Can I sue Callie Oettinger?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Cool. I’m sure she would appreciate a good counter suit. And an easily winnable one at that!

Why are you advocating for a person who took 35,000 children's private data without their or their parents' consent and shared it with others? Listen to yourself.

I surely didn't give Callie permission to give my kid's data to the vice president of legal affairs at Goldwater Institute.

Did you give permission for fcps to give it to Callie?

Well, she was inadvertently given access to it by FCPS. But she copied the files, kept them and shared them knowing they are private data. It might not be a criminal charge, but a class action civil suit is worth it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Cool. I’m sure she would appreciate a good counter suit. And an easily winnable one at that!

Why are you advocating for a person who took 35,000 children's private data without their or their parents' consent and shared it with others? Listen to yourself.

I surely didn't give Callie permission to give my kid's data to the vice president of legal affairs at Goldwater Institute.

Did you give permission for fcps to give it to Callie?

Well, she was inadvertently given access to it by FCPS. But she copied the files, kept them and shared them knowing they are private data. It might not be a criminal charge, but a class action civil suit is worth it.

Emotional distress plus time spent hunting down where our kids' information might be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Cool. I’m sure she would appreciate a good counter suit. And an easily winnable one at that!

Why are you advocating for a person who took 35,000 children's private data without their or their parents' consent and shared it with others? Listen to yourself.

I’m not. I’m saying fcps should have never given it to her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Cool. I’m sure she would appreciate a good counter suit. And an easily winnable one at that!

Why are you advocating for a person who took 35,000 children's private data without their or their parents' consent and shared it with others? Listen to yourself.

I surely didn't give Callie permission to give my kid's data to the vice president of legal affairs at Goldwater Institute.

Did you give permission for fcps to give it to Callie?

Well, she was inadvertently given access to it by FCPS. But she copied the files, kept them and shared them knowing they are private data. It might not be a criminal charge, but a class action civil suit is worth it.

You seem to be glossing over the fact that fcps gave her the info. Both a paralegal and it expert. Not some kindergartener.

[Anonymous]

Callie gave 7,869 emails to Ms. Winter and Ms. Cress Lane in Springfield, VA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Cool. I’m sure she would appreciate a good counter suit. And an easily winnable one at that!

Based on what?

What is being suggested can easily turn into slander and harassment. But you do you.

So she did or did not immediately delete the files? Did or did not distribute them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Cool. I’m sure she would appreciate a good counter suit. And an easily winnable one at that!

Why are you advocating for a person who took 35,000 children's private data without their or their parents' consent and shared it with others? Listen to yourself.

I surely didn't give Callie permission to give my kid's data to the vice president of legal affairs at Goldwater Institute.

Did you give permission for fcps to give it to Callie?

Well, she was inadvertently given access to it by FCPS. But she copied the files, kept them and shared them knowing they are private data. It might not be a criminal charge, but a class action civil suit is worth it.

Emotional distress plus time spent hunting down where our kids' information might be.

Any civil charges against the Goldwater institute for taking files he knew had others' private data on it? It is illegal to distribute, post, email, or disclose any other person's information without his or her consent--she did that with him at least. And it sounds like with the journalist too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Cool. I’m sure she would appreciate a good counter suit. And an easily winnable one at that!

Why are you advocating for a person who took 35,000 children's private data without their or their parents' consent and shared it with others? Listen to yourself.

I surely didn't give Callie permission to give my kid's data to the vice president of legal affairs at Goldwater Institute.

Did you give permission for fcps to give it to Callie?

Well, she was inadvertently given access to it by FCPS. But she copied the files, kept them and shared them knowing they are private data. It might not be a criminal charge, but a class action civil suit is worth it.

+1

Absolutely

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Cool. I’m sure she would appreciate a good counter suit. And an easily winnable one at that!

Why are you advocating for a person who took 35,000 children's private data without their or their parents' consent and shared it with others? Listen to yourself.

