Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Yay, so you've shown that people sometimes use striver pejoritively? That still doesn't show there's a terrible scourge of joyless Go-playing vicious children stealing PP's child's rightful college acceptances ... |
| Aside from being uncool tryhards, strivers drain some of the joy out of childhood and school by treating it as a desperate competition. This results in an unhealthy, immiserating environment for all students. I'm not concerned with my kids "losing" out at some competition, but I hope they can avoid some of the childhood rat-race that's so prevalent in the DMV. We're moving to a smaller city, so hopefully it will be better. |
I never said there was, different PP here. I got into my top choice, high-ranked schools and my kids are far from the college application process. I'm just disputing the notion that striver isn't a pejorative or doesn't have an established meaning outside this board. I'd also dispute that it has a racial element--it's broader than and predates Asian students being a significant population. I'll acknowledge, however, that there is some overlap with negative Asian stereotypes. |
Uncool tryhards? What are you, 12? If not then you are an utter moron. |
Oh, hon, I have you hanging on my every word now, glad to provide you vicarious friendship. Yeah, sharing a self-deprecating story is hardly obsession, and for all I recall it didn't derail a thing. Maybe he is/was a striver, at least he's self aware and sees that's a bad way to put it...which is step above OP and the feigned confusion from half the posters here, and my only point in sharing...
|
Amusing collection, thanks. |
You have too big of a chip on your should to hear or understand anything. You are the proof it is not about Asians and your narcissistic attempt to make this about you is pathetic. |
Truly, you are a sad little person with a large whole in your heart. |
Hole... back to studying... sorry your kid did not get into an Ivy, he can still be a doctor though .. it’s fine relax. |
DP here. I agree with the PP...you do seem seriously sad and pathetic. Why don't you give it a break and maybe read a good book...take your mind off your weird obsessions. |
|
Strivers, to me, are children of and bonkers tiger parents, but without the prestige of original tiger mom and dad, who are tenured Yale Law School professors.
Annoying middle class sheep who lie and backstab people and claw to get “ahead”. Their parents, like many in this thread, Google stalk parents at their kids’ schools, in an attempt to push their grubby kids into higher social circles. Of course their desperation is obvious to everyone. Unstable lunatics. |
Wait, so your definition is strictly based on socioeconomic class. Got it. |
|
The notion that it’s inauthentic/overly aggressive to aspire to upward mobility is the key to understanding this discourse. It’s promulgated by people who didn’t earn their own position (it came to them “naturally”) and who are afraid of their own kids being downwardly mobile because they are facing competition from people who are smarter and work harder. How dare these “grubby” people aspire to “higher social circles?!”
So yeah, it’s entitled and yeah, it’s racialized. |
NP. Nailed it. |
- I'm a white person who oscillates between being laid back and trying to be a striver but am too scattered to be an effective striver. - It's really important, for our survival, for us to have a mix of laid-back families and striver families, and laid-back kids and striver kids. One approach will work in many circumstances, but others in other circumstances. Sometimes the kids who relentlessly play by the rules save us, and sometimes the kids who kept transferring schools and changing majors save us. - I think we have to shape the gameboard so the main players are, frankly, upper-income/middle-income white people, Asians, and maybe very successful African Americans. The idea that Asian American kids feel as if they have to do better to get into good colleges is horrific. That's just plain wrong. But the idea that all of next year's African-American freshmen at Stuyvesant High School in New York will fit in a van is wrong, too. And the idea poor white kids from rural schools with weak gifted and AP programs are being treated as if they were to the manor born is wrong. |