Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I believe the Visi analysis is wrong. There is a 27, probably two 28s, and at least one 29 that can fill up the cage. Maybe they aren't featured with the presence of the talented seniors, but I would offer that there is more talent there for future years than the ambitious usurpers think.
I agree with that. Losing those seniors is a significant issue that goes well beyond just scoring, but if we focus solely on points, I'd say that Visi already distributes scoring well enough that they'll have options next year. It's worth noting that all the Big 4 teams are losing key senior scorers. Supporters of other teams might believe their pipelines are strong enough to compete next year. However, they may not fully appreciate what the Big 4 have lined up, which is likely better than expected. Therefore, I would not expect any changes in the makeup of the Big 4 next year.