Should Biden even continue as POTUS?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought the National Archived is supposed to vette the Presidential papers before being sent off to private locations (eg Presidential Libaries). Does this not happen? Is the POTUS or VP just unilaterally take whatever without vetting and review by the government?

That seems really problematic.

Vette. I like what you did there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought the National Archived is supposed to vette the Presidential papers before being sent off to private locations (eg Presidential Libaries). Does this not happen? Is the POTUS or VP just unilaterally take whatever without vetting and review by the government?

That seems really problematic.

You realize that unlike Trump, Biden never lost his security clearance, right?

Might be an important factor in the conversation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who is Hakim and why are we talking about his razor?

Some Democrats on this thread are laughable, and "Hakim's razor" is just one example.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or have they had the classified documents illegally in their possession for 6+ years (since Obama era)?

Hmmmm

These documents were likely in those places for a matter of days before they were discovered. After being planted by Biden himself during one of his late-night ice cream binges, which he has forgotten.

FIFY.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe this is a Democratic setup. Kamala (or someone in her camp) planted the documents in order to push Biden out.

That makes ZERO sense, simply from the perspective of access. Look at the facts as we know them:

1) Kamala had NO access to these places. None. Zero. Therefore she couldn’t have been responsible for planting them.

2) The secret service is heavily infiltrated with trumpers.

3) The secret service has access to every one of these places, even when the president is not there.



With just those three FACTS - and they are absolute FACTS - in mind, the most obvious scenario here is that the documents were planted by members of the secret service who are trumpers.

Someone earlier mentioned Hakim’s Razor. Well the simplest explanation according to that is that the documents were planted by trump operatives within the secret service. Any other scenario would call for more unsupported assumptions and is therefore less likely.

It really IS just this simple.

LOL Hakim's razor? The simplest explanation is that Trump masterminded this plan in 2017? You may want to look up the word fact.

Definition and explanation
Occam's razor (also known as the 'law of parsimony') is a philosophical tool for 'shaving off' unlikely explanations. Essentially, when faced with competing explanations for the same phenomenon, the simplest is likely the correct one.

It’s curious that so many people here are so anxious to blame Joe and chalk this up as an innocent mistake, while at the same time poo-poo’ing the very possible theory that this entire thing was a set-up by RW actors within the govt, including secret service.

Seriously- why are some of you so quick to dismiss this possibility? Why are some of you (assuming you’re posting in good faith) so quick to deny that this could be a operation designed to harm Joe, brought forth by trump sympathizers within the secret service?

Question for you: did you assume that the documents found in MAL were planted by Democratic operatives? We'll wait while you spin your answer up.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who is Hakim and why are we talking about his razor?

Have you been in a coma for the past two weeks?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is Hakim and why are we talking about his razor?

Have you been in a coma for the past two weeks?

OMG. Whooooooosh...
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe this is a Democratic setup. Kamala (or someone in her camp) planted the documents in order to push Biden out.

That makes ZERO sense, simply from the perspective of access. Look at the facts as we know them:

1) Kamala had NO access to these places. None. Zero. Therefore she couldn’t have been responsible for planting them.

2) The secret service is heavily infiltrated with trumpers.

3) The secret service has access to every one of these places, even when the president is not there.



With just those three FACTS - and they are absolute FACTS - in mind, the most obvious scenario here is that the documents were planted by members of the secret service who are trumpers.

Someone earlier mentioned Hakim’s Razor. Well the simplest explanation according to that is that the documents were planted by trump operatives within the secret service. Any other scenario would call for more unsupported assumptions and is therefore less likely.

It really IS just this simple.

LOL Hakim's razor? The simplest explanation is that Trump masterminded this plan in 2017? You may want to look up the word fact.

Definition and explanation
Occam's razor (also known as the 'law of parsimony') is a philosophical tool for 'shaving off' unlikely explanations. Essentially, when faced with competing explanations for the same phenomenon, the simplest is likely the correct one.

It’s curious that so many people here are so anxious to blame Joe and chalk this up as an innocent mistake, while at the same time poo-poo’ing the very possible theory that this entire thing was a set-up by RW actors within the govt, including secret service.

Seriously- why are some of you so quick to dismiss this possibility? Why are some of you (assuming you’re posting in good faith) so quick to deny that this could be a operation designed to harm Joe, brought forth by trump sympathizers within the secret service?

Question for you: did you assume that the documents found in MAL were planted by Democratic operatives? We'll wait while you spin your answer up.
DP

I’ll humor your ridiculous question:

Trump stole classified nuclear documents to sell them to Russia, Israel and Saudi Arabia. No one planted them. Trump stole them, for personal enrichment to sell them to our enemies. He should be convicted of treason and dealt with as the Rosenbergs were dealt with.


Is that clear enough?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe this is a Democratic setup. Kamala (or someone in her camp) planted the documents in order to push Biden out.

That makes ZERO sense, simply from the perspective of access. Look at the facts as we know them:

1) Kamala had NO access to these places. None. Zero. Therefore she couldn’t have been responsible for planting them.

2) The secret service is heavily infiltrated with trumpers.

3) The secret service has access to every one of these places, even when the president is not there.



With just those three FACTS - and they are absolute FACTS - in mind, the most obvious scenario here is that the documents were planted by members of the secret service who are trumpers.

Someone earlier mentioned Hakim’s Razor. Well the simplest explanation according to that is that the documents were planted by trump operatives within the secret service. Any other scenario would call for more unsupported assumptions and is therefore less likely.

