LMVSC town hall

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know nothing about LMVSC but from my observation it's a myopic take on the situation at hand. It's a bit unfair to judge en entire framework on the Spring season results in the wake of COVID, when many players across the region sat out last Spring and some only trained and didn't play matches this past fall--putting about an 18-month gap between their last competitive outdoor matches + lots of COVID-induced roster turnover (along with other factors that usually/will always impact roster turnover). COVID could have held back infusion of additional talent (as well as stemmed the flow of talent going out the door).

Are the White and Red rosters are significantly different now than they were pre-COVID? And are the teams about as competitive standings-wise as they were in the last full season (Fall 2019) before COVID?

I appreciate your input and view on things. To clarify:
CCL results are year-long
I think almost all of the NCSL teams moved divisions

The academy system was supposed to be best for the players but it looks like it was best for LC; also not supposed to be the for HS-aged groups. But too many age groups only have one team, and, I know at least the 2005G age group has combined to form their academy.

I don't understand why people blame academy, it can work, but it only works if there is a player pool. If you only have one team in an age group then you don't have an academy

This is my point. My problem with the academy is it was only for the purpose of helping teams with two teams; the only coach that has that is LC. And again; the HS-aged teams were supposed to be doing this but the U16 girls are. It's a standard 'no standard applied' situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know nothing about LMVSC but from my observation it's a myopic take on the situation at hand. It's a bit unfair to judge en entire framework on the Spring season results in the wake of COVID, when many players across the region sat out last Spring and some only trained and didn't play matches this past fall--putting about an 18-month gap between their last competitive outdoor matches + lots of COVID-induced roster turnover (along with other factors that usually/will always impact roster turnover). COVID could have held back infusion of additional talent (as well as stemmed the flow of talent going out the door).

Are the White and Red rosters are significantly different now than they were pre-COVID? And are the teams about as competitive standings-wise as they were in the last full season (Fall 2019) before COVID?

I appreciate your input and view on things. To clarify:
CCL results are year-long
I think almost all of the NCSL teams moved divisions

The academy system was supposed to be best for the players but it looks like it was best for LC; also not supposed to be the for HS-aged groups. But too many age groups only have one team, and, I know at least the 2005G age group has combined to form their academy.

I don't understand why people blame academy, it can work, but it only works if there is a player pool. If you only have one team in an age group then you don't have an academy

This is my point. My problem with the academy is it was only for the purpose of helping teams with two teams; the only coach that has that is LC. And again; the HS-aged teams were supposed to be doing this but the U16 girls are. It's a standard 'no standard applied' situation.

Maybe the academy is structured for LC so he can call be late to practices or not show up and have a coach there to cover for him. I guess then it is an academy for his age group as the players are forced to practice together as only 1 coach is running the practice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know nothing about LMVSC but from my observation it's a myopic take on the situation at hand. It's a bit unfair to judge en entire framework on the Spring season results in the wake of COVID, when many players across the region sat out last Spring and some only trained and didn't play matches this past fall--putting about an 18-month gap between their last competitive outdoor matches + lots of COVID-induced roster turnover (along with other factors that usually/will always impact roster turnover). COVID could have held back infusion of additional talent (as well as stemmed the flow of talent going out the door).

Are the White and Red rosters are significantly different now than they were pre-COVID? And are the teams about as competitive standings-wise as they were in the last full season (Fall 2019) before COVID?

I appreciate your input and view on things. To clarify:
CCL results are year-long
I think almost all of the NCSL teams moved divisions

The academy system was supposed to be best for the players but it looks like it was best for LC; also not supposed to be the for HS-aged groups. But too many age groups only have one team, and, I know at least the 2005G age group has combined to form their academy.

I don't understand why people blame academy, it can work, but it only works if there is a player pool. If you only have one team in an age group then you don't have an academy

This is my point. My problem with the academy is it was only for the purpose of helping teams with two teams; the only coach that has that is LC. And again; the HS-aged teams were supposed to be doing this but the U16 girls are. It's a standard 'no standard applied' situation.

Maybe the academy is structured for LC so he can call be late to practices or not show up and have a coach there to cover for him. I guess then it is an academy for his age group as the players are forced to practice together as only 1 coach is running the practice.

