Woohoo in-person voters! Virginia leading the pack

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mostly non voters rallying at a polling place. Okie dokey then

They were there to stir up trouble.

Whatever - Virginia is done with their moron leader. These long lines are NOT his voters.

You can keep braying this as much as you want. They did nothing illegal and were simply exercising their 1st Amendment rights - without screaming in anyone’s face or demanding they join them, imagine that! We know you only promote free speech when you agree with what’s being said, but you’ll just have to deal with ALL Americans having the right to speak up.

Who protests at a polling place? It doesn’t make any sense. If they were actually protesting something objectionable, I’d agree with you 100%. They just showed up to ruffle people’s feathers. I suppose that is their right, albeit a less admirable one.

I’m absolutely not afraid of them, and don’t think they should have been removed. It just wasn’t a good look to protest where people are quietly exercising their right to vote. To protest there makes it look like they don’t want people voting, and that’s not something I can quite wrap my head around. They have to right to protest just to be jerks. It seems like that’s all they were doing. I hope protesting at polling places isn’t a trend.

Except that they weren’t protesting - for the 100th time. They were simply holding a small rally. And they weren’t intimidating anyone, as much as liberals and the media enjoy pretending they were. Since when is chanting for your preferred candidate “intimidation”? Absurd.

Nope.

People had to be escorted. The line was moved inside. They disrupted the polling place. ILLEGAL.

They can go "rally" somewhere else.

Oh, boo boo. Did a handful of people chanting their candidate’s name “intimidate” them so very much? Good grief. I wonder how these poor, “scared” voters would hold up with an aggressive mob screaming in their faces, demanding they raise a fist in solidarity. Though I guess THAT would be encouraged and not at all intimidating, right?

Don’t be fascists. Allow registered voters to cast their votes and then count all the votes.

WTF is wrong with you assholes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mostly non voters rallying at a polling place. Okie dokey then

They were there to stir up trouble.

Whatever - Virginia is done with their moron leader. These long lines are NOT his voters.

You can keep braying this as much as you want. They did nothing illegal and were simply exercising their 1st Amendment rights - without screaming in anyone’s face or demanding they join them, imagine that! We know you only promote free speech when you agree with what’s being said, but you’ll just have to deal with ALL Americans having the right to speak up.

Who protests at a polling place? It doesn’t make any sense. If they were actually protesting something objectionable, I’d agree with you 100%. They just showed up to ruffle people’s feathers. I suppose that is their right, albeit a less admirable one.

I’m absolutely not afraid of them, and don’t think they should have been removed. It just wasn’t a good look to protest where people are quietly exercising their right to vote. To protest there makes it look like they don’t want people voting, and that’s not something I can quite wrap my head around. They have to right to protest just to be jerks. It seems like that’s all they were doing. I hope protesting at polling places isn’t a trend.

Except that they weren’t protesting - for the 100th time. They were simply holding a small rally. And they weren’t intimidating anyone, as much as liberals and the media enjoy pretending they were. Since when is chanting for your preferred candidate “intimidation”? Absurd.

Nope.

People had to be escorted. The line was moved inside. They disrupted the polling place. ILLEGAL.

They can go "rally" somewhere else.

Oh, boo boo. Did a handful of people chanting their candidate’s name “intimidate” them so very much? Good grief. I wonder how these poor, “scared” voters would hold up with an aggressive mob screaming in their faces, demanding they raise a fist in solidarity. Though I guess THAT would be encouraged and not at all intimidating, right?

Don’t be fascists. Allow registered voters to cast their votes and then count all the votes.

WTF is wrong with you assholes?

+1

Why is it that only Democrats care about making sure it's easier to vote and that all votes are counted?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mostly non voters rallying at a polling place. Okie dokey then

They were there to stir up trouble.

Whatever - Virginia is done with their moron leader. These long lines are NOT his voters.

You can keep braying this as much as you want. They did nothing illegal and were simply exercising their 1st Amendment rights - without screaming in anyone’s face or demanding they join them, imagine that! We know you only promote free speech when you agree with what’s being said, but you’ll just have to deal with ALL Americans having the right to speak up.

Who protests at a polling place? It doesn’t make any sense. If they were actually protesting something objectionable, I’d agree with you 100%. They just showed up to ruffle people’s feathers. I suppose that is their right, albeit a less admirable one.

I’m absolutely not afraid of them, and don’t think they should have been removed. It just wasn’t a good look to protest where people are quietly exercising their right to vote. To protest there makes it look like they don’t want people voting, and that’s not something I can quite wrap my head around. They have to right to protest just to be jerks. It seems like that’s all they were doing. I hope protesting at polling places isn’t a trend.

Except that they weren’t protesting - for the 100th time. They were simply holding a small rally. And they weren’t intimidating anyone, as much as liberals and the media enjoy pretending they were. Since when is chanting for your preferred candidate “intimidation”? Absurd.

Nope.

People had to be escorted. The line was moved inside. They disrupted the polling place. ILLEGAL.

They can go "rally" somewhere else.

Oh, boo boo. Did a handful of people chanting their candidate’s name “intimidate” them so very much? Good grief. I wonder how these poor, “scared” voters would hold up with an aggressive mob screaming in their faces, demanding they raise a fist in solidarity. Though I guess THAT would be encouraged and not at all intimidating, right?

That's rich coming from the party driven by FEAR. You're so fearful you happily crap your pants over whatever boogeyman the GOP stirs up for you.

The issue here isn't the voters feelings, the issue is the MAGAs breaking the law by disrupting the polling place. That is ILLEGAL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mostly non voters rallying at a polling place. Okie dokey then

They were there to stir up trouble.

Whatever - Virginia is done with their moron leader. These long lines are NOT his voters.

You can keep braying this as much as you want. They did nothing illegal and were simply exercising their 1st Amendment rights - without screaming in anyone’s face or demanding they join them, imagine that! We know you only promote free speech when you agree with what’s being said, but you’ll just have to deal with ALL Americans having the right to speak up.

Who protests at a polling place? It doesn’t make any sense. If they were actually protesting something objectionable, I’d agree with you 100%. They just showed up to ruffle people’s feathers. I suppose that is their right, albeit a less admirable one.

I’m absolutely not afraid of them, and don’t think they should have been removed. It just wasn’t a good look to protest where people are quietly exercising their right to vote. To protest there makes it look like they don’t want people voting, and that’s not something I can quite wrap my head around. They have to right to protest just to be jerks. It seems like that’s all they were doing. I hope protesting at polling places isn’t a trend.

Except that they weren’t protesting - for the 100th time. They were simply holding a small rally. And they weren’t intimidating anyone, as much as liberals and the media enjoy pretending they were. Since when is chanting for your preferred candidate “intimidation”? Absurd.

Nope.

People had to be escorted. The line was moved inside. They disrupted the polling place. ILLEGAL.

They can go "rally" somewhere else.

Oh, boo boo. Did a handful of people chanting their candidate’s name “intimidate” them so very much? Good grief. I wonder how these poor, “scared” voters would hold up with an aggressive mob screaming in their faces, demanding they raise a fist in solidarity. Though I guess THAT would be encouraged and not at all intimidating, right?

Don’t be fascists. Allow registered voters to cast their votes and then count all the votes.

WTF is wrong with you assholes?

+1

Why is it that only Democrats care about making sure it's easier to vote and that all votes are counted?

Because the GOP has demonstrated time and time again that they are amoral scum.

[Anonymous]

Very popular again after last night...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Very popular again after last night...

It was a nice day to vote scum out.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

I went and voted in person in City of Alexandria last week in Old Town right at 0800 when it opened. It took 5 minutes.

[Anonymous]

Drump will be indicted within six months of leaving office. That’s why he won’t voluntarily leave if he loses. There were Trump supporters driving around DC this evening in the back of pickup trucks being obnoxious. Preview of Election Day. It will be really ugly thanks to Drump.

What a disaster he has been.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Drump will be indicted within six months of leaving office. That’s why he won’t voluntarily leave if he loses. There were Trump supporters driving around DC this evening in the back of pickup trucks being obnoxious. Preview of Election Day. It will be really ugly thanks to Drump.

What a disaster he has been.

Please let this nightmare be over soon.

It’s like when your distant cousin comes to visit and brings her wild, bratty kids who destroy your house and try to hurt your dog. You count down the seconds until they leave and you have peace again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Do you understand proportions?

If there is one early voting station in a location that had 100k possible voters, it is a lot easier to have "no waiting" than when you have one location for 700k voters.

Falls church has a fraction of the voters that Fairfax has. So one voting place is not going to be as over run in Falls Church as the one site would be in Fairfax. Is Falls Church opening 14 more sites this week? Does Falls Church have over 200 open precincts on Election Day?

Yes, the smaller localities benefit in the early voting game when there is only one site open. Then Fairfax ens up when more sites open up.

Of course you can avoid all this by doing an on line ballot request. You'll get it in 7-10 days. Fill it at at your leisure and drop it off at any voting location. Easy.

[Anonymous]

Typo...

Then Fairfax CLEANS up when 14 more sites open up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Do you understand proportions?

If there is one early voting station in a location that had 100k possible voters, it is a lot easier to have "no waiting" than when you have one location for 700k voters.

Falls church has a fraction of the voters that Fairfax has. So one voting place is not going to be as over run in Falls Church as the one site would be in Fairfax. Is Falls Church opening 14 more sites this week? Does Falls Church have over 200 open precincts on Election Day?

Yes, the smaller localities benefit in the early voting game when there is only one site open. Then Fairfax cleans up when more sites open up.

Of course you can avoid all this by doing an on line ballot request. You'll get it in 7-10 days. Fill it at at your leisure and drop it off at any voting location. Easy.

Calm down. I’m PP and the reason I posted was that it’s AMAZING that 2020 turnout is already such a huge portion of 2016 turnout more than three weeks before the election. I’m not even from Virginia, but it’s a beautiful thing. More people should vote, always.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Do you understand proportions?

If there is one early voting station in a location that had 100k possible voters, it is a lot easier to have "no waiting" than when you have one location for 700k voters.

Falls church has a fraction of the voters that Fairfax has. So one voting place is not going to be as over run in Falls Church as the one site would be in Fairfax. Is Falls Church opening 14 more sites this week? Does Falls Church have over 200 open precincts on Election Day?

Yes, the smaller localities benefit in the early voting game when there is only one site open. Then Fairfax ens up when more sites open up.

Of course you can avoid all this by doing an on line ballot request. You'll get it in 7-10 days. Fill it at at your leisure and drop it off at any voting location. Easy.

I don't think PP thinks it's a competition. I believe PP means that a lot more FFX Co. people will vote as soon asthey are able.

[Anonymous]

And remember, additional early voting satellite locations will open throughout FFX county starting this Wednesday (10/14/20).