Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

[Anonymous]

Reports that conspiracy theorists associated with Flynn are being considered for top DoD jobs

https://mobile.twitter.com/AndrewFeinberg/status/1281630729122852864

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, it means they believed Flynn is a good liar.

That is not what Comey testified to.

Comey said that agents believed Flynn is a good liar.

LOL. Nice try.
The only one who lied is actually Comey.

When Comey was on his book tour, Baier asked him directly whether he told lawmakers that the agents did not think Flynn was lying intentionally. He said "maybe someone misunderstood" what he said, but he "didn't say that."

Comey was speaking a year later and without the benefit of notes or a transcript. As we have often noted, contemporaneous notes should often outweigh after-the-fact memories because they were written at the time. That's what makes Comey's memos of his conversations with Trump potentially powerful evidence.

There are contemporaneous notes that call into question Comey's version of what he told Congress.

In a letter dated May 11 to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, quoted from notes taken by a "career, nonpartisan law enforcement officer" who attended a March 15, 2017, briefing by Comey. The agent quoted Comey as saying the FBI agents "saw nothing that led them to believe [he was] lying." Grassley also quoted from committee staff notes that "agents saw no change in his demeanor or tone that would say he was being untruthful."

The majority report of the House Intelligence Committee includes a finding that FBI agents "did not detect any deception during Flynn's interview." As evidence, the report quotes Comey from a private briefing on March 2, 2017: "the agents . . . discerned no physical indications of deception. They didn't see any change in posture, in tone, in inflection, in eye contact. They saw nothing that indicated to them that he knew he was lying to them."

The majority report also quoted from a briefing given by Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe on Dec. 19, 2017, after Flynn pleaded guilty: The "conundrum that we faced on their return from the interview is that although [the agents] didn't detect deception in the statements that he made in the interview . . . the statements were inconsistent with our understanding of the conversation that he had actually had with the ambassador." McCabe added, "The two people who interviewed [Flynn] didn't think he was lying, [which] was not [a] great beginning of a false statement case."

https://www.chicagotribune.com/nation-world/ct-fact-check-comey-flynn-fbi-20180519-story.html

There's no point in continuing this. You go to all the trouble to do that fancy cut-and-paste but you didn't bother to read it, or you didn't understand the plain English words.

People can be good liars or bad liars. No matter how convincing they are, they are still liars.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, it means they believed Flynn is a good liar.

That is not what Comey testified to.

Comey said that agents believed Flynn is a good liar.

LOL. Nice try.
The only one who lied is actually Comey.

When Comey was on his book tour, Baier asked him directly whether he told lawmakers that the agents did not think Flynn was lying intentionally. He said "maybe someone misunderstood" what he said, but he "didn't say that."

Comey was speaking a year later and without the benefit of notes or a transcript. As we have often noted, contemporaneous notes should often outweigh after-the-fact memories because they were written at the time. That's what makes Comey's memos of his conversations with Trump potentially powerful evidence.

There are contemporaneous notes that call into question Comey's version of what he told Congress.

In a letter dated May 11 to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, quoted from notes taken by a "career, nonpartisan law enforcement officer" who attended a March 15, 2017, briefing by Comey. The agent quoted Comey as saying the FBI agents "saw nothing that led them to believe [he was] lying." Grassley also quoted from committee staff notes that "agents saw no change in his demeanor or tone that would say he was being untruthful."

The majority report of the House Intelligence Committee includes a finding that FBI agents "did not detect any deception during Flynn's interview." As evidence, the report quotes Comey from a private briefing on March 2, 2017: "the agents . . . discerned no physical indications of deception. They didn't see any change in posture, in tone, in inflection, in eye contact. They saw nothing that indicated to them that he knew he was lying to them."

The majority report also quoted from a briefing given by Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe on Dec. 19, 2017, after Flynn pleaded guilty: The "conundrum that we faced on their return from the interview is that although [the agents] didn't detect deception in the statements that he made in the interview . . . the statements were inconsistent with our understanding of the conversation that he had actually had with the ambassador." McCabe added, "The two people who interviewed [Flynn] didn't think he was lying, [which] was not [a] great beginning of a false statement case."

https://www.chicagotribune.com/nation-world/ct-fact-check-comey-flynn-fbi-20180519-story.html

There's no point in continuing this. You go to all the trouble to do that fancy cut-and-paste but you didn't bother to read it, or you didn't understand the plain English words.

People can be good liars or bad liars. No matter how convincing they are, they are still liars.

DP. So, let me get this straight. The two agents who interviewed him knew the transcripts of the calls ahead of time. They interview him. Then, after the interview, they say (according to McCabe) that they didn't think he was lying. Considering they knew the "truth" (the transcipts), why would they say that they didn't think he was lying, if, in fact, he WAS lying?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"FBI advised that they believed Flynn believed what he was saying was true."

FBI determined "Flynn was not acting as an agent of Russia."

What kind of idiot believes something an anonymous twitter user posts? If there were any truth he would post under a real name. Techno Fog doesn't stand by his own statement. Get out of here with that crap. It should be deleted.

Flynn is still a traitor.

[Anonymous]

https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1282027081141047296

Sounds like the new papers came from the Durham group........
"criminal investigation"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1282027081141047296

Sounds like the new papers came from the Durham group........
"criminal investigation"

They're trying to smear Flynn's prosecutors by claiming that they should've turned over these notes to defense counsel. Except they're not exculpatory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1282027081141047296

Sounds like the new papers came from the Durham group........
"criminal investigation"

They're trying to smear Flynn's prosecutors by claiming that they should've turned over these notes to defense counsel. Except they're not exculpatory.

They didn't believe he lied........Now, tell me again, what was the charge?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1282027081141047296

Sounds like the new papers came from the Durham group........
"criminal investigation"

They're trying to smear Flynn's prosecutors by claiming that they should've turned over these notes to defense counsel. Except they're not exculpatory.

They didn't believe he lied........Now, tell me again, what was the charge?

Their belief isn't exculpatory.

Unless they're magicians who can manipulate reality with their minds?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1282027081141047296

Sounds like the new papers came from the Durham group........
"criminal investigation"

They're trying to smear Flynn's prosecutors by claiming that they should've turned over these notes to defense counsel. Except they're not exculpatory.

They didn't believe he lied........Now, tell me again, what was the charge?

Their belief isn't exculpatory.

Unless they're magicians who can manipulate reality with their minds?

So, the agents who interviewed him had seen the transcripts. They stated that he didn't lie. The reports that stated this were kept from defense. They were the agents to whom he "lied." Please explain to me who is manipulating reality.

[Anonymous]

They didn't say he didn't lie, they are amazed how well he lies and that he is good at it. These are not what Flynn defenders think they are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They didn't say he didn't lie, they are amazed how well he lies and that he is good at it. These are not what Flynn defenders think they are.

LOL!

Still want to see the missing 302.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They didn't say he didn't lie, they are amazed how well he lies and that he is good at it. These are not what Flynn defenders think they are.

LOL!

Still want to see the missing 302.

Funny, you keep saying this. Barr controls it. If it was exculpatory, don't you think it would have been long since released? It is the one thread that hasn't unraveled and keeps pro-Traitor conspiracy theorists like you, going.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They didn't say he didn't lie, they are amazed how well he lies and that he is good at it. These are not what Flynn defenders think they are.

LOL!

Still want to see the missing 302.

Read the notes.

But you can't be bothered to do that can you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They didn't say he didn't lie, they are amazed how well he lies and that he is good at it. These are not what Flynn defenders think they are.

LOL!

Still want to see the missing 302.

Read the notes.

But you can't be bothered to do that can you?

I have read them, and it is clear they should have been turned over to the defense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The breadth and depth of "Trump-Russia" - there is a lot here so be patient.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1198565009925775361.html

And none of this includes Rudy's role in getting rid of the Italian mob so the Russia mob could come into NY without a bloodbath.

This woman is insane.
I stopped reading when she referenced Carter Page as a Russian agent.

Except the part where *checks 302's* Page admits he's a Russian agent