Should influencers be allowed to sue to block public records requests?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These comments are so mean.

Emilie was/is considered one of the more normal and down to earth mom 'influencers' too. A wholesome sweetheart. Just tragic.

Tragic for her. Her deadbeat husband was betting on basketball rather than parenting. He’s criminally negligent and lucky he isn’t being charged.

PP here. I can definitely see this. But she is getting hammered just for being an 'influencer'.

And? You really want people here to stop talking about this but they don't have to just because you say so.

It’s more than a little odd that people here are obsessed with a months old accidental drowning in Arizona.

Nah, it’s not odd. The details of the report were just released Friday and paint a vivid and haunting image of a three year old struggling for his life, for two full minutes, while dad watches basketball. The report clearly shows a lying, coward of a
Father. And a lovely dead child, and a
Mother who had been warned many times yet disregarded common wisdom and paid the ultimate price. Career, child, marriage- gone like POOF.

What more do you want? I think they got their comeuppance. But the “rage” some of you are feeling is misplaced. It’s sad but they are the ones who have to live with the consequences.

I just want to be able to discuss it with others without being lectured by you, since you asked.

I dont feel rage. I do think it’s an interesting discussion. We will one day look back in awe that people opened their homes and children up for public consumption.

This has nothing to do with why that boy drowned. You’re trying to make a connection that doesn’t exist.

(DP) I actually think there is a connection between her being an influencer and him drowning. I think she resisted adding pool safety features because they were not aesthetically pleasing and therefore would impact the popularity of her videos. She needed to have the “perfect” house, which is simply not conducive to water safety. Architecture Digest isn’t photography ugly pool covers or awkward pool fences.

It’s undisputed that she deleted and blocked comments that she needed better pool safety protocols in light of her son. Why would she intentionally delete those comments?

OK, so let’s assume that connection. Why are people not talking about other kids who drowned and breathless and full of schadenfruede/disdain about how/why their parents were negligent?

Because they are not. They are talking about what they want to talk about. It is a free country.

Have any of your gotcha questions on here worked yet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These comments are so mean.

Emilie was/is considered one of the more normal and down to earth mom 'influencers' too. A wholesome sweetheart. Just tragic.

Tragic for her. Her deadbeat husband was betting on basketball rather than parenting. He’s criminally negligent and lucky he isn’t being charged.

PP here. I can definitely see this. But she is getting hammered just for being an 'influencer'.

And? You really want people here to stop talking about this but they don't have to just because you say so.

It’s more than a little odd that people here are obsessed with a months old accidental drowning in Arizona.

Nah, it’s not odd. The details of the report were just released Friday and paint a vivid and haunting image of a three year old struggling for his life, for two full minutes, while dad watches basketball. The report clearly shows a lying, coward of a
Father. And a lovely dead child, and a
Mother who had been warned many times yet disregarded common wisdom and paid the ultimate price. Career, child, marriage- gone like POOF.

What more do you want? I think they got their comeuppance. But the “rage” some of you are feeling is misplaced. It’s sad but they are the ones who have to live with the consequences.

I just want to be able to discuss it with others without being lectured by you, since you asked.

I dont feel rage. I do think it’s an interesting discussion. We will one day look back in awe that people opened their homes and children up for public consumption.

This has nothing to do with why that boy drowned. You’re trying to make a connection that doesn’t exist.

(DP) I actually think there is a connection between her being an influencer and him drowning. I think she resisted adding pool safety features because they were not aesthetically pleasing and therefore would impact the popularity of her videos. She needed to have the “perfect” house, which is simply not conducive to water safety. Architecture Digest isn’t photography ugly pool covers or awkward pool fences.

It’s undisputed that she deleted and blocked comments that she needed better pool safety protocols in light of her son. Why would she intentionally delete those comments?

OK, so let’s assume that connection. Why are people not talking about other kids who drowned and breathless and full of schadenfruede/disdain about how/why their parents were negligent?

Because no one else invited 1M+ strangers into their private lives.

If you are one of the followers, you’re part of the problem.

No, I don’t follow influencers. I learned about this case on Reddit.

So, someone you had never heard of had something tragic happened to them and now you desperately want to talk about it? What’s your real agenda?

--No one is desperate.
--We talk about circumstances and people that are new to us everyday, that we learn about in the, wait for it, NEWs.
--The agenda is to talk about the circumstance.

Do you really think you can ask a million rhetorical questions all day and make people stop talking? No, you can't. You have no ability to shame others into doing what you want.

Sorry this conversation isn’t going the way you want.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These comments are so mean.

Emilie was/is considered one of the more normal and down to earth mom 'influencers' too. A wholesome sweetheart. Just tragic.

Tragic for her. Her deadbeat husband was betting on basketball rather than parenting. He’s criminally negligent and lucky he isn’t being charged.

PP here. I can definitely see this. But she is getting hammered just for being an 'influencer'.

And? You really want people here to stop talking about this but they don't have to just because you say so.

It’s more than a little odd that people here are obsessed with a months old accidental drowning in Arizona.

Nah, it’s not odd. The details of the report were just released Friday and paint a vivid and haunting image of a three year old struggling for his life, for two full minutes, while dad watches basketball. The report clearly shows a lying, coward of a
Father. And a lovely dead child, and a
Mother who had been warned many times yet disregarded common wisdom and paid the ultimate price. Career, child, marriage- gone like POOF.

What more do you want? I think they got their comeuppance. But the “rage” some of you are feeling is misplaced. It’s sad but they are the ones who have to live with the consequences.

I just want to be able to discuss it with others without being lectured by you, since you asked.

I dont feel rage. I do think it’s an interesting discussion. We will one day look back in awe that people opened their homes and children up for public consumption.

This has nothing to do with why that boy drowned. You’re trying to make a connection that doesn’t exist.

(DP) I actually think there is a connection between her being an influencer and him drowning. I think she resisted adding pool safety features because they were not aesthetically pleasing and therefore would impact the popularity of her videos. She needed to have the “perfect” house, which is simply not conducive to water safety. Architecture Digest isn’t photography ugly pool covers or awkward pool fences.

It’s undisputed that she deleted and blocked comments that she needed better pool safety protocols in light of her son. Why would she intentionally delete those comments?

OK, so let’s assume that connection. Why are people not talking about other kids who drowned and breathless and full of schadenfruede/disdain about how/why their parents were negligent?

Because no one else invited 1M+ strangers into their private lives.

If you are one of the followers, you’re part of the problem.

No, I don’t follow influencers. I learned about this case on Reddit.

So, someone you had never heard of had something tragic happened to them and now you desperately want to talk about it? What’s your real agenda?

What’s YOUR real agenda? Are you part of the family trying to make yourself look better or just a random troll trying to get people to stop talking about a news story that’s plastered all over the internet right now? Hmmmmm?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you use your children as props for financial gain, and put yourself out there as this ideal family to be envied and emulated, its only natural for people to feel some amount of schadenfreude when it all turns out to be for show.

They were fine with, and even sought and encouraged, all the attention when it was lining their pockets. Will be interesting to see if they try to use influencing as an income stream going forward or not.

Did you follow Emilie before this happened? Just curious.

"Following" is just as meaningless as saving a web fsvorite. Influences made themselves public figures, so no, you implications that no one can speak about her unless they clicked a button to add her to a web fsvorite is preposterous.

I definitely don't think people shouldn't speak about her. I was just wondering if they were familiar with her before this situation or if they were just making assumptions based on a general knowledge of influencers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These comments are so mean.

Emilie was/is considered one of the more normal and down to earth mom 'influencers' too. A wholesome sweetheart. Just tragic.

Tragic for her. Her deadbeat husband was betting on basketball rather than parenting. He’s criminally negligent and lucky he isn’t being charged.

PP here. I can definitely see this. But she is getting hammered just for being an 'influencer'.

And? You really want people here to stop talking about this but they don't have to just because you say so.

It’s more than a little odd that people here are obsessed with a months old accidental drowning in Arizona.

Nah, it’s not odd. The details of the report were just released Friday and paint a vivid and haunting image of a three year old struggling for his life, for two full minutes, while dad watches basketball. The report clearly shows a lying, coward of a
Father. And a lovely dead child, and a
Mother who had been warned many times yet disregarded common wisdom and paid the ultimate price. Career, child, marriage- gone like POOF.

What more do you want? I think they got their comeuppance. But the “rage” some of you are feeling is misplaced. It’s sad but they are the ones who have to live with the consequences.

I just want to be able to discuss it with others without being lectured by you, since you asked.

I dont feel rage. I do think it’s an interesting discussion. We will one day look back in awe that people opened their homes and children up for public consumption.

This has nothing to do with why that boy drowned. You’re trying to make a connection that doesn’t exist.

(DP) I actually think there is a connection between her being an influencer and him drowning. I think she resisted adding pool safety features because they were not aesthetically pleasing and therefore would impact the popularity of her videos. She needed to have the “perfect” house, which is simply not conducive to water safety. Architecture Digest isn’t photography ugly pool covers or awkward pool fences.

