Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SCHIFF: So when you told Sondland to push back, it was by definition because THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WAS BEHIND THE WHOLE THING, right?

TAYLOR: Um. Yup!

What is the context?

Semi-parody.

[Anonymous]

They think they're doing well with Jordan, lots of smug whispering.

However, there was no substantive point made.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They think they're doing well with Jordan, lots of smug whispering.

However, there was no substantive point made.

Amb Taylor was giving him the slightly amused smile you give to a well-trained monkey.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They think they're doing well with Jordan, lots of smug whispering.

However, there was no substantive point made.

What Jordan did will sell well with the base and some moderates.

That was the high point for gop today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They think they're doing well with Jordan, lots of smug whispering.

However, there was no substantive point made.

What Jordan did will sell well with the base and some moderates.

That was the high point for gop today.

What did he do?

[Anonymous]

Jim Jordan just laid out the GOP argument:

-There were 3 meetings w/ Zelensky where quid pro quo didn't come up (2 while Zelensky didn't know aid was held up)
-Aid released and no investigation happened

Ignores all evidence of Trump endeavoring to use aid to get investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jim Jordan just laid out the GOP argument:

-There were 3 meetings w/ Zelensky where quid pro quo didn't come up (2 while Zelensky didn't know aid was held up)
-Aid released and no investigation happened

Ignores all evidence of Trump endeavoring to use aid to get investigation.

If I try to murder someone from the back and do not succeed, am I guilty of anything?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They think they're doing well with Jordan, lots of smug whispering.

However, there was no substantive point made.

What Jordan did will sell well with the base and some moderates.

That was the high point for gop today.

Jordan was outstanding; do the Democrats have anyone who can grab the attention of those watching? It sure as hell is not Schiff who is the answer to insomnia.

[Anonymous]

Federalist Society just doesn’t have the brightest bulbs, do they? https://fedsoc.org/contributors/steve-castor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jim Jordan just laid out the GOP argument:

-There were 3 meetings w/ Zelensky where quid pro quo didn't come up (2 while Zelensky didn't know aid was held up)
-Aid released and no investigation happened

Ignores all evidence of Trump endeavoring to use aid to get investigation.

Also ignores what his personal attorney was doing on his behalf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jim Jordan just laid out the GOP argument:

-There were 3 meetings w/ Zelensky where quid pro quo didn't come up (2 while Zelensky didn't know aid was held up)
-Aid released and no investigation happened

Ignores all evidence of Trump endeavoring to use aid to get investigation.

Exactly and there is so much evidence.

Gym Jordan hung on one sentence from one witness. That is all they have.

[Anonymous]

Himes is another boring guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They think they're doing well with Jordan, lots of smug whispering.

However, there was no substantive point made.

What Jordan did will sell well with the base and some moderates.

That was the high point for gop today.

Jordan was outstanding; do the Democrats have anyone who can grab the attention of those watching? It sure as hell is not Schiff who is the answer to insomnia.

He’s a meathead and plays well to meatheads.

Facts are boring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jim Jordan just laid out the GOP argument:

-There were 3 meetings w/ Zelensky where quid pro quo didn't come up (2 while Zelensky didn't know aid was held up)
-Aid released and no investigation happened

Ignores all evidence of Trump endeavoring to use aid to get investigation.

If I try to murder someone from the back and do not succeed, am I guilty of anything?

Yes, attempted murder and conspiracy to commit murder are crimes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They think they're doing well with Jordan, lots of smug whispering.

However, there was no substantive point made.

What Jordan did will sell well with the base and some moderates.

That was the high point for gop today.

Jordan was outstanding; do the Democrats have anyone who can grab the attention of those watching? It sure as hell is not Schiff who is the answer to insomnia.

Does your attention live some other part of the body (than normal-thinking people) that Jordan could grab? I know what grabbing your dear leader promotes.