He’s a joke. But looks like he’s not going anywhere anytime soon

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know nothing about LMVSC but from my observation it's a myopic take on the situation at hand. It's a bit unfair to judge en entire framework on the Spring season results in the wake of COVID, when many players across the region sat out last Spring and some only trained and didn't play matches this past fall--putting about an 18-month gap between their last competitive outdoor matches + lots of COVID-induced roster turnover (along with other factors that usually/will always impact roster turnover). COVID could have held back infusion of additional talent (as well as stemmed the flow of talent going out the door).

Are the White and Red rosters are significantly different now than they were pre-COVID? And are the teams about as competitive standings-wise as they were in the last full season (Fall 2019) before COVID?

I appreciate your input and view on things. To clarify:
CCL results are year-long
I think almost all of the NCSL teams moved divisions

The academy system was supposed to be best for the players but it looks like it was best for LC; also not supposed to be the for HS-aged groups. But too many age groups only have one team, and, I know at least the 2005G age group has combined to form their academy.

I don't understand why people blame academy, it can work, but it only works if there is a player pool. If you only have one team in an age group then you don't have an academy

This is my point. My problem with the academy is it was only for the purpose of helping teams with two teams; the only coach that has that is LC. And again; the HS-aged teams were supposed to be doing this but the U16 girls are. It's a standard 'no standard applied' situation.

Maybe the academy is structured for LC so he can call be late to practices or not show up and have a coach there to cover for him. I guess then it is an academy for his age group as the players are forced to practice together as only 1 coach is running the practice.

He’s a joke. But looks like he’s not going anywhere anytime soon

Wait....this club has travel teams? When things shake out, there will be no need for a TD or DOC. They will all be looking for new jobs or taking a big pay cut.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know nothing about LMVSC but from my observation it's a myopic take on the situation at hand. It's a bit unfair to judge en entire framework on the Spring season results in the wake of COVID, when many players across the region sat out last Spring and some only trained and didn't play matches this past fall--putting about an 18-month gap between their last competitive outdoor matches + lots of COVID-induced roster turnover (along with other factors that usually/will always impact roster turnover). COVID could have held back infusion of additional talent (as well as stemmed the flow of talent going out the door).

Are the White and Red rosters are significantly different now than they were pre-COVID? And are the teams about as competitive standings-wise as they were in the last full season (Fall 2019) before COVID?

I appreciate your input and view on things. To clarify:
CCL results are year-long
I think almost all of the NCSL teams moved divisions

The academy system was supposed to be best for the players but it looks like it was best for LC; also not supposed to be the for HS-aged groups. But too many age groups only have one team, and, I know at least the 2005G age group has combined to form their academy.

I don't understand why people blame academy, it can work, but it only works if there is a player pool. If you only have one team in an age group then you don't have an academy

This is my point. My problem with the academy is it was only for the purpose of helping teams with two teams; the only coach that has that is LC. And again; the HS-aged teams were supposed to be doing this but the U16 girls are. It's a standard 'no standard applied' situation.

Maybe the academy is structured for LC so he can call be late to practices or not show up and have a coach there to cover for him. I guess then it is an academy for his age group as the players are forced to practice together as only 1 coach is running the practice.

He’s a joke. But looks like he’s not going anywhere anytime soon

Wait....this club has travel teams? When things shake out, there will be no need for a TD or DOC. They will all be looking for new jobs or taking a big pay cut.

Why do you say that?

[Anonymous]

Wow, looks like EM still posts here.

[Anonymous]

Where's the love?

[Anonymous]

How is LMVSC doing these days?

[Anonymous]

Where's the love?

[Anonymous]

Bored today, EM?

[Anonymous]

Sinking ship for sure

[Anonymous]

Must be nice to wreck this club to grow your own club, EM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Must be nice to wreck this club to grow your own club, EM.

LB wrecked this club and no one else is to blame but her and the board at lmvsc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Must be nice to wreck this club to grow your own club, EM.

LB wrecked this club and no one else is to blame but her and the board at lmvsc.

We never properly thanked you for taking away all of our players.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Must be nice to wreck this club to grow your own club, EM.

LB wrecked this club and no one else is to blame but her and the board at lmvsc.

We never properly thanked you for taking away all of our players.

Was it not the guy that took all the players to another club?