RMIB vs BCC IB

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:RMIB has the same number of admittances to the same kinds of colleges as Whitman. There's an annual chart that someone always posts in the college forum.

So the usual - 1 or 2 to Harvard, 1 to MIT etc etc.
They aren't changing the college's own criteria for selection or the limits on how many they will accept from any given HS.

You all should know this already.

I'm guessing that the chart is for Richard Montgomery HS, not for the RM IB magnet program. From reading DCUM, you'd think the only RM students who go to college are the students in the RM IB magnet program.

Nope its for everyone from "RM"

BCC is in decline. Kids are passed out in the bathrooms. RM is a better environment.

BCC and RM are the same in this regard. Yeah, some kids were passed out in the bathroom and there's drug dealing and use going on at BCC, but there are armed robberies and weapons showing up at RM.

No MCPS high school is safe right now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:RMIB has the same number of admittances to the same kinds of colleges as Whitman. There's an annual chart that someone always posts in the college forum.

So the usual - 1 or 2 to Harvard, 1 to MIT etc etc.
They aren't changing the college's own criteria for selection or the limits on how many they will accept from any given HS.

You all should know this already.

I'm guessing that the chart is for Richard Montgomery HS, not for the RM IB magnet program. From reading DCUM, you'd think the only RM students who go to college are the students in the RM IB magnet program.

Nope its for everyone from "RM"

BCC is in decline. Kids are passed out in the bathrooms. RM is a better environment.

BCC and RM are the same in this regard. Yeah, some kids were passed out in the bathroom and there's drug dealing and use going on at BCC, but there are armed robberies and weapons showing up at RM.

No MCPS high school is safe right now.

Oh I know I even heard there are kids with knives running around Whitman and Churchill these days. Nowhere is safe, but drug problem at BCC seems out of control.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:RMIB has the same number of admittances to the same kinds of colleges as Whitman. There's an annual chart that someone always posts in the college forum.

So the usual - 1 or 2 to Harvard, 1 to MIT etc etc.
They aren't changing the college's own criteria for selection or the limits on how many they will accept from any given HS.

You all should know this already.

I'm guessing that the chart is for Richard Montgomery HS, not for the RM IB magnet program. From reading DCUM, you'd think the only RM students who go to college are the students in the RM IB magnet program.

Nope its for everyone from "RM"

BCC is in decline. Kids are passed out in the bathrooms. RM is a better environment.

I have a kid in RMIB and I’ll disagree. I mean, with the robbery in the bathroom recently and the rampant weed smoking. It’s not great.

But I truly think that is the case at every single MCPS middle school and high school right now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
“Also, the percentage pass rate is higher at RM.”

What you mean to say is that the pass rate of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend a program is predictably higher than the pass rate of a group of students who did not need to meet any criteria to attend a program, right?

Just saying

I agree with you. But I'm not sure the point of the statement. Don't people consider the outcomes of private school when deciding to send their kids there? And isn't that really the same analysis? Don't people consider the outcomes from graduating various colleges when choosing to go there? Both of which are based on competitive selection...

In other words:

"The top tier college acceptance rate of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend (Sidwell/Choate/GDS) is predictably higher than the top tier college acceptance rate of a group of kids who did not compete and attended their local public school."
"The average annual income post-graduation of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend a top tier college is predictably higher than the annual income of a group that did not compete and get accepted to those schools."

No.

You are saying that people do not think about the outcomes when making these types of decisions? Then what do people consider?

It's not the same analysis.

Any kid who gets into the magnet program for IB at RM will likely be equally successful, with respect to the IB diploma, at any of the multiple high schools in MCPS that offer IB. And might even be MORE successful at getting into fancy colleges at some of the other high schools than at RM, because the competition for fancy colleges from kids who are in the magnet program for IB at RM must be stiff.

When you define a "Fancy college" aren't you including in that analysis the overall outcomes from that degree, notwithstanding that individual outcomes may differ?

What you just described is not wrong, but it is precisely true of the examples that I gave as well.

If you're making the point that being in the RMIB magnet helps you get into the fancy colleges - well, I doubt it. I bet it hurts you. If you want to increase your chances of getting into a fancy college, go to Watkins Mill or Kennedy or Springbrook. Or move to Idaho and become a shepherd.

The admission data published by Bethesda Beat by high-school suggests otherwise. RMIB >>> Kennedy > Springbrook etc.

Yes, the college admission data published by Bethesda beat shows that RMIB has more impressive statistics than any other school aside for Blair in the county.

