Reply to Should influencers be allowed to sue to block public records requests?

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Should influencers be allowed to sue to block public records requests?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]These comments are so mean.

Emilie was/is considered one of the more normal and down to earth mom 'influencers' too. A wholesome sweetheart. Just tragic.[/quote]

Tragic for her. Her deadbeat husband was betting on basketball rather than parenting. He’s criminally negligent and lucky he isn’t being charged. [/quote]

PP here. I can definitely see this. [b]But she is getting hammered just for being an 'influencer[/b]'. [/quote]

And? You really want people here to stop talking about this but they don't have to just because you say so. [/quote]

It’s more than a little odd that people here are obsessed with a months old accidental drowning in Arizona.[/quote]

Nah, it’s not odd. The details of the report were just released Friday and paint a vivid and haunting image of a three year old struggling for his life, for two full minutes, while dad watches basketball. The report clearly shows a lying, coward of a
Father. And a lovely dead child, and a
Mother who had been warned many times yet disregarded common wisdom and paid the ultimate price. Career, child, marriage- gone like POOF. [/quote]

What more do you want? I think they got their comeuppance. But the “rage” some of you are feeling is misplaced. It’s sad but they are the ones who have to live with the consequences.[/quote]

I just want to be able to discuss it with others without being lectured by you, since you asked.

I dont feel rage. I do think it’s an interesting discussion. We will one day look back in awe that people opened their homes and children up for public consumption. [/quote]

This has nothing to do with why that boy drowned. You’re trying to make a connection that doesn’t exist.[/quote]

(DP) I actually think there is a connection between her being an influencer and him drowning. I think she resisted adding pool safety features because they were not aesthetically pleasing and therefore would impact the popularity of her videos. She needed to have the “perfect” house, which is simply not conducive to water safety. Architecture Digest isn’t photography ugly pool covers or awkward pool fences.

It’s undisputed that she deleted and blocked comments that she needed better pool safety protocols in light of her son. Why would she intentionally delete those comments?[/quote]

OK, so let’s assume that connection. Why are people not talking about other kids who drowned and breathless and full of schadenfruede/disdain about how/why their parents were negligent? [/quote]

Because no one else invited 1M+ strangers into their private lives.[/quote]

If you are one of the followers, you’re part of the problem.[/quote]

No, I don’t follow influencers. I learned about this case on Reddit.[/quote]

So, someone you had never heard of had something tragic happened to them and now you desperately want to talk about it? What’s your real agenda?[/quote]

I think the agenda is basically anti-influencer for whatever reason.[/quote]

More anti- double standard. Share everything when the child is alive then try to share nothing when they tragically pass. The whole thing seemed like a big coverup and created additional attention because of the weird way it was handled. People naturally talk about things that are weird. It’s also everywhere in the press right now and people naturally talk about current events. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics