Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now the argument is, everything done before this vote on Thursday is illegitimate and doesn't count.

Good one, particularly in light of the court already affirming the proceedings are legitimate.

The GOP is feckless.

Agree, but the counter argument is if it didn’t count before, let’s do all the testimony again, this time in public.

I think thst was their intent all along.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the impeachment is focused on Ukraine right. So why did the House request the grand jury materials from DOJ. Do you think the House is going to do an article on obstruction of justice?

Worth noting that the request for the grand jury materials predated the Ukraine stuff coming to light. I’m not exactly sure whether they’re going to do a giant laundry list or focus on Ukraine.

If I was Pelosi, I would send the articles of impeachment on Ukraine to the Senate and start working on a new set of articles. Send articles of impeachment to Senate on a flow basis - there's only so much time they can dedicate to investigating his corruption.

Nope, there is one bite at the apple on this. You have to get it airtight and 100% right.

Says who?

Legally they can impeach him every day from now until he leaves office. Politically, if they can't convince 20 Republicans that he deserves conviction now, then nothing will and another impeachment trial will just look stupid.

Stupid? Nope.

Ok, so what would be the point? There's.a ton of evidence, Mulvaney confessed and Trump did in public what he claims he didn't.do in private.

If they can't convince the Senate now, what would convince them next time? Why bother? So the history books can say he was the first to be impeached?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the impeachment is focused on Ukraine right. So why did the House request the grand jury materials from DOJ. Do you think the House is going to do an article on obstruction of justice?

Worth noting that the request for the grand jury materials predated the Ukraine stuff coming to light. I’m not exactly sure whether they’re going to do a giant laundry list or focus on Ukraine.

If I was Pelosi, I would send the articles of impeachment on Ukraine to the Senate and start working on a new set of articles. Send articles of impeachment to Senate on a flow basis - there's only so much time they can dedicate to investigating his corruption.

Nope, there is one bite at the apple on this. You have to get it airtight and 100% right.

Says who?

Legally they can impeach him every day from now until he leaves office. Politically, if they can't convince 20 Republicans that he deserves conviction now, then nothing will and another impeachment trial will just look stupid.

Stupid? Nope.

Ok, so what would be the point? There's.a ton of evidence, Mulvaney confessed and Trump did in public what he claims he didn't.do in private.

If they can't convince the Senate now, what would convince them next time? Why bother? So the history books can say he was the first to be impeached? *

* First to be impeached twice.

[Anonymous]

Please stop wasting our taxes. She should be locked up for causing so many problems in the great country

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Please stop wasting our taxes. She should be locked up for causing so many problems in the great country

Ivanka? I agree. That’s a one-woman crime spree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now the argument is, everything done before this vote on Thursday is illegitimate and doesn't count.

Good one, particularly in light of the court already affirming the proceedings are legitimate.

The GOP is feckless.

Agree, but the counter argument is if it didn’t count before, let’s do all the testimony again, this time in public.

I think thst was their intent all along.

Well, yeah.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please stop wasting our taxes. She should be locked up for causing so many problems in the great country

Ivanka? I agree. That’s a one-woman crime spree.

And her 10th wedding anniversary party at Camp David? Ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Please stop wasting our taxes. She should be locked up for causing so many problems in the great country

She caved. LOVE IT!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please stop wasting our taxes. She should be locked up for causing so many problems in the great country

She caved. LOVE IT!

No, she is playing her hand, dummy.

New witness who was on the call is now corroborating whistleblower. Trump is guilty. Case closed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please stop wasting our taxes. She should be locked up for causing so many problems in the great country

She caved. LOVE IT!

You love that the impeachment inquiry is proceeding briskly?

[Anonymous]

I know I do!

My republican Prince William County sister in law said she wants Trump locked up. The world has tilted on its axis. If he's lost her he's in deep do do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please stop wasting our taxes. She should be locked up for causing so many problems in the great country

She caved. LOVE IT!

No, she is playing her hand, dummy.

New witness who was on the call is now corroborating whistleblower. Trump is guilty. Case closed.

New witness is saying he was alarmed. He is not stating that he heard quid pro quo. It is within a President's right to do what Trump did, regardless of whether Democrats like it or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please stop wasting our taxes. She should be locked up for causing so many problems in the great country

She caved. LOVE IT!

No, she is playing her hand, dummy.

New witness who was on the call is now corroborating whistleblower. Trump is guilty. Case closed.

Your witness - and others - will now have to face cross-examination, so to speak.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Please stop wasting our taxes. She should be locked up for causing so many problems in the great country


She caved. LOVE IT!


No, she is playing her hand, dummy.

New witness who was on the call is now corroborating whistleblower. Trump is guilty. Case closed.


New witness is saying he was alarmed. He is not stating that he heard quid pro quo. It is within a President's right to do what Trump did, regardless of whether Democrats like it or not.

A president can ask a foreign power to dig up dirt on a private US citizen and withhold taxpayer security aid money that has been voted on by Congress until said foreign country comes up with the dirt? Oooooookay, sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Please stop wasting our taxes. She should be locked up for causing so many problems in the great country


She caved. LOVE IT!


No, she is playing her hand, dummy.

New witness who was on the call is now corroborating whistleblower. Trump is guilty. Case closed.


New witness is saying he was alarmed. He is not stating that he heard quid pro quo. It is within a President's right to do what Trump did, regardless of whether Democrats like it or not.

A president can ask a foreign power to dig up dirt on a private US citizen and withhold taxpayer security aid money that has been voted on by Congress until said foreign country comes up with the dirt? Oooooookay, sure.

Again, there was no quo. And yes, we have a treaty with Ukraine, and Biden was not a private citizen at the time Hunter got his lucrative contracts.