The school is RM. RMIB is not a school.

The entire thread is about RMIB! It’s in the title.

DP. I think PP's point is that the Bethesda Beat article shows RMHS as a whole, not just RMIB. Some people think that RM's college admissions data in that article only reflects RMIB students. It doesn't. I know of several non RMIB students who do very well in college admissions. That is why RM as a whole is on that list, and why the other regional IBs are not on the list.

All NMSF from RM are in IB

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
“Also, the percentage pass rate is higher at RM.”

What you mean to say is that the pass rate of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend a program is predictably higher than the pass rate of a group of students who did not need to meet any criteria to attend a program, right?

Just saying

I agree with you. But I'm not sure the point of the statement. Don't people consider the outcomes of private school when deciding to send their kids there? And isn't that really the same analysis? Don't people consider the outcomes from graduating various colleges when choosing to go there? Both of which are based on competitive selection...

In other words:

"The top tier college acceptance rate of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend (Sidwell/Choate/GDS) is predictably higher than the top tier college acceptance rate of a group of kids who did not compete and attended their local public school."
"The average annual income post-graduation of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend a top tier college is predictably higher than the annual income of a group that did not compete and get accepted to those schools."

No.

You are saying that people do not think about the outcomes when making these types of decisions? Then what do people consider?

It's not the same analysis.

Any kid who gets into the magnet program for IB at RM will likely be equally successful, with respect to the IB diploma, at any of the multiple high schools in MCPS that offer IB. And might even be MORE successful at getting into fancy colleges at some of the other high schools than at RM, because the competition for fancy colleges from kids who are in the magnet program for IB at RM must be stiff.

When you define a "Fancy college" aren't you including in that analysis the overall outcomes from that degree, notwithstanding that individual outcomes may differ?

What you just described is not wrong, but it is precisely true of the examples that I gave as well.

If you're making the point that being in the RMIB magnet helps you get into the fancy colleges - well, I doubt it. I bet it hurts you. If you want to increase your chances of getting into a fancy college, go to Watkins Mill or Kennedy or Springbrook. Or move to Idaho and become a shepherd.

The admission data published by Bethesda Beat by high-school suggests otherwise. RMIB >>> Kennedy > Springbrook etc.

Yes, the college admission data published by Bethesda beat shows that RMIB has more impressive statistics than any other school aside for Blair in the county.

The school is RM. RMIB is not a school.

The entire thread is about RMIB! It’s in the title.

DP. I think PP's point is that the Bethesda Beat article shows RMHS as a whole, not just RMIB. Some people think that RM's college admissions data in that article only reflects RMIB students. It doesn't. I know of several non RMIB students who do very well in college admissions. That is why RM as a whole is on that list, and why the other regional IBs are not on the list.

All NMSF from RM are in IB

ok, and ? We're not talking about NMSF.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
“Also, the percentage pass rate is higher at RM.”

What you mean to say is that the pass rate of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend a program is predictably higher than the pass rate of a group of students who did not need to meet any criteria to attend a program, right?

Just saying

I agree with you. But I'm not sure the point of the statement. Don't people consider the outcomes of private school when deciding to send their kids there? And isn't that really the same analysis? Don't people consider the outcomes from graduating various colleges when choosing to go there? Both of which are based on competitive selection...

In other words:

"The top tier college acceptance rate of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend (Sidwell/Choate/GDS) is predictably higher than the top tier college acceptance rate of a group of kids who did not compete and attended their local public school."
"The average annual income post-graduation of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend a top tier college is predictably higher than the annual income of a group that did not compete and get accepted to those schools."

No.

You are saying that people do not think about the outcomes when making these types of decisions? Then what do people consider?

It's not the same analysis.

Any kid who gets into the magnet program for IB at RM will likely be equally successful, with respect to the IB diploma, at any of the multiple high schools in MCPS that offer IB. And might even be MORE successful at getting into fancy colleges at some of the other high schools than at RM, because the competition for fancy colleges from kids who are in the magnet program for IB at RM must be stiff.

When you define a "Fancy college" aren't you including in that analysis the overall outcomes from that degree, notwithstanding that individual outcomes may differ?

What you just described is not wrong, but it is precisely true of the examples that I gave as well.

If you're making the point that being in the RMIB magnet helps you get into the fancy colleges - well, I doubt it. I bet it hurts you. If you want to increase your chances of getting into a fancy college, go to Watkins Mill or Kennedy or Springbrook. Or move to Idaho and become a shepherd.

The admission data published by Bethesda Beat by high-school suggests otherwise. RMIB >>> Kennedy > Springbrook etc.

Yes, the college admission data published by Bethesda beat shows that RMIB has more impressive statistics than any other school aside for Blair in the county.

The school is RM. RMIB is not a school.

The entire thread is about RMIB! It’s in the title.

DP. I think PP's point is that the Bethesda Beat article shows RMHS as a whole, not just RMIB. Some people think that RM's college admissions data in that article only reflects RMIB students. It doesn't. I know of several non RMIB students who do very well in college admissions. That is why RM as a whole is on that list, and why the other regional IBs are not on the list.

All NMSF from RM are in IB

ok, and ? We're not talking about NMSF.

So the assumption that it’s the IB students who got in to top colleges from RM

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
“Also, the percentage pass rate is higher at RM.”

What you mean to say is that the pass rate of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend a program is predictably higher than the pass rate of a group of students who did not need to meet any criteria to attend a program, right?

Just saying

I agree with you. But I'm not sure the point of the statement. Don't people consider the outcomes of private school when deciding to send their kids there? And isn't that really the same analysis? Don't people consider the outcomes from graduating various colleges when choosing to go there? Both of which are based on competitive selection...

In other words:

"The top tier college acceptance rate of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend (Sidwell/Choate/GDS) is predictably higher than the top tier college acceptance rate of a group of kids who did not compete and attended their local public school."
"The average annual income post-graduation of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend a top tier college is predictably higher than the annual income of a group that did not compete and get accepted to those schools."

No.

You are saying that people do not think about the outcomes when making these types of decisions? Then what do people consider?

It's not the same analysis.

Any kid who gets into the magnet program for IB at RM will likely be equally successful, with respect to the IB diploma, at any of the multiple high schools in MCPS that offer IB. And might even be MORE successful at getting into fancy colleges at some of the other high schools than at RM, because the competition for fancy colleges from kids who are in the magnet program for IB at RM must be stiff.

When you define a "Fancy college" aren't you including in that analysis the overall outcomes from that degree, notwithstanding that individual outcomes may differ?

What you just described is not wrong, but it is precisely true of the examples that I gave as well.

If you're making the point that being in the RMIB magnet helps you get into the fancy colleges - well, I doubt it. I bet it hurts you. If you want to increase your chances of getting into a fancy college, go to Watkins Mill or Kennedy or Springbrook. Or move to Idaho and become a shepherd.

The admission data published by Bethesda Beat by high-school suggests otherwise. RMIB >>> Kennedy > Springbrook etc.

Yes, the college admission data published by Bethesda beat shows that RMIB has more impressive statistics than any other school aside for Blair in the county.

The school is RM. RMIB is not a school.

The entire thread is about RMIB! It’s in the title.

DP. I think PP's point is that the Bethesda Beat article shows RMHS as a whole, not just RMIB. Some people think that RM's college admissions data in that article only reflects RMIB students. It doesn't. I know of several non RMIB students who do very well in college admissions. That is why RM as a whole is on that list, and why the other regional IBs are not on the list.

All NMSF from RM are in IB

false

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
“Also, the percentage pass rate is higher at RM.”

What you mean to say is that the pass rate of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend a program is predictably higher than the pass rate of a group of students who did not need to meet any criteria to attend a program, right?

Just saying

I agree with you. But I'm not sure the point of the statement. Don't people consider the outcomes of private school when deciding to send their kids there? And isn't that really the same analysis? Don't people consider the outcomes from graduating various colleges when choosing to go there? Both of which are based on competitive selection...

In other words:

"The top tier college acceptance rate of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend (Sidwell/Choate/GDS) is predictably higher than the top tier college acceptance rate of a group of kids who did not compete and attended their local public school."
"The average annual income post-graduation of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend a top tier college is predictably higher than the annual income of a group that did not compete and get accepted to those schools."

No.

You are saying that people do not think about the outcomes when making these types of decisions? Then what do people consider?

It's not the same analysis.

Any kid who gets into the magnet program for IB at RM will likely be equally successful, with respect to the IB diploma, at any of the multiple high schools in MCPS that offer IB. And might even be MORE successful at getting into fancy colleges at some of the other high schools than at RM, because the competition for fancy colleges from kids who are in the magnet program for IB at RM must be stiff.

When you define a "Fancy college" aren't you including in that analysis the overall outcomes from that degree, notwithstanding that individual outcomes may differ?