It really IS just this simple.

LOL Hakim's razor? The simplest explanation is that Trump masterminded this plan in 2017? You may want to look up the word fact.

Definition and explanation
Occam's razor (also known as the 'law of parsimony') is a philosophical tool for 'shaving off' unlikely explanations. Essentially, when faced with competing explanations for the same phenomenon, the simplest is likely the correct one.

It’s curious that so many people here are so anxious to blame Joe and chalk this up as an innocent mistake, while at the same time poo-poo’ing the very possible theory that this entire thing was a set-up by RW actors within the govt, including secret service.

Seriously- why are some of you so quick to dismiss this possibility? Why are some of you (assuming you’re posting in good faith) so quick to deny that this could be a operation designed to harm Joe, brought forth by trump sympathizers within the secret service?

Question for you: did you assume that the documents found in MAL were planted by Democratic operatives? We'll wait while you spin your answer up.
DP

I thought the FBI planted them. That’s what Trump said and he wouldn’t lie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe this is a Democratic setup. Kamala (or someone in her camp) planted the documents in order to push Biden out.

That makes ZERO sense, simply from the perspective of access. Look at the facts as we know them:

1) Kamala had NO access to these places. None. Zero. Therefore she couldn’t have been responsible for planting them.

2) The secret service is heavily infiltrated with trumpers.

3) The secret service has access to every one of these places, even when the president is not there.



With just those three FACTS - and they are absolute FACTS - in mind, the most obvious scenario here is that the documents were planted by members of the secret service who are trumpers.

Someone earlier mentioned Hakim’s Razor. Well the simplest explanation according to that is that the documents were planted by trump operatives within the secret service. Any other scenario would call for more unsupported assumptions and is therefore less likely.

It really IS just this simple.

LOL Hakim's razor? The simplest explanation is that Trump masterminded this plan in 2017? You may want to look up the word fact.

Definition and explanation
Occam's razor (also known as the 'law of parsimony') is a philosophical tool for 'shaving off' unlikely explanations. Essentially, when faced with competing explanations for the same phenomenon, the simplest is likely the correct one.

It’s curious that so many people here are so anxious to blame Joe and chalk this up as an innocent mistake, while at the same time poo-poo’ing the very possible theory that this entire thing was a set-up by RW actors within the govt, including secret service.

Seriously- why are some of you so quick to dismiss this possibility? Why are some of you (assuming you’re posting in good faith) so quick to deny that this could be a operation designed to harm Joe, brought forth by trump sympathizers within the secret service?

Question for you: did you assume that the documents found in MAL were planted by Democratic operatives? We'll wait while you spin your answer up.
DP

I’ll humor your ridiculous question:

Trump stole classified nuclear documents to sell them to Russia, Israel and Saudi Arabia. No one planted them. Trump stole them, for personal enrichment to sell them to our enemies. He should be convicted of treason and dealt with as the Rosenbergs were dealt with.


Is that clear enough?

Holy $hit. Someone is really enjoying his/her Friday night.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought the National Archived is supposed to vette the Presidential papers before being sent off to private locations (eg Presidential Libaries). Does this not happen? Is the POTUS or VP just unilaterally take whatever without vetting and review by the government?

That seems really problematic.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh good grief.

Take a break from the internet.

Rather: Try to get the social media consulting firm that serves as the employer to find the original poster a pleasant job promoting a bank, or new Netflix shows, rather than forcing the original poster to focus on destroying America.

[Anonymous]

Yes, of course! Biden has been a great President.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe this is a Democratic setup. Kamala (or someone in her camp) planted the documents in order to push Biden out.

That makes ZERO sense, simply from the perspective of access. Look at the facts as we know them:

1) Kamala had NO access to these places. None. Zero. Therefore she couldn’t have been responsible for planting them.

2) The secret service is heavily infiltrated with trumpers.

3) The secret service has access to every one of these places, even when the president is not there.



With just those three FACTS - and they are absolute FACTS - in mind, the most obvious scenario here is that the documents were planted by members of the secret service who are trumpers.

Someone earlier mentioned Hakim’s Razor. Well the simplest explanation according to that is that the documents were planted by trump operatives within the secret service. Any other scenario would call for more unsupported assumptions and is therefore less likely.

It really IS just this simple.

LOL Hakim's razor? The simplest explanation is that Trump masterminded this plan in 2017? You may want to look up the word fact.

Definition and explanation
Occam's razor (also known as the 'law of parsimony') is a philosophical tool for 'shaving off' unlikely explanations. Essentially, when faced with competing explanations for the same phenomenon, the simplest is likely the correct one.

It’s curious that so many people here are so anxious to blame Joe and chalk this up as an innocent mistake, while at the same time poo-poo’ing the very possible theory that this entire thing was a set-up by RW actors within the govt, including secret service.

Seriously- why are some of you so quick to dismiss this possibility? Why are some of you (assuming you’re posting in good faith) so quick to deny that this could be a operation designed to harm Joe, brought forth by trump sympathizers within the secret service?

Question for you: did you assume that the documents found in MAL were planted by Democratic operatives? We'll wait while you spin your answer up.
DP

I thought the FBI planted them. That’s what Trump said and he wouldn’t lie.

The FBI wanted all cameras cut off, and no lawyers could be present. That raises suspicions right there.

[Anonymous]

The idea that Biden is cooperating and Trump was not is bogus. Trump has an argument that he can keep the documents. Biden does not have authority to have such documents as VP.