King Charles strips Andrew’s prince title

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.

He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.

Is it not possible that he thought he was hiring a consenting prostitute!

You’re actually defending this creep. So very gross. Epstein was convicted the first time years ago. Yes, Andrew absolutely knew the girls were underaged in the US and were trafficked.

How do we know what he knew? He has denied all of it. What's the proof you're relying on?

The BRF clearly knows more than the public. Charles would never have taken such extra measures unless he knows the evidence.

PP, ignore the MAGA creep who is defending Andrew and has already admitted to trolling here. There are adults here who are more worth your time.

Again, what proof? His accuser is dead. You can’t just make facts up.

There’s a picture with her and Andrew! Get real.

You make zero sense. With her gone you are going to need something more.

Please help, I'm dying to know, and I'm sure others are as well.

Why are you defending this pedo on every page?
- You're paid. Can you tell us who is paying you?
- You're an unpaid intern for some royalist group. Or you're an unpaid intern for that creepy part of the Heritage Foundation that's run by that loser Thatcher-obsessed Brit who lives in Virginia
- You're one of the sad royalists here who loves Kate's wigs and thinks the Mountbatten-Windsors can never do any wrong because they have special blood
- You're a pedo or an ephebophile (ugh, I'll never forgive the poster who introduced this word earlier in the thread) yourself

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.

He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.

Is it not possible that he thought he was hiring a consenting prostitute!

You’re actually defending this creep. So very gross. Epstein was convicted the first time years ago. Yes, Andrew absolutely knew the girls were underaged in the US and were trafficked.

How do we know what he knew? He has denied all of it. What's the proof you're relying on?

The BRF clearly knows more than the public. Charles would never have taken such extra measures unless he knows the evidence.

PP, ignore the MAGA creep who is defending Andrew and has already admitted to trolling here. There are adults here who are more worth your time.

Again, what proof? His accuser is dead. You can’t just make facts up.

There’s a picture with her and Andrew! Get real.

You make zero sense. With her gone you are going to need something more.

Please help, I'm dying to know, and I'm sure others are as well.

Why are you defending this pedo on every page?
- You're paid. Can you tell us who is paying you?
- You're an unpaid intern for some royalist group. Or you're an unpaid intern for that creepy part of the Heritage Foundation that's run by that loser Thatcher-obsessed Brit who lives in Virginia
- You're one of the sad royalists here who loves Kate's wigs and thinks the Mountbatten-Windsors can never do any wrong because they have special blood
- You're a pedo or an ephebophile (ugh, I'll never forgive the poster who introduced this word earlier in the thread) yourself

I am not that poster. Just picking up on something they said though - I would imagine Andrew was so entitled that he never considered he was paying for anything sexual from anyone, that it was his god given right and their honor to service him.