Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It sounds like Taylor's testimony is it. He has “remembered some things that previous witnesses somehow failed to remember.”

https://twitter.com/benyc/status/1186692092216696833

And this is why the depositions are behind closed doors and why the transcripts have not yet been released.

So it can’t be challenged or heard? Yes we get that....

Both Republicans and Democrats are on these committees, hearing the testimony and asking questions.

Do you get that?

From USA Today:

Republicans have complained that the meetings should be public and transcripts should be released. Access has been limited to members of the three panels, which prevented one Republican from attending Monday and the half-dozen Wednesday. Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said private sessions are needed to prevent witnesses from hearing each other, the same protocol used by prosecutors in criminal investigations.

Them's the rules.

The January 2019 House rules clearly spell out that only committee members may attend the closed door sessions, but there are Rs and Ds on the committees.

Complain away. Then you look like a bunch of complainers, instead of patriots.

The American people, and that includes other members of congress, deserve to hear the testimony if you have plans to remove a duly elected President. If Schiff has to defend the private sessions by stating what he did above, then those aren’t THE rules, those are Schiff’s ‘rules’.

You sound like someone who, when the Barr report comes out, will scream “it’s not TRUE!! He LIES”.

Actually, you sound like someone who, when the public impeachment hearings start, will scream "But taxes! But judges! But but but!"

Why do democratic underlings have to babysit Rs who want to read the transcripts?

Again, if Schiff has to defend the private sessions in the way he did, then those aren't 'the rules'; they are Schiff's rules

Whiny Republican babies with lips as loose as cheap pantyhose don’t get the benefit of the doubt. Just because Repos belch out complaints doesn’t mean there’s any merit to them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It sounds like Taylor's testimony is it. He has “remembered some things that previous witnesses somehow failed to remember.”

https://twitter.com/benyc/status/1186692092216696833

And this is why the depositions are behind closed doors and why the transcripts have not yet been released.

So it can’t be challenged or heard? Yes we get that....

Both Republicans and Democrats are on these committees, hearing the testimony and asking questions.

Do you get that?

From USA Today:

Republicans have complained that the meetings should be public and transcripts should be released. Access has been limited to members of the three panels, which prevented one Republican from attending Monday and the half-dozen Wednesday. Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said private sessions are needed to prevent witnesses from hearing each other, the same protocol used by prosecutors in criminal investigations.

Them's the rules.

The January 2019 House rules clearly spell out that only committee members may attend the closed door sessions, but there are Rs and Ds on the committees.

Complain away. Then you look like a bunch of complainers, instead of patriots.

The American people, and that includes other members of congress, deserve to hear the testimony if you have plans to remove a duly elected President. If Schiff has to defend the private sessions by stating what he did above, then those aren’t THE rules, those are Schiff’s ‘rules’.

You sound like someone who, when the Barr report comes out, will scream “it’s not TRUE!! He LIES”.

Actually, you sound like someone who, when the public impeachment hearings start, will scream "But taxes! But judges! But but but!"

Why do democratic underlings have to babysit Rs who want to read the transcripts?

Again, if Schiff has to defend the private sessions in the way he did, then those aren't 'the rules'; they are Schiff's rules

Whiny Republican babies with lips as loose as cheap pantyhose don’t get the benefit of the doubt. Just because Repos belch out complaints doesn’t mean there’s any merit to them.

I see. Yet it's been the Dems that have leaked, leaked, leaked.

Insanity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It sounds like Taylor's testimony is it. He has “remembered some things that previous witnesses somehow failed to remember.”

https://twitter.com/benyc/status/1186692092216696833

And this is why the depositions are behind closed doors and why the transcripts have not yet been released.

So it can’t be challenged or heard? Yes we get that....

Both Republicans and Democrats are on these committees, hearing the testimony and asking questions.

Do you get that?

From USA Today:

Republicans have complained that the meetings should be public and transcripts should be released. Access has been limited to members of the three panels, which prevented one Republican from attending Monday and the half-dozen Wednesday. Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said private sessions are needed to prevent witnesses from hearing each other, the same protocol used by prosecutors in criminal investigations.