It’s undisputed that she deleted and blocked comments that she needed better pool safety protocols in light of her son. Why would she intentionally delete those comments?

OK, so let’s assume that connection. Why are people not talking about other kids who drowned and breathless and full of schadenfruede/disdain about how/why their parents were negligent?

Because no one else invited 1M+ strangers into their private lives.

If you are one of the followers, you’re part of the problem.

No, I don’t follow influencers. I learned about this case on Reddit.

I am actively anti influencer and believe these family and mommy bloggers are doing irreparable damage to their own and to other families. They sell image and discourage actual presence- in their watchers and by the creators- and all of the children suffer by having distracted parents living lives in their phones instead of in their living room- present in body if not in mind or spirit- or attention.

This popped up in my Reddit feed because it was both trending and on point with my beliefs around influencers. I still don’t follow Emilie or any other influencer and I still think this is a subject worth discussing.

These people made a living - and a very profitable one- by opening up their children, skin care routines, relationships, and (apparently) their urination emergencies. They bought that pool - the one that killed their child- with viewer clicks.

Why do you want the national interest to center around little sally who drowned in Bethesda and is Mourned by her family and neighbors because who else knows a 3 year old? That child will have privacy because their parents gave them privacy.

Trigg unfortunately did not get privacy in life- turning his death into a circus.

Only two people are responsible for that indisputable fact- his mother and father.

They ask strangers to award him privacy in death yet they didn’t allow him a moment of privacy in life.

This is exactly what the outrage is over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These comments are so mean.

Emilie was/is considered one of the more normal and down to earth mom 'influencers' too. A wholesome sweetheart. Just tragic.

Tragic for her. Her deadbeat husband was betting on basketball rather than parenting. He’s criminally negligent and lucky he isn’t being charged.

PP here. I can definitely see this. But she is getting hammered just for being an 'influencer'.

And? You really want people here to stop talking about this but they don't have to just because you say so.

It’s more than a little odd that people here are obsessed with a months old accidental drowning in Arizona.

Nah, it’s not odd. The details of the report were just released Friday and paint a vivid and haunting image of a three year old struggling for his life, for two full minutes, while dad watches basketball. The report clearly shows a lying, coward of a
Father. And a lovely dead child, and a
Mother who had been warned many times yet disregarded common wisdom and paid the ultimate price. Career, child, marriage- gone like POOF.

What more do you want? I think they got their comeuppance. But the “rage” some of you are feeling is misplaced. It’s sad but they are the ones who have to live with the consequences.

I just want to be able to discuss it with others without being lectured by you, since you asked.

I dont feel rage. I do think it’s an interesting discussion. We will one day look back in awe that people opened their homes and children up for public consumption.

This has nothing to do with why that boy drowned. You’re trying to make a connection that doesn’t exist.

(DP) I actually think there is a connection between her being an influencer and him drowning. I think she resisted adding pool safety features because they were not aesthetically pleasing and therefore would impact the popularity of her videos. She needed to have the “perfect” house, which is simply not conducive to water safety. Architecture Digest isn’t photography ugly pool covers or awkward pool fences.

It’s undisputed that she deleted and blocked comments that she needed better pool safety protocols in light of her son. Why would she intentionally delete those comments?

OK, so let’s assume that connection. Why are people not talking about other kids who drowned and breathless and full of schadenfruede/disdain about how/why their parents were negligent?

Because no one else invited 1M+ strangers into their private lives.

If you are one of the followers, you’re part of the problem.

No, I don’t follow influencers. I learned about this case on Reddit.

I am actively anti influencer and believe these family and mommy bloggers are doing irreparable damage to their own and to other families. They sell image and discourage actual presence- in their watchers and by the creators- and all of the children suffer by having distracted parents living lives in their phones instead of in their living room- present in body if not in mind or spirit- or attention.

This popped up in my Reddit feed because it was both trending and on point with my beliefs around influencers. I still don’t follow Emilie or any other influencer and I still think this is a subject worth discussing.

These people made a living - and a very profitable one- by opening up their children, skin care routines, relationships, and (apparently) their urination emergencies. They bought that pool - the one that killed their child- with viewer clicks.

Why do you want the national interest to center around little sally who drowned in Bethesda and is Mourned by her family and neighbors because who else knows a 3 year old? That child will have privacy because their parents gave them privacy.

Trigg unfortunately did not get privacy in life- turning his death into a circus.

Only two people are responsible for that indisputable fact- his mother and father.

They ask strangers to award him privacy in death yet they didn’t allow him a moment of privacy in life.

