not to initiate the process to investigate, in fact BP issued s real-life statement saying an investigation would “distract” Parliament from other issues. So Parliament is in limbo, and may investigate, or may not investigate. Whining about “nobody has initiated the process” looks like you’re either ignorant or trying to shut down discussion by insulting other posters, although surely you’d never want to do that. Hope that clears it up.

So you want Andrew to just show up without being asked to “testify” ? Seems like you’re angry at the wrong people.

For those of you in the back seats (not for this troll): Andrew probably has dirt on Trump's relationship with Epstein (see: pictures of Andrew, Trump, and Epstein together at Mar al Lago) that could potentially bring the orange dirtbag down, and maybe also on Clinton and lots of other rich men. To get this information, either (1) the US Congress needs to do a thorough investigation into Epstein, including issuing subpoenas to lots of people involved with Epstein. Or (2) Parliament needs to defy Charles and William and force Andrew to testify. At this point, a Parliamentary inquiry seems more likely.

Both seem extremely unlikely but you are entitled to your dreams.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:donnie's in trouble.

Andrew will spill his guts.

So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?

I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.

They don't even need to go to such lengths. They can simply subpoena the many Americans with information. Or make a deal with Ghislaine.

Trump and his pet attorneys and judges aren’t going to allow that. Why the Brits needs to get Andrew to spill.

How do you propose they do that? They aren't exactly stopping him from doing that now.

The palace is trying to stop Parliament from making Andrew testify. Below is just one of many reports about why--Charles and William don't want a broader investigation into royal finances, leases on Crown Estate properties, and the rest. Which is really too bad, because this is one of the few opportunities where some investigative body would let Andrew go full blast on Epstein and Trump.

https://robshuter.substack.com/p/exclusive-the-real-reason-the-king?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=4354752&post_id=177808109&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=3g207y&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

You mean full blast on Bill Clinton.

Sorry, MAGA pedo defender. There’s many more pictures and a long history of Trump and Epstein, sometimes with Andrew in the same pic. If Clinton raped children then go after him. But Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files says it all about Trump.

You are all over the place. You're laser focused on Andrew ignoring all the available Americans who can testify. Andrew is not the glue holding all the together. Just says you're not really looking out for victims as you keep claiming.

You do realize you’re fighting/trolling with multiple posters who are appalled you’re defending Andrew and Trump, right?

You do realize nobody has defended them in any way? And that more than one person keeps pointing this out?

Actually, one poster said that listing after young teens was just fine. And the MAGAs here seem really opposed to real consequences for Andrew.

*lusting

More lies. Nobody here has said anything of the sort. Demanding he testify when he hasn't even been asked is not opposing consequences. There is a process to be followed that nobody has even initiated.

Calm down, you’re misunderstanding. Yes, people here want Andrew to testify (to spill on Epstein’s operation and probably on Trump) or not to testify (because they don’t think lusting after teens is bad—someone here absolutely said “ephobophilia is ok” close to the beginning of this thread—or because they don’t want Trump and/or the BRF’s finances exposed.)

The point, which you keep missing, is that some in Parliament actually want to initiate the process. But lots of press have reported that the palace is leaning on Parliament not to initiate the process to investigate, in fact BP issued s real-life statement saying an investigation would “distract” Parliament from other issues. So Parliament is in limbo, and may investigate, or may not investigate. Whining about “nobody has initiated the process” looks like you’re either ignorant or trying to shut down discussion by insulting other posters, although surely you’d never want to do that. Hope that clears it up.

So you want Andrew to just show up without being asked to “testify” ? Seems like you’re angry at the wrong people.

For those of you in the back seats (not for this troll): Andrew probably has dirt on Trump's relationship with Epstein (see: pictures of Andrew, Trump, and Epstein together at Mar al Lago) that could potentially bring the orange dirtbag down, and maybe also on Clinton and lots of other rich men. To get this information, either (1) the US Congress needs to do a thorough investigation into Epstein, including issuing subpoenas to lots of people involved with Epstein. Or (2) Parliament needs to defy Charles and William and force Andrew to testify. At this point, a Parliamentary inquiry seems more likely.

So you want all these rich men, the ones in power, to bring themselves down? Are you completely delusional?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you want to get a summary of Andrew Lownie’s book as well as information on Andrew and Fergie’s connection to Epstein as well as Trump’s and Melania’s connections watch this. It’s worth it. Lownie is actually a historian. He is not a tabloid biographer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62j0L8KiRS8

Everyone please watch this. Eye opening!

Thank you, PP!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:donnie's in trouble.

Andrew will spill his guts.

So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?

I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.

They don't even need to go to such lengths. They can simply subpoena the many Americans with information. Or make a deal with Ghislaine.

Trump and his pet attorneys and judges aren’t going to allow that. Why the Brits needs to get Andrew to spill.

How do you propose they do that? They aren't exactly stopping him from doing that now.

The palace is trying to stop Parliament from making Andrew testify. Below is just one of many reports about why--Charles and William don't want a broader investigation into royal finances, leases on Crown Estate properties, and the rest. Which is really too bad, because this is one of the few opportunities where some investigative body would let Andrew go full blast on Epstein and Trump.

https://robshuter.substack.com/p/exclusive-the-real-reason-the-king?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=4354752&post_id=177808109&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=3g207y&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

You mean full blast on Bill Clinton.

Sorry, MAGA pedo defender. There’s many more pictures and a long history of Trump and Epstein, sometimes with Andrew in the same pic. If Clinton raped children then go after him. But Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files says it all about Trump.

You are all over the place. You're laser focused on Andrew ignoring all the available Americans who can testify. Andrew is not the glue holding all the together. Just says you're not really looking out for victims as you keep claiming.

You do realize you’re fighting/trolling with multiple posters who are appalled you’re defending Andrew and Trump, right?

You do realize nobody has defended them in any way? And that more than one person keeps pointing this out?

Actually, one poster said that listing after young teens was just fine. And the MAGAs here seem really opposed to real consequences for Andrew.

*lusting

More lies. Nobody here has said anything of the sort. Demanding he testify when he hasn't even been asked is not opposing consequences. There is a process to be followed that nobody has even initiated.

Calm down, you’re misunderstanding. Yes, people here want Andrew to testify (to spill on Epstein’s operation and probably on Trump) or not to testify (because they don’t think lusting after teens is bad—someone here absolutely said “ephobophilia is ok” close to the beginning of this thread—or because they don’t want Trump and/or the BRF’s finances exposed.)

The point, which you keep missing, is that some in Parliament actually want to initiate the process. But lots of press have reported that the palace is leaning on Parliament not to initiate the process to investigate, in fact BP issued s real-life statement saying an investigation would “distract” Parliament from other issues. So Parliament is in limbo, and may investigate, or may not investigate. Whining about “nobody has initiated the process” looks like you’re either ignorant or trying to shut down discussion by insulting other posters, although surely you’d never want to do that. Hope that clears it up.

So you want Andrew to just show up without being asked to “testify” ? Seems like you’re angry at the wrong people.

For those of you in the back seats (not for this troll): Andrew probably has dirt on Trump's relationship with Epstein (see: pictures of Andrew, Trump, and Epstein together at Mar al Lago) that could potentially bring the orange dirtbag down, and maybe also on Clinton and lots of other rich men. To get this information, either (1) the US Congress needs to do a thorough investigation into Epstein, including issuing subpoenas to lots of people involved with Epstein. Or (2) Parliament needs to defy Charles and William and force Andrew to testify. At this point, a Parliamentary inquiry seems more likely.

Both seem extremely unlikely but you are entitled to your dreams.

There's definitely a higher chance Parliament will investigate Andrew and his Epstein connections, including Trump, than there is of the current US Congress investigating the orange dumpster fire. Already a parliamentary subcommittee has asked for info on Andrew's lease. Keir Starmer has expressed support for an investigation into all Crown Estate leases. And several in parliament have expressed support for a full investigation into the real issue, which is Andrew's pedo activities. Fingers crossed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:donnie's in trouble.

