Man and Woman Shot and Killed Outside Capital Jewish Museum

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The attack occurred during a reception hosted by the American Jewish Committee’s DC Young Professional Board.

According to witnesses, a man entered the museum shortly after the shooting, wearing a keffiyeh and shouting “Free Palestine” before being removed by police.

This sounds a little suspicious. I sincerely hope this is not just another example of a false flag type attack like the one where Israel bombed its own London Embassy and blamed innocent Palestinians for it.

Yes, it’s definitely likelier that the Israeli government murdered two of its own employees in D.C. to … blame left wing protesters? than it is that someone who probably shouldn’t have had a gun got radicalized and snapped. Certainly no one ever does any random acts of horrific violence in this country, it was probably Mossad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The attack occurred during a reception hosted by the American Jewish Committee’s DC Young Professional Board.

According to witnesses, a man entered the museum shortly after the shooting, wearing a keffiyeh and shouting “Free Palestine” before being removed by police.

This sounds a little suspicious. I sincerely hope this is not just another example of a false flag type attack like the one where Israel bombed its own London Embassy and blamed innocent Palestinians for it.

Yes, it’s definitely likelier that the Israeli government murdered two of its own employees in D.C. to … blame left wing protesters? than it is that someone who probably shouldn’t have had a gun got radicalized and snapped. Certainly no one ever does any random acts of horrific violence in this country, it was probably Mossad.

DP. I mean the Israeli government and military have stated that retrieving the hostages is lowest on their priority list, so one can't really say that integrity is a value of the Israeli government.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone seen a credible report on whether or not this shooter was in the country legally?

What's prompting you to ask this question? Is it because he has an 'ethnic' name?

Yes. Any update on this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No question about the assassin’s motive in targeting, stalking, and slaughtering this innocent young couple merely on account of their nationality and heritage:


https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/cqxe20l1lyro

Conspiracy trash. The BBC should be ashamed. I guess they’re trying to keep up with the Brit tabloids now.


The ONLY reason this man shot these two people is because he had a gun. He wouldn’t have killed them if he didn’t have a gun. This isn’t antisemitism or a political assassination or any other crazy theory. This was a white male (albeit with a Latinx surname), with a gun, doing what white males with guns do - murdering people.

The problem - everywhere - is guns. And the white men who use them.


Why aren’t we discussing that? Instead were chasing conspiracy theories and arguing about what-if’s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone seen a credible report on whether or not this shooter was in the country legally?

What's prompting you to ask this question? Is it because he has an 'ethnic' name?

Yes. Any update on this?

Two facts are true. He's a murderer, and you're a bigot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone seen a credible report on whether or not this shooter was in the country legally?

What's prompting you to ask this question? Is it because he has an 'ethnic' name?

Yes. Any update on this?

Two facts are true. He's a murderer, and you're a bigot.

No I’m not. It’s a valid question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone seen a credible report on whether or not this shooter was in the country legally?

What's prompting you to ask this question? Is it because he has an 'ethnic' name?

Yes. Any update on this?

He’s a white man with a Hispanic last name. Even if he has the physical appearance of a BIPOC person, his lived experience is as a white man. He’s enjoyed all the privileges of being a white man, so that makes him a white man as far as I’m concerned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No question about the assassin’s motive in targeting, stalking, and slaughtering this innocent young couple merely on account of their nationality and heritage:


https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/cqxe20l1lyro

Conspiracy trash. The BBC should be ashamed. I guess they’re trying to keep up with the Brit tabloids now.


The ONLY reason this man shot these two people is because he had a gun. He wouldn’t have killed them if he didn’t have a gun. This isn’t antisemitism or a political assassination or any other crazy theory. This was a white male (albeit with a Latinx surname), with a gun, doing what white males with guns do - murdering people.

The problem - everywhere - is guns. And the white men who use them.


Why aren’t we discussing that? Instead were chasing conspiracy theories and arguing about what-if’s.

so I guess we need to round up all the White Males (but only conservatives and Republicans) and put them in concentration camps, and then we would finally have a pure, happy, utopian state where everyone gets along and there is no violence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone seen a credible report on whether or not this shooter was in the country legally?

What's prompting you to ask this question? Is it because he has an 'ethnic' name?

Yes. Any update on this?

He’s a white man with a Hispanic last name. Even if he has the physical appearance of a BIPOC person, his lived experience is as a white man. He’s enjoyed all the privileges of being a white man, so that makes him a white man as far as I’m concerned.

He is not Caucasian white. And I’m simply asking if anyone has heard his residence status. You know this will be verified at some point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No question about the assassin’s motive in targeting, stalking, and slaughtering this innocent young couple merely on account of their nationality and heritage:


https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/cqxe20l1lyro

Conspiracy trash. The BBC should be ashamed. I guess they’re trying to keep up with the Brit tabloids now.


The ONLY reason this man shot these two people is because he had a gun. He wouldn’t have killed them if he didn’t have a gun. This isn’t antisemitism or a political assassination or any other crazy theory. This was a white male (albeit with a Latinx surname), with a gun, doing what white males with guns do - murdering people.

The problem - everywhere - is guns. And the white men who use them.


Why aren’t we discussing that? Instead were chasing conspiracy theories and arguing about what-if’s.

