King Charles strips Andrew’s prince title

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.

He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.

Is it not possible that he thought he was hiring a consenting prostitute!

You’re actually defending this creep. So very gross. Epstein was convicted the first time years ago. Yes, Andrew absolutely knew the girls were underaged in the US and were trafficked.

How do we know what he knew? He has denied all of it. What's the proof you're relying on?

The BRF clearly knows more than the public. Charles would never have taken such extra measures unless he knows the evidence.

PP, ignore the MAGA creep who is defending Andrew and has already admitted to trolling here. There are adults here who are more worth your time.

Again, what proof? His accuser is dead. You can’t just make facts up.

There’s a picture with her and Andrew! Get real.

You make zero sense. With her gone you are going to need something more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.

He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.

Is it not possible that he thought he was hiring a consenting prostitute!

You’re actually defending this creep. So very gross. Epstein was convicted the first time years ago. Yes, Andrew absolutely knew the girls were underaged in the US and were trafficked.

How do we know what he knew? He has denied all of it. What's the proof you're relying on?

The BRF clearly knows more than the public. Charles would never have taken such extra measures unless he knows the evidence.

PP, ignore the MAGA creep who is defending Andrew and has already admitted to trolling here. There are adults here who are more worth your time.

Again, what proof? His accuser is dead. You can’t just make facts up.

There’s a picture with her and Andrew! Get real.

And there’s another picture of Andrew, Trump, Maxwell and Epstein at Mar al Lago—extremely easy to google. Poor pedo-protecting troll keeps pretending these don’t exist.

And? You need something like “bring me the child” or else they will deny deny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.

He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.

Is it not possible that he thought he was hiring a consenting prostitute!

You’re actually defending this creep. So very gross. Epstein was convicted the first time years ago. Yes, Andrew absolutely knew the girls were underaged in the US and were trafficked.

How do we know what he knew? He has denied all of it. What's the proof you're relying on?

The BRF clearly knows more than the public. Charles would never have taken such extra measures unless he knows the evidence.

PP, ignore the MAGA creep who is defending Andrew and has already admitted to trolling here. There are adults here who are more worth your time.

Again, what proof? His accuser is dead. You can’t just make facts up.

There’s a picture with her and Andrew! Get real.

You make zero sense. With her gone you are going to need something more.

Epstein confirmed the Andrew-Virginia photo was real. Stop defending pedos.

https://theroyalist.substack.com/p/epstein-said-gross-andrew-giuffre

[Anonymous]

Or this link. Maybe you can stop defending Andrew now.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cglgj08erywo.amp

Wonder if this will give new impetus to Parliament’s investigations??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.

He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.

Is it not possible that he thought he was hiring a consenting prostitute!

You’re actually defending this creep. So very gross. Epstein was convicted the first time years ago. Yes, Andrew absolutely knew the girls were underaged in the US and were trafficked.

How do we know what he knew? He has denied all of it. What's the proof you're relying on?

The BRF clearly knows more than the public. Charles would never have taken such extra measures unless he knows the evidence.

PP, ignore the MAGA creep who is defending Andrew and has already admitted to trolling here. There are adults here who are more worth your time.

Again, what proof? His accuser is dead. You can’t just make facts up.

There’s a picture with her and Andrew! Get real.

You make zero sense. With her gone you are going to need something more.

Epstein confirmed the Andrew-Virginia photo was real. Stop defending pedos.

https://theroyalist.substack.com/p/epstein-said-gross-andrew-giuffre

Are you slow? You can't just have a pic and show that it proves everything. Andrew denied knowing her until the pic was passed around, so he clearly knew her. He was never charged with any crimes. Much like the pic with Trump and the others doesn't prove crimes. If it did why are we still here? If this one photo proves all the crimes what is the hold up?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Or this link. Maybe you can stop defending Andrew now.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cglgj08erywo.amp

Wonder if this will give new impetus to Parliament’s investigations??

“It included allegations that girls were directed to sit on Andrew's knee at Epstein's New York home, that he groped them and took part in sexual encounters on Epstein's private island.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Or this link. Maybe you can stop defending Andrew now.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cglgj08erywo.amp

Wonder if this will give new impetus to Parliament’s investigations??

You obviously have no clue about how law works. Nobody is defending anyone, but show us the evidence that connects all the dots. Because you actually need evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.

He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.

Is it not possible that he thought he was hiring a consenting prostitute!

You’re actually defending this creep. So very gross. Epstein was convicted the first time years ago. Yes, Andrew absolutely knew the girls were underaged in the US and were trafficked.

How do we know what he knew? He has denied all of it. What's the proof you're relying on?

The BRF clearly knows more than the public. Charles would never have taken such extra measures unless he knows the evidence.

PP, ignore the MAGA creep who is defending Andrew and has already admitted to trolling here. There are adults here who are more worth your time.

Again, what proof? His accuser is dead. You can’t just make facts up.

There’s a picture with her and Andrew! Get real.

You make zero sense. With her gone you are going to need something more.

Epstein confirmed the Andrew-Virginia photo was real. Stop defending pedos.

https://theroyalist.substack.com/p/epstein-said-gross-andrew-giuffre

Are you slow? You can't just have a pic and show that it proves everything. Andrew denied knowing her until the pic was passed around, so he clearly knew her. He was never charged with any crimes. Much like the pic with Trump and the others doesn't prove crimes. If it did why are we still here? If this one photo proves all the crimes what is the hold up?

Insults—the last resort of losers and trolls and pedos with their morals in the gutter.

Duh, proof of Andrew’s association with Giuffre, including in NYC, and Andrew’s visit to Epstein Isle, just came to light *yesterday*. No hold up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.

He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.

Is it not possible that he thought he was hiring a consenting prostitute!

You’re actually defending this creep. So very gross. Epstein was convicted the first time years ago. Yes, Andrew absolutely knew the girls were underaged in the US and were trafficked.

How do we know what he knew? He has denied all of it. What's the proof you're relying on?

The BRF clearly knows more than the public. Charles would never have taken such extra measures unless he knows the evidence.

PP, ignore the MAGA creep who is defending Andrew and has already admitted to trolling here. There are adults here who are more worth your time.

Again, what proof? His accuser is dead. You can’t just make facts up.

There’s a picture with her and Andrew! Get real.

You make zero sense. With her gone you are going to need something more.

Epstein confirmed the Andrew-Virginia photo was real. Stop defending pedos.

https://theroyalist.substack.com/p/epstein-said-gross-andrew-giuffre

Are you slow? You can't just have a pic and show that it proves everything. Andrew denied knowing her until the pic was passed around, so he clearly knew her. He was never charged with any crimes. Much like the pic with Trump and the others doesn't prove crimes. If it did why are we still here? If this one photo proves all the crimes what is the hold up?

Insults—the last resort of losers and trolls and pedos with their morals in the gutter.

Duh, proof of Andrew’s association with Giuffre, including in NYC, and Andrew’s visit to Epstein Isle, just came to light *yesterday*. No hold up.

You are certifiable. If they had more proof they would have arrested him by now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or this link. Maybe you can stop defending Andrew now.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cglgj08erywo.amp

Wonder if this will give new impetus to Parliament’s investigations??

You obviously have no clue about how law works. Nobody is defending anyone, but show us the evidence that connects all the dots. Because you actually need evidence.

Oh shut up, pedo troll.

Epstein’s email about Andrew, revealed yesterday, is the smoking gun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.

He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.

Is it not possible that he thought he was hiring a consenting prostitute!

You’re actually defending this creep. So very gross. Epstein was convicted the first time years ago. Yes, Andrew absolutely knew the girls were underaged in the US and were trafficked.

How do we know what he knew? He has denied all of it. What's the proof you're relying on?

The BRF clearly knows more than the public. Charles would never have taken such extra measures unless he knows the evidence.

PP, ignore the MAGA creep who is defending Andrew and has already admitted to trolling here. There are adults here who are more worth your time.

Again, what proof? His accuser is dead. You can’t just make facts up.

There’s a picture with her and Andrew! Get real.

You make zero sense. With her gone you are going to need something more.

Epstein confirmed the Andrew-Virginia photo was real. Stop defending pedos.

https://theroyalist.substack.com/p/epstein-said-gross-andrew-giuffre

Are you slow? You can't just have a pic and show that it proves everything. Andrew denied knowing her until the pic was passed around, so he clearly knew her. He was never charged with any crimes. Much like the pic with Trump and the others doesn't prove crimes. If it did why are we still here? If this one photo proves all the crimes what is the hold up?

Insults—the last resort of losers and trolls and pedos with their morals in the gutter.

Duh, proof of Andrew’s association with Giuffre, including in NYC, and Andrew’s visit to Epstein Isle, just came to light *yesterday*. No hold up.

You are certifiable. If they had more proof they would have arrested him by now.

Arrested him today based on evidence that came out yesterday? How dumb are you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or this link. Maybe you can stop defending Andrew now.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cglgj08erywo.amp

Wonder if this will give new impetus to Parliament’s investigations??

You obviously have no clue about how law works. Nobody is defending anyone, but show us the evidence that connects all the dots. Because you actually need evidence.

Oh shut up, pedo troll.

Epstein’s email about Andrew, revealed yesterday, is the smoking gun.

You're going to be awfully disappointed how this turns out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.

He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.

Is it not possible that he thought he was hiring a consenting prostitute!

