Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

[Anonymous]

Biden told MSNBC that he wasnt involved in the Flynn case, yet evidence produced yesterday says otherwise. What did Logan Act Joe know and when did he know it.

[Anonymous]

Trump voter here. I do resent being called "deplorable" and you have no idea what I have done to help lift African Americans. I have done far more real world, hands on lifting than these BLM protesters. And, I recognize which policies help and which don't. I've observed it first hand and seen the results.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are there crickets on Biden pushing for the Logan Act against Flynn, per Strozk?

What did Biden know and when did he know it?

I‘M really ok with the executive branch putting a stop to treasonous behavior. Why aren’t you?

I am too. I'm sending another donation to Biden today. Flynn is a traitor. The people who excuse his crimes are traitors too.

[Anonymous]

I am too. I'm sending another donation to Biden today. Flynn is a traitor. The people who excuse his crimes are traitors too.

Not a traitor. How do you feel about the candidate who paid Russians to collude?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are there crickets on Biden pushing for the Logan Act against Flynn, per Strozk?

What did Biden know and when did he know it?

I‘M really ok with the executive branch putting a stop to treasonous behavior. Why aren’t you?

I am too. I'm sending another donation to Biden today. Flynn is a traitor. The people who excuse his crimes are traitors too.

Judge Sullivan asked the prosecutor why he wasn't charging Flynn with treason. Prosecutors response: because I don't have any evidence of it.

So much for "treason". Try something else.

[Anonymous]

The left continues to move the goalpost, ignores the truth and pushes a narrative for their own use. Once Durham hands out the indictments it will be over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The left continues to move the goalpost, ignores the truth and pushes a narrative for their own use. Once Durham hands out the indictments it will be over.

Oookay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The left continues to move the goalpost, ignores the truth and pushes a narrative for their own use. Once Durham hands out the indictments it will be over.

Yep.
And that is what all these hearings and "Barr impeachment" talk is about.

Trying to discredit the person who is overseeing the investigations.
I am now wondering if some of the Dem members of Congress were involved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left continues to move the goalpost, ignores the truth and pushes a narrative for their own use. Once Durham hands out the indictments it will be over.

Yep.
And that is what all these hearings and "Barr impeachment" talk is about.

Trying to discredit the person who is overseeing the investigations.
I am now wondering if some of the Dem members of Congress were involved.

This thread is about Flynn. Our Department of Justice just said that lying to the FBI is okay.

Who moved what goalpost?

[Anonymous]

At this point Barr is pretty much trump's new Michael Cohen with better paper

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left continues to move the goalpost, ignores the truth and pushes a narrative for their own use. Once Durham hands out the indictments it will be over.

Yep.
And that is what all these hearings and "Barr impeachment" talk is about.

Trying to discredit the person who is overseeing the investigations.
I am now wondering if some of the Dem members of Congress were involved.

This thread is about Flynn. Our Department of Justice just said that lying to the FBI is okay.

Who moved what goalpost?

No. They said that 1) they couldn't prove that it was material and 2) he did it knowingly and intentionally.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left continues to move the goalpost, ignores the truth and pushes a narrative for their own use. Once Durham hands out the indictments it will be over.

Yep.
And that is what all these hearings and "Barr impeachment" talk is about.

Trying to discredit the person who is overseeing the investigations.
I am now wondering if some of the Dem members of Congress were involved.

This thread is about Flynn. Our Department of Justice just said that lying to the FBI is okay.

Who moved what goalpost?

No. They said that 1) they couldn't prove that it was material and 2) he did it knowingly and intentionally.

Lol

Same thing. Since they had previously proved both those things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left continues to move the goalpost, ignores the truth and pushes a narrative for their own use. Once Durham hands out the indictments it will be over.

Yep.
And that is what all these hearings and "Barr impeachment" talk is about.

Trying to discredit the person who is overseeing the investigations.
I am now wondering if some of the Dem members of Congress were involved.

This thread is about Flynn. Our Department of Justice just said that lying to the FBI is okay.

Who moved what goalpost?

No. They said that 1) they couldn't prove that it was material and 2) he did it knowingly and intentionally.

Lol

No. They "proved" nothing. Saying "I don't remember" or "I'm not sure, but I may have" is hardly "knowingly and intentionally".

Lol.

Same thing. Since they had previously proved both those things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left continues to move the goalpost, ignores the truth and pushes a narrative for their own use. Once Durham hands out the indictments it will be over.

Yep.
And that is what all these hearings and "Barr impeachment" talk is about.

Trying to discredit the person who is overseeing the investigations.
I am now wondering if some of the Dem members of Congress were involved.

This thread is about Flynn. Our Department of Justice just said that lying to the FBI is okay.

Who moved what goalpost?

No. They said that 1) they couldn't prove that it was material and 2) he did it knowingly and intentionally.

Lol

No. They "proved" nothing. Saying "I don't remember" or "I'm not sure, but I may have" is hardly "knowingly and intentionally".

Lol.

Same thing. Since they had previously proved both those things.

No. They "proved" nothing. Saying "I don't remember" or "I'm not sure, but I may have" is hardly "knowingly and intentionally".

Lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left continues to move the goalpost, ignores the truth and pushes a narrative for their own use. Once Durham hands out the indictments it will be over.

Yep.
And that is what all these hearings and "Barr impeachment" talk is about.

Trying to discredit the person who is overseeing the investigations.
I am now wondering if some of the Dem members of Congress were involved.

This thread is about Flynn. Our Department of Justice just said that lying to the FBI is okay.

Who moved what goalpost?

No. They said that 1) they couldn't prove that it was material and 2) he did it knowingly and intentionally.

Lol

No. They "proved" nothing. Saying "I don't remember" or "I'm not sure, but I may have" is hardly "knowingly and intentionally".

Lol.

Same thing. Since they had previously proved both those things.

No. They "proved" nothing. Saying "I don't remember" or "I'm not sure, but I may have" is hardly "knowingly and intentionally".

Lol.

It can be. It was then.

Anyone can look at the facts and see that he knowingly and intentionally lied and that his lies were material.