Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does the phone still ping if it is turned off?

The guy's face looks strange like he was wearing a mask.

I think it's just a bad image. It's good enough that I think the person of interest will be caught. Let's keep in mind, though, that the two other people of interest were not the shooter, so this guy may also not be.

They had an image like this of the bomber who entered the metro on January 6, and never caught him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Feds, have you gotten an email from the head of your agency both commemorating 9/11 and expressing horror about Kirk? (And ignoring the Denver school shooting that happened the same day) Just wondering if a directive came down from the White House or if my agency head is just crazy.

How is that crazy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FBI is retracting the transgender and antifa bullet fragment leak.

It’s now in the MAGA ether so it will be treated as truth. It was put out there on purpose for exactly that

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Has there been a press conference with the treating doctor or medical examiner? Or is this going to be another Butler?

Treating doctor? Pretty sure he was gone by the time he got to the hospital.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Feds, have you gotten an email from the head of your agency both commemorating 9/11 and expressing horror about Kirk? (And ignoring the Denver school shooting that happened the same day) Just wondering if a directive came down from the White House or if my agency head is just crazy.

We haven't received any emails about anything other than that we now have to use AI...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was just flipping channels and some conservative maga mouthpiece is spewing “Charlie lkirk never said anything hateful.”

I am so tired of the gaslighting

Yeah they’re really trying to turn him into RFK Sr. or MLK. It’s gross.

Ew.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A professional would not have done this from a position where there are any cameras in the area.

Also more than likely had a 50 yard zero on that rifle and was aiming center mass. This would explain the point of impact in the neck area.

Exactly.

No professional would intentionally make a neck-shot.

Plus, police are reporting to the WSJ, BBC, etc, the assassin used “an older, .30 calibre rifle.” This was not some dark-ops highly-trained assassin.

This assassination was committed by a homicidal amateur with a political grudge.

Sounds like it, but we may never know which kind of grudge was held.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A professional would not have done this from a position where there are any cameras in the area.

Also more than likely had a 50 yard zero on that rifle and was aiming center mass. This would explain the point of impact in the neck area.

Exactly.

No professional would intentionally make a neck-shot.

Plus, police are reporting to the WSJ, BBC, etc, the assassin used “an older, .30 calibre rifle.” This was not some dark-ops highly-trained assassin.

This assassination was committed by a homicidal amateur with a political grudge.

Dark ops induces homicides by blackmailing the assassin. Find someone at a shooting range, groom them and threaten their family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shooter isnt white.

How would you possibly know this?

FBI released images

You think those images released by the FBI show a guy who’s not white?

To me the images show someone who could be white, hispanic, asian or a mix of any of the above. Very generic looking. If thin.

I'm Asian. I'd be surprised if that nose was Asian, the bridge is classically Caucasian. Apart from that, he looks pale-skinned and all that rules out is African-American

[Anonymous]

Charlie's last big campaign was an effort to get the Epstein files released. https://www.axios.com/2025/07/15/trump-epstein-maga-charlie-kirk


Do it for Charlie. Release the files.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie Kirk was murdered because he was EFFECTIVE!

'

Which is what Loomer was saying, which again, feeds the conspiracy that this was the Administration martyring Kirk as a false flag to seize more control of the country and distract from Epstein.

As crazy as it sounds, I would not rule this out yet.

I would rule it out. Trump was friends with Kirk and he is inexplicably loyal to his few friends (such as Ghislaine Maxwell).

Uh, he literally has his BFF killed, according to many. Trump is exactly the kind of guy to stab his friend in the back if it served him.

People really don’t understand Trump at all.

I don’t think Trump understands himself. He picks a lottery ball to decide what he’ll do that day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FBI is retracting the transgender and antifa bullet fragment leak.

I’m shocked! Actually, I am shocked that they would admit it.

+1

Yeah

Did anybody actually believe this was true? Seemed like a conservative fairy tale to.me.

[Anonymous]

I'm not very knowledgeable about guns or rifles, so I have a question for those who are: How good of a marksman does one have to be to shoot a person in the head/neck area from ~150 yards, which is about how far away this gunman was, from what I understand. Not being a gun expert, this doesn't seem easy to me, but it might be if someone practiced for a while. But how much would one need to practice to pull this off?

If this question has been answered, apologies. Please direct me to the link.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Weapon was probably this short action 30-06.

Scope is mounted too far back towards the buttstock. Probably not a professional.

A professional would not have done this inside 200 yards. They would not have left the weapon behind either.

A professional wouldn’t use that rifle or that scope either.

The shooter obviously practiced on a standard flat range where he sighted in the scope. That means, when shooting from an elevated position, it is imperative to aim lower. The scope was sighted for the gravitational bullet drop across a level area from position to target. When firing at a downward angle from elevation there is less gravitational bullet drop.

The shooter aimed center mass and his lack of training caused the bullet to strike 8”-12” high and 6” to the right. He almost missed him altogether. Sadly he got lucky.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not very knowledgeable about guns or rifles, so I have a question for those who are: How good of a marksman does one have to be to shoot a person in the head/neck area from ~150 yards, which is about how far away this gunman was, from what I understand. Not being a gun expert, this doesn't seem easy to me, but it might be if someone practiced for a while. But how much would one need to practice to pull this off?

If this question has been answered, apologies. Please direct me to the link.

Not hard at all, especially with a gun that has a scope on it