2022 Senate Map

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just realized that even if it just stays 50-50, this is a big fat failure for Rick Scott, the Senator in charge of winning the GOP Senate seats this cycle. Early in it seemed like he was using his position to elevate his own profile and not those of his candidates. He’s the one that came out with the idiot tax everyone and get rid of Social Security and Medicare agenda. Yay.

I swear I posted this before I saw this article:

It feels like time for a Republicans in disarray! masterthread.

Also - seriously, where do they go from here? The obvious thing is to cultivate the normal Republicans and cut MAGA loose, or try to defang them as much as possible - but can they do that?

They need MAGA to win. 2024 is a great map for them, they have the house, and they’ll be running against Biden. The can stay the course and have a reasonably good shot at Congress and the presidency in two years

Which is why Biden must not run again. Time for dynamic, *articulate* new blood.

Except Biden beat Trump and overperformed in the midterms against MAGA candidates.

I feel like it's time to recognize MAGA as something that hurts Republicans in the polls, it doesn't help them. How many times do they have to lose? Yes the maps are better in the next cycle - but didn't they just learn that voters don't want their lousy MAGA candidates?

MAGA is horrible for them, but they haven't figured out how to get rid of it without Trump burning the whole thing down. They made a deal with the devil in 2016.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just realized that even if it just stays 50-50, this is a big fat failure for Rick Scott, the Senator in charge of winning the GOP Senate seats this cycle. Early in it seemed like he was using his position to elevate his own profile and not those of his candidates. He’s the one that came out with the idiot tax everyone and get rid of Social Security and Medicare agenda. Yay.

I swear I posted this before I saw this article:

It feels like time for a Republicans in disarray! masterthread.

Also - seriously, where do they go from here? The obvious thing is to cultivate the normal Republicans and cut MAGA loose, or try to defang them as much as possible - but can they do that?

They need MAGA to win. 2024 is a great map for them, they have the house, and they’ll be running against Biden. The can stay the course and have a reasonably good shot at Congress and the presidency in two years

Which is why Biden must not run again. Time for dynamic, *articulate* new blood.

Except Biden beat Trump and overperformed in the midterms against MAGA candidates.

I feel like it's time to recognize MAGA as something that hurts Republicans in the polls, it doesn't help them. How many times do they have to lose? Yes the maps are better in the next cycle - but didn't they just learn that voters don't want their lousy MAGA candidates?

MAGA is horrible for them, but they haven't figured out how to get rid of it without Trump burning the whole thing down. They made a deal with the devil in 2016.

Oh, they are in a terrible position as a party - and it's all their own fault. I just find it really funny that after all these shellackings they're still coming here trying to give advice to Dems about what we HAVE to do and changes we have to make because MAGA is otherwise too strong to defeat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just realized that even if it just stays 50-50, this is a big fat failure for Rick Scott, the Senator in charge of winning the GOP Senate seats this cycle. Early in it seemed like he was using his position to elevate his own profile and not those of his candidates. He’s the one that came out with the idiot tax everyone and get rid of Social Security and Medicare agenda. Yay.

I swear I posted this before I saw this article:

It feels like time for a Republicans in disarray! masterthread.

Also - seriously, where do they go from here? The obvious thing is to cultivate the normal Republicans and cut MAGA loose, or try to defang them as much as possible - but can they do that?

They need MAGA to win. 2024 is a great map for them, they have the house, and they’ll be running against Biden. The can stay the course and have a reasonably good shot at Congress and the presidency in two years

Which is why Biden must not run again. Time for dynamic, *articulate* new blood.

Except Biden beat Trump and overperformed in the midterms against MAGA candidates.

I feel like it's time to recognize MAGA as something that hurts Republicans in the polls, it doesn't help them. How many times do they have to lose? Yes the maps are better in the next cycle - but didn't they just learn that voters don't want their lousy MAGA candidates?

MAGA is horrible for them, but they haven't figured out how to get rid of it without Trump burning the whole thing down. They made a deal with the devil in 2016.

Oh, they are in a terrible position as a party - and it's all their own fault. I just find it really funny that after all these shellackings they're still coming here trying to give advice to Dems about what we HAVE to do and changes we have to make because MAGA is otherwise too strong to defeat.

They also have to stand for something. They need actual policies not just be against any D policies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just realized that even if it just stays 50-50, this is a big fat failure for Rick Scott, the Senator in charge of winning the GOP Senate seats this cycle. Early in it seemed like he was using his position to elevate his own profile and not those of his candidates. He’s the one that came out with the idiot tax everyone and get rid of Social Security and Medicare agenda. Yay.

I swear I posted this before I saw this article:

It feels like time for a Republicans in disarray! masterthread.

Also - seriously, where do they go from here? The obvious thing is to cultivate the normal Republicans and cut MAGA loose, or try to defang them as much as possible - but can they do that?

They need MAGA to win. 2024 is a great map for them, they have the house, and they’ll be running against Biden. The can stay the course and have a reasonably good shot at Congress and the presidency in two years

Which is why Biden must not run again. Time for dynamic, *articulate* new blood.

Except Biden beat Trump and overperformed in the midterms against MAGA candidates.

I feel like it's time to recognize MAGA as something that hurts Republicans in the polls, it doesn't help them. How many times do they have to lose? Yes the maps are better in the next cycle - but didn't they just learn that voters don't want their lousy MAGA candidates?

I'm the poster above who said Biden needs to go. I am left-wing. He needs to go: he has declined considerably these past few years, because the Presidency wrings the lifeblood out of people, and he makes an unacceptable number of gaffes. He's a NICE GUY. I LIKE HIM. HE'S HAD MANY ACHIEVEMENTS. But he will not survive a DeSantis challenge.

Make no mistake. Trump is done. It's DeSantis now, and he can out-debate Biden with both feet stuck up his nose hanging upside down over a bucket of semolina.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just realized that even if it just stays 50-50, this is a big fat failure for Rick Scott, the Senator in charge of winning the GOP Senate seats this cycle. Early in it seemed like he was using his position to elevate his own profile and not those of his candidates. He’s the one that came out with the idiot tax everyone and get rid of Social Security and Medicare agenda. Yay.

I swear I posted this before I saw this article:

It feels like time for a Republicans in disarray! masterthread.

Also - seriously, where do they go from here? The obvious thing is to cultivate the normal Republicans and cut MAGA loose, or try to defang them as much as possible - but can they do that?

They need MAGA to win. 2024 is a great map for them, they have the house, and they’ll be running against Biden. The can stay the course and have a reasonably good shot at Congress and the presidency in two years

Which is why Biden must not run again. Time for dynamic, *articulate* new blood.

Except Biden beat Trump and overperformed in the midterms against MAGA candidates.

I feel like it's time to recognize MAGA as something that hurts Republicans in the polls, it doesn't help them. How many times do they have to lose? Yes the maps are better in the next cycle - but didn't they just learn that voters don't want their lousy MAGA candidates?

I'm the poster above who said Biden needs to go. I am left-wing. He needs to go: he has declined considerably these past few years, because the Presidency wrings the lifeblood out of people, and he makes an unacceptable number of gaffes. He's a NICE GUY. I LIKE HIM. HE'S HAD MANY ACHIEVEMENTS. But he will not survive a DeSantis challenge.

Make no mistake. Trump is done. It's DeSantis now, and he can out-debate Biden with both feet stuck up his nose hanging upside down over a bucket of semolina.

The winner of the debate doesn't get handed the keys to the White House. If that were true then Hillary would have been president. DeSantis is a weird character. He's a bad debater, too, for what that's worth.

Anyway - we'll see. This doesn't have to be decided today. Let's get through midterms.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’d like to have some of whatever this Simon Rosenberg is smoking.

Heh heh heh

[Anonymous]

Laxalt’s lead down to 8000 votes, less than 1%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d like to have some of whatever this Simon Rosenberg is smoking.

Heh heh heh

I posted the comment doubting Rosenberg and I’ve never been more glad to have been proved wrong.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Great job!
All eyes on Nevada now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d like to have some of whatever this Simon Rosenberg is smoking.

Heh heh heh

I posted the comment doubting Rosenberg and I’ve never been more glad to have been proved wrong.

Woohoo!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just realized that even if it just stays 50-50, this is a big fat failure for Rick Scott, the Senator in charge of winning the GOP Senate seats this cycle. Early in it seemed like he was using his position to elevate his own profile and not those of his candidates. He’s the one that came out with the idiot tax everyone and get rid of Social Security and Medicare agenda. Yay.

OOOOOOOOPS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This is huge, I am so happy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just realized that even if it just stays 50-50, this is a big fat failure for Rick Scott, the Senator in charge of winning the GOP Senate seats this cycle. Early in it seemed like he was using his position to elevate his own profile and not those of his candidates. He’s the one that came out with the idiot tax everyone and get rid of Social Security and Medicare agenda. Yay.

OOOOOOOOPS

Wow. Embarassing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d like to have some of whatever this Simon Rosenberg is smoking.

Heh heh heh

I posted the comment doubting Rosenberg and I’ve never been more glad to have been proved wrong.

It wasn’t just you. I know I posted a few Rosenberg tweets over the last few weeks and people had a lot of negative things to say, which I still don’t understand given that some of the posts he made were about the early vote count.

Anyway, I’m glad you were wrong, too!