I can see the case for more privacy for kids when it comes to content creation by influencers.

BUT, I don't begrudge anyone trying to make buck by selling things on social media whether it is for UTIs or skincare.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These comments are so mean.

Emilie was/is considered one of the more normal and down to earth mom 'influencers' too. A wholesome sweetheart. Just tragic.

Tragic for her. Her deadbeat husband was betting on basketball rather than parenting. He’s criminally negligent and lucky he isn’t being charged.

PP here. I can definitely see this. But she is getting hammered just for being an 'influencer'.

And? You really want people here to stop talking about this but they don't have to just because you say so.

It’s more than a little odd that people here are obsessed with a months old accidental drowning in Arizona.

Nah, it’s not odd. The details of the report were just released Friday and paint a vivid and haunting image of a three year old struggling for his life, for two full minutes, while dad watches basketball. The report clearly shows a lying, coward of a
Father. And a lovely dead child, and a
Mother who had been warned many times yet disregarded common wisdom and paid the ultimate price. Career, child, marriage- gone like POOF.

What more do you want? I think they got their comeuppance. But the “rage” some of you are feeling is misplaced. It’s sad but they are the ones who have to live with the consequences.

I just want to be able to discuss it with others without being lectured by you, since you asked.

I dont feel rage. I do think it’s an interesting discussion. We will one day look back in awe that people opened their homes and children up for public consumption.

This has nothing to do with why that boy drowned. You’re trying to make a connection that doesn’t exist.

(DP) I actually think there is a connection between her being an influencer and him drowning. I think she resisted adding pool safety features because they were not aesthetically pleasing and therefore would impact the popularity of her videos. She needed to have the “perfect” house, which is simply not conducive to water safety. Architecture Digest isn’t photography ugly pool covers or awkward pool fences.

It’s undisputed that she deleted and blocked comments that she needed better pool safety protocols in light of her son. Why would she intentionally delete those comments?

OK, so let’s assume that connection. Why are people not talking about other kids who drowned and breathless and full of schadenfruede/disdain about how/why their parents were negligent?

Because no one else invited 1M+ strangers into their private lives.

If you are one of the followers, you’re part of the problem.

No, I don’t follow influencers. I learned about this case on Reddit.

So, someone you had never heard of had something tragic happened to them and now you desperately want to talk about it? What’s your real agenda?

I think the agenda is basically anti-influencer for whatever reason.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These comments are so mean.

Emilie was/is considered one of the more normal and down to earth mom 'influencers' too. A wholesome sweetheart. Just tragic.

Tragic for her. Her deadbeat husband was betting on basketball rather than parenting. He’s criminally negligent and lucky he isn’t being charged.

PP here. I can definitely see this. But she is getting hammered just for being an 'influencer'.

And? You really want people here to stop talking about this but they don't have to just because you say so.

It’s more than a little odd that people here are obsessed with a months old accidental drowning in Arizona.

Nah, it’s not odd. The details of the report were just released Friday and paint a vivid and haunting image of a three year old struggling for his life, for two full minutes, while dad watches basketball. The report clearly shows a lying, coward of a
Father. And a lovely dead child, and a
Mother who had been warned many times yet disregarded common wisdom and paid the ultimate price. Career, child, marriage- gone like POOF.

What more do you want? I think they got their comeuppance. But the “rage” some of you are feeling is misplaced. It’s sad but they are the ones who have to live with the consequences.

I just want to be able to discuss it with others without being lectured by you, since you asked.

I dont feel rage. I do think it’s an interesting discussion. We will one day look back in awe that people opened their homes and children up for public consumption.

This has nothing to do with why that boy drowned. You’re trying to make a connection that doesn’t exist.

(DP) I actually think there is a connection between her being an influencer and him drowning. I think she resisted adding pool safety features because they were not aesthetically pleasing and therefore would impact the popularity of her videos. She needed to have the “perfect” house, which is simply not conducive to water safety. Architecture Digest isn’t photography ugly pool covers or awkward pool fences.

It’s undisputed that she deleted and blocked comments that she needed better pool safety protocols in light of her son. Why would she intentionally delete those comments?

OK, so let’s assume that connection. Why are people not talking about other kids who drowned and breathless and full of schadenfruede/disdain about how/why their parents were negligent?

Because no one else invited 1M+ strangers into their private lives.

If you are one of the followers, you’re part of the problem.

No, I don’t follow influencers. I learned about this case on Reddit.

I am actively anti influencer and believe these family and mommy bloggers are doing irreparable damage to their own and to other families. They sell image and discourage actual presence- in their watchers and by the creators- and all of the children suffer by having distracted parents living lives in their phones instead of in their living room- present in body if not in mind or spirit- or attention.

