|
Nobody is misinforming anyone when all they're asking for is the details.
I'd be much more worried about the guy telling you to not post details. Who do you think has an agenda vs who is trying to get ti the truth? |
| This thread is toast. |
. |
|
You can do whatever you want but this thread got crazy when the question
"Do all the players on your team have the same graduating year? was asked. Why is that such a bad question to ask? |
| Has any parent received an explanation from their club on how they determined whether they were going to keep their kid playing up an age group or play with their new age group? I'm asking about kids on top team going from one top team to another. I know several from our club in different age groups and no one has been approached by the club They only know they are going to be on the top team of one of the 2 age groups. It appears the goal of our club is to get as many kids from outside the club and then make a decision on our kids after they have all the new kids sorted out. |
It's a troll question. |
That makes no sense. its a valid question. Trying to convince people to not respond is Sus. |
Unfortunately discussing grades here is just being used to feed a troll and not for useful discussion. |
We received the determination but no real explanation. They will likely wait to try to secure outside Q4s before letting you know. |
More like someone is trying their best to convince people that grade doesnt apply to club soccer when everyone with a brain knows that it does. |
If grades applied to club soccer, we wouldn't be having this stupid argument There is no argument if U12 or U16 applies to club soccer There is no argument if age and DOB applies to club soccer. Because that's really There are no 8th Grade brackets or teams. It's someone's dream |
|
We don't have to worry about Godwin's Law on this board, BUT boy, we do have some Crazy-Grade Law.
And it stinks for discussion. Good morning and good luck, all! |
I'd go further than this and say at my kid's club the top players on the second team are very disproportionately Q4, while first teams average 1-3 out of 16-18 Q4 kids currently (according to ECNL grad years posted, I think we're one of the worst around with systemic Q4 underrepresentation). If clubs only move first team players to first teams, there's going to be a lot of resentment next year as older players fully realize that they are better than younger kids but didn't get a fair look. Any club which accepts that relative age matters, if others don't, has a chance to steal good players. By the second half of next year, some teams very accustomed to winning might find they are struggling without the bigger/faster kids who left their club. Obviously the magnitude of this depends a lot on age group. I'm anticipating GA teams stealing a lot of quality RL Q4s. |
Ok call it Graduating Year which is on every ECNL player profile. You know because grade in school doesnt exist and Graduating Year is completely different from Grade in school. The hypocrisy is thick around here. |
The only thing thick is the Crazy Grade Law. |