Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who here saves their calendars?

I do. And I look at them.

- Someone older than Kavanaugh

when do you look at them - every time you're accused of a crime committed four decades ago?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who here saves their calendars?

I do. And I look at them.

- Someone older than Kavanaugh

So does my spouse - also older than Kavanaugh.
I suspect one day, some of the people on this site will regret not maintaining calendars and records.

Heh?

No one’s saying they don’t keep records, we’re saying it’s weird AF to think that a 17 year old binge drinker was carefully tracking his days and writing all of his skeevy social engagements down. It’s not outside the realm of possibility, but it kinda seems.... like a coordinated effort.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"Caesar's wife must be above suspicion."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pompeia_(wife_of_Caesar)

This is not an interview for Undersecretary of Paperclips. This is the highest court in our country, for a lifetime appointment. Surely there is someone else.

EXACTLY

Frat boy Brett isn't the best we've got. Not even among GOP hacks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The guy who wanted to ask these questions of the President is worried about what’s debasing our public discourse.

We knew for a fact that Clinton and Lewinsky had a consensual affair.

DJT could do everything WJC did and more, ADMIT IT, and the GOP STILL wouldn't care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"Caesar's wife must be above suspicion."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pompeia_(wife_of_Caesar)

This is not an interview for Undersecretary of Paperclips. This is the highest court in our country, for a lifetime appointment. Surely there is someone else.

+1 This isn't the time to be kind of hoping he's not a violent assaulter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who here saves their calendars?

I do. And I look at them.

- Someone older than Kavanaugh

So does my spouse - also older than Kavanaugh.
I suspect one day, some of the people on this site will regret not maintaining calendars and records.

Heh?

No one’s saying they don’t keep records, we’re saying it’s weird AF to think that a 17 year old binge drinker was carefully tracking his days and writing all of his skeevy social engagements down. It’s not outside the realm of possibility, but it kinda seems.... like a coordinated effort.

Yup. They've done the math and realized they probably can't get a new nominee confirmed before midterms and are digging their heels in. They may get Kavanaugh confirmed, but it will cost them in midterms.

Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh denied new sexual misconduct allegations and said he would “not be intimidated into withdrawing” as the Supreme Court nominee.
Senior Republicans are closing ranks around the nominee, and they echoed Judge Kavanaugh’s claims, accusing Democrats of running “a smear campaign” to derail his confirmation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The guy who wanted to ask these questions of the President is worried about what’s debasing our public discourse.

We knew for a fact that Clinton and Lewinsky had a consensual affair.

Did you know this before or after the investigation? Why should there be no credible investigation to Brett's gang rape of a drunk woman?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who here saves their calendars?

I do. And I look at them.

- Someone older than Kavanaugh

So does my spouse - also older than Kavanaugh.
I suspect one day, some of the people on this site will regret not maintaining calendars and records.

Heh?

No one’s saying they don’t keep records, we’re saying it’s weird AF to think that a 17 year old binge drinker was carefully tracking his days and writing all of his skeevy social engagements down. It’s not outside the realm of possibility, but it kinda seems.... like a coordinated effort.

Yup. They've done the math and realized they probably can't get a new nominee confirmed before midterms and are digging their heels in. They may get Kavanaugh confirmed, but it will cost them in midterms.

Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh denied new sexual misconduct allegations and said he would “not be intimidated into withdrawing” as the Supreme Court nominee.
Senior Republicans are closing ranks around the nominee, and they echoed Judge Kavanaugh’s claims, accusing Democrats of running “a smear campaign” to derail his confirmation.

Dem here and really? They don't have to do it by election day, just by Jan 20. How is that not enough time? Surely they have a short list.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So when the Democrats nominate someone and a random Republican Woman makes a vague accusation, you guys will drop your nom too right? I bet it happens.

We did with Franken...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who here saves their calendars?

I do. And I look at them.

- Someone older than Kavanaugh

So does my spouse - also older than Kavanaugh.
I suspect one day, some of the people on this site will regret not maintaining calendars and records.

