| I would feel comfortable being a SAHM in your position. |
| I love my SAH life. There’s definitely a trade off to have it, but I wouldn’t trade it for anything. I have my own accounts, but mostly just enjoy living my life and having the freedom to choose what to do with my day every day. It’s wonderful. |
There is not a 30% chance of this. |
It’s my goal. I think other posters are just jealous. I will be inheriting millions from my parents and do not plan on working another day. |
Superfund some 529s and be the owner. That is what I did. And once the 5 years is up, I am going to super fund them again. Just do not be dumb. Be involved in your finances. If your husband is not the kind of guy who is ok with this, don’t give up your job. |
It's very easy to assume others are just jealous in your position. Most women arent |
So what? Super funded 529s is just for kids. You need to have at least $5mm in own assets as a woman to have about $150k spent budget in present value at retirement. It's a very high goal for most people even with law partner husbands. I've got $4mm and still work |
Alternatively don’t procreate with the type of man who would liquidate 529s upon divorce. If things are that bad and he’s being that hateful then I don’t see exactly what having a job would even do for you. This guy apparently wiped out millions of dollars, liquidated a 401k, moved money offshore and then closed his kids’ 529s? That’s all a special kind of evil and I’m not sure being gainfully employed is really going to improve things that much. |
Right. That kind of guy is going scorched earth regardless of your $100k job or not. |
Obviously she’d need to downgrade her lifestyle. But if she divorces a high earner she’s going to have to do that anyway. Even high earners would struggle to replicate their lifestyle for a second house and expenses. I’m not sure that staying gainfully employed is the solution you think it is. |
+10000000 The 100-200k job isn’t going to do that much for you if you’re divorcing a man like that. A man like that will also try to keep your kids from you. In a situation like that you’re better off just staying married and trying to ignore the DH. Not worth all of that drama and he’s likely busy at work anyway. |
That's an odd way to view a marriage and family. |
With a man like that I would be more concerned he would physically harm me or the kids than I’d be worried about not having a job. |
|
So she keeps working, and when the evil man divorces her, he wipes out all the accounts, leaving her without her earnings anyway.
In the evil man divorce scenario, the only people "saved" are those who can fall back on family money he can't touch or those who were equally "evil" and hid some of their own assets knowing divorce was likely. Her 100K salary isn't going to cover a place to live near her kids in the $2mil house, double of all their belongings, and attorneys fees. Live the life you are in now, OP. Be financially smart, but don't live in fear of worst case scenarios. That's no life. |
NP. It’s not that uncommon a scenario in wealthy people divorce. I would say what the PP described is actually pretty average in high net worth divorce. |