OK, so let’s assume that connection. Why are people not talking about other kids who drowned and breathless and full of schadenfruede/disdain about how/why their parents were negligent? |
The PP seems to agree that the reaction is due to the family's media presence. |
Because no one else invited 1M+ strangers into their private lives. |
But some of the PP are saying they never even heard of her until this blew up. So why care about the media presence after the fact? |
1. They don't want to--people can choose who they want to talk about Or 2. They don't know about the other cases Or 3. The influencer wants us to talk about her life in other aspects so why not this? She is getting what she asked for |
If you are one of the followers, you’re part of the problem. |
|
No, I don’t follow influencers. I learned about this case on Reddit. |
So, someone you had never heard of had something tragic happened to them and now you desperately want to talk about it? What’s your real agenda? |
Agree. Wouldn’t know who this woman was if sure hadn’t made a big fuss about redactions and dodging convictions and such that made her family newsworthy for months. |
"Following" is just as meaningless as saving a web fsvorite. Influences made themselves public figures, so no, you implications that no one can speak about her unless they clicked a button to add her to a web fsvorite is preposterous. |
Yes, yes I do. I want to talk about it. That IS the agenda. |
--No one is desperate. --We talk about circumstances and people that are new to us everyday, that we learn about in the, wait for it, NEWs. --The agenda is to talk about the circumstance. Do you really think you can ask a million rhetorical questions all day and make people stop talking? No, you can't. You have no ability to shame others into doing what you want. |
Because they do care. And they can care. |
I am actively anti influencer and believe these family and mommy bloggers are doing irreparable damage to their own and to other families. They sell image and discourage actual presence- in their watchers and by the creators- and all of the children suffer by having distracted parents living lives in their phones instead of in their living room- present in body if not in mind or spirit- or attention. This popped up in my Reddit feed because it was both trending and on point with my beliefs around influencers. I still don’t follow Emilie or any other influencer and I still think this is a subject worth discussing. These people made a living - and a very profitable one- by opening up their children, skin care routines, relationships, and (apparently) their urination emergencies. They bought that pool - the one that killed their child- with viewer clicks. Why do you want the national interest to center around little sally who drowned in Bethesda and is Mourned by her family and neighbors because who else knows a 3 year old? That child will have privacy because their parents gave them privacy. Trigg unfortunately did not get privacy in life- turning his death into a circus. Only two people are responsible for that indisputable fact- his mother and father. They ask strangers to award him privacy in death yet they didn’t allow him a moment of privacy in life. |