Murdaugh Murders-southern scandal: Netflix

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wtf is Wofford? Is it a decent school?

Acceptance rate is 53%. USC’s is 75%.
It’s National Liberal Arts Colleges, #70

[Anonymous]

How is it that guy who took the drone footage can legally share that in the public forum? Meaning, is it legal to film someone on their private property?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How is it that guy who took the drone footage can legally share that in the public forum? Meaning, is it legal to film someone on their private property?

I don’t know, but it was very interesting/damning footage!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How is it that guy who took the drone footage can legally share that in the public forum? Meaning, is it legal to film someone on their private property?

Each state has its own drone (UAV) laws.

I Googled and found: According to the South Carolina Department of Transportation and the South Carolina General Assembly there are currently no state laws in place concerning the operations of drones in South Carolina.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a tiktok that had a theory I thought made sense. That he hired a hit man to do it and paul wasn't supposed to be there. And that is why he's so seemingly distraught in the 911 call and says 'why did you get into that paul' or something like that. He just meant to kill the wife, but the kid was there unplanned and both got killed.

That doesn’t make any sense. The kennel video has Paul talking to Cash and Alex and Maggie talking in the background. If you can hear the two of them, they can hear Paul. So Alex wouldn’t have been surprised to know that Paul was there.

I think he and Maggie had a fight. She said something that made him flip and he went after her. Paul saw it, got in the middle and Alex shot him, before shooting her.

I believe they know Paul was killed first. Alex knew Paul would be there. He planned to kill him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did they ever say why they think he killed Paul? What was his motive?

His life was falling apart:
- his wife and song knew of pill problem
- his law firm confronted him that day about his embezzlement of law firm funds
- marriage was in trouble (see above)
- his son was awaiting trial for a death while driving his boat, where the son was drunk

- also, there are other suspicious deaths in his past. He is a liar and a con man.

But I still wonder exactly what happened.
Was it totally calculated? Is that why he called in Maggie to come to the house? Or was it all in a moment of rage?
Was she then intended target? Who did he shoot first, and why?
Did he shoot Paul first and then Maggie, because she was a witness? The other way around?

What were the other suspicious deaths in his past?

Maggie owned the beach house and he wanted to get a loan against it. All of Maggies property became his when she died. He was desperate for the money. I wonder if he had additional insurance on Msggie / Paul.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Paul had recently been suspended or expelled from U. of South Carolina law school for cheating. Doubt that he will be readmitted now.

Buster transferred and still graduated

I have not seen any source claim Buster graduate law school anywhere. I’m pretty sure he’s unemployed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Paul had recently been suspended or expelled from U. of South Carolina law school for cheating. Doubt that he will be readmitted now.

Buster transferred and still graduated

I have not seen any source claim Buster graduate law school anywhere. I’m pretty sure he’s unemployed.

Before Alex was incarcerated, he had worked out (paid) for Buster to be re admitted to law school that fall. Then, Maggie and Paul were murdered. After that, the plan seemed to change and fluctuate. There are several recorded jail house calls between Alex and Buster about the re admission. After the murders, the law school decided to defer his acceptance another year. Iirc, and if nothing has changed, that would have him going back to law school this fall. I don’t think it’s been mentioned where he is working, just that he is currently employed and making “a good living” wherever that means.

I read/heard Alex paid $60,000.00 to have Buster re admitted to law school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a tiktok that had a theory I thought made sense. That he hired a hit man to do it and paul wasn't supposed to be there. And that is why he's so seemingly distraught in the 911 call and says 'why did you get into that paul' or something like that. He just meant to kill the wife, but the kid was there unplanned and both got killed.

That doesn’t make any sense. The kennel video has Paul talking to Cash and Alex and Maggie talking in the background. If you can hear the two of them, they can hear Paul. So Alex wouldn’t have been surprised to know that Paul was there.

I think he and Maggie had a fight. She said something that made him flip and he went after her. Paul saw it, got in the middle and Alex shot him, before shooting her.

No it was preplanned. She was divorcing him. This was all about money. Paul was costing him money with the boat law suit, Maggie was going to take half.

Buster was an asset (graduated law school), Paul and Maggie were liabilities.


Buster didn’t graduate law school. He was kicked out for plagiarism. He was caught plagiarizing a paper. Alex paid over $50,000.00 to get Buster back in; his admission was deferred to this fall. Nevertheless, he hasn’t graduated law school. He will be lucky if he can even restart now that Alex is locked up and not pulling strings.

[Anonymous]

The amount of drinking and the lack of parental interest regarding the drinking was shocking to me. This documentary should be a PSA for “Do you know where your children are?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The amount of drinking and the lack of parental interest regarding the drinking was shocking to me. This documentary should be a PSA for “Do you know where your children are?

+1 totally agree

[Anonymous]

Just hearing the kid’s nicknames, Buster and Paw Paw, hurts my ears.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The amount of drinking and the lack of parental interest regarding the drinking was shocking to me. This documentary should be a PSA for “Do you know where your children are?

It is strange to me that few mention this. Everyone knew Paul was a bad kid. Why were the parents letting their daughters hang out with him late at night?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of drinking and the lack of parental interest regarding the drinking was shocking to me. This documentary should be a PSA for “Do you know where your children are?

It is strange to me that few mention this. Everyone knew Paul was a bad kid. Why were the parents letting their daughters hang out with him late at night?

If not for the $, those kids wouldn't give him the time of day. Skrony ginger.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of drinking and the lack of parental interest regarding the drinking was shocking to me. This documentary should be a PSA for “Do you know where your children are?

It is strange to me that few mention this. Everyone knew Paul was a bad kid. Why were the parents letting their daughters hang out with him late at night?

I’m not sure it’s fair to say he was “bad” but he made horrible choices because he never had to deal with the repercussions of those choices. The parents let their kids hang out with him because the family had cache in the area and they were willing to look the other way on the partying if it meant proximity to local power.