Why Some People Convert to Islam

Anonymous
Iran rules by a different yardstick, and for what the U.S. calls the Islamic government, one can actually do a lot in Teheran. You can take ballet classes if you want. Try doing that in Jeddah. Jews have a guaranteed government seat.

When I say music, I mean instrumental music, not singing, or singing accompanied with instruments.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I should also add that it doesn't make sense for god to send down a book allegedly for all ages and peoples, and make its beauty accessible only to a minority of Muslims (not people, Muslims) who speak Arabic, since most of them do not.

I thinks a posting titled "Why some people converted to Islam" should be about that. Not some forum for simpletons who enjoy going off topic with something they can copy and paste from the internet.


Muslim PP gave a Youtube link where women allegedly converted to Islam after reading the Quran. So it seems fair that people are discussing the impact on various people of ... reading the Quran.


I think that would be a different discussion, The Impact of Reading the Qur'an. Not Why Some People Convert to Islam. Conversion has many paths not just reading the Qur'an, reading may be secondary. I don't believe you need to read it to convert.


This conversation makes absolutely no sense. PP, you need to take a chill pill. Anything that influences a person to convert should be in this thread. You have hijacked many threads but now suddenly find it objectionable to anyone who even slightly veers off topic (which arguably this does not do anyway)?


That was my first post here but thank-you for the warm welcome


oops, sorry, PP. Confused you with the islamophobe. Hard to determine who wrote what on an anonymous forum.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who was talking about the Gulf countries--the Arab world is much bigger than that and the Muslim world is even bigger. Culturally, being a musician is not seen as a respectable profession in the Arab world. If music is banned, it is banned. And the fundamentalists who do this do not make exceptions for weddings or funerals. All the ridiculous reasons for banning apply equally well to these occasions.

Singing is almost as deeply rooted in people as speaking. Fundamentalists keep trying to work against human nature. Mohammed did not do this or early Islam would never have succeeded. He saw how deeply important the pagan pilgrimage was to the economy of Mecca and innate spiritual needs of the people in that area of the peninsula. So he went on the pilgrimage himself, changing some things to root out the more obvious pagan aspects. This was a major factor in swaying Mecca to accept Islam. There was a man who understood human nature.

He never would have won over the Meccans if he'd banned the pilgrimage. And he would have won over close to no one if he'd banned music and singing, not there is any evidence he was inclined to do so.


Well not Arab but part of the Gulf, I don't believe the Shi'a Islam Government of Iran has banned music. The may restrict what you say though. Not supporting the regime at all btw, just commenting.


As I recall when Khomeini first came to power the regime tried to ban all kinds of things, including music and singing. I recall a lot of ridicule directed at that and them having to beat a hasty retreat on it.

Actually bothered to do a quick on this rather than relying on memory about this. Here's the first link I found. It confirms the Islamic regime's early banning of music:

http://fis-iran.org/en/irannameh/volxix/iran-status-music

Again, repeat my assertion that Islamic fundamentalists really don't have the first grasp on human nature and are doomed to failure because of this. Unfortunately, until that happens, much human misery will occur.

Anonymous
Here is a video about Dr. Jeffrey Lang, math professor, on how / why he went from being atheist to a Muslim:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3H_C0BMyGCA
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Here is a video about Dr. Jeffrey Lang, math professor, on how / why he went from being atheist to a Muslim:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3H_C0BMyGCA


Yawn. Can I post about people who went from Islam to atheism? Because there are a lot of them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here is a video about Dr. Jeffrey Lang, math professor, on how / why he went from being atheist to a Muslim:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3H_C0BMyGCA


Yawn. Can I post about people who went from Islam to atheism? Because there are a lot of them.


+1.

Who cares about one person's personal journey from one religion to another other than those enthralled by the chosen religion and who see the conversion as confirmation of the rightness of their beliefs?