This popped up in my Reddit feed because it was both trending and on point with my beliefs around influencers. I still don’t follow Emilie or any other influencer and I still think this is a subject worth discussing.

These people made a living - and a very profitable one- by opening up their children, skin care routines, relationships, and (apparently) their urination emergencies. They bought that pool - the one that killed their child- with viewer clicks.

Why do you want the national interest to center around little sally who drowned in Bethesda and is Mourned by her family and neighbors because who else knows a 3 year old? That child will have privacy because their parents gave them privacy.

Trigg unfortunately did not get privacy in life- turning his death into a circus.

Only two people are responsible for that indisputable fact- his mother and father.

They ask strangers to award him privacy in death yet they didn’t allow him a moment of privacy in life.

This is sort of over the top. The kids were not a central part of her posts. I mean she posted about being a mom but the cameras were not in their faces all the time or anything close to that. Probably even less than non-influencers who post on social media. So not sure what you mean about not having a moment of privacy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These comments are so mean.

Emilie was/is considered one of the more normal and down to earth mom 'influencers' too. A wholesome sweetheart. Just tragic.

Tragic for her. Her deadbeat husband was betting on basketball rather than parenting. He’s criminally negligent and lucky he isn’t being charged.

PP here. I can definitely see this. But she is getting hammered just for being an 'influencer'.

And? You really want people here to stop talking about this but they don't have to just because you say so.

It’s more than a little odd that people here are obsessed with a months old accidental drowning in Arizona.

Nah, it’s not odd. The details of the report were just released Friday and paint a vivid and haunting image of a three year old struggling for his life, for two full minutes, while dad watches basketball. The report clearly shows a lying, coward of a
Father. And a lovely dead child, and a
Mother who had been warned many times yet disregarded common wisdom and paid the ultimate price. Career, child, marriage- gone like POOF.

What more do you want? I think they got their comeuppance. But the “rage” some of you are feeling is misplaced. It’s sad but they are the ones who have to live with the consequences.

I just want to be able to discuss it with others without being lectured by you, since you asked.

I dont feel rage. I do think it’s an interesting discussion. We will one day look back in awe that people opened their homes and children up for public consumption.

This has nothing to do with why that boy drowned. You’re trying to make a connection that doesn’t exist.

(DP) I actually think there is a connection between her being an influencer and him drowning. I think she resisted adding pool safety features because they were not aesthetically pleasing and therefore would impact the popularity of her videos. She needed to have the “perfect” house, which is simply not conducive to water safety. Architecture Digest isn’t photography ugly pool covers or awkward pool fences.

It’s undisputed that she deleted and blocked comments that she needed better pool safety protocols in light of her son. Why would she intentionally delete those comments?

OK, so let’s assume that connection. Why are people not talking about other kids who drowned and breathless and full of schadenfruede/disdain about how/why their parents were negligent?

Because no one else invited 1M+ strangers into their private lives.

If you are one of the followers, you’re part of the problem.

No, I don’t follow influencers. I learned about this case on Reddit.

So, someone you had never heard of had something tragic happened to them and now you desperately want to talk about it? What’s your real agenda?

--No one is desperate.
--We talk about circumstances and people that are new to us everyday, that we learn about in the, wait for it, NEWs.
--The agenda is to talk about the circumstance.

Do you really think you can ask a million rhetorical questions all day and make people stop talking? No, you can't. You have no ability to shame others into doing what you want.

Sorry this conversation isn’t going the way you want.

Sorry this conversation is not going along with your preference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you use your children as props for financial gain, and put yourself out there as this ideal family to be envied and emulated, its only natural for people to feel some amount of schadenfreude when it all turns out to be for show.

They were fine with, and even sought and encouraged, all the attention when it was lining their pockets. Will be interesting to see if they try to use influencing as an income stream going forward or not.

Did you follow Emilie before this happened? Just curious.

"Following" is just as meaningless as saving a web fsvorite. Influences made themselves public figures, so no, you implications that no one can speak about her unless they clicked a button to add her to a web fsvorite is preposterous.

I definitely don't think people shouldn't speak about her. I was just wondering if they were familiar with her before this situation or if they were just making assumptions based on a general knowledge of influencers.

Ok well stay wondering, no one owes you an explanation for sharing opinions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These comments are so mean.

Emilie was/is considered one of the more normal and down to earth mom 'influencers' too. A wholesome sweetheart. Just tragic.

Tragic for her. Her deadbeat husband was betting on basketball rather than parenting. He’s criminally negligent and lucky he isn’t being charged.

PP here. I can definitely see this. But she is getting hammered just for being an 'influencer'.

And? You really want people here to stop talking about this but they don't have to just because you say so.

It’s more than a little odd that people here are obsessed with a months old accidental drowning in Arizona.

Nah, it’s not odd. The details of the report were just released Friday and paint a vivid and haunting image of a three year old struggling for his life, for two full minutes, while dad watches basketball. The report clearly shows a lying, coward of a
Father. And a lovely dead child, and a
Mother who had been warned many times yet disregarded common wisdom and paid the ultimate price. Career, child, marriage- gone like POOF.

What more do you want? I think they got their comeuppance. But the “rage” some of you are feeling is misplaced. It’s sad but they are the ones who have to live with the consequences.

I just want to be able to discuss it with others without being lectured by you, since you asked.

I dont feel rage. I do think it’s an interesting discussion. We will one day look back in awe that people opened their homes and children up for public consumption.

This has nothing to do with why that boy drowned. You’re trying to make a connection that doesn’t exist.

(DP) I actually think there is a connection between her being an influencer and him drowning. I think she resisted adding pool safety features because they were not aesthetically pleasing and therefore would impact the popularity of her videos. She needed to have the “perfect” house, which is simply not conducive to water safety. Architecture Digest isn’t photography ugly pool covers or awkward pool fences.

It’s undisputed that she deleted and blocked comments that she needed better pool safety protocols in light of her son. Why would she intentionally delete those comments?

OK, so let’s assume that connection. Why are people not talking about other kids who drowned and breathless and full of schadenfruede/disdain about how/why their parents were negligent?

Because no one else invited 1M+ strangers into their private lives.

If you are one of the followers, you’re part of the problem.

No, I don’t follow influencers. I learned about this case on Reddit.

So, someone you had never heard of had something tragic happened to them and now you desperately want to talk about it? What’s your real agenda?

I think the agenda is basically anti-influencer for whatever reason.

More anti- double standard. Share everything when the child is alive then try to share nothing when they tragically pass. The whole thing seemed like a big coverup and created additional attention because of the weird way it was handled. People naturally talk about things that are weird. It’s also everywhere in the press right now and people naturally talk about current events.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These comments are so mean.

Emilie was/is considered one of the more normal and down to earth mom 'influencers' too. A wholesome sweetheart. Just tragic.

Tragic for her. Her deadbeat husband was betting on basketball rather than parenting. He’s criminally negligent and lucky he isn’t being charged.

PP here. I can definitely see this. But she is getting hammered just for being an 'influencer'.

And? You really want people here to stop talking about this but they don't have to just because you say so.

It’s more than a little odd that people here are obsessed with a months old accidental drowning in Arizona.

Nah, it’s not odd. The details of the report were just released Friday and paint a vivid and haunting image of a three year old struggling for his life, for two full minutes, while dad watches basketball. The report clearly shows a lying, coward of a
Father. And a lovely dead child, and a
Mother who had been warned many times yet disregarded common wisdom and paid the ultimate price. Career, child, marriage- gone like POOF.

What more do you want? I think they got their comeuppance. But the “rage” some of you are feeling is misplaced. It’s sad but they are the ones who have to live with the consequences.

I just want to be able to discuss it with others without being lectured by you, since you asked.

I dont feel rage. I do think it’s an interesting discussion. We will one day look back in awe that people opened their homes and children up for public consumption.

This has nothing to do with why that boy drowned. You’re trying to make a connection that doesn’t exist.

(DP) I actually think there is a connection between her being an influencer and him drowning. I think she resisted adding pool safety features because they were not aesthetically pleasing and therefore would impact the popularity of her videos. She needed to have the “perfect” house, which is simply not conducive to water safety. Architecture Digest isn’t photography ugly pool covers or awkward pool fences.

It’s undisputed that she deleted and blocked comments that she needed better pool safety protocols in light of her son. Why would she intentionally delete those comments?

OK, so let’s assume that connection. Why are people not talking about other kids who drowned and breathless and full of schadenfruede/disdain about how/why their parents were negligent?

Because no one else invited 1M+ strangers into their private lives.

If you are one of the followers, you’re part of the problem.

No, I don’t follow influencers. I learned about this case on Reddit.

So, someone you had never heard of had something tragic happened to them and now you desperately want to talk about it? What’s your real agenda?

I think the agenda is basically anti-influencer for whatever reason.

More anti- double standard. Share everything when the child is alive then try to share nothing when they tragically pass. The whole thing seemed like a big coverup and created additional attention because of the weird way it was handled. People naturally talk about things that are weird. It’s also everywhere in the press right now and people naturally talk about current events.

I am seeing a lot of hyperbole like this from people who want to justify crucifying this family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These comments are so mean.

Emilie was/is considered one of the more normal and down to earth mom 'influencers' too. A wholesome sweetheart. Just tragic.

Tragic for her. Her deadbeat husband was betting on basketball rather than parenting. He’s criminally negligent and lucky he isn’t being charged.

PP here. I can definitely see this. But she is getting hammered just for being an 'influencer'.

And? You really want people here to stop talking about this but they don't have to just because you say so.

It’s more than a little odd that people here are obsessed with a months old accidental drowning in Arizona.

Nah, it’s not odd. The details of the report were just released Friday and paint a vivid and haunting image of a three year old struggling for his life, for two full minutes, while dad watches basketball. The report clearly shows a lying, coward of a
Father. And a lovely dead child, and a
Mother who had been warned many times yet disregarded common wisdom and paid the ultimate price. Career, child, marriage- gone like POOF.

What more do you want? I think they got their comeuppance. But the “rage” some of you are feeling is misplaced. It’s sad but they are the ones who have to live with the consequences.

I just want to be able to discuss it with others without being lectured by you, since you asked.

I dont feel rage. I do think it’s an interesting discussion. We will one day look back in awe that people opened their homes and children up for public consumption.

This has nothing to do with why that boy drowned. You’re trying to make a connection that doesn’t exist.

(DP) I actually think there is a connection between her being an influencer and him drowning. I think she resisted adding pool safety features because they were not aesthetically pleasing and therefore would impact the popularity of her videos. She needed to have the “perfect” house, which is simply not conducive to water safety. Architecture Digest isn’t photography ugly pool covers or awkward pool fences.

It’s undisputed that she deleted and blocked comments that she needed better pool safety protocols in light of her son. Why would she intentionally delete those comments?

OK, so let’s assume that connection. Why are people not talking about other kids who drowned and breathless and full of schadenfruede/disdain about how/why their parents were negligent?

Because no one else invited 1M+ strangers into their private lives.

If you are one of the followers, you’re part of the problem.

No, I don’t follow influencers. I learned about this case on Reddit.

I am actively anti influencer and believe these family and mommy bloggers are doing irreparable damage to their own and to other families. They sell image and discourage actual presence- in their watchers and by the creators- and all of the children suffer by having distracted parents living lives in their phones instead of in their living room- present in body if not in mind or spirit- or attention.

This popped up in my Reddit feed because it was both trending and on point with my beliefs around influencers. I still don’t follow Emilie or any other influencer and I still think this is a subject worth discussing.

These people made a living - and a very profitable one- by opening up their children, skin care routines, relationships, and (apparently) their urination emergencies. They bought that pool - the one that killed their child- with viewer clicks.

Why do you want the national interest to center around little sally who drowned in Bethesda and is Mourned by her family and neighbors because who else knows a 3 year old? That child will have privacy because their parents gave them privacy.

Trigg unfortunately did not get privacy in life- turning his death into a circus.

Only two people are responsible for that indisputable fact- his mother and father.

They ask strangers to award him privacy in death yet they didn’t allow him a moment of privacy in life.

This is sort of over the top. The kids were not a central part of her posts. I mean she posted about being a mom but the cameras were not in their faces all the time or anything close to that. Probably even less than non-influencers who post on social media. So not sure what you mean about not having a moment of privacy.

I mean. Cameras on the newborn, cameras on the SAHD cameras on trigg in bed? Eek. Tbats private, or should be. A three year old can’t give consent to be content.

https://www.the-sun.com/news/14270845/trigg-kiser-dead-accident-emilie-tiktok/

H he has been on tik tok since he was just “bump content”. So whatever your level of comfort is may vary- sure. But here’s what 4M followers and strangers were invited into. It’s wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These comments are so mean.

Emilie was/is considered one of the more normal and down to earth mom 'influencers' too. A wholesome sweetheart. Just tragic.

Tragic for her. Her deadbeat husband was betting on basketball rather than parenting. He’s criminally negligent and lucky he isn’t being charged.

PP here. I can definitely see this. But she is getting hammered just for being an 'influencer'.

And? You really want people here to stop talking about this but they don't have to just because you say so.

It’s more than a little odd that people here are obsessed with a months old accidental drowning in Arizona.