Andrew will spill his guts.

So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?

I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.

They don't even need to go to such lengths. They can simply subpoena the many Americans with information. Or make a deal with Ghislaine.

Trump and his pet attorneys and judges aren’t going to allow that. Why the Brits needs to get Andrew to spill.

How do you propose they do that? They aren't exactly stopping him from doing that now.

The palace is trying to stop Parliament from making Andrew testify. Below is just one of many reports about why--Charles and William don't want a broader investigation into royal finances, leases on Crown Estate properties, and the rest. Which is really too bad, because this is one of the few opportunities where some investigative body would let Andrew go full blast on Epstein and Trump.

https://robshuter.substack.com/p/exclusive-the-real-reason-the-king?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=4354752&post_id=177808109&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=3g207y&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

You mean full blast on Bill Clinton.

Sorry, MAGA pedo defender. There’s many more pictures and a long history of Trump and Epstein, sometimes with Andrew in the same pic. If Clinton raped children then go after him. But Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files says it all about Trump.

You are all over the place. You're laser focused on Andrew ignoring all the available Americans who can testify. Andrew is not the glue holding all the together. Just says you're not really looking out for victims as you keep claiming.

You do realize you’re fighting/trolling with multiple posters who are appalled you’re defending Andrew and Trump, right?

You do realize nobody has defended them in any way? And that more than one person keeps pointing this out?

Actually, one poster said that listing after young teens was just fine. And the MAGAs here seem really opposed to real consequences for Andrew.

*lusting

More lies. Nobody here has said anything of the sort. Demanding he testify when he hasn't even been asked is not opposing consequences. There is a process to be followed that nobody has even initiated.

Calm down, you’re misunderstanding. Yes, people here want Andrew to testify (to spill on Epstein’s operation and probably on Trump) or not to testify (because they don’t think lusting after teens is bad—someone here absolutely said “ephobophilia is ok” close to the beginning of this thread—or because they don’t want Trump and/or the BRF’s finances exposed.)

The point, which you keep missing, is that some in Parliament actually want to initiate the process. But lots of press have reported that the palace is leaning on Parliament not to initiate the process to investigate, in fact BP issued s real-life statement saying an investigation would “distract” Parliament from other issues. So Parliament is in limbo, and may investigate, or may not investigate. Whining about “nobody has initiated the process” looks like you’re either ignorant or trying to shut down discussion by insulting other posters, although surely you’d never want to do that. Hope that clears it up.

So you want Andrew to just show up without being asked to “testify” ? Seems like you’re angry at the wrong people.

For those of you in the back seats (not for this troll): Andrew probably has dirt on Trump's relationship with Epstein (see: pictures of Andrew, Trump, and Epstein together at Mar al Lago) that could potentially bring the orange dirtbag down, and maybe also on Clinton and lots of other rich men. To get this information, either (1) the US Congress needs to do a thorough investigation into Epstein, including issuing subpoenas to lots of people involved with Epstein. Or (2) Parliament needs to defy Charles and William and force Andrew to testify. At this point, a Parliamentary inquiry seems more likely.

Both seem extremely unlikely but you are entitled to your dreams.

There's definitely a higher chance Parliament will investigate Andrew and his Epstein connections, including Trump, than there is of the current US Congress investigating the orange dumpster fire. Already a parliamentary subcommittee has asked for info on Andrew's lease. Keir Starmer has expressed support for an investigation into all Crown Estate leases. And several in parliament have expressed support for a full investigation into the real issue, which is Andrew's pedo activities. Fingers crossed.

Won't happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:donnie's in trouble.

Andrew will spill his guts.

So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?

I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.

They don't even need to go to such lengths. They can simply subpoena the many Americans with information. Or make a deal with Ghislaine.

Trump and his pet attorneys and judges aren’t going to allow that. Why the Brits needs to get Andrew to spill.