Stuff like this should be posted on an Islamic site, not DCUM.
Anonymous
There is a whole industry dedicated to proving that the Quran has predicted all modern science and contains all sorts of scientific statements that centuries later, proved to be true. When you look at them closer, these statements are invariably incredibly vague and either meaningless, or a simple reflection of common sense. I remember reading one site that argued that the Quran correctly described the fetal development in humans based on this gem:

"God created man from sperm".

Or "God creates you inside the bodies of your mothers."

Or "We caused who we will to rest in the womb for the appointed term.

I was like, ummmmm, isn't all of that blindingly obvious, even to a 7th-century Arab? That sperm is required for procreation? That babies grow inside their mother's stomach?

But no wonder. Saudi Arabia has a very well financed program for scientists and physicians who convert that covers book deals, symposia etc. When you look closer at what they say, there is no other explanation than they do it for the money.
Anonymous
There's also the Quranic verse about the invisible pillars that hold up the sky.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:There is a whole industry dedicated to proving that the Quran has predicted all modern science and contains all sorts of scientific statements that centuries later, proved to be true. When you look at them closer, these statements are invariably incredibly vague and either meaningless, or a simple reflection of common sense. I remember reading one site that argued that the Quran correctly described the fetal development in humans based on this gem:

"God created man from sperm".

Or "God creates you inside the bodies of your mothers."

Or "We caused who we will to rest in the womb for the appointed term.

I was like, ummmmm, isn't all of that blindingly obvious, even to a 7th-century Arab? That sperm is required for procreation? That babies grow inside their mother's stomach?

But no wonder. Saudi Arabia has a very well financed program for scientists and physicians who convert that covers book deals, symposia etc. When you look closer at what they say, there is no other explanation than they do it for the money.


Not to mention that the bits going on and on about creating man from sperm miss a rather obvious part: the egg.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:There's also the Quranic verse about the invisible pillars that hold up the sky.

Could you post the verse this comes from please.
Anonymous
2. THE GENDER DETERMINATION HADITH

According to embryology, the crucial event that determines whether the embryo will develop into a male or female occurs in the second half of the sixth week of gestation.

See for example: How Is Sex Determined? www.pbs.org

The Prophet Muhammad MHMD - upon him and his House blessings and peace - disclosed the exact same timeframe fourteen centuries ago.

Imam Muslim narrates from Hudhayfa that the Prophet MHMD said:

The sperm-and-ovum drop falls into the uterus [and remains] for forty nights, after which the angel in charge of fashioning it descends upon it and says, "Lord! Male or female?" Then Allah makes it male or female.

Another version from Hudhayfa in al-Bukhari and Muslim states:

The angel is sent to the sperm-and-ovum drop after it has settled in the uterus for FORTY OR FORTY-FIVE NIGHTS and says, "Lord! Is it to be wretched or happy?" Then this is inscribed. Then he says, "Lord! Is it to be male or female?" Then this is inscribed, together with its deeds, its progeny, its term of life, and its sustenance. Then the records are folded up and nothing more is added nor subtracted.



Having just gone through IVF and PGD, which told me the sex of the fetus after FIVE FREAKING DAYS, I couldn't stop laughing at that one.
Anonymous
All very ironic considering Muslim men regularly divorce their wives for not producing sons (kind of like Henry the VIII).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:2. THE GENDER DETERMINATION HADITH

According to embryology, the crucial event that determines whether the embryo will develop into a male or female occurs in the second half of the sixth week of gestation.

See for example: How Is Sex Determined? www.pbs.org

The Prophet Muhammad MHMD - upon him and his House blessings and peace - disclosed the exact same timeframe fourteen centuries ago.

Imam Muslim narrates from Hudhayfa that the Prophet MHMD said:

The sperm-and-ovum drop falls into the uterus [and remains] for forty nights, after which the angel in charge of fashioning it descends upon it and says, "Lord! Male or female?" Then Allah makes it male or female.

Another version from Hudhayfa in al-Bukhari and Muslim states:

The angel is sent to the sperm-and-ovum drop after it has settled in the uterus for FORTY OR FORTY-FIVE NIGHTS and says, "Lord! Is it to be wretched or happy?" Then this is inscribed. Then he says, "Lord! Is it to be male or female?" Then this is inscribed, together with its deeds, its progeny, its term of life, and its sustenance. Then the records are folded up and nothing more is added nor subtracted.



