Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was just flipping channels and some conservative maga mouthpiece is spewing “Charlie lkirk never said anything hateful.”

I am so tired of the gaslighting

Yeah they’re really trying to turn him into RFK Sr. or MLK. It’s gross.

Ew.

NO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A professional would not have done this from a position where there are any cameras in the area.

Also more than likely had a 50 yard zero on that rifle and was aiming center mass. This would explain the point of impact in the neck area.

Exactly.

No professional would intentionally make a neck-shot.

Plus, police are reporting to the WSJ, BBC, etc, the assassin used “an older, .30 calibre rifle.” This was not some dark-ops highly-trained assassin.

This assassination was committed by a homicidal amateur with a political grudge.

Dark ops induces homicides by blackmailing the assassin. Find someone at a shooting range, groom them and threaten their family.

“Dark ops”

🤣

It's illogical and odd to ascribe to a foreign power what is a natural consequence of an overheated political environment that glorifies gun violence and vilifies political opponents.

+1

[Anonymous]

I just figured he went for the neck because he was being kind enough to not explode the contents of Kirk's skull across all of the people nearby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not very knowledgeable about guns or rifles, so I have a question for those who are: How good of a marksman does one have to be to shoot a person in the head/neck area from ~150 yards, which is about how far away this gunman was, from what I understand. Not being a gun expert, this doesn't seem easy to me, but it might be if someone practiced for a while. But how much would one need to practice to pull this off?

If this question has been answered, apologies. Please direct me to the link.

Don’t listen to anyone on here saying, it’s nothing, anyone with 30 min training could do it. They couldn’t. I’ll leave it at that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Charlie's last big campaign was an effort to get the Epstein files released. https://www.axios.com/2025/07/15/trump-epstein-maga-charlie-kirk


Do it for Charlie. Release the files.

Bullcrap. He was a time wasting divisive gate-keeper whose job was to brainwash and corral young Americans into voting against their interests, hating their fellow Americans, and ultimately never cease being pro Israel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just sayin, Charlie Kirk alludes to following the Bible when it says to stone LGQBT folk

https://www.reddit.com/r/ToiletPaperUSA/comments/1de7h1p/while_criticizing_youtuber_ms_rachel_for_quoting/

He NEVER advocated that.

Did you watch the video??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not very knowledgeable about guns or rifles, so I have a question for those who are: How good of a marksman does one have to be to shoot a person in the head/neck area from ~150 yards, which is about how far away this gunman was, from what I understand. Not being a gun expert, this doesn't seem easy to me, but it might be if someone practiced for a while. But how much would one need to practice to pull this off?

If this question has been answered, apologies. Please direct me to the link.

Not hard at all, especially with a gun that has a scope on it

If you are shooting at a target.

Every person I know who has been in combat has said that shooting a living person is not easy. And that includes when the other person is shooting at you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FBI is retracting the transgender and antifa bullet fragment leak.

Where are you seeing this? Not seeing any reports of this.

[Anonymous]

Former FBI Agent Stuart Kaplan said the shooter likely put a lot of preparation into the attack:

“This assassination, different to the attack [on Trump] back in Butler, PA, was a very well-planned, very well-orchestrated plot that was put in motion days before.
The individual had a plan of escape to elude detection of being out on a rooftop & also able to evade & elude law enforcement. This is indicative of a professional hit.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Former FBI Agent Stuart Kaplan said the shooter likely put a lot of preparation into the attack:

“This assassination, different to the attack [on Trump] back in Butler, PA, was a very well-planned, very well-orchestrated plot that was put in motion days before.
The individual had a plan of escape to elude detection of being out on a rooftop & also able to evade & elude law enforcement. This is indicative of a professional hit.”

Indicative of anyone that has watched TV at all for the last 20 years. What a clown.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FBI is retracting the transgender and antifa bullet fragment leak.

Where are you seeing this? Not seeing any reports of this.

Nor am I. But keep in mind this was what was initially said with the United Health guy being murdered and thus far that assertion has simply faded away. No confirmation. No presentation of the ammo with the alleged markings. For the time being it goes into the ever larger pile of things that are "maybe yes; maybe no".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not very knowledgeable about guns or rifles, so I have a question for those who are: How good of a marksman does one have to be to shoot a person in the head/neck area from ~150 yards, which is about how far away this gunman was, from what I understand. Not being a gun expert, this doesn't seem easy to me, but it might be if someone practiced for a while. But how much would one need to practice to pull this off?

If this question has been answered, apologies. Please direct me to the link.

I posted an explanation of why the shooter is an amateur, but it was removed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FBI is retracting the transgender and antifa bullet fragment leak.

Where are you seeing this? Not seeing any reports of this.

Nor am I. But keep in mind this was what was initially said with the United Health guy being murdered and thus far that assertion has simply faded away. No confirmation. No presentation of the ammo with the alleged markings. For the time being it goes into the ever larger pile of things that are "maybe yes; maybe no".

Well then where is PP getting their info from? Some Reddit forum?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Former FBI Agent Stuart Kaplan said the shooter likely put a lot of preparation into the attack:

“This assassination, different to the attack [on Trump] back in Butler, PA, was a very well-planned, very well-orchestrated plot that was put in motion days before.
The individual had a plan of escape to elude detection of being out on a rooftop & also able to evade & elude law enforcement. This is indicative of a professional hit.”

Note to Stuart: I don't know anyone who would perform an assassination in a crowd and not put a lot of planning into it.

He's not saying anything earth stattering here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:i don't think this person will ever get caught. you?

People are using AI to identify masked ICE officers, and law enforcement (and military, because they will definitely involve military to investigate) has much more elaborate means.

If they are acting alone eventually they will be seen by an ordinary person. From what I've seen of Utah, I can't think of areas where they could hide out in the woods for a long time. Plus they need to be where they can monitor news about the search, which means needing cell phone which can communicate their location to other devices or else be in an area with very poor coverage if any.

If not, more complicated.
But we've never had a political hit in the US where the person disappeared into the world, and usually they are caught quickly. (Unless MLK's shooter was actually innocent, and if Oswald was working with CIA they didn't help him out much, did they?)