Heh?

No one’s saying they don’t keep records, we’re saying it’s weird AF to think that a 17 year old binge drinker was carefully tracking his days and writing all of his skeevy social engagements down. It’s not outside the realm of possibility, but it kinda seems.... like a coordinated effort.

Yup. They've done the math and realized they probably can't get a new nominee confirmed before midterms and are digging their heels in. They may get Kavanaugh confirmed, but it will cost them in midterms.

Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh denied new sexual misconduct allegations and said he would “not be intimidated into withdrawing” as the Supreme Court nominee.
Senior Republicans are closing ranks around the nominee, and they echoed Judge Kavanaugh’s claims, accusing Democrats of running “a smear campaign” to derail his confirmation.

Dem here and really? They don't have to do it by election day, just by Jan 20. How is that not enough time? Surely they have a short list.

Of course they have a list. But if they don’t get someone by Election Day and it is a blue tsunami, it’s a lot harder for them to force another con onto the court. Especially after their “let the people speak” fourteen months of eight justices shenanigans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who here saves their calendars?

I do. And I look at them.

- Someone older than Kavanaugh

So does my spouse - also older than Kavanaugh.
I suspect one day, some of the people on this site will regret not maintaining calendars and records.

Heh?

No one’s saying they don’t keep records, we’re saying it’s weird AF to think that a 17 year old binge drinker was carefully tracking his days and writing all of his skeevy social engagements down. It’s not outside the realm of possibility, but it kinda seems.... like a coordinated effort.

Yup. They've done the math and realized they probably can't get a new nominee confirmed before midterms and are digging their heels in. They may get Kavanaugh confirmed, but it will cost them in midterms.

Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh denied new sexual misconduct allegations and said he would “not be intimidated into withdrawing” as the Supreme Court nominee.
Senior Republicans are closing ranks around the nominee, and they echoed Judge Kavanaugh’s claims, accusing Democrats of running “a smear campaign” to derail his confirmation.

Dem here and really? They don't have to do it by election day, just by Jan 20. How is that not enough time? Surely they have a short list.

You sure about that? New Congress takes office Jan. 3.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when the Democrats nominate someone and a random Republican Woman makes a vague accusation, you guys will drop your nom too right? I bet it happens.

We did with Franken...

+1 Franken got bounced because there was a picture of him air groping. Don't accuse Democrats of not being willing to walk the talk. This isn't Bill Clinton's Democratic party more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when the Democrats nominate someone and a random Republican Woman makes a vague accusation, you guys will drop your nom too right? I bet it happens.

We did with Franken...

He wasn’t a nominee. Nice try.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who here saves their calendars?

I do. And I look at them.

- Someone older than Kavanaugh

So does my spouse - also older than Kavanaugh.
I suspect one day, some of the people on this site will regret not maintaining calendars and records.

Heh?

No one’s saying they don’t keep records, we’re saying it’s weird AF to think that a 17 year old binge drinker was carefully tracking his days and writing all of his skeevy social engagements down. It’s not outside the realm of possibility, but it kinda seems.... like a coordinated effort.

Yup. They've done the math and realized they probably can't get a new nominee confirmed before midterms and are digging their heels in. They may get Kavanaugh confirmed, but it will cost them in midterms.

Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh denied new sexual misconduct allegations and said he would “not be intimidated into withdrawing” as the Supreme Court nominee.
Senior Republicans are closing ranks around the nominee, and they echoed Judge Kavanaugh’s claims, accusing Democrats of running “a smear campaign” to derail his confirmation.

Dem here and really? They don't have to do it by election day, just by Jan 20. How is that not enough time? Surely they have a short list.

FWIW, Jan 20 is the presidential inaugural. The House and Senate are seated at the beginning of the month.

[Anonymous]

To those asking, why didn't she report it at the time.

https://twitter.com/SpicyFiles/status/1044295980336730113

HIS MOM WAS THE PRESIDING JUDGE IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY.