Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

THE BEACH WEEK LETTER HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY NONE OTHER THAN BRETT KAVANAUGH.

"Through his lawyers, Judge Kavanaugh declined to comment for this article, other than to say of his letter: “This is a note I wrote to organize ‘Beach Week’ in the summer of 1983.” "

Excerpt from underground newspaper at Georgetown Prep, written by BK's friend MJ:

Well I’ll be....

All of these letters from high school are amusing, but they have little to do with someone being appointed to a position such as a scj.
Sure, if someone lies you won’t even pass a security clearance and that disqualifies you.
But being an irresponsible imbecile - within the bounds of our laws - doesn’t disqualify you and it’s not terribly shocking.
These letters are just dumb kid stuff.

I’m gonna go burn my teen letters that were filled with incredible stupidity, irresponsibility and really bad mean jokes.
Burn baby burn!!

+1
I remember looking through all my high school stuff years ago and being incredulous at the kinds of things we talked about, wrote notes about, drew pictures of (!). I threw all of that stuff away. I find it hard to take people seriously who place so much credence in someone's high school antics (beyond rape or murder, of course - neither of which we're talking about).

We wrote risqué notes back and forth to each other - all of it made up - just for the riskiness of possibly getting caught. And we were just frustrated jerks - still stuck at home and school with parents and teachers telling us what to do nonstop. None of it meant much except we were ready to put on our own.

LOL. That is the most pitiful and contrived excuse of Kavanaugh yet! And you're still a frustrated jerk. Get a new hobby.

We are girls!
Apparently you were never a teenager. You can’t remember? Nothing? Too many drinks in your lifetime? Bonks on the head?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The investigation is a waste of time because the Republicans are going to vote to confirm, they don’t care that he lied unde oath, they don’t care if he attacked a woman, they only care that he is not only conservative but that he will be partisan. We simply need to vote the Republicans out.

I'm just sure you mean, ALLEGEDY attacked a woman. Funny how that one little word changes things.

No, you don't understand. They don't care if it's a proven fact that he attacked a woman. They don't care if he gets drunk and beats his wife every night. They only care that he will uphold what policy Republicans want.

[Anonymous]

This guy is a DB to the nth degree.

Sadly, I think he will be confirmed. Because this is how LOW our country has sunk.

And Trumpster the Dumpster mocking Dr. Ford today? WTF? ARE YOU KIDDING ME????????

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The investigation is a waste of time because the Republicans are going to vote to confirm, they don’t care that he lied unde oath, they don’t care if he attacked a woman, they only care that he is not only conservative but that he will be partisan. We simply need to vote the Republicans out.

I'm just sure you mean, ALLEGEDY attacked a woman. Funny how that one little word changes things.

Actually, that one word doesn't change anything.

Well, it sure does to me.

Really? So you think is should read: they don’t care if he allegedly attacked a woman? The Republican Senators don’t care if he attacked a woman or that it has been alleged that he attacked a woman. I think you are not seeing the “if”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After all that has come out in the past couple weeks, I have changed my mind about Dr. Ford and her testimony.

I have thought all along that she had a case of mistaken identify because of trauma she suffered as a youth.

I don’t believe that any longer. I now believe she is making it all up. Why did she do this? I don’t know. But, because she first revealed this in couple’s therapy, she may have been desperate for an reason to attribute her behavior to, and this was an easy explanation. And, as the lie went on, it became more complicated, but she went with the lie to save her marriage.

Just my thoughts.

From the moment her redacted letter was published, you thought she was mistaken about Kavanaugh but was right about Mark Judge? Or did you only think this after Kavanaugh began to float the idea of mistaken identity, after Whalen came up with the elaborate doppelganger theory?

I thought it from the moment she made her allegations and Kavanaugh proclaimed his innocence. Even before Kavanaugh said anything about mistaken identity. The Whelan stuff is crap.

But, not any more. I think she is lying. And, really good at it. I think her psychology training has helped with that.

