New Bravo Show: Real Housewives of Potomac

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Katie is engaged...AGAIN. 5 months of dating.

https://www.bravotv.com/the-daily-dish/the-real-housewives-of-potomacs-katie-rost-engaged-boyfriend-jesse

Still producing odd tweets:
https://twitter.com/KatieRost/status/1154152391974854658?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

No kids or parenting in sight.

Claims to be bisexual and writing a book.

I can't with this chick.

[Anonymous]

Do you all remember when Ashley over out of Michael's condo? She got an apartment in Potomac Yards. That was only 2 years ago or so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do you all remember when Ashley over out of Michael's condo? She got an apartment in Potomac Yards. That was only 2 years ago or so.

Yes, he kicked her out and they were at the edge of divorce. They renotiaged the pre-nup, and tried again. It's very much a business marriage.

[Anonymous]

What is with Kate’s horrific wigs??

[Anonymous]

Why do some of these women actually think they can sing? Ashley, Candiace, and now Rayven - I’m looking at you.

[Anonymous]

Gizelle and her popcorn - she is such a $hit stirrer but she never fails to crack me up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is with Kate’s horrific wigs??

I can't with her wigs. And in the flashback with that weird long scarf siting on her head really has me thinking it has passed entertaining and is frankly sad, like when you see a mentally ill person with no awareness of their appearance. Between the wigs and the groucho glasses it's like she's in disguise. If she came in my store I'd think she was shoplifting, because of her bizarre attention-drawing, shifty disguise. I think michael rappaport said she looked like she puts on her wigs by throwing them up in air, letting them land on her head and however it lands, she wears it. Accurate. Sad no one is addressing this with her- maybe they are scared/unsure how to proceed?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is with Kate’s horrific wigs??

I can't with her wigs. And in the flashback with that weird long scarf siting on her head really has me thinking it has passed entertaining and is frankly sad, like when you see a mentally ill person with no awareness of their appearance. Between the wigs and the groucho glasses it's like she's in disguise. If she came in my store I'd think she was shoplifting, because of her bizarre attention-drawing, shifty disguise. I think michael rappaport said she looked like she puts on her wigs by throwing them up in air, letting them land on her head and however it lands, she wears it. Accurate. Sad no one is addressing this with her- maybe they are scared/unsure how to proceed?

How do you know no one is addressing this? Unless Katie is trying to harm herself or others, there is very little that family can do for those that are mentally ill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is with Kate’s horrific wigs??

She said she shaved her head and bleached it blonde in December, which messed up the texture. There were pics on Instagram.
Since then she’s been hiding under the shitty wigs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Katie is engaged...AGAIN. 5 months of dating.

https://www.bravotv.com/the-daily-dish/the-real-housewives-of-potomacs-katie-rost-engaged-boyfriend-jesse

Still producing odd tweets:
https://twitter.com/KatieRost/status/1154152391974854658?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

No kids or parenting in sight.

Claims to be bisexual and writing a book.

I can't with this chick.

Is it a book or movie? She claims both.

https://pagesix.com/2019/07/29/real-housewives-star-katie-rost-opens-up-about-new-fiance-and-ongoing-custody-battle/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is with Kate’s horrific wigs??

She said she shaved her head and bleached it blonde in December, which messed up the texture. There were pics on Instagram.
Since then she’s been hiding under the shitty wigs.

This current season was filmed last summer/Fall and she’s been wearing them.

[Anonymous]

The last episode (and the last few minutes) were crazy. They showed Michael basically admit that he did something the camera man didn't like. Maryland Case search says the plea was "other" and the disposition was "nolle prosequi". I don't know what that means....but if there is footage, why wouldn't it be a guilty finding? My bigger question is what is Bravo doing about it? Shouldn't they fire Michael from the show?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The last episode (and the last few minutes) were crazy. They showed Michael basically admit that he did something the camera man didn't like. Maryland Case search says the plea was "other" and the disposition was "nolle prosequi". I don't know what that means....but if there is footage, why wouldn't it be a guilty finding? My bigger question is what is Bravo doing about it? Shouldn't they fire Michael from the show?

That means the plaintiff formally dismissed the charges.

Sounds like they settled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The last episode (and the last few minutes) were crazy. They showed Michael basically admit that he did something the camera man didn't like. Maryland Case search says the plea was "other" and the disposition was "nolle prosequi". I don't know what that means....but if there is footage, why wouldn't it be a guilty finding? My bigger question is what is Bravo doing about it? Shouldn't they fire Michael from the show?

That means the plaintiff formally dismissed the charges.

Sounds like they settled.

And how is Bravo handling it? Why wasn't Michael fired?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The last episode (and the last few minutes) were crazy. They showed Michael basically admit that he did something the camera man didn't like. Maryland Case search says the plea was "other" and the disposition was "nolle prosequi". I don't know what that means....but if there is footage, why wouldn't it be a guilty finding? My bigger question is what is Bravo doing about it? Shouldn't they fire Michael from the show?

That means the plaintiff formally dismissed the charges.
Sounds like they settled.

And how is Bravo handling it? Why wasn't Michael fired?

The cameraman stopping speaking to the DA. Perhaps he retracted his comments to Bravo/the production company. They should have done their own investigation - The charges being dropped shouldn’t have been relevant. They fired Jeff Lewis for harassing Jenny and Jeff wasn’t being criminally investigated.