How do you propose they do that? They aren't exactly stopping him from doing that now.

The palace is trying to stop Parliament from making Andrew testify. Below is just one of many reports about why--Charles and William don't want a broader investigation into royal finances, leases on Crown Estate properties, and the rest. Which is really too bad, because this is one of the few opportunities where some investigative body would let Andrew go full blast on Epstein and Trump.

https://robshuter.substack.com/p/exclusive-the-real-reason-the-king?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=4354752&post_id=177808109&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=3g207y&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

You mean full blast on Bill Clinton.

Sorry, MAGA pedo defender. There’s many more pictures and a long history of Trump and Epstein, sometimes with Andrew in the same pic. If Clinton raped children then go after him. But Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files says it all about Trump.

You are all over the place. You're laser focused on Andrew ignoring all the available Americans who can testify. Andrew is not the glue holding all the together. Just says you're not really looking out for victims as you keep claiming.

You do realize you’re fighting/trolling with multiple posters who are appalled you’re defending Andrew and Trump, right?

You do realize nobody has defended them in any way? And that more than one person keeps pointing this out?

Actually, one poster said that listing after young teens was just fine. And the MAGAs here seem really opposed to real consequences for Andrew.

*lusting

More lies. Nobody here has said anything of the sort. Demanding he testify when he hasn't even been asked is not opposing consequences. There is a process to be followed that nobody has even initiated.

Calm down, you’re misunderstanding. Yes, people here want Andrew to testify (to spill on Epstein’s operation and probably on Trump) or not to testify (because they don’t think lusting after teens is bad—someone here absolutely said “ephobophilia is ok” close to the beginning of this thread—or because they don’t want Trump and/or the BRF’s finances exposed.)

The point, which you keep missing, is that some in Parliament actually want to initiate the process. But lots of press have reported that the palace is leaning on Parliament not to initiate the process to investigate, in fact BP issued s real-life statement saying an investigation would “distract” Parliament from other issues. So Parliament is in limbo, and may investigate, or may not investigate. Whining about “nobody has initiated the process” looks like you’re either ignorant or trying to shut down discussion by insulting other posters, although surely you’d never want to do that. Hope that clears it up.

So you want Andrew to just show up without being asked to “testify” ? Seems like you’re angry at the wrong people.

For those of you in the back seats (not for this troll): Andrew probably has dirt on Trump's relationship with Epstein (see: pictures of Andrew, Trump, and Epstein together at Mar al Lago) that could potentially bring the orange dirtbag down, and maybe also on Clinton and lots of other rich men. To get this information, either (1) the US Congress needs to do a thorough investigation into Epstein, including issuing subpoenas to lots of people involved with Epstein. Or (2) Parliament needs to defy Charles and William and force Andrew to testify. At this point, a Parliamentary inquiry seems more likely.

Both seem extremely unlikely but you are entitled to your dreams.

There's definitely a higher chance Parliament will investigate Andrew and his Epstein connections, including Trump, than there is of the current US Congress investigating the orange dumpster fire. Already a parliamentary subcommittee has asked for info on Andrew's lease. Keir Starmer has expressed support for an investigation into all Crown Estate leases. And several in parliament have expressed support for a full investigation into the real issue, which is Andrew's pedo activities. Fingers crossed.

Merrick Garland sat on the Epstein files and given how much his DOJ hated Trump and threw everything plus the kitchen sink at him, that somehow no one leaked incriminating info about Trump and Epstein would be very weird, frankly, implausible. Meanwhile Trump was campaigning on releasing the files and he talked openly about it for a long time. It would be amazing bluster from him if he was genuinely involved in a bad way.

It is interesting that both parties, despite hating each other, somehow can't or wouldn't reveal the files. The concept of the files has grown into something much bigger than they may really be. These talks about investigating the files in Parliament is clearly a form of distraction from Labour's many other problems, including total abysmal approval ratings. In other words, I read nothing meaningful in these promises and expect nothing will happen.