When you say t50...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Using individual metrics and making an informed decision that fits your specific child is what I believe most parents would do. It’s unfortunate if the decision is purely based on the final US News ranking, but I have seen some status hungry parents go this route. And it doesn’t stop at college. The decision on grad school vs FAANG job, the brand of their kid’s first car are all driven by the same perspective. Life outcomes have also reflected this.

Parents who do that aren’t following USNWR’s own advice. It’s meant to be a starting point or an input into creating a list. For that, it is helpful. I think it’s weird to lament that it weights 10% on how the 1/3 most financially strained perform, or to declare the deans and presidents contributing to the survey should be ignored, but it was never meant to be the end all. Ultimately college is about fit, and the guide books are there to help families start their research and list formation, not replace it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Outside of a few exceptions or if you cant afford it, there is no reason for a DCUM striver family to send your kid to a State University to hang around the Plebe…

The elites are not hanging out with the Plebe….

You send your kid to Sidwell only to see him/her end up at a State School….OMG

What social meltdown.

This is the type of parent who has a meltdown when schools like Wake Forest or Tulane slip in the rankings. While both are perfectly fine institutions, they often serve as landing spots for wealthy but otherwise average students. So, where do you turn when your "Ivy backup" now ranks lower than Rutgers? I suppose you choose a because a pricey college the size of a small high school at least sounds exclusive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Outside of a few exceptions or if you cant afford it, there is no reason for a DCUM striver family to send your kid to a State University to hang around the Plebe…

The elites are not hanging out with the Plebe….

You send your kid to Sidwell only to see him/her end up at a State School….OMG

What social meltdown.

This is the type of parent who has a meltdown when schools like Wake Forest or Tulane slip in the rankings. While both are perfectly fine institutions, they often serve as landing spots for wealthy but otherwise average students. So, where do you turn when your "Ivy backup" now ranks lower than Rutgers? I suppose you choose a because a pricey college the size of a small high school at least sounds exclusive.

Based on these posts, it seems they turn to DCUM to rage about it and try to convince everyone that their school is *actually* really elite.

[Anonymous]

I think that LACs should be added to
US News national rankings, but I would just do so in bulk since it takes something like 20 of them to equal the undergraduate population of one state school. For example, I would just consider the NESCAC schools one school for the purposes of rankings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Outside of a few exceptions or if you cant afford it, there is no reason for a DCUM striver family to send your kid to a State University to hang around the Plebe…

The elites are not hanging out with the Plebe….

You send your kid to Sidwell only to see him/her end up at a State School….OMG

What social meltdown.

This is the type of parent who has a meltdown when schools like Wake Forest or Tulane slip in the rankings. While both are perfectly fine institutions, they often serve as landing spots for wealthy but otherwise average students. So, where do you turn when your "Ivy backup" now ranks lower than Rutgers? I suppose you choose a because a pricey college the size of a small high school at least sounds exclusive.

Ivy backups are WashU, Vandy, Emory, Georgetown etc. Wake and Tulane and the backups to the backups

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Outside of a few exceptions or if you cant afford it, there is no reason for a DCUM striver family to send your kid to a State University to hang around the Plebe…

The elites are not hanging out with the Plebe….

You send your kid to Sidwell only to see him/her end up at a State School….OMG

What social meltdown.

This is the type of parent who has a meltdown when schools like Wake Forest or Tulane slip in the rankings. While both are perfectly fine institutions, they often serve as landing spots for wealthy but otherwise average students. So, where do you turn when your "Ivy backup" now ranks lower than Rutgers? I suppose you choose a because a pricey college the size of a small high school at least sounds exclusive.

Ivy backups are WashU, Vandy, Emory, Georgetown etc. Wake and Tulane and the backups to the backups

I'm pretty sure Vanderbilt is no one's backup these days.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Outside of a few exceptions or if you cant afford it, there is no reason for a DCUM striver family to send your kid to a State University to hang around the Plebe…

The elites are not hanging out with the Plebe….

You send your kid to Sidwell only to see him/her end up at a State School….OMG

What social meltdown.

This is the type of parent who has a meltdown when schools like Wake Forest or Tulane slip in the rankings. While both are perfectly fine institutions, they often serve as landing spots for wealthy but otherwise average students. So, where do you turn when your "Ivy backup" now ranks lower than Rutgers? I suppose you choose a because a pricey college the size of a small high school at least sounds exclusive.

Ivy backups are WashU, Vandy, Emory, Georgetown etc. Wake and Tulane and the backups to the backups

I'm pretty sure Vanderbilt is no one's backup these days.

A lot of students applly ED to WF and Tulane as first choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Outside of a few exceptions or if you cant afford it, there is no reason for a DCUM striver family to send your kid to a State University to hang around the Plebe…

The elites are not hanging out with the Plebe….

You send your kid to Sidwell only to see him/her end up at a State School….OMG

What social meltdown.

This is the type of parent who has a meltdown when schools like Wake Forest or Tulane slip in the rankings. While both are perfectly fine institutions, they often serve as landing spots for wealthy but otherwise average students. So, where do you turn when your "Ivy backup" now ranks lower than Rutgers? I suppose you choose a because a pricey college the size of a small high school at least sounds exclusive.

Ivy backups are WashU, Vandy, Emory, Georgetown etc. Wake and Tulane and the backups to the backups

I'm pretty sure Vanderbilt is no one's backup these days.

