Have you read the whole thread?? Numerous examples have been given. Not all women have the good intentions that you have and that underscores the basic premise that people are different - it is NOT a black and white issue. |
To the above...
Yes, I have read the entire thread and I saw the examples assuming the worst of people. My question is still why is it not okay to tell simply out of sisterhood and wanting the other person to know she is being shit on? |
All I can say is that if you are going to say something to the wife, please be specific and do it because you are coming from a good place. I got an anonymous email once claiming that my husband cheated. No details about who, when, where etc and when I responded all I got back was riddles and mean-spirited things, i.e. "think about who he knows in the office", "not everything that happens at work is stressful, it can be quite enjoyable", "has anyone given him a present lately" etc. It was really stressful and horrible and took me a long time to get over. There was never any evidence and I ultimately decided to move on, but it still haunts me at times. To this day I don't know who did this. Oh, and I was 7 months pregnant with a high risk pregnancy too... |
It is OK in most cases - but not all. To puppet myself, I would not tell a woman who is in late pregnancy and I would not tell a person who just lost a parent - at least not then! To me, "sisterhood" is more than telling a woman that her man has cheated. To me, it is having the compassion to understand the revealing what you know might not always be the right thing to do right then. IMHO, saying that "there will be chaos whenever she finds out, so I am going to tell her now" or "I don't know how she will react and it may unleash holy hell on her given all she has on her plate, but I going to tell her out of sisterhood" is not compassionate to me. Of course, the cheater is ultimately to blame but a lack of consideration by the messenger can make an awful situation much worse. As far as assuming the worst in people, there are "associates" in my social circle that I KNOW would not have my best interests in mind based on experiences with them. If they told me my DH was cheating, it would be difficult for me to automatically think their motives were sincere - there is a history there. And some people just want to see the (your) world burn. |
Okay, but again, why is your concern with the messengers motive and not focused on your cheating spouse? What is confusing me is why so many people are concerned with the motives of the person giving the message and NOT the fact the person they married is the one breaking a vow. And yes, I get the pregnancy thing and the dead parent thing. This isn't about the person relaying the news. To me I am reading over and over and over again that wives prefer to have a reason NOT to know what their husbands are doing wrong and that in doing so they can place blame on the intentions of the person telling them. If the intentions of the person telling them are not 100% angelic and compassionate then it is okay for the spouse to cheat and the wife to not be told. |
Two reasons. I think a married woman would have no problem finding a guy just in it for the sex that doesn't want a relationship - doesn't that describe a good percentage of the 18-28 year old guys? Second is if she is working full-time plus kids, and is doing most of the heavy lifting at home, when does she have time and energy? It would have to be a co-worker and chances are he would know her marital status. |
So I can only be concerned about one thing? My DH would catch hell - and the one who cheated on me did. That would be my FIRST stop - not my only one! Depending on how they told me, if I knew that the messenger was the type of person who liked to start shit then that person would likely feel my wrath at some point. I can give you two examples. My cousin was being cheated on by her husband. Her co-worker knew (it was her sister) and revealed the affair in the break room at the job (with other people present) after telling other co-workers that my cousin "was getting full of herself." My friend was "told" by another friend in our social circle who texted my friend a pic of her DH out with another woman with the caption "not the prince you thought he was, huh?" So, yea motive matters when it is designed to fvck with me. To me, that was the OP's motive. All I am saying is I would hope that a "friend" would look at the big picture in deciding if and when to tell me. It is not a cut and dry issue to me. That is all I am saying. |
So text the wife from a burner phone? |
No, that happened to me - anonymous email - and it was just mean and horrible. I to this day have no idea if whoever did it was telling the truth or just being spiteful. |
You don't know if your spouse cheated on you? |
This sounds like me. It nearly killed me, and I was six months along a high-risk pregnancy. I thought I would lose the baby. NEVER ever ever send an anonymous note to someone about anything. It's cowardly, it's unethical, and it's just a horrible thing for a human being to do to someone else. It's abhorrent to me. |
Could you check the IP address of the email & see where it originated from or who sent it? |
Meaning NO email is truly anonymous. |
So? It doesn't matter what their intentions are; the issue is the deceit. You sound like a person who cares more about style than substance. |
You are being dramatic. An anonymous email giving you specifics, so that you could figure it out yourself would be perfectly acceptable to me. An anonymous email with riddles - yeah that's b.s. and I would toss it. |