She picked Tim

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow the GOP are freaking out.

To the contrary Kamals played right into their hands by selecting a VP from a deep blue state

So why did Trump choose JD Vance from the deep red state of Ohio?
Or Trump choose Mike Pence from Indiana?
Or Biden choose Kamala Harris from California?

Actually, when was the last time someone from a swing state was chosen as the VP?

While VP candidates can certainly be a burden (JD, Palin, Quayle), their upside potential is limited.

Ohio isn’t deep red. It’s a swing state. Indiana went blue in 2008. It became deep red with time but Pence’s appeal was he helped with Christians who didn’t know like Trumps morals or crude language

disagree. It may not be deep red, but it's red.

https://www.270towin.com/states/ohio

WI, MI, PA are true swing states.

They’re all swing states now. NJ is a swing state.

I think the only solid East Coast state for the Dems is Maryland. I wouldn’t be surprised if PA, NJ, NY, VA, NH flips. People are tired of migrant takeovers and woke public school districts

Do you really think that OH won't vote for Trump/Vance? It may not be deep red, but it's red.

Walz is more Ohio than Vance. Vance sounds like a douchebag sleek phony from the coast. And Trump is losing it.

I'm not disagreeing with you about Vance, but I don't think OH is gonna be impressed with Walz enough to vote D.

If Ohio votes D - and I'm not saying this is very likely - it will be because women are pissed that Trump took away their reproductive rights. Walz's message that the government should "mind its own damned business" will resonate on that topic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The GOP are losing and panicking. This is why they’re trotting out the usual allegations:
questioning race,
questioning political label,
questioning military service,
bringing up gay and transgender issues

It’s a rerun. Yawn!

I'm nervous because some of these things have worked in the past, but I do like that they're clearly panicking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow the GOP are freaking out.

To the contrary Kamals played right into their hands by selecting a VP from a deep blue state

So why did Trump choose JD Vance from the deep red state of Ohio?
Or Trump choose Mike Pence from Indiana?
Or Biden choose Kamala Harris from California?

Actually, when was the last time someone from a swing state was chosen as the VP?

While VP candidates can certainly be a burden (JD, Palin, Quayle), their upside potential is limited.

Ohio isn’t deep red. It’s a swing state. Indiana went blue in 2008. It became deep red with time but Pence’s appeal was he helped with Christians who didn’t know like Trumps morals or crude language

disagree. It may not be deep red, but it's red.

https://www.270towin.com/states/ohio

WI, MI, PA are true swing states.

They’re all swing states now. NJ is a swing state.

I think the only solid East Coast state for the Dems is Maryland. I wouldn’t be surprised if PA, NJ, NY, VA, NH flips. People are tired of migrant takeovers and woke public school districts

Do you really think that OH won't vote for Trump/Vance? It may not be deep red, but it's red.

Walz is more Ohio than Vance. Vance sounds like a douchebag sleek phony from the coast. And Trump is losing it.

I'm not disagreeing with you about Vance, but I don't think OH is gonna be impressed with Walz enough to vote D.

Sherrod Brown is up for re-election -- I suspect his supporters and Walz's may be motivated to turn out in force

[Anonymous]

I LOVE Tim he is just a solid guy that makes me smile.

[Anonymous]

The Harris/Walz event in Wisconsin is jam-packed and ROCKING.

[Anonymous]

Walz looking out for the crowd just like Taylor does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I LOVE Tim he is just a solid guy that makes me smile.

Tim's not all fun and games. He'll tell you to shut the door already, because we're not trying to heat the whole neighborhood dang it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow the GOP are freaking out.

To the contrary Kamals played right into their hands by selecting a VP from a deep blue state

So why did Trump choose JD Vance from the deep red state of Ohio?
Or Trump choose Mike Pence from Indiana?
Or Biden choose Kamala Harris from California?

Actually, when was the last time someone from a swing state was chosen as the VP?

While VP candidates can certainly be a burden (JD, Palin, Quayle), their upside potential is limited.

Ohio isn’t deep red. It’s a swing state. Indiana went blue in 2008. It became deep red with time but Pence’s appeal was he helped with Christians who didn’t know like Trumps morals or crude language

disagree. It may not be deep red, but it's red.

https://www.270towin.com/states/ohio

WI, MI, PA are true swing states.

They’re all swing states now. NJ is a swing state.

I think the only solid East Coast state for the Dems is Maryland. I wouldn’t be surprised if PA, NJ, NY, VA, NH flips. People are tired of migrant takeovers and woke public school districts

Do you really think that OH won't vote for Trump/Vance? It may not be deep red, but it's red.

Walz is more Ohio than Vance. Vance sounds like a douchebag sleek phony from the coast. And Trump is losing it.

I'm not disagreeing with you about Vance, but I don't think OH is gonna be impressed with Walz enough to vote D.

If Ohio votes D - and I'm not saying this is very likely - it will be because women are pissed that Trump took away their reproductive rights. Walz's message that the government should "mind its own damned business" will resonate on that topic.

Trump really blew it on reproductive rights. I have a friend who was working in Kansas when they had their referendum. She recounted that many many women didn’t want to mention it to their neighbors, but they would be voting to support continued access to abortion. Recognize this anecdotal so make of it what you will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow the GOP are freaking out.

To the contrary Kamals played right into their hands by selecting a VP from a deep blue state

So why did Trump choose JD Vance from the deep red state of Ohio?
Or Trump choose Mike Pence from Indiana?
Or Biden choose Kamala Harris from California?

Actually, when was the last time someone from a swing state was chosen as the VP?

While VP candidates can certainly be a burden (JD, Palin, Quayle), their upside potential is limited.

Ohio isn’t deep red. It’s a swing state. Indiana went blue in 2008. It became deep red with time but Pence’s appeal was he helped with Christians who didn’t know like Trumps morals or crude language

disagree. It may not be deep red, but it's red.

https://www.270towin.com/states/ohio

WI, MI, PA are true swing states.

They’re all swing states now. NJ is a swing state.

I think the only solid East Coast state for the Dems is Maryland. I wouldn’t be surprised if PA, NJ, NY, VA, NH flips. People are tired of migrant takeovers and woke public school districts

Do you really think that OH won't vote for Trump/Vance? It may not be deep red, but it's red.

Walz is more Ohio than Vance. Vance sounds like a douchebag sleek phony from the coast. And Trump is losing it.

I'm not disagreeing with you about Vance, but I don't think OH is gonna be impressed with Walz enough to vote D.

What a perfectly-on brand comment for Ohio. You’re either from there, or you understand the Ohioan sentiment about their place in the midwestern hierarchy perfectly. 10 out of 10, no notes.

[Anonymous]

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/08/07/us/harris-trump-election

Raking in cash: The Harris campaign said on Wednesday that it had raised $36 million in the 24 hours after Gov. Tim Walz was named to the ticket. That builds on the $81 million her team said it had raised in the first 24 hours after Ms. Harris entered the 2024 race. The totality of money that has poured in is remaking the financial landscape of the race in Ms. Harris’s favor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/08/07/us/harris-trump-election

Raking in cash: The Harris campaign said on Wednesday that it had raised $36 million in the 24 hours after Gov. Tim Walz was named to the ticket. That builds on the $81 million her team said it had raised in the first 24 hours after Ms. Harris entered the 2024 race. The totality of money that has poured in is remaking the financial landscape of the race in Ms. Harris’s favor.

We donated today. Harris Walz is an exciting optimistic ticket.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Harris/Walz event in Wisconsin is jam-packed and ROCKING.

I see she’s targeting the 90 and over crowd.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Harris/Walz event in Wisconsin is jam-packed and ROCKING.

And Detroit had 50,000 RSVPs so that had to move it from an arena to the airport.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Harris/Walz event in Wisconsin is jam-packed and ROCKING.

And Detroit had 50,000 RSVPs so that had to move it from an arena to the airport.

These are Obama sized crowds.

“Good lord, there’s a lot of people here today,” Gov. Tony Evers of Wisconsin tells the audience here. Evers spoke at a Biden rally in Madison last month that attracted a fraction of the crowd here today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Harris/Walz event in Wisconsin is jam-packed and ROCKING.

I see she’s targeting the 90 and over crowd.

Of course! Inclusivity. My elderly mother is all in. She thinks Walz is very funny.