Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?

[Anonymous]

Are Republicans really trying to pretend like candidate quality matters over someone who will reliably vote with the "team"? They have already admitted that's all that matters -- see Herschel Walker.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I donated $100 to Fetterman this morning.

Thanks for the inspiration, trolls.

Proves the political elite point. Blue collar folk are not giving 100 to anything if they can’t pay their bills.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are Republicans really trying to pretend like candidate quality matters over someone who will reliably vote with the "team"? They have already admitted that's all that matters -- see Herschel Walker.

Dem here. No, I'm not. But I'm not going to vote for a stroke victim on principle. Unfortunately for you/us, Dems are intelligent and want candidates fully capable of rising to the occasion and leading with erudite passion. The GOP would vote for a potato as long as it was willing to ban abortion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GOP trolls are out in force. First, they predicted Hilary was dying & cognitively impaired (or even dead with a body double acting as her), Biden was also cognitively impaired..., now Fettermen.

Can you trolls, ever rest?

DEM here - I never believed either. I do think we could do better than people who are declining in health - mentally or physically. No more stroke victims please. Where is our new Obama (the man, not the woman)?

Sure, campaign for candidates with better policies, better health, better temperament, and better integrity during the primary. However after the primary is over, there should be no qualms about voting for a Democratic candidate who had a stroke over a dishonest, fascist, fraud GOP candidate.

Stop feeding the trolls, they are out to torpedo a good (not perfect) Democratic candidate so that GOP can take over the senate and McConnell can block all ob Biden's court nominations. Understand what is at stake Democrats and Independents!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are Republicans really trying to pretend like candidate quality matters over someone who will reliably vote with the "team"? They have already admitted that's all that matters -- see Herschel Walker.

Dem here. No, I'm not. But I'm not going to vote for a stroke victim on principle. Unfortunately for you/us, Dems are intelligent and want candidates fully capable of rising to the occasion and leading with erudite passion. The GOP would vote for a potato as long as it was willing to ban abortion.

You have idiotic principles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GOP trolls are out in force. First, they predicted Hilary was dying & cognitively impaired (or even dead with a body double acting as her), Biden was also cognitively impaired..., now Fettermen.

Can you trolls, ever rest?

DEM here - I never believed either. I do think we could do better than people who are declining in health - mentally or physically. No more stroke victims please. Where is our new Obama (the man, not the woman)?

Sure, campaign for candidates with better policies, better health, better temperament, and better integrity during the primary. However after the primary is over, there should be no qualms about voting for a Democratic candidate who had a stroke over a dishonest, fascist, fraud GOP candidate.

Stop feeding the trolls, they are out to torpedo a good (not perfect) Democratic candidate so that GOP can take over the senate and McConnell can block all ob Biden's court nominations. Understand what is at stake Democrats and Independents!

You're kidding right? Anyone with a mental impairment as serious as a stroke has decreased faculties. His literal job is think of legislation and policy affecting the entire country. Its not like he's running for foreman of a coal plant.

He is not a good or perfect candidate. He's flat-lined. Speaking of which, when is Feinstein stepping down?

[Anonymous]

Those of you trashing Fetterman clearly have issues with those with disabilities or differing abilities. So I'm calling the bigots for what they are. Difficulty with speech does not mean mentally impaired. There is nothing to indicate that he is mentally impaired or has worse odds of keeling over than the dozens of 80 year olds in Congress right now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GOP trolls are out in force. First, they predicted Hilary was dying & cognitively impaired (or even dead with a body double acting as her), Biden was also cognitively impaired..., now Fettermen.

Can you trolls, ever rest?

DEM here - I never believed either. I do think we could do better than people who are declining in health - mentally or physically. No more stroke victims please. Where is our new Obama (the man, not the woman)?

Sure, campaign for candidates with better policies, better health, better temperament, and better integrity during the primary. However after the primary is over, there should be no qualms about voting for a Democratic candidate who had a stroke over a dishonest, fascist, fraud GOP candidate.

Stop feeding the trolls, they are out to torpedo a good (not perfect) Democratic candidate so that GOP can take over the senate and McConnell can block all ob Biden's court nominations. Understand what is at stake Democrats and Independents!

You're kidding right? Anyone with a mental impairment as serious as a stroke has decreased faculties. His literal job is think of legislation and policy affecting the entire country. Its not like he's running for foreman of a coal plant.

He is not a good or perfect candidate. He's flat-lined. Speaking of which, when is Feinstein stepping down?

He doesn't have a mental impairment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are Republicans really trying to pretend like candidate quality matters over someone who will reliably vote with the "team"? They have already admitted that's all that matters -- see Herschel Walker.

Control of the Senate and/or House is what's desired by both parties. It's politics as usual.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. I honestly don’t get what all the fuss is. I watched it and was expecting someone drooling and barely understandable. Instead I saw someone who stumbles over words. I’d still rather have that than the slimy grifter Oz.

None of my friends in PA (a lot of them, I have a lot of connections there) are voting for Oz and their minds didn’t change post debate. They don’t want a carpetbagger.

Good for them for staying “true to the gang”

Unlike those unprincipled New Yorkers. They had the gall to put carpetbagger Hillary Rodham Clinton into one of their senate seats, even though she had no ties to that state at all.

Man, she really does live rent free in y'alls heads, doesn't she? Good for her. LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Those of you trashing Fetterman clearly have issues with those with disabilities or differing abilities. So I'm calling the bigots for what they are. Difficulty with speech does not mean mentally impaired. There is nothing to indicate that he is mentally impaired or has worse odds of keeling over than the dozens of 80 year olds in Congress right now.

He does not have a stutter. He had a stroke caused by a blood clot. He is also not releasing his medical records. If he wants to be re-categorized as disabled have at it, but there is a big difference between a speech impediment caused by anxiety and one cause by a debilitating medical condition that cut off oxygen to his brain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Those of you trashing Fetterman clearly have issues with those with disabilities or differing abilities. So I'm calling the bigots for what they are. Difficulty with speech does not mean mentally impaired. There is nothing to indicate that he is mentally impaired or has worse odds of keeling over than the dozens of 80 year olds in Congress right now.

I think he’s wildly unqualified. What has he accomplished to earn the nomination? He had to supported by his parents into his 40s and his greatest accomplishment seems to be running a small town into the ground.

Why don’t you share what you think his qualifications are?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of you trashing Fetterman clearly have issues with those with disabilities or differing abilities. So I'm calling the bigots for what they are. Difficulty with speech does not mean mentally impaired. There is nothing to indicate that he is mentally impaired or has worse odds of keeling over than the dozens of 80 year olds in Congress right now.

I think he’s wildly unqualified. What has he accomplished to earn the nomination? He had to supported by his parents into his 40s and his greatest accomplishment seems to be running a small town into the ground.

Why don’t you share what you think his qualifications are?

That too. I already thought he was a poor candidate pre-stroke. Like what happened to Senators who were lawyers? Judges? Former governors?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of you trashing Fetterman clearly have issues with those with disabilities or differing abilities. So I'm calling the bigots for what they are. Difficulty with speech does not mean mentally impaired. There is nothing to indicate that he is mentally impaired or has worse odds of keeling over than the dozens of 80 year olds in Congress right now.

I think he’s wildly unqualified. What has he accomplished to earn the nomination? He had to supported by his parents into his 40s and his greatest accomplishment seems to be running a small town into the ground.

Why don’t you share what you think his qualifications are?

lol

These are bs talking points. Now we know how unserious you are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of you trashing Fetterman clearly have issues with those with disabilities or differing abilities. So I'm calling the bigots for what they are. Difficulty with speech does not mean mentally impaired. There is nothing to indicate that he is mentally impaired or has worse odds of keeling over than the dozens of 80 year olds in Congress right now.

I think he’s wildly unqualified. What has he accomplished to earn the nomination? He had to supported by his parents into his 40s and his greatest accomplishment seems to be running a small town into the ground.

Why don’t you share what you think his qualifications are?

lol

These are bs talking points. Now we know how unserious you are.

NP. You sound like those imbeciles who were insisting McAuliffe was winning right up until the election was called and Wolf Blitzer looked like was going to cry. Honest to god, enough with the quips. Get your head out of the sand. Democrats have had 6 months to recognize Fetterman was a poor candidate and a YEAR to focus on inflation instead of other crap. Did neither.