She picked Tim

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Imagine thinking that mocking a governor who is providing feminine hygiene products for (low income) students so they don't have the extra burden of blood-stained clothing, is some sort of "own"?

Who in the hell could support such an insidious, selfish, hateful political party as the GOP? And I don't even care if you hate the Dems, but the GOP is just scummy.

Um... no one has mocked him for providing girls with sanitary products. The point is, why is he also providing BOYS with the same sanitary products??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are gains that can be excluded from income for personal residences. Also you can put money into teacher pension plans. So if he had money he probably put it there.

The tax laws are pretty strict. I doubt he could put $300,000 into a pension at once. There should be annual limits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Imagine thinking that mocking a governor who is providing feminine hygiene products for (low income) students so they don't have the extra burden of blood-stained clothing, is some sort of "own"?

Who in the hell could support such an insidious, selfish, hateful political party as the GOP? And I don't even care if you hate the Dems, but the GOP is just scummy.

I think it’s that he’s putting menstrual products in the boys’ room that’s an issue, not free menstrual products. Doesn’t anyone have common sense now?

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Imagine thinking that mocking a governor who is providing feminine hygiene products for (low income) students so they don't have the extra burden of blood-stained clothing, is some sort of "own"?

Who in the hell could support such an insidious, selfish, hateful political party as the GOP? And I don't even care if you hate the Dems, but the GOP is just scummy.

Um... no one has mocked him for providing girls with sanitary products. The point is, why is he also providing BOYS with the same sanitary products??

MAGA’s obsession with what goes on in bathrooms is just weird and creepy. Why does this topic take up so much space in your heads?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So if they are not investing their money, where is it going?

Well let’s see, for decades they were both teachers who don’t make much money. They needed IVF to have their kids, and one of them has a learning disability. Sent both kids to college. He was in Congress where you need to maintain a place to stay here as well as your residence. Now he’s the Governor. Not sure they really ever had a lot of extra money. But I’m sure we’ll find out more when we see their tax returns.

Yeah this sounds like most people I know. Other poster is in a sweet bubble.

I’m a bit worried about his money management skills, honestly. Time will tell, I guess.

This isn’t helping the socialist/commie accusations. Not owning a home at 60+ as a current governor is embarrassing. He was former military so there’s no excuse to not owning a home.

He’s cheap

DP. He sold his home. He is the real deal—a public servant, a leader, a National Guardsman, and someone who cares about people. That money and property ownership may not matter that much to him is admirable. Having said that, if and when he wants to write a book or whatever, he will quickly have more money than pretty much anyone posting here. Tim Walz will be vp and, eventually, president. He will take this country to a better place.

Ok but my money better matter to this loony socialist. When I am 60, I don’t want to be broke like he is.

Or like Trump who has to use his political funds to pay his legal bills because he’s BROKE?

I’d rather be Trump broke than Walz broke

Why have people decided Walz is broke? He could have his money in pension plans and an interest bearing savings account.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Imagine thinking that mocking a governor who is providing feminine hygiene products for (low income) students so they don't have the extra burden of blood-stained clothing, is some sort of "own"?

Who in the hell could support such an insidious, selfish, hateful political party as the GOP? And I don't even care if you hate the Dems, but the GOP is just scummy.

Um... no one has mocked him for providing girls with sanitary products. The point is, why is he also providing BOYS with the same sanitary products??

Because the girls bathrooms always run out, so it is easy to ask a friend to grab one from the boys room.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Imagine thinking that mocking a governor who is providing feminine hygiene products for (low income) students so they don't have the extra burden of blood-stained clothing, is some sort of "own"?

Who in the hell could support such an insidious, selfish, hateful political party as the GOP? And I don't even care if you hate the Dems, but the GOP is just scummy.

Um... no one has mocked him for providing girls with sanitary products. The point is, why is he also providing BOYS with the same sanitary products??

"Um"....Bull. SH*T.

What you're doing is moving the goal posts now that the attempt to mock him FAILED. I saw the comments when it was first said and it wasn't about "boys." They called him that simply for putting it in the school bathrooms for free.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Imagine thinking that mocking a governor who is providing feminine hygiene products for (low income) students so they don't have the extra burden of blood-stained clothing, is some sort of "own"?

Who in the hell could support such an insidious, selfish, hateful political party as the GOP? And I don't even care if you hate the Dems, but the GOP is just scummy.

I think it’s that he’s putting menstrual products in the boys’ room that’s an issue, not free menstrual products. Doesn’t anyone have common sense now?

Exactly.

