King Charles strips Andrew’s prince title

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:William didn’t play a role in Andrew’s move. Instead, the Waleses were moving to their fifth forever home.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2025/11/01/prince-princess-of-wales-become-closer-neighbours-andrew-uk/

“Prince William did not attend the meetings last week as Buckingham Palace finally moved to strip his uncle of his titles and force him out of his grand home on the Crown Estate. But his closest aides were kept abreast of developments and William “fully supported” the King’s decision.”

He may not have been here physically but easily could have phoned in. Or told daddy beforehand “Dad, handle it and I’ll respect what you give him or I’ll handle when I am king and leave him nothing.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:donnie's in trouble.

Andrew will spill his guts.

So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?

I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.

They don't even need to go to such lengths. They can simply subpoena the many Americans with information. Or make a deal with Ghislaine.

Trump and his pet attorneys and judges aren’t going to allow that. Why the Brits needs to get Andrew to spill.

How do you propose they do that? They aren't exactly stopping him from doing that now.

The palace is trying to stop Parliament from making Andrew testify. Below is just one of many reports about why--Charles and William don't want a broader investigation into royal finances, leases on Crown Estate properties, and the rest. Which is really too bad, because this is one of the few opportunities where some investigative body would let Andrew go full blast on Epstein and Trump.

https://robshuter.substack.com/p/exclusive-the-real-reason-the-king?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=4354752&post_id=177808109&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=3g207y&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

You mean full blast on Bill Clinton.

Sorry, MAGA pedo defender. There’s many more pictures and a long history of Trump and Epstein, sometimes with Andrew in the same pic. If Clinton raped children then go after him. But Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files says it all about Trump.

You are all over the place. You're laser focused on Andrew ignoring all the available Americans who can testify. Andrew is not the glue holding all the together. Just says you're not really looking out for victims as you keep claiming.

There must be a whole lot of prominent politicians, both parties, in it otherwise Biden should have released it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:donnie's in trouble.

Andrew will spill his guts.

So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?

I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.

They don't even need to go to such lengths. They can simply subpoena the many Americans with information. Or make a deal with Ghislaine.

Trump and his pet attorneys and judges aren’t going to allow that. Why the Brits needs to get Andrew to spill.

How do you propose they do that? They aren't exactly stopping him from doing that now.

The palace is trying to stop Parliament from making Andrew testify. Below is just one of many reports about why--Charles and William don't want a broader investigation into royal finances, leases on Crown Estate properties, and the rest. Which is really too bad, because this is one of the few opportunities where some investigative body would let Andrew go full blast on Epstein and Trump.

https://robshuter.substack.com/p/exclusive-the-real-reason-the-king?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=4354752&post_id=177808109&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=3g207y&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

You mean full blast on Bill Clinton.

Sorry, MAGA pedo defender. There’s many more pictures and a long history of Trump and Epstein, sometimes with Andrew in the same pic. If Clinton raped children then go after him. But Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files says it all about Trump.

You are all over the place. You're laser focused on Andrew ignoring all the available Americans who can testify. Andrew is not the glue holding all the together. Just says you're not really looking out for victims as you keep claiming.

You do realize you’re fighting/trolling with multiple posters who are appalled you’re defending Andrew and Trump, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William didn’t play a role in Andrew’s move. Instead, the Waleses were moving to their fifth forever home.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2025/11/01/prince-princess-of-wales-become-closer-neighbours-andrew-uk/

“Prince William did not attend the meetings last week as Buckingham Palace finally moved to strip his uncle of his titles and force him out of his grand home on the Crown Estate. But his closest aides were kept abreast of developments and William “fully supported” the King’s decision.”

He may not have been here physically but easily could have phoned in. Or told daddy beforehand “Dad, handle it and I’ll respect what you give him or I’ll handle when I am king and leave him nothing.”

Sure. Or he could have turned over on his beach blanket and said eff it. Prove me wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:donnie's in trouble.

Andrew will spill his guts.

So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?

I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.

They don't even need to go to such lengths. They can simply subpoena the many Americans with information. Or make a deal with Ghislaine.

Trump and his pet attorneys and judges aren’t going to allow that. Why the Brits needs to get Andrew to spill.

How do you propose they do that? They aren't exactly stopping him from doing that now.

The palace is trying to stop Parliament from making Andrew testify. Below is just one of many reports about why--Charles and William don't want a broader investigation into royal finances, leases on Crown Estate properties, and the rest. Which is really too bad, because this is one of the few opportunities where some investigative body would let Andrew go full blast on Epstein and Trump.

https://robshuter.substack.com/p/exclusive-the-real-reason-the-king?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=4354752&post_id=177808109&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=3g207y&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

You mean full blast on Bill Clinton.

Sorry, MAGA pedo defender. There’s many more pictures and a long history of Trump and Epstein, sometimes with Andrew in the same pic. If Clinton raped children then go after him. But Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files says it all about Trump.

You are all over the place. You're laser focused on Andrew ignoring all the available Americans who can testify. Andrew is not the glue holding all the together. Just says you're not really looking out for victims as you keep claiming.

You do realize you’re fighting/trolling with multiple posters who are appalled you’re defending Andrew and Trump, right?

You do realize nobody has defended them in any way? And that more than one person keeps pointing this out?

[Anonymous]

I heard some speculation (and let's be honest, it's all speculation here) that perhaps this is a signal that Charles' cancer is worse than we know and his time is nearing an end, and he wanted to handle this before William became king. Or, William insisted Charles handle it because if it is left to WIlliam to handle it would have been even more abrupt/punitive.

But who knows. There's very little actual truth to parse here.

I do wonder about Fergie. She maybe wasn't having sex with trafficked girls, but she was awfully chummy with Epstein.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I heard some speculation (and let's be honest, it's all speculation here) that perhaps this is a signal that Charles' cancer is worse than we know and his time is nearing an end, and he wanted to handle this before William became king. Or, William insisted Charles handle it because if it is left to WIlliam to handle it would have been even more abrupt/punitive.

But who knows. There's very little actual truth to parse here.

I do wonder about Fergie. She maybe wasn't having sex with trafficked girls, but she was awfully chummy with Epstein.

I mean, this is the most obvious to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William didn’t play a role in Andrew’s move. Instead, the Waleses were moving to their fifth forever home.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2025/11/01/prince-princess-of-wales-become-closer-neighbours-andrew-uk/

“Prince William did not attend the meetings last week as Buckingham Palace finally moved to strip his uncle of his titles and force him out of his grand home on the Crown Estate. But his closest aides were kept abreast of developments and William “fully supported” the King’s decision.”

He may not have been here physically but easily could have phoned in. Or told daddy beforehand “Dad, handle it and I’ll respect what you give him or I’ll handle when I am king and leave him nothing.”

Sure. Or he could have turned over on his beach blanket and said eff it. Prove me wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I heard some speculation (and let's be honest, it's all speculation here) that perhaps this is a signal that Charles' cancer is worse than we know and his time is nearing an end, and he wanted to handle this before William became king. Or, William insisted Charles handle it because if it is left to WIlliam to handle it would have been even more abrupt/punitive.

But who knows. There's very little actual truth to parse here.

I do wonder about Fergie. She maybe wasn't having sex with trafficked girls, but she was awfully chummy with Epstein.

This seems like a signal that Fergie and Andrew’s emails to Epstein were just released, with more supposedly to come. Also a signal that Andrew Lownie published a book. So Charles finally had to deal with Andrew.

Charles’ days may or may not be numbered, as you say, it’s all speculation apart from facts about the emails and book.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:donnie's in trouble.

Andrew will spill his guts.

So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?

I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.

They don't even need to go to such lengths. They can simply subpoena the many Americans with information. Or make a deal with Ghislaine.

Trump and his pet attorneys and judges aren’t going to allow that. Why the Brits needs to get Andrew to spill.

How do you propose they do that? They aren't exactly stopping him from doing that now.

The palace is trying to stop Parliament from making Andrew testify. Below is just one of many reports about why--Charles and William don't want a broader investigation into royal finances, leases on Crown Estate properties, and the rest. Which is really too bad, because this is one of the few opportunities where some investigative body would let Andrew go full blast on Epstein and Trump.

https://robshuter.substack.com/p/exclusive-the-real-reason-the-king?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=4354752&post_id=177808109&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=3g207y&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

You mean full blast on Bill Clinton.

Sorry, MAGA pedo defender. There’s many more pictures and a long history of Trump and Epstein, sometimes with Andrew in the same pic. If Clinton raped children then go after him. But Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files says it all about Trump.

You are all over the place. You're laser focused on Andrew ignoring all the available Americans who can testify. Andrew is not the glue holding all the together. Just says you're not really looking out for victims as you keep claiming.

You do realize you’re fighting/trolling with multiple posters who are appalled you’re defending Andrew and Trump, right?

You do realize nobody has defended them in any way? And that more than one person keeps pointing this out?

