Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are now known as the "Impeachment Party."

They need a new bumper sticker.... "We can't beat him, so let's impeach him."

Is putting your country in a compromised position for personal gain worse than a blowjob? If so, then the president should be impeached. If he didn't want to be impeached, then perhaps he should check his actions at the door.

Sounds like this is exactly what Biden did.
And, thanks for reminding everyone of Bill Clinton's sick proclivities.

Anything a Democrat does is far worse. Duh! Republicans don’t care what their own do because their only purpose is to go after Dems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds to me that this is not going to go well for the Democrats.

They are going with the "Ready, fire, aim" strategy. They get the American people all worked up for something that turns out to be nothing.
And, if this is the case, I hope this "whistleblower" is held accountable. And, Pelosi and Schumer when it comes to the 2020 election.

You’re despicable. The criminals in the GOP should be held accountable for what they’ve done. Do you really think a whistleblower is just making this all up? For spite or partisanship? JFC, the projection among conservatives is out of control. Just because you guys spent billions attacking the Clintons and Obama just cause doesn’t mean we’re doing the same thing.

Yeah, I really do - based on what I have heard.

A "whistleblower" who did not have first hand knowledge of what he/she is complaining about AND happens to have political motivations?
Where have we heard this before????

That’s understandable, but let me clear it up for you. What you’re “hearing” is the sound of hot, fetid air escaping from Ghouliani’s corpse. Barr can’t even stop the train now. I understand this is what you’ve been told to believe, but it’s not supported by facts.

"Facts?"
What "facts" do you have that everyone else doesn't?
And, learn to spell Giulianii. You get it wrong every time.

Ghouliani
Ghouliani
Ghouliani

Oh thank god, it not like saying Beetlejuice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Trump squirming so much if there is nothing to hide?

He's not.

He has changed his story three times.
His DOJ and White House are illegally trying to bury the Whistleblower claim.

How are these not actions of someone caught red-handed?

So, how is releasing the whistleblower's complaint trying to "bury" it?

He had not right to have it in the first place and it still hasn't been released. By law, it should have been released to the Congress in August. The White House and DOJ are currently in violation of the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds to me that this is not going to go well for the Democrats.

They are going with the "Ready, fire, aim" strategy. They get the American people all worked up for something that turns out to be nothing.
And, if this is the case, I hope this "whistleblower" is held accountable. And, Pelosi and Schumer when it comes to the 2020 election.

You’re despicable. The criminals in the GOP should be held accountable for what they’ve done. Do you really think a whistleblower is just making this all up? For spite or partisanship? JFC, the projection among conservatives is out of control. Just because you guys spent billions attacking the Clintons and Obama just cause doesn’t mean we’re doing the same thing.

Yeah, I really do - based on what I have heard.

A "whistleblower" who did not have first hand knowledge of what he/she is complaining about AND happens to have political motivations?
Where have we heard this before????

That’s understandable, but let me clear it up for you. What you’re “hearing” is the sound of hot, fetid air escaping from Ghouliani’s corpse. Barr can’t even stop the train now. I understand this is what you’ve been told to believe, but it’s not supported by facts.

"Facts?"
What "facts" do you have that everyone else doesn't?
And, learn to spell Giulianii. You get it wrong every time.

Ghouliani
Ghouliani
Ghouliani

Oh thank god, it not like saying Beetlejuice.

You sound so, um, mature.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are now known as the "Impeachment Party."

They need a new bumper sticker.... "We can't beat him, so let's impeach him."

Is putting your country in a compromised position for personal gain worse than a blowjob? If so, then the president should be impeached. If he didn't want to be impeached, then perhaps he should check his actions at the door.

Sounds like this is exactly what Biden did.
And, thanks for reminding everyone of Bill Clinton's sick proclivities.

There is no proof that is what Biden did. In fact, Biden's actions at the time were consistent with US and its' allies foreign policy objectives. There is nothing in any cables, read-outs or conversations that suggest otherwise. The whole Biden thing is a manufactured smokescreen. Just like UraniumOne, the NunesMemo, Pizzagate, Wiretapping and the list goes on. How many times are the right wing people going to fall for the same formula of false narratives and distraction before they start to blame the messenger about the fake messages they are given? Or do they just prefer and enjoy being lied to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Ghouliani
Ghouliani
Ghouliani

Oh thank god, it not like saying Beetlejuice.

Thanks for introducing some levity into this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are now known as the "Impeachment Party."

They need a new bumper sticker.... "We can't beat him, so let's impeach him."

Is putting your country in a compromised position for personal gain worse than a blowjob? If so, then the president should be impeached. If he didn't want to be impeached, then perhaps he should check his actions at the door.

Sounds like this is exactly what Biden did.
And, thanks for reminding everyone of Bill Clinton's sick proclivities.

There is no proof that is what Biden did. In fact, Biden's actions at the time were consistent with US and its' allies foreign policy objectives. There is nothing in any cables, read-outs or conversations that suggest otherwise. The whole Biden thing is a manufactured smokescreen. Just like UraniumOne, the NunesMemo, Pizzagate, Wiretapping and the list goes on. How many times are the right wing people going to fall for the same formula of false narratives and distraction before they start to blame the messenger about the fake messages they are given? Or do they just prefer and enjoy being lied to?

Biden outted himself on video when he said exactly why he had that investigator fired. Or else!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are now known as the "Impeachment Party."

They need a new bumper sticker.... "We can't beat him, so let's impeach him."

Is putting your country in a compromised position for personal gain worse than a blowjob? If so, then the president should be impeached. If he didn't want to be impeached, then perhaps he should check his actions at the door.

Sounds like this is exactly what Biden did.
And, thanks for reminding everyone of Bill Clinton's sick proclivities.

There is no proof that is what Biden did. In fact, Biden's actions at the time were consistent with US and its' allies foreign policy objectives. There is nothing in any cables, read-outs or conversations that suggest otherwise. The whole Biden thing is a manufactured smokescreen. Just like UraniumOne, the NunesMemo, Pizzagate, Wiretapping and the list goes on. How many times are the right wing people going to fall for the same formula of false narratives and distraction before they start to blame the messenger about the fake messages they are given? Or do they just prefer and enjoy being lied to?

Biden outted himself on video when he said exactly why he had that investigator fired. Or else!

So then Biden shouldn't be President. It doesn't change Trump's situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are now known as the "Impeachment Party."

They need a new bumper sticker.... "We can't beat him, so let's impeach him."

Is putting your country in a compromised position for personal gain worse than a blowjob? If so, then the president should be impeached. If he didn't want to be impeached, then perhaps he should check his actions at the door.

Sounds like this is exactly what Biden did.
And, thanks for reminding everyone of Bill Clinton's sick proclivities.

There is no proof that is what Biden did. In fact, Biden's actions at the time were consistent with US and its' allies foreign policy objectives. There is nothing in any cables, read-outs or conversations that suggest otherwise. The whole Biden thing is a manufactured smokescreen. Just like UraniumOne, the NunesMemo, Pizzagate, Wiretapping and the list goes on. How many times are the right wing people going to fall for the same formula of false narratives and distraction before they start to blame the messenger about the fake messages they are given? Or do they just prefer and enjoy being lied to?

Biden outted himself on video when he said exactly why he had that investigator fired. Or else!

So then Biden shouldn't be President. It doesn't change Trump's situation.

What do you think about Menendez, Durbin, and Leahy contacting the Ukraine govt. to encourage continued investigation on Trump?

It got almost no attention, but in May, CNN reported that Sens. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) and Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) wrote a letter to Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Yuriy Lutsenko, expressing concern at the closing of four investigations they said were critical to the Mueller probe. In the letter, they implied that their support for U.S. assistance to Ukraine was at stake. Describing themselves as “strong advocates for a robust and close relationship with Ukraine,” the Democratic senators declared, “We have supported [the] capacity-building process and are disappointed that some in Kyiv appear to have cast aside these [democratic] principles to avoid the ire of President Trump,” before demanding Lutsenko “reverse course and halt any efforts to impede cooperation with this important investigation.”

So, it’s okay for Democratic senators to encourage Ukraine to investigate Trump, but it’s not okay for the president to allegedly encourage Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/09/24/democrats-investigation-might-do-more-hurt-biden-than-trump/

[Anonymous]

Trump blackmailed the Ukrainians out of cooperating with the Mueller investigation. What is your point?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds to me that this is not going to go well for the Democrats.

They are going with the "Ready, fire, aim" strategy. They get the American people all worked up for something that turns out to be nothing.
And, if this is the case, I hope this "whistleblower" is held accountable. And, Pelosi and Schumer when it comes to the 2020 election.

You’re despicable. The criminals in the GOP should be held accountable for what they’ve done. Do you really think a whistleblower is just making this all up? For spite or partisanship? JFC, the projection among conservatives is out of control. Just because you guys spent billions attacking the Clintons and Obama just cause doesn’t mean we’re doing the same thing.

Yeah, I really do - based on what I have heard.

A "whistleblower" who did not have first hand knowledge of what he/she is complaining about AND happens to have political motivations?
Where have we heard this before????

That’s understandable, but let me clear it up for you. What you’re “hearing” is the sound of hot, fetid air escaping from Ghouliani’s corpse. Barr can’t even stop the train now. I understand this is what you’ve been told to believe, but it’s not supported by facts.

"Facts?"
What "facts" do you have that everyone else doesn't?
And, learn to spell Giulianii. You get it wrong every time.

Ghouliani
Ghouliani
Ghouliani

Oh thank god, it not like saying Beetlejuice.

Or is it? Look under the bed, PP! - but put on a garlic necklace first!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are now known as the "Impeachment Party."

They need a new bumper sticker.... "We can't beat him, so let's impeach him."

Is putting your country in a compromised position for personal gain worse than a blowjob? If so, then the president should be impeached. If he didn't want to be impeached, then perhaps he should check his actions at the door.

Sounds like this is exactly what Biden did.
And, thanks for reminding everyone of Bill Clinton's sick proclivities.

There is no proof that is what Biden did. In fact, Biden's actions at the time were consistent with US and its' allies foreign policy objectives. There is nothing in any cables, read-outs or conversations that suggest otherwise. The whole Biden thing is a manufactured smokescreen. Just like UraniumOne, the NunesMemo, Pizzagate, Wiretapping and the list goes on. How many times are the right wing people going to fall for the same formula of false narratives and distraction before they start to blame the messenger about the fake messages they are given? Or do they just prefer and enjoy being lied to?

Biden outted himself on video when he said exactly why he had that investigator fired. Or else!

You have the story backwards. Biden called out the Ukranian investigator for not rooting out corruption. His statements were in line with the Obama Adminsitration views and the views of ALL of our allies. So yes, he is on video, but no, the underlying facts are not the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are now known as the "Impeachment Party."

They need a new bumper sticker.... "We can't beat him, so let's impeach him."

Is putting your country in a compromised position for personal gain worse than a blowjob? If so, then the president should be impeached. If he didn't want to be impeached, then perhaps he should check his actions at the door.

Sounds like this is exactly what Biden did.
And, thanks for reminding everyone of Bill Clinton's sick proclivities.

There is no proof that is what Biden did. In fact, Biden's actions at the time were consistent with US and its' allies foreign policy objectives. There is nothing in any cables, read-outs or conversations that suggest otherwise. The whole Biden thing is a manufactured smokescreen. Just like UraniumOne, the NunesMemo, Pizzagate, Wiretapping and the list goes on. How many times are the right wing people going to fall for the same formula of false narratives and distraction before they start to blame the messenger about the fake messages they are given? Or do they just prefer and enjoy being lied to?

Biden outted himself on video when he said exactly why he had that investigator fired. Or else!

So then Biden shouldn't be President. It doesn't change Trump's situation.

What do you think about Menendez, Durbin, and Leahy contacting the Ukraine govt. to encourage continued investigation on Trump?

It got almost no attention, but in May, CNN reported that Sens. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) and Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) wrote a letter to Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Yuriy Lutsenko, expressing concern at the closing of four investigations they said were critical to the Mueller probe. In the letter, they implied that their support for U.S. assistance to Ukraine was at stake. Describing themselves as “strong advocates for a robust and close relationship with Ukraine,” the Democratic senators declared, “We have supported [the] capacity-building process and are disappointed that some in Kyiv appear to have cast aside these [democratic] principles to avoid the ire of President Trump,” before demanding Lutsenko “reverse course and halt any efforts to impede cooperation with this important investigation.”

So, it’s okay for Democratic senators to encourage Ukraine to investigate Trump, but it’s not okay for the president to allegedly encourage Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/09/24/democrats-investigation-might-do-more-hurt-biden-than-trump/

Your whataboutism fails because these lawmakers didn't threaten holding up aid - Trump's mobster move is what will take him down. No doubt this has been how he's operated since day 1 in office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are now known as the "Impeachment Party."

They need a new bumper sticker.... "We can't beat him, so let's impeach him."

Is putting your country in a compromised position for personal gain worse than a blowjob? If so, then the president should be impeached. If he didn't want to be impeached, then perhaps he should check his actions at the door.

Sounds like this is exactly what Biden did.
And, thanks for reminding everyone of Bill Clinton's sick proclivities.

There is no proof that is what Biden did. In fact, Biden's actions at the time were consistent with US and its' allies foreign policy objectives. There is nothing in any cables, read-outs or conversations that suggest otherwise. The whole Biden thing is a manufactured smokescreen. Just like UraniumOne, the NunesMemo, Pizzagate, Wiretapping and the list goes on. How many times are the right wing people going to fall for the same formula of false narratives and distraction before they start to blame the messenger about the fake messages they are given? Or do they just prefer and enjoy being lied to?

Biden outted himself on video when he said exactly why he had that investigator fired. Or else!

So then Biden shouldn't be President. It doesn't change Trump's situation.

What do you think about Menendez, Durbin, and Leahy contacting the Ukraine govt. to encourage continued investigation on Trump?

It got almost no attention, but in May, CNN reported that Sens. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) and Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) wrote a letter to Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Yuriy Lutsenko, expressing concern at the closing of four investigations they said were critical to the Mueller probe. In the letter, they implied that their support for U.S. assistance to Ukraine was at stake. Describing themselves as “strong advocates for a robust and close relationship with Ukraine,” the Democratic senators declared, “We have supported [the] capacity-building process and are disappointed that some in Kyiv appear to have cast aside these [democratic] principles to avoid the ire of President Trump,” before demanding Lutsenko “reverse course and halt any efforts to impede cooperation with this important investigation.”

So, it’s okay for Democratic senators to encourage Ukraine to investigate Trump, but it’s not okay for the president to allegedly encourage Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/09/24/democrats-investigation-might-do-more-hurt-biden-than-trump/

Your whataboutism fails because these lawmakers didn't threaten holding up aid - Trump's mobster move is what will take him down. No doubt this has been how he's operated since day 1 in office.

^^ The rantings of an immature, highly partisan rube who has been fooled by the Democrats into believing *anything* negative about this administration because, Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump blackmailed the Ukrainians out of cooperating with the Mueller investigation. What is your point?

Yup.
https://www.newsweek.com/ukraine-stopped-helping-mueller-probe-after-trump-administration-gave-it-908322