DP. I don't know if she's lying or not, but I've certainly been giving her psychology background some thought. It seems her expertise is in exactly the kinds of situations she claims to be in - sexual assault trauma. She was eager to offer her professional thoughts on why some memories are buried, etc. It's almost as if she has created the perfect, textbook case of sexual assault/suppressed memories, etc. I'd find her more credible if her background was in something completely irrelevant, like accounting or IT, etc. Just something that doesn't look like she's spouting from a psychology textbook about her own situation.

You don't know too many people with Psych PhDs do you? I am one. This stuff is taught in multiple courses at the grad and undergrad levels. Most people who earn PhDs teach at some point in their career (either as a grad school TA or afterward as a professor) and have to teach this to others. When we talk about this stuff to other people we sound like we're spouting from a textbook because we are! We know this stuff like the back of our hand from years of being immersed in the field... teaching courses, reading research, talking to colleagues, going to conferences. You don't have to be an expert in trauma memory to know about the things she's talked about. I'm not an expert on that topic and I could have told you all of what she said if some random person had asked me about trauma memories.

My father has a psych phd. Agree with everything you wrote.

I'm not a psych PhD but bet I could find similar info about poygraphs on google. There's nothing devious about wanting to know about polygraph tests before taking one. It doesn't mean you're trying to outsmart the test - just prepare for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Kavanaugh acknowledged the beach week letter was his, but where did it come from? Who produced it? And who on earth saves something like this from HIGH SCHOOL??

It's similar to Kavanaugh saving his calendars. I really think those guys were planning for their memoirs all the way back in high school.

Just imagine what these guys would still have if mobile phones with cameras and the internet existed when they were at GT Prep. I have actually been expecting some party photos would surface, but calendars and handwritten notes, well that was a surprise.

Those cell phone pics and videos of girls can also be a problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Kavanaugh acknowledged the beach week letter was his, but where did it come from? Who produced it? And who on earth saves something like this from HIGH SCHOOL??

It's similar to Kavanaugh saving his calendars. I really think those guys were planning for their memoirs all the way back in high school.

Just imagine what these guys would still have if mobile phones with cameras and the internet existed when they were at GT Prep. I have actually been expecting some party photos would surface, but calendars and handwritten notes, well that was a surprise.

Those cell phone pics and videos of girls can also be a problem.

I know!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The investigation is a waste of time because the Republicans are going to vote to confirm, they don’t care that he lied unde oath, they don’t care if he attacked a woman, they only care that he is not only conservative but that he will be partisan. We simply need to vote the Republicans out.

I'm just sure you mean, ALLEGEDY attacked a woman. Funny how that one little word changes things.

No, you don't understand. They don't care if it's a proven fact that he attacked a woman. They don't care if he gets drunk and beats his wife every night. They only care that he will uphold what policy Republicans want.

That's just B.S. and you know it. What we have are allegations. Nothing more. If there was incontrovertible proof, that would be that; but that's not what we have, is it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know Kavanaugh acknowledged the beach week letter was his, but where did it come from? Who produced it? And who on earth saves something like this from HIGH SCHOOL??

An aspiring writer, who one day writes an autobiography about his crazy high school days

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The investigation is a waste of time because the Republicans are going to vote to confirm, they don’t care that he lied unde oath, they don’t care if he attacked a woman, they only care that he is not only conservative but that he will be partisan. We simply need to vote the Republicans out.

I'm just sure you mean, ALLEGEDY attacked a woman. Funny how that one little word changes things.

Actually, that one word doesn't change anything.

Well, it sure does to me.

Really? So you think is should read: they don’t care if he allegedly attacked a woman? The Republican Senators don’t care if he attacked a woman or that it has been alleged that he attacked a woman. I think you are not seeing the “if”.

And, according to Cory Booker, the Dems don’t care if he’s innocent.

[Anonymous]

Ford's ex seems like a douche. Good thing she married her husband instead.

She said on the stand she had not told anyone else besides her husband, therapist, and later the friends she was with at the beach.

She didn't say she told him - so he felt the need to write a freaking letter to say that?

As for the PTSD - those symptoms can come on at any time for the rest of your life. Almost 1/4 of PTSD cases are delayed onset.

He just wanted to feel important.

I bet her talk to her friend about a polygraph was like, they are going to hook you up, just stay calm, it is NBD. You are going to do GREAT!

