Can I sue Callie Oettinger?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine being the teacher of this loon's kids? I'd be absolutely terrified to interact with the child in any way for fear of being put on blast all over her website. I'm sure the kids are perfectly nice like most kids, but I wonder if teachers draw straws to see who has to deal with that family on their roster.

LOL. Trust me. We do. Teachers know which parents/students to avoid enrolling or happily disenroll if given the opportunity.

Just a thought. If you’re actually a teacher, perhaps if teachers weren’t on DCUM during the school day instead of doing work things, maybe Callie never would have gotten the info of 35,000 kids.

But I’m guessing you’re not.

Oh give it a break. It was 2:57 pm when the teacher posted. Maybe they no longer have students and want quick break. Maybe they are home sick. Maybe they only work half a day. If no one ever posted on this site during their work hours there would be 1/4 the amount of posts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine being the teacher of this loon's kids? I'd be absolutely terrified to interact with the child in any way for fear of being put on blast all over her website. I'm sure the kids are perfectly nice like most kids, but I wonder if teachers draw straws to see who has to deal with that family on their roster.

LOL. Trust me. We do. Teachers know which parents/students to avoid enrolling or happily disenroll if given the opportunity.

Just a thought. If you’re actually a teacher, perhaps if teachers weren’t on DCUM during the school day instead of doing work things, maybe Callie never would have gotten the info of 35,000 kids.

But I’m guessing you’re not.

A teacher had exactly 0 to do with this situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She went to her local high school and was provided data for 35,000 kids.

Why is countywide data available at her local high school?

The info is really free flowing in FCPS.

It's because she requested files for her kid who received countywide services and who had since graduated. So I'm guessing she requested access to things that made her go up levels in terms of where the data is stored.

[Anonymous]

Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[

You can't "keep information illegally". Please explain this.

This is how you tell me you don't have a security clearance without telling me you don't have a security clearance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Cool. I’m sure she would appreciate a good counter suit. And an easily winnable one at that!

[Anonymous]

This rises to the level of a federal criminal matter due to the electronic distribution across state lines.

She can always defend herself against a later civil suit from a medium security federal penitentiary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Cool. I’m sure she would appreciate a good counter suit. And an easily winnable one at that!

Based on what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Cool. I’m sure she would appreciate a good counter suit. And an easily winnable one at that!

Why are you advocating for a person who took 35,000 children's private data without their or their parents' consent and shared it with others? Listen to yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Cool. I’m sure she would appreciate a good counter suit. And an easily winnable one at that!

Why are you advocating for a person who took 35,000 children's private data without their or their parents' consent and shared it with others? Listen to yourself.

I surely didn't give Callie permission to give my kid's data to the vice president of legal affairs at Goldwater Institute.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This rises to the level of a federal criminal matter due to the electronic distribution across state lines.

She can always defend herself against a later civil suit from a medium security federal penitentiary.

Great. Another Matlock fan chiming in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Cool. I’m sure she would appreciate a good counter suit. And an easily winnable one at that!

Why are you advocating for a person who took 35,000 children's private data without their or their parents' consent and shared it with others? Listen to yourself.

I surely didn't give Callie permission to give my kid's data to the vice president of legal affairs at Goldwater Institute.

Did you give permission for fcps to give it to Callie?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Cool. I’m sure she would appreciate a good counter suit. And an easily winnable one at that!

Based on what?

What is being suggested can easily turn into slander and harassment. But you do you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Callie doesn't owe you all anything. You can hate what she did, but she breached no legal duty to any of you. Get over it.

"breached no legal duty"?? You are making no sense.

Translation-this doesn’t make sense to me because I don’t understand the law, but I’m really pissed.

Explain it then. Breach of duty seems to be to be applicable in a negligence case.
But it wouldn't apply to this because she should have never had the data in the first place.

Sounds like you answered your own question. She has no duty because she didn’t ask for the data and FCPS just coughed it up without asking. See: the last time this happened.

I think a class action civil suit would go the parents' way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine being the teacher of this loon's kids? I'd be absolutely terrified to interact with the child in any way for fear of being put on blast all over her website. I'm sure the kids are perfectly nice like most kids, but I wonder if teachers draw straws to see who has to deal with that family on their roster.

LOL. Trust me. We do. Teachers know which parents/students to avoid enrolling or happily disenroll if given the opportunity.

Just a thought. If you’re actually a teacher, perhaps if teachers weren’t on DCUM during the school day instead of doing work things, maybe Callie never would have gotten the info of 35,000 kids.

But I’m guessing you’re not.

Oh, Callie. Nice try.