Nah, it’s not odd. The details of the report were just released Friday and paint a vivid and haunting image of a three year old struggling for his life, for two full minutes, while dad watches basketball. The report clearly shows a lying, coward of a
Father. And a lovely dead child, and a
Mother who had been warned many times yet disregarded common wisdom and paid the ultimate price. Career, child, marriage- gone like POOF.

What more do you want? I think they got their comeuppance. But the “rage” some of you are feeling is misplaced. It’s sad but they are the ones who have to live with the consequences.

I just want to be able to discuss it with others without being lectured by you, since you asked.

I dont feel rage. I do think it’s an interesting discussion. We will one day look back in awe that people opened their homes and children up for public consumption.

This has nothing to do with why that boy drowned. You’re trying to make a connection that doesn’t exist.

(DP) I actually think there is a connection between her being an influencer and him drowning. I think she resisted adding pool safety features because they were not aesthetically pleasing and therefore would impact the popularity of her videos. She needed to have the “perfect” house, which is simply not conducive to water safety. Architecture Digest isn’t photography ugly pool covers or awkward pool fences.

It’s undisputed that she deleted and blocked comments that she needed better pool safety protocols in light of her son. Why would she intentionally delete those comments?

OK, so let’s assume that connection. Why are people not talking about other kids who drowned and breathless and full of schadenfruede/disdain about how/why their parents were negligent?

Because no one else invited 1M+ strangers into their private lives.

If you are one of the followers, you’re part of the problem.

No, I don’t follow influencers. I learned about this case on Reddit.

So, someone you had never heard of had something tragic happened to them and now you desperately want to talk about it? What’s your real agenda?

I think the agenda is basically anti-influencer for whatever reason.

More anti- double standard. Share everything when the child is alive then try to share nothing when they tragically pass. The whole thing seemed like a big coverup and created additional attention because of the weird way it was handled. People naturally talk about things that are weird. It’s also everywhere in the press right now and people naturally talk about current events.

I am seeing a lot of hyperbole like this from people who want to justify crucifying this family.

They crucified themselves with their neglect that led to the death of their child, don’t put that burden on strangers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These comments are so mean.

Emilie was/is considered one of the more normal and down to earth mom 'influencers' too. A wholesome sweetheart. Just tragic.

Tragic for her. Her deadbeat husband was betting on basketball rather than parenting. He’s criminally negligent and lucky he isn’t being charged.

PP here. I can definitely see this. But she is getting hammered just for being an 'influencer'.

And? You really want people here to stop talking about this but they don't have to just because you say so.

It’s more than a little odd that people here are obsessed with a months old accidental drowning in Arizona.

Nah, it’s not odd. The details of the report were just released Friday and paint a vivid and haunting image of a three year old struggling for his life, for two full minutes, while dad watches basketball. The report clearly shows a lying, coward of a
Father. And a lovely dead child, and a
Mother who had been warned many times yet disregarded common wisdom and paid the ultimate price. Career, child, marriage- gone like POOF.

What more do you want? I think they got their comeuppance. But the “rage” some of you are feeling is misplaced. It’s sad but they are the ones who have to live with the consequences.

I just want to be able to discuss it with others without being lectured by you, since you asked.

I dont feel rage. I do think it’s an interesting discussion. We will one day look back in awe that people opened their homes and children up for public consumption.

This has nothing to do with why that boy drowned. You’re trying to make a connection that doesn’t exist.

(DP) I actually think there is a connection between her being an influencer and him drowning. I think she resisted adding pool safety features because they were not aesthetically pleasing and therefore would impact the popularity of her videos. She needed to have the “perfect” house, which is simply not conducive to water safety. Architecture Digest isn’t photography ugly pool covers or awkward pool fences.

It’s undisputed that she deleted and blocked comments that she needed better pool safety protocols in light of her son. Why would she intentionally delete those comments?

OK, so let’s assume that connection. Why are people not talking about other kids who drowned and breathless and full of schadenfruede/disdain about how/why their parents were negligent?

Because no one else invited 1M+ strangers into their private lives.

If you are one of the followers, you’re part of the problem.

No, I don’t follow influencers. I learned about this case on Reddit.

So, someone you had never heard of had something tragic happened to them and now you desperately want to talk about it? What’s your real agenda?

I think the agenda is basically anti-influencer for whatever reason.

More anti- double standard. Share everything when the child is alive then try to share nothing when they tragically pass. The whole thing seemed like a big coverup and created additional attention because of the weird way it was handled. People naturally talk about things that are weird. It’s also everywhere in the press right now and people naturally talk about current events.

I am seeing a lot of hyperbole like this from people who want to justify crucifying this family.

I am not seeing hyperbole. So guess we are even, right? My opinion cancels out yours.