Should Biden even continue as POTUS?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems as if many of that 22% frequent the DCUM site.

Yep. This bears repeating (from the article linked):

just 37% of Democrats say they want him to seek a second term

That doesn't mean they won't vote for him. Because every R is a disaster

No. With Dems it is "Vote blue no matter who." Party over country every time.

One word for you-Santos

Nope, one word for you, Fetterman.

[Anonymous]

If things weren't so chaotic in the world, at our border, and with our economy, I would want him to stay for the pure entertainment value.

But, he has screwed things up so badly that both he and his replacement should resign. Neither of them have made a positive difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems as if many of that 22% frequent the DCUM site.

Yep. This bears repeating (from the article linked):

just 37% of Democrats say they want him to seek a second term

That doesn't mean they won't vote for him. Because every R is a disaster

No. With Dems it is "Vote blue no matter who." Party over country every time.

One word for you-Santos

Nope, one word for you, Fetterman.

false equivalency alert

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems as if many of that 22% frequent the DCUM site.

Yep. This bears repeating (from the article linked):

just 37% of Democrats say they want him to seek a second term

That doesn't mean they won't vote for him. Because every R is a disaster

No. With Dems it is "Vote blue no matter who." Party over country every time.

The reason this saying came about is that Democrats often disagree amongst themselves and it makes it harder to get $hit done and have the majority. Republicans are the opposite- get in line or they swing at your knees. But a bloc is effective. Republicans aren’t effective at the complexities of governing, but they are great at sticking together - so this voting cheer is really asking democrats to do what modern republican voters have always done.

The speaker voting was the exact opposite

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If things weren't so chaotic in the world, at our border, and with our economy, I would want him to stay for the pure entertainment value.

But, he has screwed things up so badly that both he and his replacement should resign. Neither of them have made a positive difference.

Our economy? You mean the recession you promised us? You mist be so angry that unemployment is at the lowest ever and inflation is slowing! Boo hoo!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems as if many of that 22% frequent the DCUM site.

Yep. This bears repeating (from the article linked):

just 37% of Democrats say they want him to seek a second term

That doesn't mean they won't vote for him. Because every R is a disaster

No. With Dems it is "Vote blue no matter who." Party over country every time.

Exactly.

No, Dems are voting FOR their country every time they vote for a dem. We are voting for the policies that keep our country a democracy. We can live with a front-man who is kind of dopey and old, as long as it keeps the democracy from becoming a theocracy or autocracy.

Say it with me: We are a representative republic, a Constitutional republic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems as if many of that 22% frequent the DCUM site.

Yep. This bears repeating (from the article linked):

just 37% of Democrats say they want him to seek a second term

That doesn't mean they won't vote for him. Because every R is a disaster

No. With Dems it is "Vote blue no matter who." Party over country every time.

Exactly.

No, Dems are voting FOR their country every time they vote for a dem. We are voting for the policies that keep our country a democracy. We can live with a front-man who is kind of dopey and old, as long as it keeps the democracy from becoming a theocracy or autocracy.

Say it with me: We are a representative republic, a Constitutional republic.

… which is a form of democracy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems as if many of that 22% frequent the DCUM site.

Yep. This bears repeating (from the article linked):

just 37% of Democrats say they want him to seek a second term

That doesn't mean they won't vote for him. Because every R is a disaster

No. With Dems it is "Vote blue no matter who." Party over country every time.

One word for you-Santos

Nope, one word for you, Fetterman.

Uh, Dr. Oz was the other option. You wanted us to vote for a reality star quack with no experience in government or policy proposals? I think Republicans have the market cornered on D-list celebrities and reality TV stars jonesing for elected office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems as if many of that 22% frequent the DCUM site.

Yep. This bears repeating (from the article linked):

just 37% of Democrats say they want him to seek a second term

That doesn't mean they won't vote for him. Because every R is a disaster

No. With Dems it is "Vote blue no matter who." Party over country every time.

One word for you-Santos

Nope, one word for you, Fetterman.

Oh come on. Fetterman's a genuine dude, unlike Santos, whose entire existence is a fabrication. Millions love Fetterman. Can't say the same about Santos, whose own county GOP have denounced him. Fetterman's only issue and liability is his health.

[Anonymous]

Again the real question is:

Should the GOP even continue as a political party?

That's far more of a legitimate question than whether Biden should continue as POTUS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Again the real question is:

Should the GOP even continue as a political party?

That's far more of a legitimate question than whether Biden should continue as POTUS.

Still waiting for their proposal to address the debt ceiling limit. Still waiting for a party platform that isn't a series of slogans or a rehash of something put out in 2016.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems as if many of that 22% frequent the DCUM site.

Yep. This bears repeating (from the article linked):

just 37% of Democrats say they want him to seek a second term

That doesn't mean they won't vote for him. Because every R is a disaster

No. With Dems it is "Vote blue no matter who." Party over country every time.

One word for you-Santos

Nope, one word for you, Fetterman.

false equivalency alert

+1
And I don’t see Democrats filing petitions with thousands of signatures from their own party insisting that he resign.

[Anonymous]

Biden wiped the floor with Republicans, over the last two years and at the SOTU. Not only should he stay, I'm looking forward to him continue doing so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems as if many of that 22% frequent the DCUM site.

Yep. This bears repeating (from the article linked):

just 37% of Democrats say they want him to seek a second term

That doesn't mean they won't vote for him. Because every R is a disaster

No. With Dems it is "Vote blue no matter who." Party over country every time.

One word for you-Santos

Nope, one word for you, Fetterman.

Oh come on. Fetterman's a genuine dude, unlike Santos, whose entire existence is a fabrication. Millions love Fetterman. Can't say the same about Santos, whose own county GOP have denounced him. Fetterman's only issue and liability is his health.

A "genuine dude" who lied about the severity of his condition. If you call that "genuine,"......

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems as if many of that 22% frequent the DCUM site.

Yep. This bears repeating (from the article linked):

just 37% of Democrats say they want him to seek a second term

That doesn't mean they won't vote for him. Because every R is a disaster

No. With Dems it is "Vote blue no matter who." Party over country every time.

One word for you-Santos

Nope, one word for you, Fetterman.

Oh come on. Fetterman's a genuine dude, unlike Santos, whose entire existence is a fabrication. Millions love Fetterman. Can't say the same about Santos, whose own county GOP have denounced him. Fetterman's only issue and liability is his health.

A "genuine dude" who lied about the severity of his condition. If you call that "genuine,"......

No he did not lie

That is your whole team. Republicans lie every single day. From MTG/Boebert idiots to Hawley running man and Cruz crap. Rick Scott is a liar. They all lie fact!.

Fetterman is a better man than any republcian any idiot maga moron and any chirstian creepy nationalist.