Says who? Vandy is a Stanford/ Duke backup

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think that LACs should be added to
US News national rankings, but I would just do so in bulk since it takes something like 20 of them to equal the undergraduate population of one state school. For example, I would just consider the NESCAC schools one school for the purposes of rankings.

They are added to other rankings. WSJ and Forbes rank all schools together.

Forbes is probably the closest to USNews in their criteria while WSJ produces some wild results. CMC is top 5 while Williams is like 300.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Outside of a few exceptions or if you cant afford it, there is no reason for a DCUM striver family to send your kid to a State University to hang around the Plebe…

The elites are not hanging out with the Plebe….

You send your kid to Sidwell only to see him/her end up at a State School….OMG

What social meltdown.

This is the type of parent who has a meltdown when schools like Wake Forest or Tulane slip in the rankings. While both are perfectly fine institutions, they often serve as landing spots for wealthy but otherwise average students. So, where do you turn when your "Ivy backup" now ranks lower than Rutgers? I suppose you choose a because a pricey college the size of a small high school at least sounds exclusive.

Ivy backups are WashU, Vandy, Emory, Georgetown etc. Wake and Tulane and the backups to the backups

I'm pretty sure Vanderbilt is no one's backup these days.

A lot of students applly ED to WF and Tulane as first choice.

Tulane kind of forces you to apply ED anyways. 🤣

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that LACs should be added to
US News national rankings, but I would just do so in bulk since it takes something like 20 of them to equal the undergraduate population of one state school. For example, I would just consider the NESCAC schools one school for the purposes of rankings.

They are added to other rankings. WSJ and Forbes rank all schools together.

Forbes is probably the closest to USNews in their criteria while WSJ produces some wild results. CMC is top 5 while Williams is like 300.

Do not use any rankings. Look at the actual schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Outside of a few exceptions or if you cant afford it, there is no reason for a DCUM striver family to send your kid to a State University to hang around the Plebe…

The elites are not hanging out with the Plebe….

You send your kid to Sidwell only to see him/her end up at a State School….OMG

What social meltdown.

This is the type of parent who has a meltdown when schools like Wake Forest or Tulane slip in the rankings. While both are perfectly fine institutions, they often serve as landing spots for wealthy but otherwise average students. So, where do you turn when your "Ivy backup" now ranks lower than Rutgers? I suppose you choose a because a pricey college the size of a small high school at least sounds exclusive.

Ivy backups are WashU, Vandy, Emory, Georgetown etc. Wake and Tulane and the backups to the backups

I'm pretty sure Vanderbilt is no one's backup these days.

A lot of students applly ED to WF and Tulane as first choice.

Tulane kind of forces you to apply ED anyways. 🤣

How the F a school force you to apply or apply ED 🥱

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that LACs should be added to
US News national rankings, but I would just do so in bulk since it takes something like 20 of them to equal the undergraduate population of one state school. For example, I would just consider the NESCAC schools one school for the purposes of rankings.

They are added to other rankings. WSJ and Forbes rank all schools together.

Forbes is probably the closest to USNews in their criteria while WSJ produces some wild results. CMC is top 5 while Williams is like 300.

WSJ rankings are absolute trash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Outside of a few exceptions or if you cant afford it, there is no reason for a DCUM striver family to send your kid to a State University to hang around the Plebe…

The elites are not hanging out with the Plebe….

You send your kid to Sidwell only to see him/her end up at a State School….OMG

What social meltdown.

This is the type of parent who has a meltdown when schools like Wake Forest or Tulane slip in the rankings. While both are perfectly fine institutions, they often serve as landing spots for wealthy but otherwise average students. So, where do you turn when your "Ivy backup" now ranks lower than Rutgers? I suppose you choose a because a pricey college the size of a small high school at least sounds exclusive.

Ivy backups are WashU, Vandy, Emory, Georgetown etc. Wake and Tulane and the backups to the backups

I'm pretty sure Vanderbilt is no one's backup these days.

A lot of students applly ED to WF and Tulane as first choice.

Tulane kind of forces you to apply ED anyways. 🤣

How the F a school force you to apply or apply ED 🥱

You wouldn't know hyperbole if it hit you in the face.

Applicants to Tulane know the deal.

Look at Tulane's ED acceptance rate ( close to 70%). Look up the EA rejections and immediate emails to switch to ED2.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Outside of a few exceptions or if you cant afford it, there is no reason for a DCUM striver family to send your kid to a State University to hang around the Plebe…

The elites are not hanging out with the Plebe….

You send your kid to Sidwell only to see him/her end up at a State School….OMG

What social meltdown.

This is the type of parent who has a meltdown when schools like Wake Forest or Tulane slip in the rankings. While both are perfectly fine institutions, they often serve as landing spots for wealthy but otherwise average students. So, where do you turn when your "Ivy backup" now ranks lower than Rutgers? I suppose you choose a because a pricey college the size of a small high school at least sounds exclusive.

Ivy backups are WashU, Vandy, Emory, Georgetown etc. Wake and Tulane and the backups to the backups

I'm pretty sure Vanderbilt is no one's backup these days.

A lot of students applly ED to WF and Tulane as first choice.

Tulane kind of forces you to apply ED anyways. 🤣

How the F a school force you to apply or apply ED 🥱

You wouldn't know hyperbole if it hit you in the face.

Applicants to Tulane know the deal.

Look at Tulane's ED acceptance rate ( close to 70%). Look up the EA rejections and immediate emails to switch to ED2.

All the students applied with their free will.
Wake the F up LoL