Them's the rules.

The January 2019 House rules clearly spell out that only committee members may attend the closed door sessions, but there are Rs and Ds on the committees.

Complain away. Then you look like a bunch of complainers, instead of patriots.

The American people, and that includes other members of congress, deserve to hear the testimony if you have plans to remove a duly elected President. If Schiff has to defend the private sessions by stating what he did above, then those aren’t THE rules, those are Schiff’s ‘rules’.

You sound like someone who, when the Barr report comes out, will scream “it’s not TRUE!! He LIES”.

And the American people will. This is like the Grand Jury phase. When the committees are done with their work, if the facts lead to it, there will be a formal vote, then open hearings and then a vote to adopt articles of impeachment that would be sent to the Senate.

In the meantime, you are complaining about the exact same rules established by Speaker Ryan, that have been in effect for several years. These are not "Pelosi" rules or "Schiff" rules. Maybe next time the GOP is in charge, it will adopt rules that better share power with the minority?

I don't believe that for a minute. This is a repeat of the Mueller investigation, i.e. "don't you WANT it to be investigated? It takes TIME". And lots of cries of "He will be JAILED due to Mueller's findings." Nope. Didn't happen. The goal here is to draw out the process without votes so that Dems don't have to go on record.

He still could be jailed due to Mueller's findings - just not while he's in office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:



Why do democratic underlings have to babysit Rs who want to read the transcripts?

Again, if Schiff has to defend the private sessions in the way he did, then those aren't 'the rules'; they are Schiff's rules

Maybe if one side didn't have a long history of selective leaks that were weaponized *cough* Nunes Memo *cough* Barr Memo, then it wouldn't be necessary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It sounds like Taylor's testimony is it. He has “remembered some things that previous witnesses somehow failed to remember.”

https://twitter.com/benyc/status/1186692092216696833

And this is why the depositions are behind closed doors and why the transcripts have not yet been released.

So it can’t be challenged or heard? Yes we get that....

Both Republicans and Democrats are on these committees, hearing the testimony and asking questions.

Do you get that?

From USA Today:

Republicans have complained that the meetings should be public and transcripts should be released. Access has been limited to members of the three panels, which prevented one Republican from attending Monday and the half-dozen Wednesday. Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said private sessions are needed to prevent witnesses from hearing each other, the same protocol used by prosecutors in criminal investigations.

Them's the rules.

The January 2019 House rules clearly spell out that only committee members may attend the closed door sessions, but there are Rs and Ds on the committees.

Complain away. Then you look like a bunch of complainers, instead of patriots.

The American people, and that includes other members of congress, deserve to hear the testimony if you have plans to remove a duly elected President. If Schiff has to defend the private sessions by stating what he did above, then those aren’t THE rules, those are Schiff’s ‘rules’.

You sound like someone who, when the Barr report comes out, will scream “it’s not TRUE!! He LIES”.

And the American people will. This is like the Grand Jury phase. When the committees are done with their work, if the facts lead to it, there will be a formal vote, then open hearings and then a vote to adopt articles of impeachment that would be sent to the Senate.

In the meantime, you are complaining about the exact same rules established by Speaker Ryan, that have been in effect for several years. These are not "Pelosi" rules or "Schiff" rules. Maybe next time the GOP is in charge, it will adopt rules that better share power with the minority?

I don't believe that for a minute. This is a repeat of the Mueller investigation, i.e. "don't you WANT it to be investigated? It takes TIME". And lots of cries of "He will be JAILED due to Mueller's findings." Nope. Didn't happen. The goal here is to draw out the process without votes so that Dems don't have to go on record.

You don't have to believe it. But it is easily verifiable that Pelosi simply continued Ryan's rules in the House. Complain all you want.

