Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"FBI advised that they believed Flynn believed what he was saying was true."

FBI determined "Flynn was not acting as an agent of Russia."

What kind of idiot believes something an anonymous twitter user posts? If there were any truth he would post under a real name. Techno Fog doesn't stand by his own statement. Get out of here with that crap. It should be deleted.

Flynn is still a traitor.

I know it is frustrating for you to know that these agents didn't believe he was lying AND that this information was withheld from Flynn's defense team.
It must be disappointing to come to the realization that you have been hoodwinked by the left's lies all along.
This twitter user simply posted the latest documents released. What is not to believe?

These are the same docs that Catherine Herridge has posted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The breadth and depth of "Trump-Russia" - there is a lot here so be patient.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1198565009925775361.html

And none of this includes Rudy's role in getting rid of the Italian mob so the Russia mob could come into NY without a bloodbath.

This woman is insane.
I stopped reading when she referenced Carter Page as a Russian agent.

Except the part where *checks 302's* Page admits he's a Russian agent

Oh, FFS.
Eric Garland is a tool. He is full of fake news. A conspiracy theorist.

Carter Page was hinting that he was working for the CIA, which has since been revealed to be fact.
Clinesmith - FBI - falsified a document stating such.

It appears Page tries to hint to the FBI agents that he was working on behalf of the CIA as a source for the RIS, and give them some idea of where the Russian collusion narrative began. Page at one point references the 9/11 commission report conclusion, which identifies a major cause of the intelligence failure as the lack of communication between the FBI and the CIA. As per the 302, “Page intimated that the allegations of Russian interference into the election are a repeat of the USIC failures leading to the 9/11 attacks”.

In another 302 from the day after, on March 31, 2017, the interview again shifted to Page’s prior contacts with the two Russians. In a section titled “Relationship to the Russian Intelligence Services” an interesting exchange takes place. The SSA (Supervisory Special Agent) conducting the interview begins to describe the varying levels of intelligence contacts that Russian Intelligence Officers maintain. The 302 notes that Page interrupts the agents, stating that he is probably the “highest level contact”. Page then references Bulatov and Podobnyy, and states “the more immaterial non-public information I give them, the better for this country”.

Page then goes on to reference himself as being “on the books”. The Special Agent conducting the interview asks if Page understands what that really means; that the FBI defines “on the books” as being in some sort of source-handler relationship, either witting or unwitting, with the RIS. They go on to ask Page again, if including the circumstances of his relationship with Bulatov and Podobnyy, Page was “on the books” of the RIS, and Page agreed that he was “on the books”. However, he tells the agents that he “didn’t like when they characterized him as “working with” the two Russians.”

https://uncoverdc.com/2020/03/11/carter-page-302s-shed-light-into-relationship-with-intelligence-agencies/

[Anonymous]

The full DC Appeals Court is going to reconsider DOJ’s decision to drop the Flynn charges.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/michael-flynn-case-to-be-reheard-by-full-federal-appeals-court-in-dc/2020/07/30/003f9720-d033-11ea-8d32-1ebf4e9d8e0d_story.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The full DC Appeals Court is going to reconsider DOJ’s decision to drop the Flynn charges.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/michael-flynn-case-to-be-reheard-by-full-federal-appeals-court-in-dc/2020/07/30/003f9720-d033-11ea-8d32-1ebf4e9d8e0d_story.html

Key line from the Order: “The parties should be prepared to address whether there are ‘no other adequate means to obtain the relief’ desired.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The full DC Appeals Court is going to reconsider DOJ’s decision to drop the Flynn charges.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/michael-flynn-case-to-be-reheard-by-full-federal-appeals-court-in-dc/2020/07/30/003f9720-d033-11ea-8d32-1ebf4e9d8e0d_story.html

Key line from the Order: “The parties should be prepared to address whether there are ‘no other adequate means to obtain the relief’ desired.”

Whoa. That's kind of big. I'm calling it that the full court reverses the panel decision.

[Anonymous]

Of course the full court is going to reverse the Rao panel. Their read of the law and application of logic was completely off base.

[Anonymous]

Report

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/statement-assistant-attorney-general-national-security-john-c-demers-public-release

The Dept. of Justice says they’ve completed their review of 29 FISA warrants that were flagged by the IG for being out of compliance and have found only 2 material errors and found that all of the applications contained sufficient basis for probable cause, a statement says.

“...our review of these applications concluded that all contained sufficient basis for probable cause and uncovered only two material errors, neither of which invalidated the authorizations granted by the FISA Court.”

“These findings, together with the more than 40 corrective actions...should instill confidence in the FBI’s use of FISA authorities.”

I'm shocked Catherine Herridge isn't breaking this one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Report

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/statement-assistant-attorney-general-national-security-john-c-demers-public-release

The Dept. of Justice says they’ve completed their review of 29 FISA warrants that were flagged by the IG for being out of compliance and have found only 2 material errors and found that all of the applications contained sufficient basis for probable cause, a statement says.

“...our review of these applications concluded that all contained sufficient basis for probable cause and uncovered only two material errors, neither of which invalidated the authorizations granted by the FISA Court.”

“These findings, together with the more than 40 corrective actions...should instill confidence in the FBI’s use of FISA authorities.”

I'm shocked Catherine Herridge isn't breaking this one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Report

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/statement-assistant-attorney-general-national-security-john-c-demers-public-release

The Dept. of Justice says they’ve completed their review of 29 FISA warrants that were flagged by the IG for being out of compliance and have found only 2 material errors and found that all of the applications contained sufficient basis for probable cause, a statement says.

“...our review of these applications concluded that all contained sufficient basis for probable cause and uncovered only two material errors, neither of which invalidated the authorizations granted by the FISA Court.”

“These findings, together with the more than 40 corrective actions...should instill confidence in the FBI’s use of FISA authorities.”

I'm shocked Catherine Herridge isn't breaking this one.

Well, that’s good, but it certainly makes the 17 “errors” in the Carter Page warrants look really bad.

[Anonymous]

But none of them material to obviate probable cause.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:But none of them material to obviate probable cause.

Rosenstein said he would not have signed Page FISA warrant, if he knew then what he knows now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But none of them material to obviate probable cause.

Rosenstein said he would not have signed Page FISA warrant, if he knew then what he knows now.

Two of them have already been determined to be not adequately predicated.

[Anonymous]

Klinesmith changing the part that Page worked/helped the CIA is kind of significant.

[Anonymous]

Poor sycophant Neomi Rao and the other sycophant judge looking like sycophants and getting rebuffed. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/11/federal-appeals-court-michael-flynn-dismissal-393638

Flynn is guilty. Barr is a fixer.

[Anonymous]

I am guessing they will overturn the panel and remand to Judge Sullivan.

Sullivan will eventually dismiss without prejudice, meaning Flynn can be retried when there are real lawyers and patriots involved and not this corrupt GOP/Barr charade.