Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry

[Anonymous]

So let's get this straight.

The lawyer who is representing the whistle blower used to work for Hilary Clinton and Chuck Schumer campaigns, plus they have a connection to an interest group that has financial stakes in whistleblowing and who pays officials to leak whistleblower complaints. The group even pays rent, mortgages, and healthcare for so called whistleblowers ...gee nothing shady there with Hilary and Schumer connected plus a gray area for attonery ethics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So let's get this straight.

The lawyer who is representing the whistle blower used to work for Hilary Clinton and Chuck Schumer campaigns, plus they have a connection to an interest group that has financial stakes in whistleblowing and who pays officials to leak whistleblower complaints. The group even pays rent, mortgages, and healthcare for so called whistleblowers ...gee nothing shady there with Hilary and Schumer connected plus a gray area for attonery ethics.

He was an intern 18 years ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So let's get this straight.

The lawyer who is representing the whistle blower used to work for Hilary Clinton and Chuck Schumer campaigns, plus they have a connection to an interest group that has financial stakes in whistleblowing and who pays officials to leak whistleblower complaints. The group even pays rent, mortgages, and healthcare for so called whistleblowers ...gee nothing shady there with Hilary and Schumer connected plus a gray area for attonery ethics.

So you must have a problem with Kavanaugh then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are now known as the "Impeachment Party."

They need a new bumper sticker.... "We can't beat him, so let's impeach him."

Is putting your country in a compromised position for personal gain worse than a blowjob? If so, then the president should be impeached. If he didn't want to be impeached, then perhaps he should check his actions at the door.

Sounds like this is exactly what Biden did.
And, thanks for reminding everyone of Bill Clinton's sick proclivities.

There is no proof that is what Biden did. In fact, Biden's actions at the time were consistent with US and its' allies foreign policy objectives. There is nothing in any cables, read-outs or conversations that suggest otherwise. The whole Biden thing is a manufactured smokescreen. Just like UraniumOne, the NunesMemo, Pizzagate, Wiretapping and the list goes on. How many times are the right wing people going to fall for the same formula of false narratives and distraction before they start to blame the messenger about the fake messages they are given? Or do they just prefer and enjoy being lied to?

Biden outted himself on video when he said exactly why he had that investigator fired. Or else!

No he didn't. Stop reading right-wing propaganda and read actual facts about the situation. This Biden situation is the true nothingburger.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The best part about this is that they can hold hearings for months and months.

And, get nothing else done. Win-win, right?

The House is doing plenty. Take your complaints to the Senate.

LOL. Anything the House has done is for show only. Like this latest move by Pelosi.
None of the "legislation" they have passed has a chance in hell of being signed into law. They know it. They are doing it for show.
And, the American people are paying attention.

And what exactly is it that the Senate is doing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So let's get this straight.

The lawyer who is representing the whistle blower used to work for Hilary Clinton and Chuck Schumer campaigns, plus they have a connection to an interest group that has financial stakes in whistleblowing and who pays officials to leak whistleblower complaints. The group even pays rent, mortgages, and healthcare for so called whistleblowers ...gee nothing shady there with Hilary and Schumer connected plus a gray area for attonery ethics.

So you must have a problem with Kavanaugh then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are now known as the "Impeachment Party."

They need a new bumper sticker.... "We can't beat him, so let's impeach him."

More like the party that cares about upholding the Constitution.

The GOP bumper sticker would be "Corruption-R-Us".

[Anonymous]

Question: If House votes for Impeachment, is Senate required to try him, or is it just like whether or not to bring a bill to the floor. I.E. can it be tabled?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So let's get this straight.

The lawyer who is representing the whistle blower used to work for Hilary Clinton and Chuck Schumer campaigns, plus they have a connection to an interest group that has financial stakes in whistleblowing and who pays officials to leak whistleblower complaints. The group even pays rent, mortgages, and healthcare for so called whistleblowers ...gee nothing shady there with Hilary and Schumer connected plus a gray area for attonery ethics.

Let’s get this straight: you are not being honest.

Take this crap right down to the basement of Comet Ping Pong and wait for the Deep State “fake whistleblower” there. Alex Jones is transmitting the coordinates to you as we speak. They are encrypted in this post. Bee boop beep. The chicken will lay the egg when the day meets night.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Question: If House votes for Impeachment, is Senate required to try him, or is it just like whether or not to bring a bill to the floor. I.E. can it be tabled?

https://www.lawfareblog.com/can-senate-decline-try-impeachment-case

It seems they are free not to hold the trial but that would be a disaster for them, especially when there will never be 67 votes to convict.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Trump squirming so much if there is nothing to hide?

He's not.

Then why did he call Pelosi to see if he could "straighten" this up?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Trump squirming so much if there is nothing to hide?

He's not.

Then why did he call Pelosi to see if he could "straighten" this up?

He's definitely squirming. He got caught with his hand in the cookie jar and he's acting guilt as heck. He also knows that these hearing will run through next year when he's running for President and he'll probably be impeached by the House during the election cycle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The best part about this is that they can hold hearings for months and months.

And, get nothing else done. Win-win, right?

They can walk and chew gum at the same time. Ask Mitch why there are so many bills on his desk that he is not moving?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Question: If House votes for Impeachment, is Senate required to try him, or is it just like whether or not to bring a bill to the floor. I.E. can it be tabled?

https://www.lawfareblog.com/can-senate-decline-try-impeachment-case

It seems they are free not to hold the trial but that would be a disaster for them, especially when there will never be 67 votes to convict.

Predicting that McConnell is going to do this anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Question: If House votes for Impeachment, is Senate required to try him, or is it just like whether or not to bring a bill to the floor. I.E. can it be tabled?

https://www.lawfareblog.com/can-senate-decline-try-impeachment-case

It seems they are free not to hold the trial but that would be a disaster for them, especially when there will never be 67 votes to convict.

Predicting that McConnell is going to do this anyway.

That will look horrible for the President, impeached but no trial to resolve it right before the election.