And if you read the Mueller report, and not Barr's "findings," then perhaps you would have a different opinion, but clearly you haven't read the Mueller Report.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It sounds like Taylor's testimony is it. He has “remembered some things that previous witnesses somehow failed to remember.”

https://twitter.com/benyc/status/1186692092216696833

And this is why the depositions are behind closed doors and why the transcripts have not yet been released.

So it can’t be challenged or heard? Yes we get that....

Both Republicans and Democrats are on these committees, hearing the testimony and asking questions.

Do you get that?

From USA Today:

Republicans have complained that the meetings should be public and transcripts should be released. Access has been limited to members of the three panels, which prevented one Republican from attending Monday and the half-dozen Wednesday. Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said private sessions are needed to prevent witnesses from hearing each other, the same protocol used by prosecutors in criminal investigations.

Them's the rules.

The January 2019 House rules clearly spell out that only committee members may attend the closed door sessions, but there are Rs and Ds on the committees.

Complain away. Then you look like a bunch of complainers, instead of patriots.

The American people, and that includes other members of congress, deserve to hear the testimony if you have plans to remove a duly elected President. If Schiff has to defend the private sessions by stating what he did above, then those aren’t THE rules, those are Schiff’s ‘rules’.

You sound like someone who, when the Barr report comes out, will scream “it’s not TRUE!! He LIES”.

Actually, you sound like someone who, when the public impeachment hearings start, will scream "But taxes! But judges! But but but!"

Why do democratic underlings have to babysit Rs who want to read the transcripts?

Again, if Schiff has to defend the private sessions in the way he did, then those aren't 'the rules'; they are Schiff's rules

Whiny Republican babies with lips as loose as cheap pantyhose don’t get the benefit of the doubt. Just because Repos belch out complaints doesn’t mean there’s any merit to them.

I see. Yet it's been the Dems that have leaked, leaked, leaked.

Insanity.

Nunes and Gaetz are Democrats?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It sounds like Taylor's testimony is it. He has “remembered some things that previous witnesses somehow failed to remember.”

https://twitter.com/benyc/status/1186692092216696833

And this is why the depositions are behind closed doors and why the transcripts have not yet been released.

So it can’t be challenged or heard? Yes we get that....

Both Republicans and Democrats are on these committees, hearing the testimony and asking questions.

Do you get that?

From USA Today:

Republicans have complained that the meetings should be public and transcripts should be released. Access has been limited to members of the three panels, which prevented one Republican from attending Monday and the half-dozen Wednesday. Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said private sessions are needed to prevent witnesses from hearing each other, the same protocol used by prosecutors in criminal investigations.

Them's the rules.

The January 2019 House rules clearly spell out that only committee members may attend the closed door sessions, but there are Rs and Ds on the committees.

Complain away. Then you look like a bunch of complainers, instead of patriots.

The American people, and that includes other members of congress, deserve to hear the testimony if you have plans to remove a duly elected President. If Schiff has to defend the private sessions by stating what he did above, then those aren’t THE rules, those are Schiff’s ‘rules’.

You sound like someone who, when the Barr report comes out, will scream “it’s not TRUE!! He LIES”.

And the American people will. This is like the Grand Jury phase. When the committees are done with their work, if the facts lead to it, there will be a formal vote, then open hearings and then a vote to adopt articles of impeachment that would be sent to the Senate.

In the meantime, you are complaining about the exact same rules established by Speaker Ryan, that have been in effect for several years. These are not "Pelosi" rules or "Schiff" rules. Maybe next time the GOP is in charge, it will adopt rules that better share power with the minority?

I don't believe that for a minute. This is a repeat of the Mueller investigation, i.e. "don't you WANT it to be investigated? It takes TIME". And lots of cries of "He will be JAILED due to Mueller's findings." Nope. Didn't happen. The goal here is to draw out the process without votes so that Dems don't have to go on record.

You don't have to believe it. But it is easily verifiable that Pelosi simply continued Ryan's rules in the House. Complain all you want.

And if you read the Mueller report, and not Barr's "findings," then perhaps you would have a different opinion, but clearly you haven't read the Mueller Report.

I read it. I’m also someone who remembers Mueller/Weismann and their dealings in MA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It sounds like Taylor's testimony is it. He has “remembered some things that previous witnesses somehow failed to remember.”

https://twitter.com/benyc/status/1186692092216696833

And this is why the depositions are behind closed doors and why the transcripts have not yet been released.

So it can’t be challenged or heard? Yes we get that....

Both Republicans and Democrats are on these committees, hearing the testimony and asking questions.

Do you get that?

From USA Today:

Republicans have complained that the meetings should be public and transcripts should be released. Access has been limited to members of the three panels, which prevented one Republican from attending Monday and the half-dozen Wednesday. Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said private sessions are needed to prevent witnesses from hearing each other, the same protocol used by prosecutors in criminal investigations.

Them's the rules.

The January 2019 House rules clearly spell out that only committee members may attend the closed door sessions, but there are Rs and Ds on the committees.

Complain away. Then you look like a bunch of complainers, instead of patriots.

The American people, and that includes other members of congress, deserve to hear the testimony if you have plans to remove a duly elected President. If Schiff has to defend the private sessions by stating what he did above, then those aren’t THE rules, those are Schiff’s ‘rules’.

You sound like someone who, when the Barr report comes out, will scream “it’s not TRUE!! He LIES”.

And the American people will. This is like the Grand Jury phase. When the committees are done with their work, if the facts lead to it, there will be a formal vote, then open hearings and then a vote to adopt articles of impeachment that would be sent to the Senate.

In the meantime, you are complaining about the exact same rules established by Speaker Ryan, that have been in effect for several years. These are not "Pelosi" rules or "Schiff" rules. Maybe next time the GOP is in charge, it will adopt rules that better share power with the minority?

I don't believe that for a minute. This is a repeat of the Mueller investigation, i.e. "don't you WANT it to be investigated? It takes TIME". And lots of cries of "He will be JAILED due to Mueller's findings." Nope. Didn't happen. The goal here is to draw out the process without votes so that Dems don't have to go on record.

You don't have to believe it. But it is easily verifiable that Pelosi simply continued Ryan's rules in the House. Complain all you want.

And if you read the Mueller report, and not Barr's "findings," then perhaps you would have a different opinion, but clearly you haven't read the Mueller Report.

I read it. I’m also someone who remembers Mueller/Weismann and their dealings in MA

Tell us more about your love affair with the criminal mob bosses and the crooks at Enron and Arthur Anderson.

It’s bizarre that conservatives hate Weissman-Mueller for going after the mafia. Why is that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It sounds like Taylor's testimony is it. He has “remembered some things that previous witnesses somehow failed to remember.”

https://twitter.com/benyc/status/1186692092216696833

And this is why the depositions are behind closed doors and why the transcripts have not yet been released.

So it can’t be challenged or heard? Yes we get that....

Both Republicans and Democrats are on these committees, hearing the testimony and asking questions.

Do you get that?

From USA Today:

Republicans have complained that the meetings should be public and transcripts should be released. Access has been limited to members of the three panels, which prevented one Republican from attending Monday and the half-dozen Wednesday. Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said private sessions are needed to prevent witnesses from hearing each other, the same protocol used by prosecutors in criminal investigations.

Them's the rules.

The January 2019 House rules clearly spell out that only committee members may attend the closed door sessions, but there are Rs and Ds on the committees.

Complain away. Then you look like a bunch of complainers, instead of patriots.

The American people, and that includes other members of congress, deserve to hear the testimony if you have plans to remove a duly elected President. If Schiff has to defend the private sessions by stating what he did above, then those aren’t THE rules, those are Schiff’s ‘rules’.

You sound like someone who, when the Barr report comes out, will scream “it’s not TRUE!! He LIES”.

And the American people will. This is like the Grand Jury phase. When the committees are done with their work, if the facts lead to it, there will be a formal vote, then open hearings and then a vote to adopt articles of impeachment that would be sent to the Senate.

In the meantime, you are complaining about the exact same rules established by Speaker Ryan, that have been in effect for several years. These are not "Pelosi" rules or "Schiff" rules. Maybe next time the GOP is in charge, it will adopt rules that better share power with the minority?

I don't believe that for a minute. This is a repeat of the Mueller investigation, i.e. "don't you WANT it to be investigated? It takes TIME". And lots of cries of "He will be JAILED due to Mueller's findings." Nope. Didn't happen. The goal here is to draw out the process without votes so that Dems don't have to go on record.

There will be a vote on impeachment and the transcripts will be released prior to the vote. There will also be public testimony, maybe in the House, but definitely in the Senate where Trump will.have the opportunity to defend himself. So no this is NOT like the Mueller investigation because it won't take two years and all the evidence will be made public, with every Representative.and Senator on record.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It sounds like Taylor's testimony is it. He has “remembered some things that previous witnesses somehow failed to remember.”

https://twitter.com/benyc/status/1186692092216696833

And this is why the depositions are behind closed doors and why the transcripts have not yet been released.

So it can’t be challenged or heard? Yes we get that....

Both Republicans and Democrats are on these committees, hearing the testimony and asking questions.

Do you get that?

From USA Today:

Republicans have complained that the meetings should be public and transcripts should be released. Access has been limited to members of the three panels, which prevented one Republican from attending Monday and the half-dozen Wednesday. Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said private sessions are needed to prevent witnesses from hearing each other, the same protocol used by prosecutors in criminal investigations.

Them's the rules.

The January 2019 House rules clearly spell out that only committee members may attend the closed door sessions, but there are Rs and Ds on the committees.

Complain away. Then you look like a bunch of complainers, instead of patriots.

The American people, and that includes other members of congress, deserve to hear the testimony if you have plans to remove a duly elected President. If Schiff has to defend the private sessions by stating what he did above, then those aren’t THE rules, those are Schiff’s ‘rules’.

You sound like someone who, when the Barr report comes out, will scream “it’s not TRUE!! He LIES”.

And the American people will. This is like the Grand Jury phase. When the committees are done with their work, if the facts lead to it, there will be a formal vote, then open hearings and then a vote to adopt articles of impeachment that would be sent to the Senate.

In the meantime, you are complaining about the exact same rules established by Speaker Ryan, that have been in effect for several years. These are not "Pelosi" rules or "Schiff" rules. Maybe next time the GOP is in charge, it will adopt rules that better share power with the minority?

I don't believe that for a minute. This is a repeat of the Mueller investigation, i.e. "don't you WANT it to be investigated? It takes TIME". And lots of cries of "He will be JAILED due to Mueller's findings." Nope. Didn't happen. The goal here is to draw out the process without votes so that Dems don't have to go on record.

Pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It sounds like Taylor's testimony is it. He has “remembered some things that previous witnesses somehow failed to remember.”

https://twitter.com/benyc/status/1186692092216696833

And this is why the depositions are behind closed doors and why the transcripts have not yet been released.

So it can’t be challenged or heard? Yes we get that....

Both Republicans and Democrats are on these committees, hearing the testimony and asking questions.

Do you get that?

From USA Today:

Republicans have complained that the meetings should be public and transcripts should be released. Access has been limited to members of the three panels, which prevented one Republican from attending Monday and the half-dozen Wednesday. Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said private sessions are needed to prevent witnesses from hearing each other, the same protocol used by prosecutors in criminal investigations.

Them's the rules.

The January 2019 House rules clearly spell out that only committee members may attend the closed door sessions, but there are Rs and Ds on the committees.

Complain away. Then you look like a bunch of complainers, instead of patriots.

The American people, and that includes other members of congress, deserve to hear the testimony if you have plans to remove a duly elected President. If Schiff has to defend the private sessions by stating what he did above, then those aren’t THE rules, those are Schiff’s ‘rules’.

You sound like someone who, when the Barr report comes out, will scream “it’s not TRUE!! He LIES”.

And the American people will. This is like the Grand Jury phase. When the committees are done with their work, if the facts lead to it, there will be a formal vote, then open hearings and then a vote to adopt articles of impeachment that would be sent to the Senate.