Exactly WRONG. The idiocy from the right was that THEY were claiming via leaders of their clown car that simply putting sanitary napkins in bathrooms would ENCOURAGE transition. In other words, the usual stupidity from the right-wing. A boy who is hetero will see the dispenser and just decide he wants to become a woman.

So per usual, the reich-wing tries to engage in hysterics and hyperbole when 99.9% of the ones using the dispenser are GIRLS and it was meant for girls, but because teh right has NOTHING to offer the American people but their bile, they want to focus on a baker's dozen of trans kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Imagine thinking that mocking a governor who is providing feminine hygiene products for (low income) students so they don't have the extra burden of blood-stained clothing, is some sort of "own"?

Who in the hell could support such an insidious, selfish, hateful political party as the GOP? And I don't even care if you hate the Dems, but the GOP is just scummy.

I think it’s that he’s putting menstrual products in the boys’ room that’s an issue, not free menstrual products. Doesn’t anyone have common sense now?

Exactly.

Because if someone identifies as a boy and is biologically female, they may need menstrual products. This happens. It’s ok.

Or if a boy has a friend, girlfriend, or sister who may need menstrual products, they can get them. Normalize menstruation. Again, it’s ok.

What’s not ok is the GOP’s obsession with everyone’s genitals and bodily functions. Ick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who would you rather have as a father - JD (shut the hell up) Vance or Tim Walz?

Do we get to vote on who our fathers are? I thought we were voting for the presidential/vice presidential ticket?

[Anonymous]

Radio ad for Walz’s first run for Congress. Amazing. Once elected he voted for the Affordable Care Act even though everyone thought if he did he would lose. He did not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who would you rather have as a father - JD (shut the hell up) Vance or Tim Walz?

Do we get to vote on who our fathers are? I thought we were voting for the presidential/vice presidential ticket?

It’s an interesting thought experiment, along the lines of - JD, Walz, or Bear?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Imagine thinking that mocking a governor who is providing feminine hygiene products for (low income) students so they don't have the extra burden of blood-stained clothing, is some sort of "own"?

Who in the hell could support such an insidious, selfish, hateful political party as the GOP? And I don't even care if you hate the Dems, but the GOP is just scummy.

I think it’s that he’s putting menstrual products in the boys’ room that’s an issue, not free menstrual products. Doesn’t anyone have common sense now?

Exactly.

Exactly WRONG. The idiocy from the right was that THEY were claiming via leaders of their clown car that simply putting sanitary napkins in bathrooms would ENCOURAGE transition. In other words, the usual stupidity from the right-wing. A boy who is hetero will see the dispenser and just decide he wants to become a woman.

So per usual, the reich-wing tries to engage in hysterics and hyperbole when 99.9% of the ones using the dispenser are GIRLS and it was meant for girls, but because teh right has NOTHING to offer the American people but their bile, they want to focus on a baker's dozen of trans kids.

And so these products were made available in the boys’ room because…??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So if they are not investing their money, where is it going?

Well let’s see, for decades they were both teachers who don’t make much money. They needed IVF to have their kids, and one of them has a learning disability. Sent both kids to college. He was in Congress where you need to maintain a place to stay here as well as your residence. Now he’s the Governor. Not sure they really ever had a lot of extra money. But I’m sure we’ll find out more when we see their tax returns.

Yeah this sounds like most people I know. Other poster is in a sweet bubble.

I’m a bit worried about his money management skills, honestly. Time will tell, I guess.

This isn’t helping the socialist/commie accusations. Not owning a home at 60+ as a current governor is embarrassing. He was former military so there’s no excuse to not owning a home.

He’s cheap

DP. He sold his home. He is the real deal—a public servant, a leader, a National Guardsman, and someone who cares about people. That money and property ownership may not matter that much to him is admirable. Having said that, if and when he wants to write a book or whatever, he will quickly have more money than pretty much anyone posting here. Tim Walz will be vp and, eventually, president. He will take this country to a better place.

Ok but my money better matter to this loony socialist. When I am 60, I don’t want to be broke like he is.

He is not broke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who would you rather have as a father - JD (shut the hell up) Vance or Tim Walz?

Do we get to vote on who our fathers are? I thought we were voting for the presidential/vice presidential ticket?

It’s an interesting thought experiment, along the lines of - JD, Walz, or Bear?

I swear my mom always votes based on who she would want to be married to. She didn’t vote for either Reagan or Clinton! She liked Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama a lot, and also the senior George Bush. And I think Lyndon Johnskn. And voted for Kennedy but wasn’t happy about it — only because the alternative was Nixon! I think many people vote on these apolitical metrics.