What you just described is not wrong, but it is precisely true of the examples that I gave as well.

If you're making the point that being in the RMIB magnet helps you get into the fancy colleges - well, I doubt it. I bet it hurts you. If you want to increase your chances of getting into a fancy college, go to Watkins Mill or Kennedy or Springbrook. Or move to Idaho and become a shepherd.

The admission data published by Bethesda Beat by high-school suggests otherwise. RMIB >>> Kennedy > Springbrook etc.

Yes, the college admission data published by Bethesda beat shows that RMIB has more impressive statistics than any other school aside for Blair in the county.

The school is RM. RMIB is not a school.

The entire thread is about RMIB! It’s in the title.

DP. I think PP's point is that the Bethesda Beat article shows RMHS as a whole, not just RMIB. Some people think that RM's college admissions data in that article only reflects RMIB students. It doesn't. I know of several non RMIB students who do very well in college admissions. That is why RM as a whole is on that list, and why the other regional IBs are not on the list.

All NMSF from RM are in IB

ok, and ? We're not talking about NMSF.

So the assumption that it’s the IB students who got in to top colleges from RM

ASSumption... need proof.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
“Also, the percentage pass rate is higher at RM.”

What you mean to say is that the pass rate of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend a program is predictably higher than the pass rate of a group of students who did not need to meet any criteria to attend a program, right?

Just saying

I agree with you. But I'm not sure the point of the statement. Don't people consider the outcomes of private school when deciding to send their kids there? And isn't that really the same analysis? Don't people consider the outcomes from graduating various colleges when choosing to go there? Both of which are based on competitive selection...

In other words:

"The top tier college acceptance rate of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend (Sidwell/Choate/GDS) is predictably higher than the top tier college acceptance rate of a group of kids who did not compete and attended their local public school."
"The average annual income post-graduation of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend a top tier college is predictably higher than the annual income of a group that did not compete and get accepted to those schools."

No.

You are saying that people do not think about the outcomes when making these types of decisions? Then what do people consider?

It's not the same analysis.

Any kid who gets into the magnet program for IB at RM will likely be equally successful, with respect to the IB diploma, at any of the multiple high schools in MCPS that offer IB. And might even be MORE successful at getting into fancy colleges at some of the other high schools than at RM, because the competition for fancy colleges from kids who are in the magnet program for IB at RM must be stiff.

When you define a "Fancy college" aren't you including in that analysis the overall outcomes from that degree, notwithstanding that individual outcomes may differ?

What you just described is not wrong, but it is precisely true of the examples that I gave as well.

If you're making the point that being in the RMIB magnet helps you get into the fancy colleges - well, I doubt it. I bet it hurts you. If you want to increase your chances of getting into a fancy college, go to Watkins Mill or Kennedy or Springbrook. Or move to Idaho and become a shepherd.

The admission data published by Bethesda Beat by high-school suggests otherwise. RMIB >>> Kennedy > Springbrook etc.

Yes, the college admission data published by Bethesda beat shows that RMIB has more impressive statistics than any other school aside for Blair in the county.

The school is RM. RMIB is not a school.

The entire thread is about RMIB! It’s in the title.

DP. I think PP's point is that the Bethesda Beat article shows RMHS as a whole, not just RMIB. Some people think that RM's college admissions data in that article only reflects RMIB students. It doesn't. I know of several non RMIB students who do very well in college admissions. That is why RM as a whole is on that list, and why the other regional IBs are not on the list.

All NMSF from RM are in IB

ok, and ? We're not talking about NMSF.

So the assumption that it’s the IB students who got in to top colleges from RM

ASSumption... need proof.

Are you that weak logical thinking ..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any RM student can join the IB program in 11th grade. The test in is only for 9th grade, whether in or out of the cluster.

That said, RM and the MS JW has the MYP program that goes to 10th grade, and ALL JW/RM students are automatically enrolled in the MYP. There is an MYP project that they have to complete by 10th grade. Again, that's if your kid doesn't get into RMIB in 9th grade.

And yes, RMIB has the highest diploma rate, I think in the country, maybe even globally.

No. Not globally. Most of Europe does to much better.

RMIB diploma rate was 92% when Jennifer Hoover was the IB coordinator. As soon as she left, it dropped to 75%. Worldwide, IB diploma rate is 60%. Even in Europe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:RMIB has the same number of admittances to the same kinds of colleges as Whitman. There's an annual chart that someone always posts in the college forum.

So the usual - 1 or 2 to Harvard, 1 to MIT etc etc.
They aren't changing the college's own criteria for selection or the limits on how many they will accept from any given HS.

You all should know this already.

I'm guessing that the chart is for Richard Montgomery HS, not for the RM IB magnet program. From reading DCUM, you'd think the only RM students who go to college are the students in the RM IB magnet program.

Nope its for everyone from "RM"

BCC is in decline. Kids are passed out in the bathrooms. RM is a better environment.

I have a kid in RMIB and I’ll disagree. I mean, with the robbery in the bathroom recently and the rampant weed smoking. It’s not great.

But I truly think that is the case at every single MCPS middle school and high school right now.

Every single public school in DC, VA and MD has it share of riff-raffs. This is a reflection of society. MCPS has a huge share of illegal immigrants to from south of the border, so it impacts who is in the schools. Of course, once the kids are in this country they need to be educated. However, it makes sense to have younger kids put in regular ES for assimilation with ESOL support but teenagers who are basically illitrate when they come to US need to be all put in a different dedicated school so that they can get educated in more intense manner.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any RM student can join the IB program in 11th grade. The test in is only for 9th grade, whether in or out of the cluster.

That said, RM and the MS JW has the MYP program that goes to 10th grade, and ALL JW/RM students are automatically enrolled in the MYP. There is an MYP project that they have to complete by 10th grade. Again, that's if your kid doesn't get into RMIB in 9th grade.

And yes, RMIB has the highest diploma rate, I think in the country, maybe even globally.

No. Not globally. Most of Europe does to much better.

RMIB diploma rate was 92% when Jennifer Hoover was the IB coordinator. As soon as she left, it dropped to 75%. Worldwide, IB diploma rate is 60%. Even in Europe.

? you're numbers are totally off.

2022 RMIB diploma rate is 98%. Prior years has been at least 90%+.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
“Also, the percentage pass rate is higher at RM.”

What you mean to say is that the pass rate of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend a program is predictably higher than the pass rate of a group of students who did not need to meet any criteria to attend a program, right?

Just saying

I agree with you. But I'm not sure the point of the statement. Don't people consider the outcomes of private school when deciding to send their kids there? And isn't that really the same analysis? Don't people consider the outcomes from graduating various colleges when choosing to go there? Both of which are based on competitive selection...

In other words:

"The top tier college acceptance rate of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend (Sidwell/Choate/GDS) is predictably higher than the top tier college acceptance rate of a group of kids who did not compete and attended their local public school."
"The average annual income post-graduation of a group of students who were competitively selected to attend a top tier college is predictably higher than the annual income of a group that did not compete and get accepted to those schools."

No.

You are saying that people do not think about the outcomes when making these types of decisions? Then what do people consider?

It's not the same analysis.

Any kid who gets into the magnet program for IB at RM will likely be equally successful, with respect to the IB diploma, at any of the multiple high schools in MCPS that offer IB. And might even be MORE successful at getting into fancy colleges at some of the other high schools than at RM, because the competition for fancy colleges from kids who are in the magnet program for IB at RM must be stiff.

When you define a "Fancy college" aren't you including in that analysis the overall outcomes from that degree, notwithstanding that individual outcomes may differ?

What you just described is not wrong, but it is precisely true of the examples that I gave as well.

If you're making the point that being in the RMIB magnet helps you get into the fancy colleges - well, I doubt it. I bet it hurts you. If you want to increase your chances of getting into a fancy college, go to Watkins Mill or Kennedy or Springbrook. Or move to Idaho and become a shepherd.

The admission data published by Bethesda Beat by high-school suggests otherwise. RMIB >>> Kennedy > Springbrook etc.

Yes, the college admission data published by Bethesda beat shows that RMIB has more impressive statistics than any other school aside for Blair in the county.

The school is RM. RMIB is not a school.

The entire thread is about RMIB! It’s in the title.

DP. I think PP's point is that the Bethesda Beat article shows RMHS as a whole, not just RMIB. Some people think that RM's college admissions data in that article only reflects RMIB students. It doesn't. I know of several non RMIB students who do very well in college admissions. That is why RM as a whole is on that list, and why the other regional IBs are not on the list.

All NMSF from RM are in IB

ok, and ? We're not talking about NMSF.

So the assumption that it’s the IB students who got in to top colleges from RM

ASSumption... need proof.

Are you that weak logical thinking ..

That's a bit calling the kettle black. You have zero proof that non IB students aren't getting into top colleges.