In the meantime, you are complaining about the exact same rules established by Speaker Ryan, that have been in effect for several years. These are not "Pelosi" rules or "Schiff" rules. Maybe next time the GOP is in charge, it will adopt rules that better share power with the minority?

I don't believe that for a minute. This is a repeat of the Mueller investigation, i.e. "don't you WANT it to be investigated? It takes TIME". And lots of cries of "He will be JAILED due to Mueller's findings." Nope. Didn't happen. The goal here is to draw out the process without votes so that Dems don't have to go on record.

Trump’s new fixer Barr killed the Mueller investigation.

And you think it’s the Democrats who don’t want to go on the record? Good Christ but your take is bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It sounds like Taylor's testimony is it. He has “remembered some things that previous witnesses somehow failed to remember.”

https://twitter.com/benyc/status/1186692092216696833

And this is why the depositions are behind closed doors and why the transcripts have not yet been released.

So it can’t be challenged or heard? Yes we get that....

Both Republicans and Democrats are on these committees, hearing the testimony and asking questions.

Do you get that?

From USA Today:

Republicans have complained that the meetings should be public and transcripts should be released. Access has been limited to members of the three panels, which prevented one Republican from attending Monday and the half-dozen Wednesday. Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said private sessions are needed to prevent witnesses from hearing each other, the same protocol used by prosecutors in criminal investigations.

Them's the rules.

The January 2019 House rules clearly spell out that only committee members may attend the closed door sessions, but there are Rs and Ds on the committees.

Complain away. Then you look like a bunch of complainers, instead of patriots.

The American people, and that includes other members of congress, deserve to hear the testimony if you have plans to remove a duly elected President. If Schiff has to defend the private sessions by stating what he did above, then those aren’t THE rules, those are Schiff’s ‘rules’.

You sound like someone who, when the Barr report comes out, will scream “it’s not TRUE!! He LIES”.

And the American people will. This is like the Grand Jury phase. When the committees are done with their work, if the facts lead to it, there will be a formal vote, then open hearings and then a vote to adopt articles of impeachment that would be sent to the Senate.

In the meantime, you are complaining about the exact same rules established by Speaker Ryan, that have been in effect for several years. These are not "Pelosi" rules or "Schiff" rules. Maybe next time the GOP is in charge, it will adopt rules that better share power with the minority?

I don't believe that for a minute. This is a repeat of the Mueller investigation, i.e. "don't you WANT it to be investigated? It takes TIME". And lots of cries of "He will be JAILED due to Mueller's findings." Nope. Didn't happen. The goal here is to draw out the process without votes so that Dems don't have to go on record.

Trump’s new fixer Barr killed the Mueller investigation.

And you think it’s the Democrats who don’t want to go on the record? Good Christ but your take is bad.

Right?

AGAIN, for like the dozenth time in this thread, THE DEMOCRATS ARE ON THE RECORD. Every one of them who’s in favor of the inquiry - all but 9 I think - put out official statements saying so.

[Anonymous]

“Support for impeaching U.S. President Donald Trump surged among political independents and rose by 3 three percentage points overall since last week, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Tuesday.”
https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN1X200Y?__twitter_impression=true

“Overall, 46% of Americans said they supported impeachment and 40% said they opposed it. Among independents, 45% said in the latest poll they supported impeachment and 32% said they opposed it, the strongest level of support recorded in more than a year.”

[Anonymous]

Quinnipiac latest:


- 55% support impeachment, a new peak
- Trump's job approval below 40% for the first time since impeachment
- Only 35% approve of his handling foreign policy
- 56% say he’s mishandling our national security

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Quinnipiac latest:


- 55% support impeachment, a new peak
- Trump's job approval below 40% for the first time since impeachment
- Only 35% approve of his handling foreign policy
- 56% say he’s mishandling our national security

Even more dramatic than that crest over 50% is that 48% now favor impeachment AND REMOVAL.