Kinda funny but not your best

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone seen a credible report on whether or not this shooter was in the country legally?

What's prompting you to ask this question? Is it because he has an 'ethnic' name?

Yes. Any update on this?

He’s a white man with a Hispanic last name. Even if he has the physical appearance of a BIPOC person, his lived experience is as a white man. He’s enjoyed all the privileges of being a white man, so that makes him a white man as far as I’m concerned.

He is not Caucasian white. And I’m simply asking if anyone has heard his residence status. You know this will be verified at some point.

Doesn’t matter if you don’t think he’s white - his experience says he is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone seen a credible report on whether or not this shooter was in the country legally?

What's prompting you to ask this question? Is it because he has an 'ethnic' name?

Yes. Any update on this?

Two facts are true. He's a murderer, and you're a bigot.

No I’m not. It’s a valid question.

No, it's not. And yes, you very much are.

You think people named David, Christopher, Catherine, and Anne are citizens?

And that people named Juan, Mohammed, Amina, or Mei are foreign or illegal?

That's basically the definition of bigotry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everything changes tomorrow.

Agree that this is terror at home and could frankly now happen anywhere in the US. Bc you “look Jewish”? Right? People have been militarized and radicalized by fundamentalism. There’s no reasoning with them and it’s been tacitly condoned by too many in the name of “speech”.

It all stops now. Zero tolerance for ANY antisemitic behavior.

This will be a turning point.

Did everything change "tomorrow" when three Palestinian-American 20-year olds were shot in Burlington, Vermont? That happened last year and I don't see any zero tolerance for anti-Muslim behavior.
https://apnews.com/article/vermont-palestinian-college-students-shot-trial-66aa46f9b1bba7492ce406e2bed64e16

It's awful that people were shot in America, but it happens all the time in a society that for some reason prioritizes guns over people.

+1 where was the "thin red line" when the little boy was murdered by an anti-Muslim man.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cyveq30lmdlo

Hate begets hate. Violence begets violence.

if you read up on that story they knew each other and were even friends . Sounds like the killer was a nut. Also nobody is celebrating the killer in that story

That's right.. when a white anti-muslim kills a little boy, it's "mental illness". When a 30 year old man with a Hispanic name kills two Jewish adults it's terrorism.

How progressive of you to focus on race.

The salient difference is actually that last night’s shooter was a political activist/extremist, whereas the Chicago shooter had no history of political activism.

In other words, last night’s shooter was part of the movement and the far left is as responsible for him as Trump is for J6.

Can’t make the same claim about the Chicago shooter.

I'm actually not a progressive, but let's not pretend that people automatically assume terrorist when the skin color is brown, and "mental illness" when the skin color is white.

And actually, someone who kills for political reasons is what the military does. They just have a structured command to kill.

Such muddled thinking.

1. Let’s go with the facts, rather than your speculative musings on society’s racism. Fact here is last night’s killer was a political activist, Chicago killer was not. That’s an important distinction.

2. Structured commands, civilian government control, targeting control and approval, subject to discipline and the rules of conflict, etc., etc. In other words, militaries and political terrorists ate nothing alike.

Smh

Except Israel doesn't gaf about "targeted control" or that the UN has condemned Israel's indiscriminate killings, so they don't exactly follow "rules of conflict".

So if Israel doesn't follow the "rule of conflict" why should others?

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. See Nelson Mandela.

Oh, I get it now! You don’t care about the actual principles being discussed. You just want to justify this douche shooting people on US soil bc Israel! You’re pro terror, even in the USA.

Great. Have a nice life. Thanks for wasting our time.

DP. Israel and Jews targets all Palestinians as terrorists. You oppress and take away peoples rights in US to voice their opinion while cold bloodily killing 100’s of thousands of innocent people. Now they hold all jews responsible for Israel’s actions. Oh well. Totally predictable.

Israel in the name of all jews kill and murder innocent people including targeting women, children, doctors, lawyer, infrastructure, etc every day for the past 75 years. Now you want to claim the high ground?

Solve the root problem. The independent Palestinian state with territory taken from Israel, right of return, compensation(pain, suffering and lost of property) and full citizenship for Palestinians.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bigger problem that I haven’t seen come up. He was apparently a member of the Party of Socialism and Liberation. Do you think he came up with this on his own or are we looking at a group planned situation.

Never heard of it. The radicalization of the far left and the far right is a problem. And unfortunately, the radicalized right is now running the government. Fortunately, the radicalized far left is extremely small and powerless.

How quickly we forget. What about the goons of the summer of 2020?

But that's in the past! /s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone seen a credible report on whether or not this shooter was in the country legally?

What's prompting you to ask this question? Is it because he has an 'ethnic' name?

Yes. Any update on this?

He’s a white man with a Hispanic last name. Even if he has the physical appearance of a BIPOC person, his lived experience is as a white man. He’s enjoyed all the privileges of being a white man, so that makes him a white man as far as I’m concerned.

He is not Caucasian white. And I’m simply asking if anyone has heard his residence status. You know this will be verified at some point.

Doesn’t matter if you don’t think he’s white - his experience says he is.

And his picture says he isn’t! Thanks but I prefer to believe my own eyes versus your dribble.