He is an ass.

https://www.verywellmind.com/delayed-onset-ptsd-meaning-and-reasons-2797636

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The investigation is a waste of time because the Republicans are going to vote to confirm, they don’t care that he lied unde oath, they don’t care if he attacked a woman, they only care that he is not only conservative but that he will be partisan. We simply need to vote the Republicans out.

I'm just sure you mean, ALLEGEDY attacked a woman. Funny how that one little word changes things.

Try reading the sentence again, it says “they don’t care if he attacked a woman”.

You must be very frustrated that your Senator is going to vote against confirmation.

I actually don't care one way or the other if he's confirmed. What I care about is this disgusting rush to judgment of someone - simply for political purposes. Pretty bad look, Democrats.

I care that he lied about his past behavior. He should just admit he doesn't remember the incident and he is sorry if he hurt her. But that would interfere with the squeaky clean image he is trying to project. I think it's a bad look for Republicans that they don't care he lied to the committee. How can he not remember it and be sure he wasn't there at the same time? How can he have a party that closely resembles the one Ford describes but still insist it couldn't be THAT party because he didn't write her name down? How can he say he only went to parties on weekends then show a calendar with a party on a weekday?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

THE BEACH WEEK LETTER HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY NONE OTHER THAN BRETT KAVANAUGH.

"Through his lawyers, Judge Kavanaugh declined to comment for this article, other than to say of his letter: “This is a note I wrote to organize ‘Beach Week’ in the summer of 1983.” "

Excerpt from underground newspaper at Georgetown Prep, written by BK's friend MJ:

Well I’ll be....

All of these letters from high school are amusing, but they have little to do with someone being appointed to a position such as a scj.
Sure, if someone lies you won’t even pass a security clearance and that disqualifies you.
But being an irresponsible imbecile - within the bounds of our laws - doesn’t disqualify you and it’s not terribly shocking.
These letters are just dumb kid stuff.

I’m gonna go burn my teen letters that were filled with incredible stupidity, irresponsibility and really bad mean jokes.
Burn baby burn!!

+1
I remember looking through all my high school stuff years ago and being incredulous at the kinds of things we talked about, wrote notes about, drew pictures of (!). I threw all of that stuff away. I find it hard to take people seriously who place so much credence in someone's high school antics (beyond rape or murder, of course - neither of which we're talking about).

We wrote risqué notes back and forth to each other - all of it made up - just for the riskiness of possibly getting caught. And we were just frustrated jerks - still stuck at home and school with parents and teachers telling us what to do nonstop. None of it meant much except we were ready to put on our own.

LOL. That is the most pitiful and contrived excuse of Kavanaugh yet! And you're still a frustrated jerk. Get a new hobby.

We are girls!
Apparently you were never a teenager. You can’t remember? Nothing? Too many drinks in your lifetime? Bonks on the head?

No, I was a teenager. I just wasn't a frustrated jerk. Not all teenagers were.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Kavanaugh acknowledged the beach week letter was his, but where did it come from? Who produced it? And who on earth saves something like this from HIGH SCHOOL??

It's similar to Kavanaugh saving his calendars. I really think those guys were planning for their memoirs all the way back in high school.

Just imagine what these guys would still have if mobile phones with cameras and the internet existed when they were at GT Prep. I have actually been expecting some party photos would surface, but calendars and handwritten notes, well that was a surprise.

Those cell phone pics and videos of girls can also be a problem.

Boys are so stupid that girls text them photos of their arms folded at the elbow and they think it is cleavage. Lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The investigation is a waste of time because the Republicans are going to vote to confirm, they don’t care that he lied unde oath, they don’t care if he attacked a woman, they only care that he is not only conservative but that he will be partisan. We simply need to vote the Republicans out.

I'm just sure you mean, ALLEGEDY attacked a woman. Funny how that one little word changes things.

Actually, that one word doesn't change anything.

Well, it sure does to me.

Really? So you think is should read: they don’t care if he allegedly attacked a woman? The Republican Senators don’t care if he attacked a woman or that it has been alleged that he attacked a woman. I think you are not seeing the “if”.

And, according to Cory Booker, the Dems don’t care if he’s innocent.

At this point, we know he is guilty of being an unhinged freakshow.