Actually, one poster said that listing after young teens was just fine. And the MAGAs here seem really opposed to real consequences for Andrew.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:donnie's in trouble.

Andrew will spill his guts.

So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?

I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.

They don't even need to go to such lengths. They can simply subpoena the many Americans with information. Or make a deal with Ghislaine.

Trump and his pet attorneys and judges aren’t going to allow that. Why the Brits needs to get Andrew to spill.

How do you propose they do that? They aren't exactly stopping him from doing that now.

The palace is trying to stop Parliament from making Andrew testify. Below is just one of many reports about why--Charles and William don't want a broader investigation into royal finances, leases on Crown Estate properties, and the rest. Which is really too bad, because this is one of the few opportunities where some investigative body would let Andrew go full blast on Epstein and Trump.

https://robshuter.substack.com/p/exclusive-the-real-reason-the-king?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=4354752&post_id=177808109&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=3g207y&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

You mean full blast on Bill Clinton.

Sorry, MAGA pedo defender. There’s many more pictures and a long history of Trump and Epstein, sometimes with Andrew in the same pic. If Clinton raped children then go after him. But Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files says it all about Trump.

You are all over the place. You're laser focused on Andrew ignoring all the available Americans who can testify. Andrew is not the glue holding all the together. Just says you're not really looking out for victims as you keep claiming.

You do realize you’re fighting/trolling with multiple posters who are appalled you’re defending Andrew and Trump, right?

You do realize nobody has defended them in any way? And that more than one person keeps pointing this out?

Actually, one poster said that listing after young teens was just fine. And the MAGAs here seem really opposed to real consequences for Andrew.

*lusting

[Anonymous]

I don’t think there was pressure from William. I don’t think Charles is dying from his cancer. I think they know of a lot more bad things Andrew has done related to Epstein and just good old fashioned pay to play schemes. Between the Giuffre book and the other guy’s book, it’s a dam breaking situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William didn’t play a role in Andrew’s move. Instead, the Waleses were moving to their fifth forever home.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2025/11/01/prince-princess-of-wales-become-closer-neighbours-andrew-uk/

“Prince William did not attend the meetings last week as Buckingham Palace finally moved to strip his uncle of his titles and force him out of his grand home on the Crown Estate. But his closest aides were kept abreast of developments and William “fully supported” the King’s decision.”

He may not have been here physically but easily could have phoned in. Or told daddy beforehand “Dad, handle it and I’ll respect what you give him or I’ll handle when I am king and leave him nothing.”

Sure. Or he could have turned over on his beach blanket and said eff it. Prove me wrong.

He is not the monarch and thus has no power to do anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:donnie's in trouble.

Andrew will spill his guts.

So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?

I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.

They don't even need to go to such lengths. They can simply subpoena the many Americans with information. Or make a deal with Ghislaine.

Trump and his pet attorneys and judges aren’t going to allow that. Why the Brits needs to get Andrew to spill.

How do you propose they do that? They aren't exactly stopping him from doing that now.

The palace is trying to stop Parliament from making Andrew testify. Below is just one of many reports about why--Charles and William don't want a broader investigation into royal finances, leases on Crown Estate properties, and the rest. Which is really too bad, because this is one of the few opportunities where some investigative body would let Andrew go full blast on Epstein and Trump.

https://robshuter.substack.com/p/exclusive-the-real-reason-the-king?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=4354752&post_id=177808109&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=3g207y&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

You mean full blast on Bill Clinton.

Sorry, MAGA pedo defender. There’s many more pictures and a long history of Trump and Epstein, sometimes with Andrew in the same pic. If Clinton raped children then go after him. But Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files says it all about Trump.

You are all over the place. You're laser focused on Andrew ignoring all the available Americans who can testify. Andrew is not the glue holding all the together. Just says you're not really looking out for victims as you keep claiming.

You do realize you’re fighting/trolling with multiple posters who are appalled you’re defending Andrew and Trump, right?

You do realize nobody has defended them in any way? And that more than one person keeps pointing this out?

Actually, one poster said that listing after young teens was just fine. And the MAGAs here seem really opposed to real consequences for Andrew.

*lusting

More lies. Nobody here has said anything of the sort. Demanding he testify when he hasn't even been asked is not opposing consequences. There is a process to be followed that nobody has even initiated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy’s only got like 5 mil. I got 5 mil. Dude is broke

Andrew is obviously the worst but there is also something grotesque about one of your children inheriting a billion dollars and the others a few million.

Happens all the time with privileged families. In this case, being the monarch provides a lot of assets that are not necessarily liquid.