Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The shooter was a highly experienced sniper/marksman. One shot yet so precise from far away. The average person wouldn’t be able to do that. The shooter has some sort of military/government background for sure.I find it hard to believe some hare brained transgender kid was behind this.


Exactly. Military man...100%

Why wouldn’t a real expert get a clesn head shot?

A real expert would aim for center mass - the chest, not the head.


Why? A chest wound isn't fatal. A neck wound usually is.


If you watch one of the really graphic videos, the shot looked surgical and very effective. The amount of blood that immediately came out had to be jugular. Plus, if you don't know what gear someone has on, seems like the neck is ideal. I don't know that this means military/government but definitely seemed like the shooter knew what he was doing.


I would imagine the shooter was going for the body, since it’s the biggest and most achievable target, but if they were going for the neck, they were targeting the carotid and not the jugular. The internal jugular veins are low pressure veins and they usually lie just overlapping the internal carotid by a bit. The internal carotids are a high pressure arteries that come right off the aorta and pumps blood up to the brain. The pressure difference is huge - think spraying across the room like in Monty python for the artery vs spilling out for the vein. When you see someone get their neck “slit” and a dark ribbon of blood oozes out, that’s venous blood. Arterial blood almost looks fake because it’s so red.

When patients require a central intravenous line, the internal jugular is a common choice and it involves placing a catheter under ultrasound guidance so that you don’t accidentally get the artery. You can squish the floppy vein but not the muscular artery, which is the main way you can tell the difference. Your biggest fear is accidentally puncturing the artery, so usually you check, recheck, recheck, and recheck again, and do many different techniques to avoid going through the posterior wall of the vein, which is where the artery usually lies. Placing a needle and catheter in the jugular causes a bruise, but the pressure is low enough that not much blood seeps out.

I once saw a fellow go through the posterior wall of the vein, puncturing the carotid. The puncture must have been less than the size of a pinprick, but almost immediately, a mass the size of a melon formed on the neck from the hematoma. Then all hell broke loose and a code was called.

Someone who watched the video described it to me and it definitely sounded as if the bullet ruptured the carotid.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:For Jen Psaki being a former spokesperson in the White House, she sure is saying some dumb and self-defeating things today.

Just like Karoline Leavitt says everyday.
Anonymous
FBI is retracting the transgender and antifa bullet fragment leak.
Anonymous
A professional would not have done this from a position where there are any cameras in the area.

Also more than likely had a 50 yard zero on that rifle and was aiming center mass. This would explain the point of impact in the neck area.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:FBI is retracting the transgender and antifa bullet fragment leak.


Except the damage is done. Patel needs to be fired. Today.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:For Jen Psaki being a former spokesperson in the White House, she sure is saying some dumb and self-defeating things today.


such as ?
Anonymous
Does the phone still ping if it is turned off?

The guy's face looks strange like he was wearing a mask.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Does the phone still ping if it is turned off?

The guy's face looks strange like he was wearing a mask.


Yes. The imei can still be tracked.
Anonymous
Has there been a press conference with the treating doctor or medical examiner? Or is this going to be another Butler?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Does the phone still ping if it is turned off?

The guy's face looks strange like he was wearing a mask.


I think it's just a bad image. It's good enough that I think the person of interest will be caught. Let's keep in mind, though, that the two other people of interest were not the shooter, so this guy may also not be.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Does the phone still ping if it is turned off?

The guy's face looks strange like he was wearing a mask.


Yes. The imei can still be tracked.


No. This is completely wrong. A tower dump cannot show the presence of phones that are turned off.

Please stop spreading misinformation.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:FBI is retracting the transgender and antifa bullet fragment leak.

Even Inspector Clouseau would be more competent.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:A professional would not have done this from a position where there are any cameras in the area.

Also more than likely had a 50 yard zero on that rifle and was aiming center mass. This would explain the point of impact in the neck area.



Exactly.

No professional would intentionally make a neck-shot.

Plus, police are reporting to the WSJ, BBC, etc, the assassin used “an older, .30 calibre rifle.” This was not some dark-ops highly-trained assassin.

This assassination was committed by a homicidal amateur with a political grudge.
Anonymous
Feds, have you gotten an email from the head of your agency both commemorating 9/11 and expressing horror about Kirk? (And ignoring the Denver school shooting that happened the same day) Just wondering if a directive came down from the White House or if my agency head is just crazy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:FBI is retracting the transgender and antifa bullet fragment leak.

I’m shocked! Actually, I am shocked that they would admit it.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: