Sidwell Sex Scandal

Anonymous
I guess Sidwell intends to continuing giving the "Newmyer Award." Very strange.

http://www.sidwell.edu/news/detail.aspx?linkid=294&moduleid=392
Anonymous
Not named for this particular Newmyer.
Anonymous
Do you have any idea about the family's history with the school? It goes WAY beyond this particular incident.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Do you have any idea about the family's history with the school? It goes WAY beyond this particular incident.


Even so, the name "Newmyer" is going to be tarnished around Sidwell for a while, don't you think?
Anonymous
Only to the DCUM community.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Only to the DCUM community.


And anyone who searches for: Sidwell Newmyer award
Anonymous
Why would anyone do that? I couldn't name another award at Sidwell or any other private school, whether my kids went there or not.

Anonymous
sex at sidwell, no!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Only to the DCUM community.


And anyone who searches for: Sidwell Newmyer award


The Newmyer family made its name in public relations. Ironically the Newmyer name is now a PR disaster for Sidwell.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:sex at sidwell, no!


Anything approaching normal sex would be newsworthy at a school with more than its share of pedophile issues and parent teacher rendezvous.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Washingtonian still covering the story: http://www.washingtonian.com/blogs/capitalcomment/local-news/disgruntled-parents-graphic-lawsuit-against-sidwell-friends-dismissed.php


A pp suggested that the Washingtonian was in Newmeyer's clocker. Guess not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Recently learned that the PR firm that was pushing the case to the international press and posting trash here for Newmyer, Anne Schroeder Mullins & Co (former reliable source reporter at Post) is headed by a woman who is married to a reporter at the Washingtonian. As anyone following this case knows, the Washingtonian has covered this case like the New York Post would. Last week's article about the dismissal read as if the ruling last week were a mere bump in the road for Newmyer rather than a death blow to him.

Some gossip: the PR hack was subpoenaed to be deposed in the Sidwell case and at first dodged, and then simply failed to show up at the date and time of the deposition. She probably didn't want to throw her client (one of her first) under the bus.

Newmyer had testified under oath in the Florida custody case that neither he, nor his agents, had ever sent the Complaint to the press, or posted on DCUM. Meanwhile in the Sidwell case, Newmyer's discovery responses stated that he had paid the Mullins' PR firm nearly $10,000 for publicizing the baseless trash to the major networks and papers, and the Washingtonian.

Awkward when your PR firm has no choice but to 1. dodge the depo, or 2. show up for it and confirm that her client has committed felony perjury!

Washingtonian has refused to print a disclosure of the apparent conflict between Anne Schroeder Mullins & Co. and the Washingtonian. But I'm SURE that the tabloid style, completely one-sided coverage of the Sidwell case by the Washingtonian was just a coincidence. I'm sure that Mullins never spoke to her husband about her new case, and that her husband never spoke to his coworkers about the case. Insert snark emoticon here.


Washingtonian reported the dismissal - how does that impact your conspiracy theory?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I guess Sidwell intends to continuing giving the "Newmyer Award." Very strange.

http://www.sidwell.edu/news/detail.aspx?linkid=294&moduleid=392


Tone deaf
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I guess Sidwell intends to continuing giving the "Newmyer Award." Very strange.

http://www.sidwell.edu/news/detail.aspx?linkid=294&moduleid=392


Tone deaf


Maybe they will change it to the Gansler award in honor of Sidwell Friends alum Doug Gansler who learned his unique view of morality from that fine Quaker institution.
post reply Forum Index » Private & Independent Schools
Message Quick Reply
Go to: