Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Who’s going to pay attention to them now that they’ve detached from the hand that feeds them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Statement from the Palace:

Royal statement on #Megxit: "Discussions with The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are at an early stage. We understand their desire to take a different approach, but these are complicated issues that will take time to work through."

Wow.

link?

The palace begging them to stay is not a good look.

All the Queen and Prince Charles has to do was issue a statement at the start of the year in support of his son and DIL.

Oh well.

The Firm: 1
H & M: 0

They look like teenagers who announce at the dinner table that they’ve decided to take a year off to find themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is what I meant by William gets what he deserves. Reporters already commenting on other senior royals needing to step up now.

Keep in mind this is a family firm and if senior members step back from official duties, others need to pick up the slack, or does the monarchy scale back?

https://mobile.twitter.com/MaxFosterCNN/status/1215011607903973376

Non brit asking again, what does this mean? What work do they do that needs to be done?

[Anonymous]

Who’s going to pay for all the security they’re going to need?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who doesn’t think MM won’t have her choice of great roles in today’s Hollywood is disconnected from the realities of casting. If the Queen disowned them both tomorrow that would still be true. I have to assume a lot of Brits are posting here with a deep misunderstanding of the american media/movie making environment.

Honest, non-snarky question--can she actually act? I mean it's not like we're talking about some really great acclaimed actress who racked up praise and awards that could return to have "her choice of great roles." She was on some random show on some random cable network...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who doesn’t think MM won’t have her choice of great roles in today’s Hollywood is disconnected from the realities of casting. If the Queen disowned them both tomorrow that would still be true. I have to assume a lot of Brits are posting here with a deep misunderstanding of the american media/movie making environment.

I hardly think there are many, if any, Brits posting on here. It's the USA fan club.

I am a bit intrigued as to why you think Meghan Markle would have her choice of great roles. I don't follow Hollywood closely but she was only a tv show actress, not the big screen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Statement from the Palace:

Royal statement on #Megxit: "Discussions with The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are at an early stage. We understand their desire to take a different approach, but these are complicated issues that will take time to work through."

Wow.

link?

The palace begging them to stay is not a good look.

All the Queen and Prince Charles has to do was issue a statement at the start of the year in support of his son and DIL.

Oh well.

The Firm: 1
H & M: 0

They look like teenagers who announce at the dinner table that they’ve decided to take a year off to find themselves.

LOL The Firm has been on a losing streak since pedophile mania broke. Meanwhile Meghan and Harry are the top four trending topics in the US and gained 80,000 followers on Instagram in the last hour.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan isn’t wearing her wedding ring in today’s photo. No official announcement from Buckingham Palace. This is Meghan’s PR getting ahead of something really bad.

That’s because they reused the photo from their engagement announcement. There’s nothing nefarious about her not wearing her wedding ring as she wasn’t married in the photo they used.

?????? No. Photo was from today.

[Anonymous]

It makes complete sense. The likelihood of him being King is slim given there are 5 people ahead of him right now. He deserves his own life. Good for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who doesn’t think MM won’t have her choice of great roles in today’s Hollywood is disconnected from the realities of casting. If the Queen disowned them both tomorrow that would still be true. I have to assume a lot of Brits are posting here with a deep misunderstanding of the american media/movie making environment.

Honest, non-snarky question--can she actually act? I mean it's not like we're talking about some really great acclaimed actress who racked up praise and awards that could return to have "her choice of great roles." She was on some random show on some random cable network...

She can act *plenty* well to score major roles. Did you see ScarJo in Marriage Story? You don’t have to ooze talent to get high profile roles. This is an industry that has cut and edited major movies around actors in the middle of rock bottom heroin addiction.

I am not saying she isn’t talented. Just that it doesn’t matter that much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who doesn’t think MM won’t have her choice of great roles in today’s Hollywood is disconnected from the realities of casting. If the Queen disowned them both tomorrow that would still be true. I have to assume a lot of Brits are posting here with a deep misunderstanding of the american media/movie making environment.

Honest, non-snarky question--can she actually act? I mean it's not like we're talking about some really great acclaimed actress who racked up praise and awards that could return to have "her choice of great roles." She was on some random show on some random cable network...

She can act *plenty* well to score major roles. Did you see ScarJo in Marriage Story? You don’t have to ooze talent to get high profile roles. This is an industry that has cut and edited major movies around actors in the middle of rock bottom heroin addiction.

I am not saying she isn’t talented. Just that it doesn’t matter that much.

Right. She will probably get one big chance in a film and bomb it because every major role she's ever had has been a direct result of her connections (uncle, dad, ex-husband) and not her talent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Statement from the Palace:

Royal statement on #Megxit: "Discussions with The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are at an early stage. We understand their desire to take a different approach, but these are complicated issues that will take time to work through."

Wow.

link?

The palace begging them to stay is not a good look.

All the Queen and Prince Charles has to do was issue a statement at the start of the year in support of his son and DIL.

Oh well.

The Firm: 1
H & M: 0

They look like teenagers who announce at the dinner table that they’ve decided to take a year off to find themselves.

LOL The Firm has been on a losing streak since pedophile mania broke. Meanwhile Meghan and Harry are the top four trending topics in the US and gained 80,000 followers on Instagram in the last hour.

Do Instagram followers make direct deposits to their bank account? We’ll see what happens when the Royal Family turns off the royal spigot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There was literally no drama until Meghan showed up. That’s why I don’t like her. She seems nice enough but she’s trying to beat the royal family and she won’t win.

You don't think the British Royal Family had any drama before this? Like, none at all?

You must be too young to remember all of the drama with Charles and Diana and Andrew and Fergie. Both divorced. Charles was seeing Camilla and obviously Andrew had a lot of other things going on. Fergie was a wild child and didn't know how to conduct herself. Poor Diana was harassed so much she had a breakdown and was ultimately killed by the paparazzi. There is no drama with Meghan. The racists are creating the drama.

MM creates her own drama (or her family does).. Wimbledon, the ridiculous and tone deaf "poor me" speech at the end of the Africa tour, and now this... Heres the thing - if she just put her head down and did her duties there would e no drama outside the few internet trolls and 50% of the Daily Mail articles about her that are nasty... but it seems like putting her head down and working means she wont have the limelight, so...
cue in dramatic press releases, and sad eye interviews...

There is no “poor me” speech that will ever compare to Charles saying he wished he could be Camilla’s tampon while married to someone else.

[Anonymous]

For those who asked will America pay for the Sussexes. The thirst is real.

Trevor Noah says ‘we’re hiring’

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Statement from the Palace:

Royal statement on #Megxit: "Discussions with The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are at an early stage. We understand their desire to take a different approach, but these are complicated issues that will take time to work through."

Wow.

link?

The palace begging them to stay is not a good look.

All the Queen and Prince Charles has to do was issue a statement at the start of the year in support of his son and DIL.

Oh well.

The Firm: 1
H & M: 0

They look like teenagers who announce at the dinner table that they’ve decided to take a year off to find themselves.

LOL The Firm has been on a losing streak since pedophile mania broke. Meanwhile Meghan and Harry are the top four trending topics in the US and gained 80,000 followers on Instagram in the last hour.

Do Instagram followers make direct deposits to their bank account? We’ll see what happens when the Royal Family turns off the royal spigot.

Ask the Kardashians. I believe one of them made $1 billion off their Instagram.