You’re actually defending this creep. So very gross. Epstein was convicted the first time years ago. Yes, Andrew absolutely knew the girls were underaged in the US and were trafficked.

How do we know what he knew? He has denied all of it. What's the proof you're relying on?

The BRF clearly knows more than the public. Charles would never have taken such extra measures unless he knows the evidence.

PP, ignore the MAGA creep who is defending Andrew and has already admitted to trolling here. There are adults here who are more worth your time.

Again, what proof? His accuser is dead. You can’t just make facts up.

There’s a picture with her and Andrew! Get real.

You make zero sense. With her gone you are going to need something more.

Epstein confirmed the Andrew-Virginia photo was real. Stop defending pedos.

https://theroyalist.substack.com/p/epstein-said-gross-andrew-giuffre

Are you slow? You can't just have a pic and show that it proves everything. Andrew denied knowing her until the pic was passed around, so he clearly knew her. He was never charged with any crimes. Much like the pic with Trump and the others doesn't prove crimes. If it did why are we still here? If this one photo proves all the crimes what is the hold up?

Insults—the last resort of losers and trolls and pedos with their morals in the gutter.

Duh, proof of Andrew’s association with Giuffre, including in NYC, and Andrew’s visit to Epstein Isle, just came to light *yesterday*. No hold up.

You are certifiable. If they had more proof they would have arrested him by now.

Arrested him today based on evidence that came out yesterday? How dumb are you?

My guess is the Brit authorities will wait for the rest of the DOJ Epstein files, now we have the discharge motion, to compile a complete case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.

He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.

Is it not possible that he thought he was hiring a consenting prostitute!

You’re actually defending this creep. So very gross. Epstein was convicted the first time years ago. Yes, Andrew absolutely knew the girls were underaged in the US and were trafficked.

How do we know what he knew? He has denied all of it. What's the proof you're relying on?

The BRF clearly knows more than the public. Charles would never have taken such extra measures unless he knows the evidence.

PP, ignore the MAGA creep who is defending Andrew and has already admitted to trolling here. There are adults here who are more worth your time.

Again, what proof? His accuser is dead. You can’t just make facts up.

There’s a picture with her and Andrew! Get real.

You make zero sense. With her gone you are going to need something more.

Epstein confirmed the Andrew-Virginia photo was real. Stop defending pedos.

https://theroyalist.substack.com/p/epstein-said-gross-andrew-giuffre

Are you slow? You can't just have a pic and show that it proves everything. Andrew denied knowing her until the pic was passed around, so he clearly knew her. He was never charged with any crimes. Much like the pic with Trump and the others doesn't prove crimes. If it did why are we still here? If this one photo proves all the crimes what is the hold up?

Insults—the last resort of losers and trolls and pedos with their morals in the gutter.

Duh, proof of Andrew’s association with Giuffre, including in NYC, and Andrew’s visit to Epstein Isle, just came to light *yesterday*. No hold up.

You are certifiable. If they had more proof they would have arrested him by now.

Arrested him today based on evidence that came out yesterday? How dumb are you?

They aren't going to get him on sex crimes. He will go down for some misconduct or something so this is all just fantasy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.

He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.

Is it not possible that he thought he was hiring a consenting prostitute!

You’re actually defending this creep. So very gross. Epstein was convicted the first time years ago. Yes, Andrew absolutely knew the girls were underaged in the US and were trafficked.

How do we know what he knew? He has denied all of it. What's the proof you're relying on?

The BRF clearly knows more than the public. Charles would never have taken such extra measures unless he knows the evidence.

PP, ignore the MAGA creep who is defending Andrew and has already admitted to trolling here. There are adults here who are more worth your time.

Again, what proof? His accuser is dead. You can’t just make facts up.

There’s a picture with her and Andrew! Get real.

You make zero sense. With her gone you are going to need something more.

Epstein confirmed the Andrew-Virginia photo was real. Stop defending pedos.

https://theroyalist.substack.com/p/epstein-said-gross-andrew-giuffre

Are you slow? You can't just have a pic and show that it proves everything. Andrew denied knowing her until the pic was passed around, so he clearly knew her. He was never charged with any crimes. Much like the pic with Trump and the others doesn't prove crimes. If it did why are we still here? If this one photo proves all the crimes what is the hold up?

Insults—the last resort of losers and trolls and pedos with their morals in the gutter.

Duh, proof of Andrew’s association with Giuffre, including in NYC, and Andrew’s visit to Epstein Isle, just came to light *yesterday*. No hold up.

You are certifiable. If they had more proof they would have arrested him by now.

Arrested him today based on evidence that came out yesterday? How dumb are you?

They aren't going to get him on sex crimes. He will go down for some misconduct or something so this is all just fantasy.

Trafficking is a crime in Britain. But yeah, no doubt they can get him for financial crimes when he was a trade envoy, too.