The lady doth protest too much, methinks. |
at least you are educated. And I will always respond. Are you 'protesting too much?' Or ? |
Whatever you say, troll. |
Oh, FFS! One glass of orange juice with a splash of prosecco makes you DRUNK and can't drive a car???? Um - no, not unless you started drinking at 8am that morning! And nobody should have 4 mimosas and 3 bottles of beer anywhere, least of all a party with families. So, no, they shouldn't judge you - I'd have loved to have one, and most of my friends would - or they'd have a beer or just OJ. You did nothing wrong, but you were NOT promoting drunk driving. I mean, everytime we have a party in the evening and we serve beer, wine or cocktails, are we PROMOTING that we hope everyone drinks too much, takes their car and wraps it around a telephone pole? I hope that's not you, because it for sure isn't me! |
You're an alcoholic, OP. |
::GASP:: The beers were FULL?!?! |
This doesn't sit right with me. Teenagers also need to learn that there are different "rules" that come at different ages and maturity. Curfews, different levels of privacy and autonomy. All that. Very related, there is value in modeling responsible drinking habits within families and communities where alcohol is accepted. A 40-year-old (or whatever) having a drink or two at a gathering over a set of hours and driving home is worlds away from a teenager pounding some drinks in a basement and getting in a car. As a baseline, the first situation would be quite legal while the latter would be emphatically illegal on multiple fronts. And obviously, you do NOT want a kid's first experiences observing alcohol use to be with their peers. Perhaps you want to show that it is never--no matter the timeframe in which alcohol is consumed and someone gets in the car--acceptable to drive after drinking. Well, OK. That is an absolutest rule that is stricter than both the law and science would set. Your kid is going to see the hypocrisy (or perhaps a better phrase would be, lack of grounded rationale) in that situation as well. I never touched a drink until I was in college and would generally avoided parties where drugs or alcohol were gonna be around based on personal preference, despite having parents who regularly had wine or cocktails in front of me. That was obviously due to both how I was raised and my personality--if your kid is rebellious, they're rebellious. And teenagers will obviously test boundaries. But they are intelligent enough, despite your view that they think in black and white terms, to know that different rules apply in different situations. |
Of course. If I didn't say that you would say that serving Corona is low class. |
I can easily hear a teenager reason "my dad always drove us home after a drink or two, I'm sure I'm fine." |
I would think it was weird to have mimosas and for a “brunch” party then serve only pizza and cake and whatever snacks you refer to.
If you are going to be serving alcohol to parents, then you should have better food options that parents actually want to eat. If you had more a substantial and appealing brunch spread, mimosas would be fine. But along side pizza and cake at 11? No. |
Honey, with your attitude I doubt you’re invited to many events, so drink your drink and be happy someone deigned to include you. |
Honey? Right. We aren’t in the same social circle. |
We sure aren't. I live in NYC--where are you? Some cute little DC suburb? Awww. So sweet. |
Shrug. In the opening post, it was clearly stated there were snacks for both grown ups and the kids and then pizza and cake was served before going home. |
And another teen could easily reason something different. I don’t think this is a substantive argument against modeling responsible behavior that is only acceptable for adults of legal age, particularly when modeling extremes to a teen could easily have negative outcomes as well. Kids are going to make a lot of stupid decisions no matter what. Really, the only thing you can do is set strong boundaries and make sure they’re butts are home by 10pm. |