I surely didn't give Callie permission to give my kid's data to the vice president of legal affairs at Goldwater Institute.

Did you give permission for fcps to give it to Callie?

Well, she was inadvertently given access to it by FCPS. But she copied the files, kept them and shared them knowing they are private data. It might not be a criminal charge, but a class action civil suit is worth it.

You seem to be glossing over the fact that fcps gave her the info. Both a paralegal and it expert. Not some kindergartener.

That's a different thread. This is about Callie and what she did with the info.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Cool. I’m sure she would appreciate a good counter suit. And an easily winnable one at that!

Why are you advocating for a person who took 35,000 children's private data without their or their parents' consent and shared it with others? Listen to yourself.

I surely didn't give Callie permission to give my kid's data to the vice president of legal affairs at Goldwater Institute.

Did you give permission for fcps to give it to Callie?

Well, she was inadvertently given access to it by FCPS. But she copied the files, kept them and shared them knowing they are private data. It might not be a criminal charge, but a class action civil suit is worth it.

Emotional distress plus time spent hunting down where our kids' information might be.

Any civil charges against the Goldwater institute for taking files he knew had others' private data on it? It is illegal to distribute, post, email, or disclose any other person's information without his or her consent--she did that with him at least. And it sounds like with the journalist too.

Sounds like that’s what fcps did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Calls to federal prosecutor would also work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Cool. I’m sure she would appreciate a good counter suit. And an easily winnable one at that!

Why are you advocating for a person who took 35,000 children's private data without their or their parents' consent and shared it with others? Listen to yourself.

I’m not. I’m saying fcps should have never given it to her.

Well, duh. But that's a different issue than how she handled it once she had it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Cool. I’m sure she would appreciate a good counter suit. And an easily winnable one at that!

Why are you advocating for a person who took 35,000 children's private data without their or their parents' consent and shared it with others? Listen to yourself.

I surely didn't give Callie permission to give my kid's data to the vice president of legal affairs at Goldwater Institute.

Did you give permission for fcps to give it to Callie?

Well, she was inadvertently given access to it by FCPS. But she copied the files, kept them and shared them knowing they are private data. It might not be a criminal charge, but a class action civil suit is worth it.

Emotional distress plus time spent hunting down where our kids' information might be.

Any civil charges against the Goldwater institute for taking files he knew had others' private data on it? It is illegal to distribute, post, email, or disclose any other person's information without his or her consent--she did that with him at least. And it sounds like with the journalist too.

Sounds like that’s what fcps did.

They didn’t do it intentionally. Or with malice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Callie needs public shaming while the lawsuit is being organized. Protests outside her house? Social media campaign?

Cool. I’m sure she would appreciate a good counter suit. And an easily winnable one at that!

Why are you advocating for a person who took 35,000 children's private data without their or their parents' consent and shared it with others? Listen to yourself.

I surely didn't give Callie permission to give my kid's data to the vice president of legal affairs at Goldwater Institute.

Did you give permission for fcps to give it to Callie?

Well, she was inadvertently given access to it by FCPS. But she copied the files, kept them and shared them knowing they are private data. It might not be a criminal charge, but a class action civil suit is worth it.

Emotional distress plus time spent hunting down where our kids' information might be.

Any civil charges against the Goldwater institute for taking files he knew had others' private data on it? It is illegal to distribute, post, email, or disclose any other person's information without his or her consent--she did that with him at least. And it sounds like with the journalist too.

Sounds like that’s what fcps did.

There's a difference between unintentional acts and intentional acts. FCPS made a terrible mistake, Oettinger and friends committed intentional acts.

[Anonymous]

I am confused about what information was given to her. I thought she was asking about IEP plans so how was information shared on kids that don’t have IEP plans and go to different school than her kids? How was that even available or is it that she was given computer and just started downloading anything she could v review a single set of papers that someone gave her to look at?