Having just gone through IVF and PGD, which told me the sex of the fetus after FIVE FREAKING DAYS, I couldn't stop laughing at that one.


Thats hilarious….BUT -- Is it possible that the Angel did not know but that God knew all along, even before the embryo became a 5 day old blastocyst?

Here is an article written by Keith L. Moore, Ph.D., F.I.A.C., Professor of Anatomy and Chairman of the Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada on how astonished he was that the Quran could have identified key stages of the embryo before the microscope was even invented:

Keith Moore: "Human beings have always been interested in where they came from and how they developed before birth. We know from the earliest records that primitive peoples realized that the birth of a baby was the sequel to sexual union or intercourse. However, for many centuries the idea about human prenatal development were based on speculation and mysticism. The absence of knowledge about embryological processes and the dominating influence of superstition resulted in a non-scientific approach to human development.

As far was we know, Aristotle wrote the first embryology book in the 4th century BC. In it he recorded some observations on comparative embryology, especially on the general progress of the developing chick. He promoted, however, the incorrect idea that the human embryo developed from a formless mass that resulted from the union of the semen with the menstrual blood.

Scientific knowledge of embryology did not progress significantly for nearly 2000 years. It was not until the close of the 17th century, when the microscope was developed, that the early stages of human development could be effectively studied. After it was possible to examine cells under the microscope, it was reasoned in the 18th century that development resulted from the growth and differentiation of embryonic cells.

Almost a year ago I was consulted about the meaning of certain verses in the Qur’an and some sayings in the Hadiths which referred to human reproduction and embryological development.
I was amazed at the scientific accuracy of these statements which were made in the 7th century AD. I have selected verses and sayings for which I shall provide personal interpretations based on my knowledge of embryological history and of the modern science of embryology.

The realization that the embryo develops in stages in the uterus (figure 1) was not discussed or illustrated until the 15th century AD., although Galen had mentioned the placenta and fetal membranes in his book On the Formation of the Foetus written in the 2nd century AD and must have known about the uterus.

This verse from the Koran (39:6) states that God makes you in the wombs of your mothers in stages, one after another, with in three veils of darkness
Figure 1. This verse from the Koran (39:6) states that God makes you in the wombs of your mothers in stages, one after another, with in three veils of darkness.

After the microscope was developed in the 17th century, descriptions of the early stages of the developing chick were made, as observed with simple lenses (Arey, 1974). The staging of human embryos was not proposed until the 1940’s (Streeter, 1942), and the stages used nowadays (figure 2) were not adopted worldwide until a few years ago (O’Rahilly, 1972; Nishumura et al., 1974)."
Anonymous
In his article, Keith Moore writes: "It is reasonable to interpret the three veils of darkness mentioned in the Koran as: (a) the mother’s abdominal wall (figure 3); (b) the wall of the uterus; and (c) the amniochorionic membrane composed of the fused amnion and chorion. These three anatomical layers protect the embryo from external injury."

So he seemed to think the Quran, if not the hadith, was on point at least in knowing the three stages of fetal development.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:In his article, Keith Moore writes: "It is reasonable to interpret the three veils of darkness mentioned in the Koran as: (a) the mother’s abdominal wall (figure 3); (b) the wall of the uterus; and (c) the amniochorionic membrane composed of the fused amnion and chorion. These three anatomical layers protect the embryo from external injury."

So he seemed to think the Quran, if not the hadith, was on point at least in knowing the three stages of fetal development.

The fact that the baby was surrounded by three veils of darkness, i.e. three layers, can be easily ascertained by unassisted observation, which has been practiced in Rome and by Cleopatra way before Islam, where C-section was pioneered, and where Cleopatra sometimes cut up pregnant women for fun. Arabs were familiar with Greek physician writing so there was nothing revolutionary in what is written in this verse.

post reply Forum Index » Religion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: